Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, October 27, 2006
Mary Katharine Ham :: Townhall.com Columnist
Hey, Liberals! Lecture me about racism when you've stopped creating more of it
by Mary Katharine Ham
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


I’m a racist. You’re a racist. He’s a racist. She’s a racist. Wouldn’t you like to be a racist, too?

This election cycle has sounded like a sicko version of that old Dr. Pepper ad. So many people are racists, it’s hard to keep up!

Let’s take a look at this week’s charges of racism, which come from the Left. They focus on two ads in the Tennessee Senate race. This race features Republican Bob Corker and Democrat Harold Ford, Jr. Corker is a white, former mayor of Chattanooga, and owner of a successful construction business. Ford is a black Congressman from a prominent political family in the state.

Here’s the TV ad in question. Go ahead and watch it. I’ll be here when you get back. The alleged racism lies in the fact that a white, blonde woman says, “I met Harold at the Playboy party,” and entreats him to call her at the end of the ad. The theory of those crying racism is that the idea of a white woman fraternizing with a black man was meant to conjure up some good Old South feelings about interracial dating.

It’s a serious reach to assume that was the intent of the Republican National Committee. Had they featured a black woman asking him to call her, I’m sure there would have been some coded message there as well, like, “Harold Ford should stick to his kind.” I don’t know how the liberal mind works, but I’ve gotta believe if it weren’t this racial overreach, it would have been another one.

People disagree with me on this. Republicans disagree with me on it. Ken Mehlman said he understands the other side’s point of view and Corker disavowed the ad on the grounds that it was “tacky.” Others have told me it was a Republican gaffe, racist or not, because it could be read as racist. Well, frankly, if we limit our political advertising things that won’t offend liberals, we will have no political advertising.

Try the other one on for size. It’s a radio ad, once again anti-Ford. Listen to it, here.

Now, the “racist” story behind this one is that there are drums as soundtrack to the parts of the ad that talk about Harold Ford. Liberal blogs have referred to them as “tom-toms” and “jungle drums,” and suggested that they’re meant to evoke images of Africa, the Dark Continent, thus turning off lily white Southern voters. Of course, it’s hard to make the argument that the anti-Ford ad is accentuating Ford’s ethnic “savagery” when the ad copy refers to his prep-school education and Northeastern roots.

Is it just me or does it feel more likely that the people who see and hear these innocuous ads and immediately jump to accusations of racism are the ones with the racial hang-ups, not Republican Southerners?

All of their theories, of course, are predicated on the idea that Tennesseans, and all Southern conservatives, are troglodytic racists who are boorish enough to vote against a man because he’s black and simultaneously sophisticated enough to pick up on very subtle coded political messages about his race.

I just don’t buy it. Listen, I understand that white Southerners are not wholly undeserving of such suspicions. Neither, certainly, are Republican operatives. I’ve lived in the South my whole life. I have seen much racial strife. But I’ve also seen much racial strife overcome.

The South is a resilient place full of warm people who don’t spend all their time thinking about race. It’s a place where black and white people live side by side, in greater percentages than any other region in the country, and where peace between them is the rule, not the exception.

Tennessee, in particular, was the first former Confederate state to ratify the 14th amendment and it had an anti-Klan law as early as 1868. It elected its first black member of the state General Assembly in 1873—Sampson W. Keeble.

More recently, the state has also elected Harold Ford, Jr. and his father before him to represent the 9th Congressional District from 1975 until now. Those are just a few things you can learn about Tennessee from a quick Google search. The same can be done for any Southern state. The South and its people are not the caricatures the Left makes them out to be.

Do we have a dark history? Yes, of course, but we’ve also proven surprisingly good at overcoming that history, and it never sits right with me when people ride into the South calling out racism where it doesn’t exist, creating more problems, sowing mistrust, and making it harder and harder for people suffering real racism to be taken seriously.

Some people criticized me a month ago for not being sufficiently quick to condemn both George Allen and Jim Webb as racists because of allegations that they had both used the n-word in the past. The allegations are a concern, to be sure, but I’m willing to listen to denials and apologies they offer now for 30-year-old offenses. Why? Because if you can’t believe that men can genuinely change their hearts on matters of race, then you cannot believe the South I love exists.

Sadly, many liberals don’t believe it does, so it’s easy for them to assume the worst of ads like the ones run for Corker in Tennessee this week.

Frankly, I get a little sick of being lectured on race issues by the same people who give a pass to Steny Hoyer for using the word “slavish” in reference to black Maryland Senate candidate Michael Steele. These are the same people who didn’t really mind that Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd used the n-word twice in a 2001 TV interview and didn’t squeal much at all when California Democratic Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante dropped the n-bomb during a speech in 2001. They’re the same folks who tolerate blackface Photoshops of Joe Lieberman and thick-lipped, offensive cartoons of Condi Rice.

The Washington Post has printed 168 references to Allen’s questionably racial “macaca” incident, and devoted but one reference to the fact that Webb used the word “towel-heads” in an interview last week.

It’s pretty clear that, for the media and liberals, condemnation for racism is not based on the credibility of the accusations. Instead, it’s handed down based largely on party affiliation. Racism becomes acceptable when perpetrated by a Democrat or a minority. It makes you wonder how serious they are about actually tackling the problem. I happen to dislike racism in all its forms.

Just today, I had to ban a commenter on my blog. It’s the first time I’ve ever done it. He was a liberal and a minority who had taken to using derogatory racial terms for white people. I have a blanket rule against racial slurs and he violated it. When I banned him, he wrote me an e-mail to tell me he was just “showing White people how it feels to be derided.”

Uh huh. He and the rest of the liberals like him can come back and lecture me when they’ve got another idea for fighting racism than creating more of it.

Update: Please enjoy a Townhall video production on this same subject. It's a short video commentary hosted by Mary Katharine Ham. It's something new we're working on at Townhall, and I hope you'll take the time to try out HamNation. It's airing twice a week on the Townhall Blog.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Mary Katharine Ham is a contributor to Townhall Magazine.

Be the first to read Mary Katharine Ham's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Politically correct
You decry a double standard on perceived racism, pointing out liberals make racist commentary and don't get called on it like conservatives do. I agree even though I am a liberal.

I wholeheartedly agree that racism abounds without distinction between political persuasions.

You castigate Steny Hoyer for using "slavishly" to describe Lt. Gov. Steele's support of the Republican agenda. It was politically incorrect because of the root of the word. It would be political suicide in Maryland to have publicly uttered a racial slur with obvious intent and I think Mr. Hoyer is too smart to have meant it in a racial, pejoritave manner.

Not every utterance that is politically racially incorrect is intended as a slur. You used the expression Steele outshined Cardin. That's about as racist as one can get if the reader would take out of context or wanted to manipulate the words against you. Of course that would be outrageous, but all is far in love, war and politics.

If a Liberal blogger conceding that Steele badly beat Cardin and used those words Steele outshined Cardin, would that revoke an outrage in the Steele camp?

It's OK to be passionate in your politics, but let's not construe everything as an intentional slur by one side and not by the other. I guess that is your very point. Just follow it.

BTW, qualifying Allen's use of "macaca" as questionably racist is insulting to any open minded reader. He used the word twice. he denied knowing the meaning, suggesting that it was a spontaneous utterance, never having heard the word before. If he didn't mean to be racist in uttering the term twice, why try to make such obviously lame excuses?

BTW, Steele is a very magnetic personality whereas Cardin has an extremely blah personality; that will stand well for Steele. I support Cardin because he represents my values and political beliefs and he took a courageous stand in voting against the war in Iraq. He was proven correct on every score. Much to Cardin's credit, he researched the reported intelligence, pouring over classified documents open to congressmen. Virtually all other members ignored independent sources for whatever reason. I will take a cold fish who does his own critical thinking on my behalf anytime.

Good luck for your candidates next Tuesday; it should prove to be interesting.


It's A Goldmine!
If you are offered huge sums of money to solve a problem, are you actually going to solve it? Put yourself out of a job? Silly goose...of course not! It's like the Welfare Sysem. If 3 Case workers each handle 30 cases and they eliminate 10 each, who are not qualified for benefits, one of them is out of a job. It's not rocket science.
Racism is job security for way too many people. Just think of the unemployment lines! First, you start with legitimate complaints - voting, education, jobs. Of course!! Then, there are problems with voting (one must read or show ID, Racism), the education system (standards are way too high, Racism) and obtaining jobs (Affirmative Action, Reverse Descrimination). Now, of course, more money to solve these.
Every Citizen should be entitled to the same Constitutional rights. Now comes "Civil Rights". Just exactly what are these? The right not to be offended? The right to have every stranger you see smile at you? Hmmm...only my friends can offend me since they are the only ones who actually know WHAT will offend me. Get it? Then comes "collectively offensive"...what??? If the shoe fits wear it, if not...big deal.
If anyone is offended by my comments, it's due to their opinion of themselves, not mine!

Like White people have credibility...
Of course it was racist…

Let me see if I get this right. According to a most recent poll http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/10/31/061031235233.s0l4o4wy.html

Less than 43% of white people believe that God exists. White people have always been and will continue to be “cafeteria Christians”.

They will take what they need, ignore the Gospels and refuse to acknowledge who they are and who they have always been. And some how it’s OK to attach yourself to that evil tome.

Not only is the Devil alive and well, he continues to influence politics, perhaps might one examine the New Testaments and understand why and the world.

Perhaps it’s time you come home, honor your savior, count your blessings and realize the devil, and his minions, Ann Coulter, George Bush, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Bonior, Delay, Hastert, Snow, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Republicans, Democrats, homosexual unions, oppression, no fiduciary responsibility, sending the middle class and poor to do their bidding… (Gee how come none of the aforementioned ever served? I think Rush said hemorrhoids), have nothing to offer…then again, Revelations would never be complete without the sons of Satan…now would it?...

demorat race card again
does it ever change whenever there is an election the dems. always try to make it a racial thing because they have no other way to reach black voters for there vote to stop the dreded republicans but to play the race card,it just shows how low they can go ,for they have no clue what to stand for,just name calling and lies, we all know that there are racists in this country and its not exclusive to republicans or anyone else,it exsists and probably always will it is what it is. the question is what kind of ideals you want this country to run by,"liberals weak on defence,homos marrying,high taxes,gun controling,and looking out for terrorists rights kind of governing", or the republicans that know how to defend a nation,family values,and tax control.

Thank you for saying it!
My reaction to the ruffled feathers over the anti-Ford ad is identical to many of those given above:

#1 - It's a tacky ad, simply on the basis of being kind of lowbrow in its production and dialogue. But then I'm not the type of person who likes in-your-face television advertising for cars or toothpaste, either. (As the saying goes: The louder/more-excited the voice-over in the commercial is, the stupider they think the viewer must be.)

#2 - The blonde is a blonde not because of a desire to contrast against Ford being (allegedly) dark-skinned, but because she's playing the part of a refugee from a Playboy party. Has anyone noticed the coloring of the occupants of Hefner's mansion (bedroom?) over the last thirty years? Either Playboy intentionally over-selects for blondes as a percentage of the population, or this once-recessive genetic trait has suddenly become dominant anywhere Mr. Hefner's recruiting-team visits. (I'm excluding the possibility that they might all be "bottle blondes" because, from what I understand about the Playboy product, there's ample opportunity for the customer to know who's a "real" blonde, and who isn't.)

#3 - The number of remaining bigots in the South is dwindling, as any occupant will testify. I suspect this is because their family trees have no branches. They don't watch political advertisements; they watch Jerry Springer.

#4 - Most of the few remaining bigots would have a difficult time figuring out that Harold Ford is "black"; in fact his skin tone is so close to that of a well-vacationed white man that I can't help but put the word "black" in scare quotes.

Seriously. Is there anyone around willing to swear that they could distinguish between Harold Ford and a curly-haired southern-Italian man, just back perhaps from vacationing for two weeks in Santorini?

And this is a beneficial thing. Between intermarriage for those Americans who (to paraphrase Dick Gephardt) "won life's melanin lottery", and periodic applications of Mystic-Tan for us "pallid-Americans", it's increasingly difficult to say at whom the few remaining racists should sneer.

And the old women (of both sexes) who've gotten a case of the vapors over the imagined undertones of this advertisement are equally silly. It's not just that they're wrong in their dark suspicions. It's that, these days, such suspicions are yearly growing plausible!

White women at a Playboy event?
The Republicans should have responded to the "racism" comments by simply referring to the fact that most women at Playboy parties are white.

To DavidMac
"Last I heard, us white folks weren't lynching negroes anymore. Maybe you heard different. Probably in the New York Times op-ed page."


Dont' read them nor trust them, trust it works for you...then again...

Of course you white people don't lynch "negroes" anymore, you never had the courage to show up as individuals nor will you ever, cowards in late night cover and groups have always been your trademark and history, read it, in the mean time, we're as well armed as you, get used to it, we know who are enemies are.


If I may begin, should you consider the Bible.

First, there are no white people nor European-Americans nor Europeans for that matter unless they are the oppressors, the Devil, or a being of light.

Romans, persecutors of Jews, etc. As a matter of fact the only “white” people in the Bible are lepers; I would suggest you attempt to read it.

Second the gospels were given as a gift to the gentiles that would be you my friend, should they perhaps choose to listen and learn.

Unfortunately for you and the majority of those you follow, you are not included, neither the religious right, nor your president might change the gospels.

As a matter of fact, Jerry Falwell and the religious right, continue to follow a false premise. After all, when Christ was taken into the precipitance and promised all of the kingdoms below, do you honestly believe that the kingdoms of white people were suddenly exempt?

When you are quite finished here, read a bit, and begin to comprehend, who you are and your current dilemma, I would be most willing to engage you in a most progressive dialogue.

Modern day ...
... politically correct baby kissing.

How typical!
Why dont some of you uninformed uneducated crackers ask black people what they think of the Ford ad? Of course if white folks say there was no racist intent then of course it must be true. White people wouldnt lie about such a thing. What I find particularly galling is this often heard response ..."well the Liberals are racist too." Just perfect, that certaintly makes me feel much better, the liberals are as bad as we are. America...gotta love it! Like my good friends from Canada have told me many many times, Americans are sick, simply, sick!

Oldschoolskills . . .
posted, "I must admit, the enemy that I and the overwhelming majority of the age group that I encounter, consider the threat of terrorism from foreign foes less than compelling when compared to the everyday reality of life in this land."

Oldschool, I think that 911 was pretty compelling to the "everyday reality of life."

Last I heard, us white folks weren't lynching negroes anymore. Maybe you heard different. Probably in the New York Times op-ed page.

gsmcpo
Enjoyable post. Slowly those knee jerk yellow dog union oriented Democrat voters are being eroded. Reagan was a huge factor, but its mostly demographics as union membership erodes and other changes lead to more independant thinking. Increased home ownership, stock market participation and the increasingly intrusive role of gov't tend to make voters think more, and that's to the good.

Liberal incompetence
Liberals are admitting their own incompetence if they claim that white southerners are still racists after they've been trying for the past 40 years or so to educate them. Their are no poor students, only poor teachers.

Once again Kimberly
Shows us she has NO contact with reality.

"The RNC wrote the playbook on nasty"

No, the DNC wrote that playbook long ago.

FYI
REAL southern belles and gents denounce the KKK as representative of anything that the south or southerners stand for, believe in, or tolerate.

Racism
My experience with racism and racists over the past 45 years or so is that the motivation for racism is different in the north and the south.

In the south, certainly the old south, it was/is based on the false logic of racial superiority, but still logic, while in the north it is based on emotions. The Klan certainly proves to be an exception in the south, but the analogy holds true for the vast majority of white southernors, and for virtually all northerners I've known whose actions or words identied them as racist, the analagy is also true.

The difference is that it is much easier to overcome logic -- especially false logic -- than it is to overcome emotional arguments.

Clyde9

Webb's Book.
"It's not a sexual act," Webb told Plotkin regarding the "Lost Soldiers" excerpt. "I actually saw this happen in a slum in Bangkok when I was there as a journalist."}

Regarding the passage by Webb and his comments, a local radio talk show said that Webb also claimed the father's action was caused by stress from combat all around.

But, combat in Bangkok? All around in Bangkok? Not really. The Thai's were fighting an insurgency at least during the Vietnam War, but that was in northern Thailand.

Clyde9


You're "offended"? TOUGH, CRYBABY!
MKH, you say: "Others have told me it was a Republican gaffe, racist or not, because it could be read as racist. Well, frankly, if we limit our political advertising things that won’t offend liberals, we will have no political advertising."

That's the idea. What conservatives say or write is offensive because they said/wrote it, & they said/wrote it in furtherance of conservative positions. Underneath it all, conservative ideas and declarations are "offensive." It's just their way of trying to squelch you. It's an old stale stunt.

A variant of this was employed successfully when the newly Republican House of Reps, after one term, caved in. Does anyone remember how a veritable cult of ponytail guys, little old ladies in tennis shoes, & soccer moms crawled out of the woodwork and into our TV sets to carp incessantly about "partisan bickering" on the part of the REpublicans, while blithely ignoring the "starving children" bile and venom emanating from the Demmie minority. Nobody ever complained about Democratic "partisanship" during the era of Tip O'Neal & they'd have been laughed out of the public arena if they had.

We need, after twelve years, to finally recognize this tired transparent tactic for what it is, & buck up our Congresspersons to quit acting scared spitless of being called "partisan" or "ideologue" or something else they ought in fact to proudly proclaim.

racist from the south are you? AP says.
Thanks for your southern hospitality and insight.

Maybe you should've linked thru HA? Good luck with the new HAM Nation, love the 'Vent'...we 'met', you and I, over at hotair.

Skip
Thanks for your article. I love the South.

OMG
i am acutally agreeing with part of kimberly's statements someone help me. I agree that negative ads are only ment to mislead voters, however i dont think this ad is racist at all. mudsliging and maybe misleading ( have not really done any reaseach on Ford yet) and should never have been used.

The problem today is we have to many politicions in power and no leaders at all. Politions talk about how bad the other guy is or trump up what they did in office while really accompishing nothing. A leader only uses words to explain what he is going to do then does it.

This is a really fascinating article.
America has changed. I don't think any section of America has changed as much as the South. A cynic might say that it had a longer way to go in order to get where it is now. I say, so what? It is a different South, and I think a better South.


Several people have pointed out that racism wasn't limited to the South. I know that when I was a kid in Philly there was segregated seating in a large downtown movie theater. We had to sit i the balcony.


I will never forget the"Spring race riots" that took place around Tilden Junior High School and Bartram High School, which were next door to each other. Two years in a row we had to run the gauntlet from the trolly stop on Elmwood Avenue up the street to Bartram.


Police had to protect us from white aduts screaming the N word at us and brandishing bottles, baseball bats and sticks. It was generally understood that if you were white, and lived in Southwest Philadelphia near those schools, you hated black people.


We all knew as kids that going into the Grays Ferry section of South Philly could be hazardous to your health. That was a predominantly Irish working class neighborhood. Racial strife was a reality there.


When it comes to the South, of course it was a monstrous place, in regard to racial injustice. As bad as it was, it has changed. Dramatically.


In spite of that change, the racists on the left continue to try to paint the South and Southern whites as unchanged. To suggest that the South has not changed for the better in regard to race is to indicate that you are either stupid or crazy. Oh! There is one other possibility. You can be a bald faced, cynical, vicious liar.


Hmmmnn. Sounds like a leftie to me.


Since I am on the subject I will mention what I consider to be an ironic incident. I voted for Jimmy Carter. I remember thinking how much things had changed, in that I was feeling OK about voting for a white man from the South. Well, we all know how that turned out, don't we?


Then, in response to George Herbert Walker Bush, as well as my own lack of information about him, I voted for Bill Clinton. Bush mentioned the "New World Order" in a speach. My blood ran cold, and the result was that I voted for that immoral, unethical, treasonous mutt, William Jefferson Clinton. We all know how that turned out too, don't we. Excuse me a moment. I want to go bang my head against the wall.


Finally, when it comes to the Fords of Tennesse, I have no use for them. Harold Senior has made racist, anti-white statements, and is unapologetic about them. His son is a priviledged, smart, Democrat politician. Because of who he is, I wouldn't vote for him if I lived in Tennessee, I would vote for his white opponent. I'm not sure, but that just might be an example of how the South has changed. Or perhaps how I have changed.


Either way, it takes a liar or a fool to contend that all Southerners are racists, or to deny that there is a new South.

MKH
Once more another lib tactic just before an election. I guess the left hasn't figured it out yet that their days of saying anything and the water being carried by the MSIM without impunity is about dead and stinking. About time the left and their mouthpieces got their come-uppance.

It's always the same during an election.
Approximately six week as go I mentioned to a friend that it was close to the time that white Republicans and Democrats would remember that black people would, once again, have a most significant presence determining the outcome of the November elections.

Whites are Conservative or Liberal, blacks “plantation Negroes” or simply taken for granted.

As an African-American conservative who voted twice for Ronal Reagan, I feel no compulsion to support either party.

Financially, I simply can’t afford the Republican’s free spending credit card mentality. God is willing, I’ll have grandchildren one day and saddling them with this current administration’s debt through enormous deficits and a misguided military adventure is preposterous.

Morally, I can’t afford the Democrats, who not only did every thing possible to make sure I couldn’t attend public schools, vote and somehow believe I’m beholden to a homosexual Godless future.

Perhaps it might be easiest to acknowledge that African-American’s send their dollars to Washington and their children to war against a foe, who has never denied them their rights, never raped their women, emasculated their men, nor bombed their churches nor lynched their youth.

I must admit, the enemy that I and the overwhelming majority of the age group that I encounter, consider the threat of terrorism from foreign foes less than compelling when compared to the everyday reality of life in this land. A land built by our forefathers long before the majority of European-Americans currently within these borders had deigned to even consider immigration.

Perhaps when President Bush is confirming Democracy for Iraq, which will never happen, and never would have, someone with an opportunity for power might return to the simple premise that “United we stand, divided we fall”.

Racist?
I lived in the south and lived in the northeast. I tend to think Rhode Island and Massachusetts were the racist place I ever lived. Of course, I am incline to think it was the time I live there - - the 1970s and early 80s. (As Rush says your since of history begin when you are born.)

While I write that I think Rhode Island and Massachusetts were racist places I am just thinking of the past, during busing the news was scary. I am sure the south was much worse in early periods and even scarier. Nevertheless, I just do not think this is racist country anymore. I do not think most people are racist. I think most people try to keep racist views to themselves.

I thought it was funny that the NAACP would try calling the Ford ad racist. I read about that ad right after I read about Ice-T's raunchy album cover that might not be able to be displayed in US stores. He and his white blonde wife are naked on the album cover.

I tried to remember if anyone offended by the Desperate Housewives ad with the white actress and the black football player was offended because its racial content. I do not think race was the inappropriate content, but I just cannot remember. I just do not remember the NAACP demanding that ABC pull the racist ad.

whoever smelled it dealt it.....
What will it take to get the intellectually lazy to come up with a new schtick? For crying out loud, if I hear racism injected into another innocous event, I might lose my mind.

to christiacons
How RIGHT you are!!!! I noticed that too.

I noticed that mindset happening to me. I have lived in Mass. all my life. I am two years in Woonsocket and can no longer feel Boston as an influence. Now I too think a run to Providence(25 miles?) is too far.


Off topic but I just had to comment
Twodog I grew up in Middletown, RI and I never meet anyone who considered themself living just outside of Boston. I am sorry I just had to comment. You must live in one of those big states. When I grew up in little Rhodie people said things like 'do you really want to go all the way to Newport.' Going off the island was bid deal to most folks on Aquidneck Island and visiting Providence was really going somewhere. Our schools took special yearly trips to Boston.

Racist Advertisements
Anything shown or said by Republicans about anybody who is non-white will be defined by the Socialist-Democrats as "racist".

It's a mantra that has, unfortunately, worked well for the S-D's political propaganda arm of the DNC.

The mind-set of the S-D's is that you can never have too many African-Americans on the DNC Plantation.

ENOUGH!!!!!
OK, how about this for a compromise. Before every campaign, let's just assume that the Republican candidate is a bigot, an idiot, Christian wannabe theocrat, a warmonger, and in the pockets of big business -- especially Halliburton and Enron; and that the Democrat (as everyone knows to be true) is genetically incapable of being a racist -- especially if he is black, a patriot who only wants our troops to stop dying in a foriegn land, and out only to help the poor and destitute.

If we can accept all of those assumptions before the campaign can we PLEASE quit chucking the "racist" mud and the other tired, monotonous, predictable insults during the campaigns. Just once I'd like to see a campaign where the candidates actually tell us what they want to do rather than what the other guy called someone of another race 30 years ago.

The Dems. will be Dems., Unfortunately!
I have seen and heard the adds in question and think there is no trace of racism at all. This is just a shamefuly obvious attempt of the Democrats to instigate a charge that is simpley not there. They have no real substantive arguments or plans, so like they often do they resort to the ridiculous.

Democrats "FOR" Minorities
I served in the military for 20 years, lived all over this great country of ours and I can state categorically that the most racist and bigoted people I have ever met go to the polls and punch the straight democratic line on the ballot. I was born in Boston...Irish Catholic...still have a lot of family there. There was a time that black people were afraid to get off the subway in South Boston because they would get assaulted. I know of a black family that moved into the "Projects" there that had to leave because of persecution from whites. They all vote democratic because of union support. In St. Louis I have to tell my in-laws that they cannot use the N-word and other racial slurs when we visit because I don't want my kids subjected to that. Sometimes I think my wife is adopted because she is so totally opposite of her parents when it comes to race. They vote democratic because of unions. In San Diego the racism revolved around Mexicans and Illegals that lived in town. San Diego County is conservative by California standards but the racism is more behind the scenes there. As a side note, I spent two years in Japan and those are the most racist people around. They are polite to everyone (except other Asians) but they allow things like a bar with a sigh out front that says "Japanese only." Memphis, Tennessee was one of the least racist places I have lived and the best place I have lived is Jacksonville, FL. What great place to live.

One last note: The Democrats controlled the House and Senate for 40 years and did nothing to fix racial problems in this country. If you are a black democrat, ask yourself what has your party done to fix problems other than to tell you that republicans are evil and racist.

Divisive concepts
It's not just racial/ethnic background:

Big OIL
Those DRUG companies
WALMART
ARMS manufacturers
CONSERVATIVES
The MILITARY
The BOY SCOUTS
Those EVANGELICALS
CAR MANUFACTURERS
GUN OWNERS

I am certain that you can find others who are not worthy of respect nor the protection of citizenship in the eyes of the Domestic EneMies Of Constitution RATS.

“Wouldn’t you like to be a racist, too?”
I am one of those “Racist, sexist, homophobe, bigots” that Rush Limbaugh has accused me of being for the past fifteen years. I often also find myself associated with term “Nazi” used in liberal vernacular.

I’m way past being even slightly ruffled by words containing “ist” and “ism”. They’re almost always used by some emotionally hypersensitive condescending stiff (come to think of it, that’s most liberals) on another adolescent tirade. I grew out of puberty along time ago. I even survived two teenage children, including their friends. The words used around our house were always concisely poignant, on topic and effective as battering-rams. We did not resort to name calling. It was a laughable offense in any argument.

But alas, its election season and we are forced to endure another round of misappropriated passion for inane colloquialisms. I don’t think that last word in the sentence will upset anyone

The Racist Dumbocrats
I got a nice political message call from a Black minister this morning. He noted that homosexual "marriage" is bogus as a civil rights issue. Fruitcakes from the Kinsey Institute have argued against laws against sex with animals. Birds of a foul feather. Loonier that Ross Perot's "Crazt Aunt Sally in the Attic" or whatever. The Kinsey fruits opined that "We should not be so judgemental about those who seek alternate forms of sexual relief." Whew!

I'll vote for Virginia's Proposed Constitutional Amendment # 1. The fruits don't deserve Veep John Nance Garner's "Bucket of Warm Spit." Now we are advised he didn't say "spit" but another word.

The minister is right ersatz "marriage" that is a rejection of the nature of man.

The Racist South
Sorry, but this is going to be long.

I grew up in the south. I can remember burning crosses. One of my first memories is wondering why there were two water fountains at the gas station, one with a "Whites Only" sign above it. I cam remember blacks being called "boy" and the n-word with impunity by people.

I also went to one of the first desegregated schools in the south. I remember how proud we were that no-one in the south was overturning school buses, while it was going almost non-stop in the north. We all got along (sorry). It wasn't easy, but we all worked at it. There were no race riots, or any overtly racial incidents, that I can remember. What was happening in the other parts of the country at the time? Watts, the Detroit riots, and others that I can't bring to mind right now.

My high school, in Athens, GA, was built well after desegregation, and I remember having friends of all races. Athens is a college town, for those who don't know, and was very forward thinking at the time, prolly still is. The racists were easily discerned, and just as easily avoided.

Since then I have been all over the world, thanks to my time in the service. I have been treated as though I was a racist simply because of my accent. I have seen overt racism everywhere I have been. I have seen hidden racism as well. I was told in CA once that I must be a racist because of my family history. In the same conversation, this native Californian informed me how lazy and incompetent Mexicans are.

But I am supposed to feel guilty about things that happened years ago; things I had no hand in? I am supposed to cower every time someone screams racist? That seems to be the message I get from the left. I refuse to bow to it. I will not go quietly. Your attempts to label me will not stand. Go bloviate somewhere else, I ain't buyin' it!

Kane

Could it Be A Different Issue?
Now that I've viewed the ad, I wonder.

Could the primary objection from the Dems be something other than their "racist" charges?

Could it be that the ad was......."effective"?

Mike Steele
...should have been "big" enough to let Hoyer's comment pass, regardless. Anyone who knows Maryland politics understands exactly what Hoyer is about, and I think Steele demeaned himself a bit by jumping on the bandwagon of offended-people.

FWIW, Hoyer is the guy who has pressed for laws that would specifically prohibit poll workers from asking a potential voter for identification. The only reason I can figure for that sentiment is that it makes life more difficult for those who would vote fraudulently. Hoyer talks about "disenfranchising" voters, but it is the legitimate voter who is disenfranchised by the fraudulent one.

David
That is how I took the ad too as more of a lame tongue-in-cheek statement about morality issues rather than racism.

Re: Anyone noticed yet-
Of late, the drive-by sniping has been more concerned with bashing Christians and equal civil rights for homosexuals. Racism isn't their "flavor issue" of the month. You are right, they don't comment and argue about this issue of racism because it doesn't exsist any longer to the degree the way some in the MSM and Democrat party want us to believe. MKH did nail it and they can't find a credible way of defending such a lame issue. Of course some have not yet found a credible or convincing way to argue about the other issues either, in my opinion that is..

valid criticisms Gestell
vis a vis morals of said candidate in the ad.

The point was the cry of 'racism' from the usual suspects.

No one has said the ad was classy, but the response wasn't either.

This outcry against these ads remind me of the idiot woman who was offended by a police officer eating a banana in front of her.

Still can't figure that one out.

PS why important to Dems...
It's important because it's a cheap shot way of trying to get the black vote by insisting that republicans are all white racists who don't see blacks and other minority groups as equals. However I for one am glad to see that people of all races are not buying this message any longer and rejecting the idea that racism is as bad today as it was in the past.

Why is racism important to Dems?
It has always been curious to me that the NAACP and Jesse Jackson etc. seem to want racism to exist because that keeps these people in business and gives them a platform in the public eye. Trouble is what they are telling people is not what people are experiencing, and in many cases these days have never experienced. The old mantra by these folks that whites want to keep the blacks powerless is just not fleshed out in todays world.

Oreo cookies being thrown at Steele?
The Democrats are such whiney race-baiters, that I find their cry of "racism!" ridiculous.

Who threw oreo cookies at Michael Steele, and called him an Uncle Tom? Not the Republicans.

Who vilifeid Clarence Thomas? Not the Republicans. Who "filibustered" Janice Rogers Brown for over 2 years? Not the Republicans.

To have a blonde bimbo proposition Harold Ford with "call me." is racist? I thought that showed how open-minded people are now, that bimbos are just as interested in Harold Ford as Bill Clinton.

Anyone notice yet . . .
that, so far, there is none of the usual "drive-by" sniping from the left on this one? No trying to turn it back on the right. No citing of MKH's points to argue against. Nothing. (We'll see, the day's young.)

Makes one wonder why. Could it be that MKH has so nailed this one that there is no refuting it?

The evidence is thick, indeed. The dims are the ones trotting out the race card every chance they get, and in the process, are actually inciting racism themselves.

OK, so what is the ad supposed to show?
OK, now we know that Republicans are really the good guys when it comes to race. Fine. But what was that ad supposed to show? What was its message? That Ford actually went (gasp!) to a Playboy party where one could meet girls? Did he in fact pick up some bimbo? You got any video of that?

I guess the ad was supposed to get the voters all stirred up with lip-smacking self-righteousness at how their guy would just NEVER be seen in such a venue.

OK. I've got it now. Dems go to parties where loose women are to be found and Republicans don't. That's why Republicans are better suited to hold office. Wait, did I just miss something there?

No Racism
As a white, christian, republican redneck woman who has lived in the south for my entire life I saw nothing racial about the Ford ad at all and it never would have entered my mind until those dang yankee liberals started yakking about it. I have watch that ad over and over again and I STILL don't get where it sends any type of racist message. Guess this old southern bellle is not as enlightened as the liberal race-baiters who have never been in the south long enough to know who we are or what we stand for or how we treat one another with repect around here. Jesse Jackson has been singing this tune down here for a long time and people just don't buy his message or the sterotype that he and others want to put on us.

My two cents
I live in Maine now but I have lived in Kentucky and in the midwest and other places and I personally think that characterizing people by the area where they live is a bit silly and even a little insulting and ignorant. People are people.

Where does racism reside today?
The answer is in liberalism. The over-riding policy of liberalsim is dependency. To that end they do not want "equal rights" but a "balkanization" of America. They claim to hate racism but they call any difference of opinion racist. As a conservative and a southerner I acknowledge the sorrowfull past but it is just that Past. It's time to stop blaming your problems on what happened to your ancesters and take responsibility for your own life today.
I'm an orphan who was abandonned by both my parents but that will not stop me from success in my life. Others need to do the same.

Rich

I agree with most of your comments. Been in Texas, New Mexico and Kentucky.

Sterotypes are hard to beat down.
That "gentleman" you describe is no gentleman.





My take
I grew up in Michigan, Massachusetts and Virginia. The biggest difference between the northerners and southerners was very clear. In the north, friends were hard to come by as they are initially cold to the new kid on the block, you have to prove yourself worthy of their friendship. Once you become a friend however, they have your back. If you say you need help, they come closer and asked in hushed tones, "what do you need?". When I moved to VA, everyone was so friendly right from the first day and seemed glad to have a "new friend" in the neighborhood. But when I said that I needed some help, they scattered like roaches when you turn on the lights. I learned that a southern "gentleman" meant that he would smile broadly as he shook your hand and with the other hand, stabbed you in the back.

As far as racism goes, it is very subtle in the north and where it still exists in the south is very "in your face", which I find more refreshing as you can deal with the overt better than the covert.

Both northerners who have not had much actual experience in the south, and southerners that haven't experienced the north have misconceptions about the other mostly fed by the MSM who never met a stereotype they didn't hype and love.

Spot-on DavidM
Also noticeable historically:
(1) Party that kept the nation together through Civil War--Republican (under Lincoln)
(2) Party which first started process of integration of African-Americans in schools--Pubs (Eisenhower)
(3) Party which assented to mass arrests during Civil Rights protests--Democrats under Wallace
(4) Party which first set up Jim Crow laws--Dems
(5) Party which has a KKK high mucky-muck (Robert Byrd) as a prominent leader--Dems
(6) Party which did the most sleazy attacks on supreme court nominees (including the second African-American)--Dems (and Byrd was one of the ones doing the sleazy attacks)

Based on those, it appears to me that the Democrats are the more racist party--despite of their having the first Indian-American (and also Asian-American) congressman, Dilip Singh Saund from 1956-1962 (and I am Indian-American myself).

I'm a White Southerner, too.
I have lived through many eras of growth in the South (South Carolina, to be exact)and I couldn't agree with you more on this issue! I have friend from Pennsylvania who never even laid eyes on a black man until he went into the service in the 60's....they didn't "allow them" in his town, he said. Well, bully bully! You got it right on every instance....Black and White Southerners have always worked, lived, played, attended school, and prayed together as long as I can remember....in the cities and in the rural areas. So what that there still exists a KKK, the majority of us are appalled by that, but we still work for racial harmony better than any other demographic area in the nation. I'm sick of Southerners always being attacked as racist, especially conservative Southern Christians! Anyone who has lived here long enough would "get it"...but the Liberal Dems just want to be divisive, as usual. It's the only way they can fight...dirty! Thank you for a marvelous commentary!

If Liberals had their way..
..they would fashion the U.S. after the European model, which we all know they are so fond of (sorry for the dangling particible).

If you pay any attention at all to Europe, however, you'll find that they are far more advanced when it comes to racism than we are, and are actively passing restrictive laws to keep themselves from being overrun with even more Muslims.

I can't blame them for that, but try doing it here. For all the complaints about America, the fact is we are more racially tolerant, even though we're made up of a mishmash of different races and cultures, than any European country, with their almost 90% pure ethnic cultures.

Then there's Japan! Talk about being racially pure! Try going there and practicing your own culture and see where that gets you.

the left can't let go of race.
Good article. I don't see any racial overtones in this ad. Many in media and on the left are obsessed with race, and will twist and contort almost anything into a racial issue.
If the sanctimonious left wants to examine a truly vile and disgusting ad, I suggest it review the NAACP ad in 2000 in which President Bush, as then governor of Texas, is deemed to have created an environment that permitted the awful dragging death of James Byrd. I don't think it gets any lower than that.

Bimbo and blackness
I think the woman is supposed to represent a bimbo more than any racial characteristics. If they had had a tarted-up black woman, the outcry would be even worse.

And anyway, Harold Ford is the lightest black man I have ever seen. As a young person, I had been unaware of his father, and I am sure that there are many others like me who didn't even know until this came up.

Mike Adams definition
suits this just fine.

Racism: Insertion of race into a situation where it doesn't belong.

I would say the democrat whiners are the racists here.

While up here in Canada
The kicking and screaming are all about that couple who say "Canada can take care of North Korea; they're not busy!"

Canadians have no sense of humour whatsoever except when they are jeering at Americans (CBC has three, count them three, shows every week devoted only to jeering at Americans, and those are their only hit shows). Clearly they cannot deal with sarcasm in any form when it is about Canada -- too subtle for them, I suppose -- so it doesn't surprise me.

Personally I think this ad is funny. Now could we make an ad like that about John Lewis, who used to represent me (ha ha) when I lived in Atlanta and who responded to my objection to his referring to a cut in finances for some Black program as a "holocaust" (my Daddy is Jewish) by leaving me a voice mail calling me a racist? Every time Lewis' name appears on my absentee ballot, I write in Neal Boortz.

Would you like to see My South?
I am a member of an 8,000 member church in a Northwest suburb of Atlanta, Georgia. Trinity Chapel. We are growing so fast that we are doubling the size of our Sanctuary this year.

Our demographic makeup? About 40% white, 40% black, 15% latino, 5% asian. Some of our black people are actually from Africa, like the Professor of my wife, when she was earning her masters degree. Some of the blacks are from all over the Carribean and will tell you that the racism in New York and New Jersey is unbearable, but they feel right at home here.

If you want proof of the demographics; any Sunday morning or Wednesday night, you can visit http://www.trinitychapel.org and watch the service and pay attention to the crowd shots.

In one of the Sunday school classes, I met John, whose mother came from Japan. John grew up in a rural town in Alabama. Try to imagine George Takai with a southern drawl, dressed like a cowboy. Try to imagine being a littl Japanese boy in the rural South while WWII was barely two decades before.

Two of my brothers in law are 2nd generation Cuban-American. They get angry when phone soliciters call the house speaking Spanish with the assumption based on their last name alone.

There are no ethnic enclaves here. In any given neighborhood there will be a rather homogenous mix of blacks, latinos, Indians, Vietnamese, Koreans, etc.

One of my Cubano nephews recently married a lily white, blonde of Scandanavian heritage, who is also deaf (but not of the "deaf culture"). Yep, there are going to be some cute little blonde haired, blue eyed Rodriguez kids running around before too long.

Welcome to the real South. The only true melting pot of America. A place where we really do like the concept of judging on the basis not of skin color, but the content of character.

And I still remember the people who told me in 1992 that character didn't matter.

Ford Needs to Remember...
...that his father didn't exactly have a sterling record about race. After his final electoral victory, he made a statement on camera that should have shocked people but, sadly, did not. At a victory party, a television station asked him for comments and he said, "I drove around East Memphis and I made a note of you white devils who had my opponents sign in your yard. You better not call me for help with anything." Not exactly a ringing endorsement of racial tolerance.

The Perpetually Indignant® will always be with us. It doesn't matter what you say or do. They will be offended.

Double Standard on the Left
To MKH. There have been times when I've
disagreed with You, but not this time. When
You're right, You're right.

To Twodog (on the lighter side). Please, it's
Irish, with a Capital (I).

You go girl!
MKH,
I lived most of my life in the northeast, although I have lived in Georgia for the past 12 years. I can honestly say I saw more racism up north than I have down here.

Is it any wonder the liberals can't get an electoral foothold in the south? ;)

This article is great
Definitely the best I've read on Townhall.com. The Dems have been exploiting racial tensions for years, instead of trying to ease the tension.

Linked it over at http://rollingthunderblog.blogspot.com/

You can't not offend Democrats
"I don’t know how the liberal mind works, but I’ve gotta believe if it weren’t this racial overreach, it would have been another one.
I don’t know how the liberal mind works, but I’ve gotta believe if it weren’t this racial overreach, it would have been another one. "

You are exactly right.

Remember the "Bureaucrats" ad regarding the leftists taking over HealthCare?

When the word Bureaucrats faded out the last part "RATS" was on the screen for 1/64th of a second eliciting cries of Subliminal Advertising.

The simple truth is there is nothing Republicans can say or do without Democrats becoming indignant. George Will called it "The Indignancy Industry" in an article long ago. Democrats got indignant when he wrote it, they still are today.

It's the only ammo Leftism has
Ad hominem attacks. Attack the messenger. Obfuscate. Try to ring the guilt bell.

They can't attack substantively, so they resort to symbolism rathetr than substance.

It's the old "nanner nanner" strategy.

and for the record
I lived just outside of Boston in Newport, R.I. for four years and spent a lot of time in the new england area.

Very good article
I am a transplanted Southerner (came here from Colorado) and married a wonderful southern belle. If I wanted to, I could go to areas here in the south and find racism. But I could also go to any number of cities in more "liberal" places such as Boston, NYC, and others, where racism is just as apparent. In fact, in Boston and NYC, it's to the point where irish live in their own community, chinese theirs, blacks, etc. But there it's considered "culturally acceptable" or some other such thing.

I also will say, just like the author, that I find the folks here in the south more open, honest, and warm than their yankee counterparts.

I wouldn't assume..
..somebody is a "minority" just because he/she states it in a comment without actually seeing that person.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.