Sen. Barack Obama (D.-Ill.) is sponsoring an amendment to the Senate’s immigration bill to strip language that would require employers to verify the social security numbers of their workers unless there is “suspicion of unlawful employment.”
The third year senator, hoping to secure his party’s nomination for President, believes requiring employers to verify legal status is an “unnecessary” hurdle. Senators Max Baucus (D.-Mont.) and Chuck Grassley (R.-Iowa) are co-sponsoring the amendment.
Under the system already in place, the Social Security Administration has the ability to flag suspicious Social Security numbers that are filed on W-2 tax forms, which is why Obama believes employers should not be forced to verify their workers’ social security numbers.
The Senate’s bill, as it is currently written, would require employers to verify the legal status of their employees within three years.
Obama’s congressional website said this amendment would “make it simple, but mandatory, for employers to verify that their employees are legally eligible to work in the United States.” His presidential campaign website says the “new employment eligibility verification system” would make getting work verification “fair to legal workers and tougher on employees.”
In a June 19 letter to the amendment’s sponsors, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff said passage of the amendment would “be a serious step backwards in our enforcement effort.” The letter was also addressed to Sen. Arlen Specter (R.-Pa.) and Sen. Ted Kennedy (D.-Mass.), chief negotiators of the bill.
Chertoff said the amendment “eliminates needed tools and allows unscrupulous business to continue to freely hire illegal workers.” Grassley-Baucus-Obama also contains language to put a 5-year limit on the amount of time the Department of Homeland Security, the Internal Revenue Service and Social Security Administration could share tax information.
"In the end, the Grassley-Baucus-Obama amendment unfortunately fuels public skepticism about whether enforcement will work or political forces will frustrate serious efforts to bring employers into compliance with the law," Chertoff's letter said.
In a reply letter to Chertoff, the three sponsors of the amendment said the secretary’s criticism was “erroneous and misleading.” They also said their provision to limit the amount of time government agencies could share tax information was “standard practice when allowing access to private taxpayer data for the first time for a new purpose.”