Needless to say, the Times was duly indignant about all the blacks at the Republican Convention, denouncing the Republicans for their "strategic deployment of blacks as props," calling it a "form of minstrelsy" and "dressing up in blackface." Republicans may not be winning huge majorities of black votes, but at least we don't think we own them. We have blacks, too. Tough luck.
According to the Times, it was an outrage for Republicans to allow blacks to speak at their convention, "given the party's recent history of code words and writing off the minority vote." Actually, those aren't "code words." The Republican Party fully and forthrightly opposes race discrimination, socialism, and laws that attempt to punish free speech ("hate crimes"). The party also candidly supports free markets, the death penalty and welfare reform -- among other Democrat issues that are supposed to be Rorschach blots for latent racism.
The utter failure of a sizable portion of blacks to adopt these views is not Republicans writing off blacks; it's blacks writing off Republican positions. It would be nice if more blacks voted Republican. It would be nice if everyone voted more Republican, including white men in Mississippi. (In 1984, nine out of 10 white men in Mississippi voted for Reagan.)
The real oddity about the parties is that the Democrats can't get white men to vote for them. Except in the landslide election in 1964, Democrats haven't been able to get a majority of men to vote for their candidate in any presidential election since 1944.
(I hasten to add that the 1964 landslide was against Barry Goldwater, who may have been solid on the Viet Cong issue, but he was very, very bad on all the "social issues," including abortion. Like John McCain, Goldwater went on to attack the Religious Right, saying every good Christian should kick Jerry Falwell in the buttocks. So spare me complaints about the cultural issues costing Republicans votes.)