Campaigning for president in 1968, '72 and '76, Alabama Democratic Gov. George Wallace said, "Send 'em a message." Wallace believed that a vote for him would send a message to Washington politicians that the people were tired of Washington's dictatorial ways.
On Tuesday, Sept. 9, Alabama voters sent the country a different kind of message than Wallace's, which was mostly based on race and Southern pride. They rejected by more than a 2-1 margin Republican Gov. Bob Riley's plea for a $1.2 billion tax increase to offset a $675 million budget deficit. Riley acknowledged receiving at least part of the message in an election-night statement: "I've heard what the people of Alabama have said, and they said it very clearly tonight, 'We do want you to be good stewards, but we want a smaller government until you prove to us you are good stewards of our money.'"
How about smaller government forever, allowing those who make the money to keep more of it and those who so often misspend it to have less to spend?
Alabama is the latest of several states with voters telling their leaders they've had enough with high taxes and unnecessary spending. Something approaching a national tax revolt may be brewing. In San Diego, voters approved a "supermajority" requirement for any tax hikes in March, 2002; in Missouri, a large fuel and sales tax increase was defeated 3-1 in August, 2002; in Virginia, voters in several suburbs last November rejected a sales tax hike by an overall margin of 10 points. Just the other day, voters in Seattle, Wash., said no to what would have been the nation's first-ever espresso tax. All over this nation, people are showing how tired they are of having their pockets picked by government.
Riley, like most politicians, forecast doom and gloom - from laid-off police to closed libraries - if voters didn't allow government to take more of their money. The public appears to be onto this scheme, especially when disaster never strikes after the tax increases are rejected.