There used to be -- generally speaking -- something called rules, and they used to be acknowledged as -- generally speaking -- a good thing.
Through differentiating the possibilities in human behavior -- rewarding some possibilities, penalizing others -- the rules definitely eased social stresses. Courts or policemen rarely enforced the rules. People did that, from friends to neighbors to cane-waving grannies.
Among the rules: no grabbing or groping women.
You'll be guessing at this point, gentle reader, that the point I would make concerns Arnold Schwarzenegger and the, ah, um, reputedly direct way in which he once made female acquaintanceships.
On the other hand, isn't there a lot more here than just plain old did he or didn't he? The point is, what happens when the rules go down, and it's Katie bar the door -- or sock the boor?
Human nature being human nature, impolite behavior between men and women doesn't exactly qualify as news (unless, it seems, the man in question is seeking high office), but rules and expectations used to govern such behavior. These rules and expectations got handed down generationally, often in forceful form.
George Bernard Shaw lampooned rules as "middle-class morality" -- without disclosing to his audiences what was wrong either with the middle classes or with morality The middle classes manifestly had their lapses, but they did work to keep the lid on things.
A particular point on which they insisted was that a man shouldn't be a man and nothing else. He should be a gentle-man, normally rendered as "gentleman." I note this datum inasmuch as only a few decrepit, wing-collared relics recall when "gentleman" was more than a name suggesting to males which restroom door they were to enter.
The rules said that a gentleman did certain things and refrained from other things -- or, at any rate, was expected to.
Among these latter things was the practice known as Taking Advantage. The Los Angeles Times' election-eve disclosures about Arnold suggest (or more than suggest) that he Took Advantage of certain unwary women. If the charge should stick, the very least one can say is that he shouldn't have done so. You can't say he plainly shouldn't have done so, inasmuch as nothing is plain anymore. The rules that used to take care of such eventualities dropped into disuse some three decades ago.
Feminism -- women's lib, it was called back then -- asserted the constitutional and political equality of men and women. Back then, you might not have recognized the assertion as an invitation to a groping party, but men (the brutes!) drew that hopeful conclusion from circumstances.
Clinton Loses The Washington Post: "Use of Private E-mail Shows Poor Regard For Public Trust" | Katie Pavlich
That Time Hillary’s State Department Booted An Ambassador For Using…A Private Email Account | Matt Vespa
WH Counsel's Office: Wait, Hillary Used Her Personal Email While She Was Secretary Of State? | Matt Vespa