Donald Lambro

Victoria Nuland, who was then the State Department's spokeswoman, e-mailed on the evening of Sept. 14 that the agency's warning "could be abused by members [of Congress] to beat the State why do we want to feed that either?"

Administration officials also resisted any reference that the terrorist attackers included the Islamist extremist group Ansar al- Sharia that is closely affiliated with al-Qaeda. A chief political claim in Obama's re-election campaign at the time was that al-Qaeda had been "decimated," while the deadly attack on our U.S. consulate suggested otherwise.

"Why do we want [Capitol] Hill to be fingering Ansar al-Sharia, when we aren't doing that ourselves," Nuland wrote. The reference to Ansar al-Sharia was dropped.

The more recent scandal over the Justice Department's unprecedented, secret seizure of the Associated Press's phone records strikes at the heart of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution's First Amendment promise to protect the freedom of the press.

In this case, the White House was directly involved in the administration's efforts to hold up or delay publication of an AP exclusive about a foiled al-Qaeda plot to blow up a U.S. passenger jet.

Attorney General Eric Holder, who personally signed off on the decision to examine the phone records of the AP's reporters and editors, said the story's release endangered the nation's security. But emerging details suggest that is not even remotely true.

During a series of meeting between AP editors and the government about plans to release the story, the CIA tried to hold up or delay the story. At a meeting on May 7, 2012, "CIA officials reported that national security concerns were 'no longer an issue,'" the Washington Post reported Thursday.

Nevertheless, the White House, looking for any political advantage it could in the midst of Obama's campaign, said it wanted to put out its own version first, and offered to let AP release its story a few minutes before the White House announcement. AP flatly rejected the offer and published its exclusive.

Holder's claim this week that the AP's disclosure "put the American people at risk" has absolutely zero credibility. The day after AP ran with its story, John O. Brennan, then the White House's counterterrorism adviser, went on TV to say the plot posed no active threat to the American public.

The administration's seizure of the AP's private phone records to find out who its sources were was a petulant act of revenge for not getting its way -- and a chilling warning to the Washington news media not to dig too deeply into the administration's activities, or else.

It's clear the West Wing is at the center of this scandal that may well be headed to the courts. Only tyrants think they can thumb their nose at the Constitution and ride roughshod over a free press.

The Nixonian use of the Internal Revenue Service to punish and persecute Obama's political opponents may be the worst of these abuses because it strikes at the heart of our democratic, political system.

These scandals will define Barack Obama's presidency throughout his second term. Hearings are lined up as far as the eye can see and if there is any justice left in this government, the perpetrators will be "put in jail", as House Speaker John Boehner suggested the other day.

The big question of who is to blame and how far up the chain of command does it go remains to be answered.

The president denies all responsibility in any of this, but Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, says "the president bears responsibility for what his government officials can and should do."

As Romero says, "the tone is set at the top." It's time to come clean, Mr. President.

Donald Lambro

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.