CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley reports every signs of a purported improving economy, but often ignores data showing signs of severe weakness in the job market which is the larger and more important story. It's rare to find any story in his broadcasts about unemployment, the weakening recovery, or that many, if not most, Americans are still struggling to cope with incomes that have hardly budged. Ditto for ABC, NBC and CNN.
Thankfully, there are economic reporters who resist touting the White House line that everything is rosier under Obama's policies.
"We're approaching the four-year anniversary of the economic recovery, and it still doesn't feel like much of one, what with the unemployment rate at 7.7 percent and wages stagnant over the past five years," Neil Irwin, the Post's veteran economic analyst, recently reported.
Yet, no matter how meager the jobs numbers are under Obama's remedial reign, the news media goes hyperbolic over them. Network reporters rarely if ever point out that the puny number of jobs being created will not make a dent in the unemployment rate.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that 227,000 jobs were created in February. But in a work force the size of ours, that number isn't going to drive down the jobless rate to more normal levels, says business economist Peter Morici at the University of Maryland.
"The economy must add more than 360,000 jobs each month for three years to lower unemployment to 6 percent. That would require [economic] growth in the range of 4 to 5 percent and is not likely with current policies," he said Thursday.
That robust level of growth isn't likely to happen anytime this year or next in a slowing economy that barely grew by 0.6 percent in the fourth quarter last year. Annual growth has averaged 2.1 percent since the recession supposedly ended, and is expected to remain in that range in the first quarter.
Meantime, Barack Obama and his advisers have been struggling to come up with some new ways to accelerate economic growth and boost job-creation. Some are off-the-wall ideas, like the one the administration leaked to the news media this week that had all of the earmarks of a insecure trial balloon.
In a nutshell, the White House wants more home loans to be made available to people, particularly younger first time home buyers, who have weak credit ratings -- a high risk scheme that critics say will plunge the U.S. economy into another sub-prime housing disaster that led to the last recession.
The administration is pressuring the Justice Department to give bank lenders assurances they will not be subject to legal actions or even financial losses "if they make loans to riskier borrowers who meet government standards but later default," the Post reported Wednesday.
The loans would be fully backed by taxpayers under various housing programs, including the Federal Housing Administration which insures home mortgages against the possibility of default.
That sent up red flags among top banking and housing experts who said this was the same irresponsible policy that drove our country into a recession in 2008.
"If that were to come to pass, that would open the floodgates to highly excessive risk and would send us right back on the same path we were just trying to recover from," said Ed Pinto, a housing expert at the American Enterprise Institute and former executive at Fannie Mae.
This is how desperate the White House has become as it foresees four years of interminably high unemployment where the Obama economy turns into a political synonym for failure and despair.
While Rick Santorum Whines About Rules, Carly Fiorina Steps Up To GOP Debate Challenge | Katie Pavlich