Senator Kennedy shared his vision for America this week in a speech at the National Press Club. The only common thread I could find in his shotgun critique was a stubborn fidelity to failed liberal policies of the past.
Kennedy is certain that, despite the election results, "We, as Democrats, may be in the minority in Congress, but we speak for the majority of Americans." Democrats lost only because they didn't "take our stand and state it clearly."
So you would assume at the very least that Kennedy's vision would differ substantially from John Kerry's message or that he would state it more clearly. But Kennedy just repeated the Kerry line on issue after issue, proving that the problem is not the delivery of the message, but the message itself.
On the War on Terror, Kerry offered criticisms, but no real solutions. He complained about how we got into Iraq (false pretenses, diversion of military resources from pursuing Osama bin Laden and "unilateralism,"), but he never suggested anything meaningfully different from President Bush on how we should go forward once we were there.
Similarly, Kennedy repeated the repudiated lie that "the administration turned away from pursuing Osama bin Laden and made the catastrophic choice instead that has bogged down America in an endless quagmire in Iraq." Like Kerry, he said that our action against Iraq has created "much more intense anti-American feeling than Osama bin Laden ever dreamed of. And the sooner we reverse that distressing trend, the better."
How do we reverse the trend? Simple. "John Kerry could have worked with the international community to end that war and bring our troops home with honor."
So the fault does not lie with militant Islamists who attacked us without provocation and hate us because of who we are. Rather, we provoked them to hate us, and we continue to do so. If we would just quit making the Muslim world mad, the War on Terror would end.
With all due respect, I'm just trying to figure out how we could make the Muslim world quit hating us, much less keep international terrorists and Iraqi insurgents from killing us and sabotaging the democratization of Iraq by sweet talking other nations -- non-Muslim ones, at that. Does that make any sense?
This is a war. The terrorists are not part of a nation state. They and the Iraqi insurgents are not amenable to negotiation, unless we agree to just surrender and hand over the world to them and convert to radical Islam. We can talk until we're blue in the face with the international community, and it won't enhance our standing with terrorists one bit.
Wheel In The Cots: Clinton Agrees To Testify On Benghazi, Will ‘Stay As Long As Necessary’ | Matt Vespa
CAIR: We Condemn The Terror Attack In Texas, But Pamela Geller Totally Had It Coming | Katie Pavlich
Some Media More Concerned About Cartoons Than Terrorists Killing Those Who Draw Them | Katie Pavlich