Such population replacement is underway everywhere non-assimilable blocs become entrenched -- with or without "amnesty." But We, the People, have never voted for it. It just happens, forced or enabled from above. It could be that a majority of us want to disappear in a global multiculture -- or, in the case of states like California, into an enclave-pocked Mexican monoculture. But that's not why we have borders and immigration laws. Tragically, we also have a political class and presidents who lawlessly refuse to enforce these laws, making a mockery of our borders, not to mention the democratic process. This makes a mockery of our nationhood, too. It looks like a means to an end -- the end of that nationhood.
Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., is one shining exception to this treacherous rule. In fact, just how exceptional Sessions is becomes clear upon reading his description in a recent report by The Hill on Sessions' sensational findings that the Obama administration, through executive orders and directives, has "already granted de facto amnesty to millions of illegal U.S. residents." The Hill describes Sessions as "a vocal opponent of granting citizenship to illegal immigrants." Once upon a time, opposition to conferring citizenship on people here illegally would have been wholly unremarkable and thus unremarked upon. No more.
What happened? If we consider the typical reaction to the recent Swiss vote -- denigration of a nation's survival instinct as a primitive expression of fear and racism -- we will recognize the mechanism of our own demise: silence and retreat in the face of endless recrimination and grievance-mongering. What a way to lose a country.
And what a way to lose a world -- the "Western" world, where this same pattern repeats almost everywhere. The demographics of The Hague, Netherlands, for example, are not too dissimilar from those in California. As in other major Dutch cities, about half of the people living there are from another country, with non-Western immigrants, mainly Muslim and often Moroccan, making up over one-third of the population. That non-Western figure approaches the halfway mark in the under-21 demographic. Short of a sharp reversal and coupled with high rates of Dutch out-migration, it becomes highly unlikely that the future of the Dutch seat of government will be Dutch.
Is it "fear" and "scaremongering" to point this out? Is it "racism" to oppose the demographic obliteration of a nation clearly underway? According to what is aptly described as the Dutch establishment -- from the prime minister, leading mayors, Dutch media, plus, quite shockingly, the U.S. ambassador, who, in a break with diplomatic etiquette, has publicly commented on Dutch affairs -- the answer to both questions is yes. This past week has seen yet another public hate campaign by this establishment to smear, demonize and thus neutralize the one Dutch party that opposes the nation's suicide -- the Party for Freedom led by Geert Wilders.
I've written more on these events at my blog www.dianawest.net. For now, it's worth noting that the Dutch are lucky. With the steadfast and brilliant Wilders leading a popular movement, at least they have a chance to survive.