Republican presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain (R.-Ariz.) defended the Senate immigration bill despite receiving harsh criticism from all nine of the GOP’s other candidates during the presidential debate in New Hampshire Monday.
The current bill is a revamped version of the 2006 “McCain-Kennedy” immigration bill the Arizona senator wrote with the liberal Sen. Ted Kennedy (D.-Mass.).
Both bills have been labeled “amnesty” by the conservative base. When asked about their positions on immigration, Republican candidates took the opportunity to bash the legislation, calling it a “mess,” “unfair” and even “disastrous.”
Not one to shy from a fight, the former P.O.W. McCain suggested that they visit the Vietnam Memorial in Washington, D.C. There, “you’ll find a whole lot of Hispanic names,” he said.
He went on: “When you go to Iraq or Afghanistan today, you’re going to see a whole lot of people who are of Hispanic background. You’re even going to meet some of the few thousand that are still green card holders who are not even citizens of this country, who love this country so much that they’re willing to risk their lives in its service in order to accelerate their path to citizenship and enjoy the bountiful, blessed nation.”
McCain also took care to single out immigration hawk Rep. Tom Tancredo (Colo.) who is also running for President. During the debate McCain supported a statement made by New Hampshire Sen. Judd Gregg (R.) that Tancredo was part of the “know nothing wing” of the political spectrum.
“I agree with Judd Gregg. He’s a great senator,” McCain said.
To warrant this dig, Tancredo had vowed earlier to “do what is ever [sic] necessary to try to stop this piece of legislation, and that includes go after any Republican that votes for it, because the Republicans can stop this.”
Under pressure from the other candidates clamoring against him, McCain admitted: “This is not the bill I would have written.” He then challenged, “If someone else has a better idea. I’d love to have them give it to us, that will get the support of enough people so that we can pass legislation.”
Rudy Giuliani, former New York City mayor, said the bill was a typical “Washington mess” with too many compromises.
“The litmus test you should have for legislation is, ‘Is it going to make things better?’ And when you look at these compromises, it is quite possible it will make things worse,” he said.
A “fatal flaw” of the bill, according to Giuliani, is that it does not call for a database to identify who exits the country. “Now tell me how you’re going to figure out who’s in the United States, if you can’t figure out whose left the United States,” he asked.