Brent Bozell

 Summer is always a big season for movie attendance, especially big, loud, special effects-laden movies. The dominating blockbuster this summer so far is "Spiderman 2," loved by critics this time as well as anticipated by fans. But does the PG-13 rating reflect the movie?s content?
 
Some parents didn?t think so. "It's very violent and very disruptive, especially for children," one parent told the New York Daily News. "It's fine to jump over buildings. It's another thing to crush someone's skull," he said, referring to a scene where the villain, Doctor Octopus, crushes a surgeon's head with one of his mechanical arms.

 Whether it?s the content ratings on television shows, video games or the granddaddy of ratings, the Motion Picture Association of America?s movie ratings system, parents have to be concerned that the ratings standards are often sloppily imposed and contradictory. Too many parents have taken children to adventure movies they assumed would be light, and they find darkness instead. Too many parents have taken kids to see comedies marketed to youngsters (one current example, the playground-inspired comedy "Dodgeball") and find surprisingly adult sexual material.

 Professor Kimberly Thompson of the Harvard School of Public Health has assembled another study about the risks we face with children and popular entertainment. In a survey of movies from 1992 to 2003, Thompson found "today?s movies contain significantly more violence, sex and profanity on average than movies of the same rating a decade ago." But more importantly, today's PG-13 movies pack about the same dose of sex, violence and foul language that used to earn films an R rating a decade ago, a problem defined as "ratings creep."

 Thompson reported that the current movie-rating system is inadequate and unreliable for parents: "Age-based ratings alone do not provide good information about the depiction of violence, sex, profanity and other content, and the criteria for rating movies became less stringent over the last decade. The MPAA rating reasons provide important information about content, but they do not identify all types of content found in films."

 She says parents need more content-oriented information from Web sites. One example is kids-in-mind.com, and one single example underlines what parents miss from a simple age-based rating. "Anchorman," the current top comedy with funny man Will Ferrell, carries a very long list of sexual content for a PG-13 film. Parents quickly will learn from this site exactly how much sexual innuendo they?re sending the children to see.


Brent Bozell

Founder and President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell runs the largest media watchdog organization in America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Brent Bozell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate