According to a recent report by Citizens Against Government Waste, a nonpartisan organization dedicated to eliminating fiscal waste and mismanagement in the federal government, fiscal 2003 was rife with increases in "pork spending," or projects that use taxpayer dollars to benefit special interests. According to the report, our legislators squandered a record $22.5 billion in pork in 2003. That represents a 12 percent increase from fiscal 2002, and a 337 percent increase over the past five years.
Now one would think that a war and a $300 billion deficit would be cause for fiscal restraint. That is, after all, the general practice. During World War II and the Korean War, Congress pared back pork spending and dedicated its resources to keeping the country safe.
Despite the new economic and military demands that accompanied the war in Iraq, our legislators continue to pork without a conscience, effectively siphoning money from the defense of this country. Among the more egregious examples recorded by the CAGW report:
The list goes on, endlessly and senselessly.
CAGW president, Thomas A Schatz, links the record increase in pork spending to delays in passing the 2003 budget. Though fiscal 2003 began in October, Congress did not approve all of its spending bills until February. Those delays may have allowed legislators to sneak in extra pork. "When they (Congress) finally reached an agreement by combining 11 of the 13 appropriations bills, members had just a few hours to comb through the 1,500-page bill before voting. As a result, juicy morsels of pork went unnoticed and unquestioned, "says Schatz.
Not surprisingly, those states with powerful appropriators led the way in pork spending. Sen. Stevens (R-Alaska), Sen. Inouye (D-Hawaii), and Sen. Byrd (D-WV) were first, second and fifth respectively in pork spending. They are all on the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations. This abuse of power is particularly deplorable given our current commitment to debt forgiveness and nation building in Iraq. Some economists estimate that the rebuilding effort could push the price tag for war upwards of $200 billion. That will require a dramatic increase in military and foreign spending. Against this backdrop, it is more important than ever to use the taxpayer dollars wisely.
As Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld stated during June 2001 Congressional testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee: "We are not treating the taxpayer's dollars with respect - and by not doing so.we are depriving the man and women of Armed Forces of the training, equipment and facilities they need to accomplish their missions. They deserve better."
We are committed to a war against terrorism. Already that war has played itself out in Afghanistan and Iraq. Other phases will follow. Ensuring the success of this war and securing the safety of U.S. interests will place new demands on the treasury. Now, more than ever, we need to cut down on government waste.
A good start would be to create rules of accountability for those agencies charged with spending our tax dollars. That means linking federal appropriations to some baseline of accountability. We are at war. We need to demand that our legislators stop raiding the treasury to line their own coffers.
Lt. Col. Oliver North: Someone Needs to Tell The Truth, Obama's ISIS Strategy is Mission Impossible | Katie Pavlich
Townhall Magazine's October Issue Preview: Obamacare's Illegal Insurance Company Bailout | Conn Carroll