That is why it is foolish to take seriously any statement on public policy signed by "a hundred Nobel Prize laureates." Why would one care about what a Nobel laureate in, let us say, chemistry, thought about capital punishment? Or, for that matter, global warming? We should care about what a Nobel laureate in chemistry has to say about chemistry and only chemistry. Unless the individual is known for his wisdom, in addition to his mastery of chemistry.
This is not to say that there are no wise businessmen, baseball players, physicians or chemists. Of course there are.
But, if a businessman has made hundreds of millions of dollars, the only thing we can be sure he knows about is how to make hundreds of millions of dollars. How else explain people who have made large amounts of money thanks to the free enterprise system supporting left-wing candidates who wish to undermine that system?
The other problem with big businessmen and big businesses is that the bigger the business, the more likely it is to be removed from conservative values. Profits trump conservative concerns -- especially if the business is publicly owned.
Last year, US Airways allowed a man who was dressed in a bra and women's underwear to board one of its planes and to remain on board for the duration of the flight.
It is safe to say that the overwhelming majority of men and women who work at US Airways -- including its owners and directors -- find such behavior lewd, unacceptable and harmful to society. But, as a rule, the bigger the business, the more politically correct it becomes.
The point of all this is to make it clear that, left-wing claims notwithstanding, conservatism is not the home of big business. That is why some of the biggest businessmen of Arizona are not supporting the Republican candidate for senate, Jeff Flake. He asks, "What is best for America?" The businessmen ask, "What is best for my big business?" And Flake's Democratic opponent asks, "What is best for big government?"