Donald Lambro
Recommend this article

In other words, in the most fundamental measurement of whether the stimulus plan is actually jump-starting the American Jobs Machine, the numbers suggest that at best job growth this year has been tepid and will remain so for several years or more.

Who says so? This month's annual Economic Report of the President. In its review of the report's forecasts, The Washington Post reported: "The economy is projected to add jobs this year at a pace too sluggish to make much of a dent in unemployment," adding that Obama's economic advisers "expect the jobless problem to be a fact of life throughout his term."

For some reason, this report never found its way into any of last week's nightly news reports about all the credit the White House thinks it deserved for its stimulus program.

The president's report said the economy would add an average of 95,000 jobs a month this year. That is a rate of job creation that would not even keep up with population growth.

To put this anemic monthly jobs estimate in sharper perspective, the economy was creating 200,000 to 300,000 jobs or more per month in the last half of the 1980s when the country was barreling out of a deep, two-year recession thanks to the pro-growth, across-the-board tax cuts implemented under President Reagan. There was a referendum on those stimulus policies in 1984, and Reagan carried 49 states.

If there were a re-election referendum on Obama's economic policies today, he would lose. A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll finds that only 45 percent of Americans agree that the economy is recovering.

There are a number of macroeconomic problems with Obama's pump-priming economic-stimulus spending plan that didn't create many full-time, permanent private-sector jobs last year and, according to the White House own forecasts, won't be making much of a dent in this year's jobs picture, either.

The biggest problem is that its spending plans are unsustainable. The spending (money taken out of a weak economy) will dwindle by the end of the year, and the funding for those state and local government jobs will end. Trillion-dollar-plus deficits will make more spending problematic at best.

What the economy's anemic, capital-starved circulatory system needs is a self-sustaining intravenous feeding of lower tax rates for all businesses. Until we do that, the economy is in for a long, painfully slow rate of mediocre growth and persistently high unemployment for as far as the eye can see.

Recommend this article

Donald Lambro

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.