After the seemingly endless preliminaries, now comes the main event Thursday night.
Will many people watch the "debates," which resemble joint news conferences? The rules are so strict that the candidates don't engage each other. One-third of homes with television sets watched the first 2000 presidential debate between Gov. George W. Bush and Vice President Al Gore. The first debate traditionally draws the most viewers, possibly including those precious "undecideds," so here is some unsolicited advice and suggested questions for both candidates.
For Sen. Kerry: You have the most to prove. You are a rich, elitist Massachusetts liberal. That is a difficult image to overcome, so you've got to at least sound as if you have convictions and make the case for why your plans are better than the president's policies.
In most of your pronouncements, you never talk specifics about victory in Iraq or offer a credible plan for achieving it. You speak of bringing the troops home, which must encourage America's enemies. You recently accused the president of planning a post-November surprise of calling up more reservists (and your wife predicts Osama bin Laden will be captured before the election). But you have repeatedly faulted the administration for not sending enough troops. Why would the president be wrong in sending more troops -- assuming he will -- when you have criticized him for not doing what you now say he plans to do? You are vulnerable to the charge of being a flip-flopper.
Your weakest link is the war. You have repeatedly said your plan for fighting terrorism is to drop more U.N. resolutions on our enemies and bring in more "allies." The trouble is the U.N. resolutions aren't worth the paper they're written on unless they are backed up with action. No foreign leader has publicly stated that your election would change his position from non-cooperation to cooperation with the United States. They have said just the opposite. (Have you talked to some who say otherwise?)
Domestically, you have criticized the president for his tax cuts, the deficit and national debt, but you propose a $653 billion government health care plan and an additional $207 billion in education spending when the record amounts now being spent have not improved education achievement. How will you reduce the deficit and debt with these proposals, unless you plan to substantially raise taxes?
Your ultimate problem, as reflected in the polls, is that most people don't know what you believe, if anything. Even Don Imus was mystified when you told him your "position" on Iraq. He said he couldn't understand what you were talking about -- and he supports your election.
Katrina vanden Heuvel: "MS, WI, TX, ND, AR, Have Become States of Misogyny of Bigotry" | Greg Hengler
Report: Boehner Won't Bring Immigration Bill to the Floor Without Majority of Republicans On Board | Guy Benson