It is amusing to watch liberals try to explain away the recent upswing in President Bush's approval rating, from around 39 percent to 47 percent. Sure enough, they've figured a way to attribute the turnaround to a validation of their positions rather than his policies.
They are promoting the idea that President Bush's popularity increase is due to his admission of "mistakes" on Iraq. But this is merely wishful thinking.
Ever since President Bush attacked Iraq, Democrats have been castigating him for doing it and for how he's handled the operation every step of the way. After all, their best political hope is either that we fail in Iraq or, if we succeed, that they can somehow taint the effort from its inception by showing he lied to get us into an unnecessary and costly war.
Their persistence finally paid off as the public -- treated to almost exclusively negative reporting from the mainstream media (MSM) along with the Democrats' ceaseless naysaying -- grew nervous about the war and lost some confidence in President Bush.
Alas, the worm is turning. Despite all their propaganda to the contrary, the burgeoning Iraqi constitutional republic in the heart of the Arab Middle East -- as a direct result of the president's policies -- is a profoundly positive development.
And to the Democrats' and MSM's everlasting frustration, President Bush has stubbornly refused to admit he lied about WMD for the simple reason that he didn't. So what are these poor liberals to do when things are starting to go north for Iraq and President Bush and south for them?
Well, one option would be to admit they were wrong. They're particularly fond of demanding the president admit his mistakes. So why don't they just concede he wasn't lying about WMD and that his vision for Iraq appears to be paying off?
The answer is that it would render them even more irrelevant and further diminish their political prospects. A better solution would be to pretend the president's turnaround vindicates their policies rather than his.
How can they pull that off? Simple: Just portray his recent speeches as mea culpas on Iraq and appropriate his renewed popularity for themselves. It's sort of a clever conversion of the adage "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em" to "If you can't beat him, pretend he joined you."
As Exhibit A for the liberal prosecution, I cite the recent "Meet the Press" episode during which Tom Brokaw opined that "one of the reasons the president's doing better in the national polls" now is that he's admitting his "mistakes" about Iraq.
10 Tips to Survive Today's College Campus, or: Everything You Need to Know About College Microaggressions | Larry Elder