It seems as though the last month has been a gift to Republicans, particularly the Romney campaign. President Obama has committed gaffe after gaffe, and every new economic indicator is yet another pebble on the scale now fully tipped against him.
Now he’s decided the key to stimulating the economy isn’t to lower the burden of government but to grant proxy amnesty to potentially millions of illegal aliens, thereby adding them to the ever-growing list of job seekers. That means more people looking for jobs that aren’t there. It’s as though he watched the Republican primary, felt badly the party wasn’t united and decided to help.
You can’t look at President Obama’s handling of the economy without thinking destruction is his ultimate goal. But if this alone wasn’t motivation enough, granting permanent residency to people he called Americans “for all intents and purposes” could be used to unite actual Americans – those here by birth or legal choice – against him.
All the stars are aligned for a strong Republican victory across the board in November. But if there’s one thing Republicans are good at it’s snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
The Romney camp and the RNC are running an aggressive campaign, hitting the president on his numerous economic failures and highlighting his many, many gaffes, such as “the private sector is doing fine.” And it’s smart of them not to focus on Obama’s character flaws, of which there are many.
Everyone knows the president spent his pre-Oval Office years being friendly and/or friends with terrorists, racists and radicals. We don’t know his grades and haven’t seen his courses or his writings, yet we’re told he’s a genius. We don’t know how a disengaged student with an admitted drug habit managed to get into some of the top universities in the world. No one in the mainstream media is asking, nor do they care. They’ve swept it aside.
He’s president – he has been more than three years. Most Americans who don’t have time to pay close attention think they know him, even though we know next to nothing about his life before he entered the national stage. The media won’t admit it has committed malpractice because the malpractice was malicious, not accidental. It’s not that they lie; it’s that they don’t care. You can’t run a correction on an omission.
So, at this point, focusing on Barack Obama as a man may be fodder for interesting blog posts, but it won’t swing many votes. His record is key.
Republicans need to educate the public on the president’s true record. They need to run not a reactive campaign or even a proactive campaign but a pre-active campaign.
We all know what David Axelrod and the Chicago machine have planned. They will attack Romney on his business record, have surrogates attack his religion – then denounce the attack after the outrageous slur makes its rounds in the media – and attack the Republican Party as “obstructionist.”
Republicans are good at dealing with the first two but horrible at the last one. And the last one is the most important.
People will forgive a man for making a lot of money. Hell, they’d love to do it too. And they understand the basic concepts of how people do it. So the Bain issue may rile the anti-capitalist base, but it won’t shift many votes. They also don’t much care Romney is a Mormon. Few people know much about the Mormon faith, but fewer still care. The Mormons they know – if they’re aware they know any – tend to be nice people and good neighbors.
That leaves the third point – the “obstructionist gambit.”
The best-kept secret in the media for the last year and a half is that Democrats control the US Senate. Everyone knows what “Speaker of the House” means and that it’s currently a Republican. Few realize the Speaker controls half of one branch of Congress. We never hear about the 27 jobs bill Republicans have passed in the House that the Senate refused to consider.
We do hear it when Republicans refuse to move on Democrats’ proposals, even when those proposals don’t exist beyond the concept stage. How many people know today is day 1,145 since Democrats passed a budget in the Senate?
Forget waiting on the media to honestly report this. It ain’t gonna happen.
Today, thanks to the Internet, the 24-hour news cycle has become the 24-second cycle. Each hour has its own narrative. You may win one, but there’s another right behind it. It’s even tougher when the referees in the media play for the other team.
President Reagan could talk over the media to the people, but Mitt Romney will have to accomplish this with ads.
The campaign, the party and outside groups all must work to educate Americans not only about President Obama’s failures but the truth behind his lies. We need pre-emptive strikes about who controls the Senate, all the Republican jobs bills the president and his party have refused even to consider and the refusal by Democrats even to propose legislation as a starting point. It has to be regular, entertaining and, most importantly, sustained.
Republicans need to step outside their comfort zone, throw away the Marquis of Queensbury Rules and remember: If you’re responding, you’re losing.
They must learn to anticipate Democrats’ arguments, say them first, frame them, then destroy them before they get legs. All campaigns find themselves reacting at least some of the time to things they didn’t see coming. But for the most part, every enemy bomb should be disarmed and dismantled before opponents even think of building the silo.
Entertaining ads – humorous when possible – that get right to the point of one issue each, one inconvenient fact, will do more than dozens of speeches reduced by the media to 10-second sound bites. Good ads are easy to write, inexpensive to produce (if creative people who care about the cause are employed) and will have even greater impact when run on “Real Housewives” or some other un-stereotypically conservative program. If done right, having good, tight ads, run on carefully chosen shows can reach more people than having an entire nightly 30-minute newscast devoted to your campaign.
Republicans are good at rebuttal. They are good at producing videos, several minutes in duration, that take apart the claims of their opponents piece by piece. But those videos too often reach only the choir – regardless of how many hits they get. The trick is not to respond but to set the conversation by producing 30-second videos with some humor and pop and get them out for the rest of the unengaged nation to see.
Don’t run the same stuffy dry campaign. Force the Democrats to have the best rapid-response team. If they’re doing rapid response, we’re winning.
The battle is going to happen. Better we choose the field and set the terms.
The pieces are all there for a major Republican victory this fall. The facts are all on Republicans’ side. But this is helpful in politics, not decisive, particularly when your opponent is a well-known enigma. Republicans can’t truly redefine President Obama at this point, but they can define the terms and times of engagement. Barring the unforeseen and barring a return to business-as-usual campaigning, that should be enough.
Republicans can win, should win, if they approach this in a smart, efficient matter. Unfortunately, recent history suggests this is a big if.
Losing Jobs Over Ex-Im’s Expiration? Don’t Believe ItLosing Jobs Over Ex-Im’s Expiration? Don’t Believe It | Ed Feulner