Florida -- where "bad" is "good"

Bill Murchison
|
Posted: Jan 10, 2006 12:05 AM

Get this: There's a new principle in American education -- namely, that public schools are to be "uniformly" bad. Such is the rock-bottom meaning of that 5-2 Florida Supreme Court decision last week scuttling a public school voucher program.

You needn't sift for long the legal gobbledygook to figure out that the Florida decision cuts aspiring students off at the knees and rewards substandard performance by their teachers and administrators.

Florida's constitution requires that "free public schools" be, among other things, "uniform." Which, by public consensus, many surely are -- uniformly bad. Which is why the state created a voucher program in the first place -- so that victims of such oppressive uniformity could opt either for public schools or private ones, with the state paying the bill.

Under the program, 730 such students are being educated in private schools. The idea is that we'll drag 'em back to the dungeons next fall. Why (according to the court's reasoning) should these brats, trying to claw their way out of ignorance, be allowed to undermine the Florida public school system's proud reputation for, ah, insufficiency? A vast, thundering irony here is that the constitution, besides requiring uniformity in education, mandates schools of "high quality"!

A basic question here: What's the purpose of public schools? Developing and sharpening the intellectual faculties, one would suppose. From which it should follow that those who pay for the schools, i.e. taxpayers, should constantly goad the schools to higher levels of performance. I mean, am I wrong? High performance doesn't count? Tells against you, in fact, in constitutional terms?

Florida's chief justice, Barbara J. Pariente, objects, in the majority opinion, that private schools aren't "uniform" with the public schools partly because, being private, they don't have to follow state standards. Why, they don't even have to teach "the history of the Holocaust or the story of Hispanics' and women's contributions to the United States." Imagine it if you can -- schools of "high quality" emerging in such an intellectually deprived environment!

More to the point, shouldn't one count as an unalloyed blessing the absence of public school standards in private schools? If the public schools' standards were as high the privates', demand for vouchers would figure on the merest handful of political wish lists.

It was, of course, those partly -- at the very least -- responsible for the present debased state of public education who set out to sink Florida's voucher system. The National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers stand, as ever, in the way of reform and progress. If the schools are bad, still they provide jobs, and the jobs provide dues money for the unions, and so on. Seeing a handful of Florida parents attack vouchers in court, the unions joined in with gusto, along with the usual leftwing suspects, notably the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

The NAACP's participation in the attack on vouchers should particularly engage us. We're going to advance "colored people" how? We're going to stick them in inferior schools and make sure they stay there -- apparently, that's how. Did I mention that the denizens of Florida's failing schools are mostly black? A mere detail, such as the NAACP chooses not to bother with, in part no doubt because the teachers' unions are reliable allies in the liberals' ongoing war against Bush-ism and whatnot.

Speaking of that particular war, it's well to note the reemergence of the Florida Supreme Court -- last heard from during the 2000 election ruckus -- as a factor in national debate. The U.S. Supreme Court, you'll recall, took on the election contest away from the Florida court, amid some national clamor. The voucher decision doesn't prove the Florida justices were wrong in their analysis of how the votes should be counted. It does raise a serious question: Would it have been better had we let a court as purblind as Florida's choose the president of the whole, entire United States?