David Harsanyi

And T. Becket Adams makes an interesting observation in The Washington Examiner, pointing to another Gallup poll that found Americans now have more confidence in the police and military than they do any of the three branches of government. Adams contends that this "is not exactly a healthy place to be in a constitutional republic," and I certainly agree. Gallup also found a 20-point increase in Americans who believe that government is corrupt. This, more or less, mirrors Washington's actual levels of corruption. And with the array of scandals (some undoubtedly imagined, others very real), the widespread incompetence and cronyism, many Americans deem Washington to be one of the biggest problems facing the country today. This also is almost certainly part of the reason that Americans have become cynical about our system; even though Washington's charge has been to expand liberty, its actions have served to limit the options of citizens, blunt dynamism and celebrate risk aversion.

But perhaps the biggest reason we have less confidence in liberty is one we don't like to talk about. In his final book, "The Servile Mind: How Democracy Erodes the Moral Life," the great Kenneth Minogue writes that "traditional societies and totalitarian states in the twentieth century suggested that many people are, in most circumstances, happy to sink themselves in some collective enterprise that guides their lives and guarantees them security." The great argument of our time -- and in some sense most times -- is the fight to balance liberty and safety. Whenever threatened, whether it be by some existential danger or a domestic economic jolt, we almost never choose what we're told is more chaotic and precarious. We almost always choose what seems safest -- and most times, it's not liberty. Whereas George W. Bush's central purpose was ostensibly tied to an effort that spread and defended freedom -- and I stress ostensibly -- the huge crowds that gathered and cheered for Barack Obama overtly reveled in the idea that we were about to erect a state-sponsored baby-sitting service. It's also worth remembering that part of the dissatisfaction Americans have with the president's job performance these days has to do with his inability to fulfill the promise of transforming government's role in American life.

This is a depressing thought for a libertarian -- and probably for many others -- but evidence that human beings opt for less freedom when things get tough isn't exactly surprising. And this Gallup poll probably doesn't do the problem justice.


David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi is a senior editor at The Federalist and the author of "The People Have Spoken (and They Are Wrong): The Case Against Democracy." Follow him on Twitter @davidharsanyi.