"[W]e have taken another step in the nuclear progress and launched more than 3,000 centrifuge machines, installing a new cascade every week," Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced this week.
The world will watch and do nothing while Iran creates a nuclear arsenal, Ahmadinejad bragged. Political players within Iran, Ahmadinejad told a gathering of Iranian academics, were pushing for compromise with the West. But, Ahmadinejad said, there is no reason for compromise: "God says that those who walk in the path of righteousness will be victorious. What reason can you have for believing God will not keep this promise?"
Ahmadinejad may be a kook, but he's no dummy. He has only one assurance that the United States will turn a blind eye to his nuclear weapons program: the assurance that the American anti-war left will stop any prospective military action cold.
Normally, the American anti-war left is a fringe element. In the aftermath of the Iraq War, however, many Americans are wary of another military entanglement in another Islamic country. Americans are particularly nervous about the prospect of military action against an Islamic country over weapons of mass destruction.
Ahmadinejad's strategy is simple: Imitate Saddam Hussein circa 2002-2003. Americans largely regret the invasion of Iraq; over 50 percent of Americans now believe that entering Iraq was a mistake. Saddam's behavior, Americans now say, did not justify war.
Which means that all Ahmadinejad must do is imitate Saddam's behavior to the letter. In the lead-up to the war, Saddam Hussein prevaricated about the status of his WMD programs; he vacillated between stonewalling and appeasing UN weapons inspectors. Most of all, Saddam talked tough. The popular view is that Saddam was playing games because he faced opposition within his own regime, and therefore had no choice but to stand up to the Americans.