Today Bill Buckley, Annette Kirk, and I are giving lectures at the White House about one of the preeminent philosophers of the twentieth century: Annette’s husband, the late Russell Kirk.
Fifty years ago—the same year I graduated from
When I read The Conservative Mind, I began to realize that someone else believed all of those things I had argued for during my undergraduate years. The book gave me great intellectual support in the early days of my political life. When I was at the White House, Kirk came to meet with President Nixon, and his thinking energized President Reagan in the 1980s and continues to guide the principles of George W. Bush.
Kirk was convinced that “a divine intent rules society as well as conscience, forging an eternal chain of right and duty which links great and obscure, living and dead. Political problems, at bottom, are religious and moral.”
Societies, Kirk asserted, should acknowledge their origin and their responsibility to God. This tenet of faith grounds our law in God’s will and character.
And those rights and responsibilities come to us as a gift from previous generations. Tradition is vital, because in it we respect our ancestors’ ongoing right to participate in our contemporary culture.
Most of all, Russell Kirk argued, neutrality on moral issues is impossible. Law and policy cannot escape moral judgments. Whether banning smoking in hospitals, setting speed limits, or legalizing abortion, public policy teaches citizens a worldview and a moral code. Kirk sought to derive policies from the moral and religious wisdom of Western civilization—as opposed to the utopian schemes of coffee-house dreamers.
Great Moments in Human Rights: Mandated “Emotional Support” Animals in College Dorms | Daniel J. Mitchell