President Bush's appointment of economist Ben Bernanke to be chairman of the Federal Reserve Board is a wise decision. In contrast to his appointment of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, Bernanke is unquestionably qualified for his position. I'm grateful that Bush didn't appoint his personal banker to the Fed and just ask us to trust him.
One of the things that struck me about the Bernanke appointment is how thorough the White House selection process was, as opposed to the slipshod method by which Miers was chosen. According to press reports, the selection process began in April, there were some 20 names on the list and all the candidates were thoroughly vetted. Senior White House staff interviewed finalists, and several met with the president personally.
This is one reason why many conservatives were so upset with the Miers selection. It appears that President Bush short-circuited the normal selection process, did not allow adequate vetting, did not give sufficient attention to other candidates, and was unconcerned about the need for an appointee with the appropriate credentials and independence from the White House.
Why President Bush did such a good job in finding a new Federal Reserve chairman while doing such an extraordinarily poor job with the Supreme Court is an interesting question.
In any case, the Bernanke appointment sets in motion a possible game of musical chairs inside the administration. He presently is chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers and therefore must be replaced. There are also two additional vacancies on the Federal Reserve Board. With growing pressure on President Bush to improve the quality of his economic team, this may be a propitious moment to make some other changes, as well.
I believe that the most important economic problem the Bush administration will have to deal with in the next few years will be coping with the explosion of entitlement spending, which is in the pipeline due to the aging of society. I continue to believe that enactment of the Medicare drug benefit was insanely bad policy for this reason. Instead of massively increasing the government's entitlement spending, Congress and the White House should have been trying to reduce it.
I think it is inevitable that some economic event will soon put deficit reduction at the top of the to-do list. Ted Truman, a former top Federal Reserve official, was recently quoted as saying, "Over the next 18 months, it's a reasonable bet, especially with interest rates going up, there will be some accidents in financial markets."
Bruce Bartlett is a former senior fellow with the National Center for Policy Analysis of Dallas, Texas. Bartlett is a prolific author, having published over 900 articles in national publications, and prominent magazines and published four books, including Reaganomics: Supply-Side Economics in Action.
Be the first to read Bruce Bartlett's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
Are We Really Surprised Democrats Who Booed Jerusalem Will Boycott Netanyahu's Speech? | Katie Pavlich
Artist Reveals Bill Clinton's Official White House Portrait Has Monica Lewinsky Reference | Christine Rousselle