Donald Lambro

He wants $50 billion for more infrastructure projects in roads and bridges, on top of the $800 billion plus he spent in his failed 2009 stimulus program; $15 billion to repair or tear down homes in blighted neighborhoods, an idea he proposed in 2011; a temporary $6 billion tax credit to assist communities hit hard by factory closings; and a $1 billion slush fund to develop “manufacturing innovation institutes” across the country.

He called for yet another green energy fund on top of the scandal-ridden, multi-billion-dollar Energy Department fund that's been bankrolling a lengthening list of politically connected energy deals that have since gone bankrupt.

Obama's latest brainstorm is an Energy Security Trust fund, paid out of federal oil and gas revenues, to finance research into exotic biofuels from pond algae -- itself an idea that was being funded under his earlier clean-energy programs that have wasted hundreds of millions of dollars.

Another of his earlier programs was the 2009 boondoggle that gave $150 million to a battery cell firm, LG Chem Michigan (a subsidiary of South Korea's giant LG), to make automobile cells. To date, battery production has not begun, the program is rife with mismanagement and only half of the 440 jobs have been filled, according to an inspector general's report.

Instead, an audit found that much of the federal money went to pay workers who've spent their time playing cards and video games, watching movies and doing volunteer work at animal shelters and community groups.

Then there were the less-than-truthful claims sprinkled throughout Obama's address that conveniently left out key statistics that show the economy's performance under his policies has not lived up to his hype.

Take, for example, his claim that “after years of grueling recession, our businesses have created over 6 million new jobs.”

The Washington Post's Glenn Kessler, king of the fact checkers, says, “The president is cherry-picking a number that puts the improvement in the economy in the best possible light,” leaving out critical data.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data “show that since the start of his presidency, about 1.2 million jobs have been created” but that “the number of jobs in the economy is about 3.2 million fewer than when the recession began in December 2007.”

“Then there's Obama's claim that “After shedding jobs for more than 10 years, our manufacturers have added about 500,000 jobs over the past three.”

“But BLS data "show that the number of manufacturing jobs is still 600,000 fewer than when Obama took office in the depths of the recession -- and 1.8 million fewer than when the recession began in December 2007.”

So when he flew to Asheville, N.C. Wednesday to peddle his umpteenth recovery plan, his cherry-picking statistics ran into the cold, hard, jobless reality of a state where the unemployment rate is a hope-crushing 9.2 percent.

”We still have a lot of work to do,” Obama told a crowd of factory workers in the fifth year of his presidency. It may be, and likely will be, the same line he'll be using in his last year in office.

He left the Capitol Tuesday night with the sound of his party's applause ringing in his ears, but the economy's future looks bleaker than ever under his impotent policies.

”Economic growth will remain slow this year,” the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office flatly forecast last week in its Economic Outlook for the next 10 years.

Right now, Obama's economy may be growing at about 1 percent, hardly registering a blip on the heart monitor. It is getting so bad that some in the news media here are looking for answers elsewhere, or suggesting darkly that our troubles are unsolvable.

“Economic growth is no longer enough,” reads a gloomy front-page headline in Thursday's Washington Post.

But read deeper into reporter Jim Tankersley's story and he notes that “the economy grew by nearly 11 percent and real median incomes grew by 5 percent” from 1982 to 1984 under President Reagan's tax cuts.

The economy was growing by nearly 8 percent in 1983 and soared into 1984 with 8.5 percent growth, ending a two-year recession. There's a lesson in these numbers and a plan for policymakers who are taking the economy in the opposite direction.

Donald Lambro

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.