Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, May 21, 2007
Wynton Hall :: Townhall.com Columnist
Take the Conservative Challenge
by Wynton Hall
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



In their new book, Landmark Speeches of the American Conservative Movement, Wynton Hall and Peter Schweizer, research fellows at the Hoover Institution, have compiled thirteen speeches from prominent conservative figures to capture the modern American conservative movement. The collection of speeches illustrates the core fundamental values and principles resonating through the conservative movement today. Before reading the book, however, take the conservative challenge quiz and test your knowledge of landmark speeches of the American conservative movement.

1. Who gave the first public statement to lay the foundation for American anticommunism, which is one of the pillars of the American conservative movement?

a. Ronald Reagan

b. Whittaker Chambers

c. Alger Hiss

d. Senator Joseph McCarthy

2. Which famous Yale University graduate said this in his epic commencement address: “Our concern for deficiencies in America must not cause us to indict the principles that have allowed our country, its faults notwithstanding, to tower over the nations of the world as a citadel of freedom and wealth.”

a. Calvin Coolidge

b. George W. Bush

c. George H.W. Bush

d. William F. Buckley

3. Who saved the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with a powerful speech, delivered minutes before the vote in the Senate?

a. Everett Dirksen

b. Barry Goldwater

c. Ronald Reagan

d. William F. Buckley

4. One of the most remarkable lines in conservative movement history: “I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” Who said it?

a. Ronald Reagan, in his 1981 Inaugural Address

b. Barry Goldwater, in his acceptance speech at 1964 GOP Convention

c. George W. Bush, in remarks to Congress following the 9-11 attacks

d. Patrick Henry, speaking to the Virginia House of Burgesses

5. Who said, “Those who would trade our freedom for the soup kitchen of the welfare state have told us that they have a utopian solution of peace without victory … And they say if we only avoid any direct confrontation with the enemy, he will forget his evil ways and learn to love us. All who oppose them are indicted as warmongers.” And “You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.”

a. George W. Bush

b. Dick Cheney

c. Newt Gingrich

d. Ronald Reagan

6. What female conservative luminary coined the famous phrase “No good deed goes unpunished”?

a. Margaret Thatcher

b. Phyllis Schlafly

c. Clare Boothe Luce

d. Elizabeth Caty Stanton— —

7. Who said “Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem,” which essentiallyoutlined the modern conservative approach to free-market philosophy in a single sentence?

a. Ronald Reagan

b. Newt Gingrich

c. Rush Limbaugh

d. George W. Bush

8. Who said, “While America’s military strength is important, let me add here that I’ve always maintained that the struggle now going on for the world will never be decided by bombs or rockets, by armies or military might. The real crisis we face today is a spiritual one; at root, it is a test of moral will and faith.”

a. Pat Robertson

b. Charles Krauthammer

c. Jerry Falwell

d. Ronald Reagan

9. Which visionary conservative launched a rhetorical attack against secularism in public school textbooks as early as 1987?

a. William F. Buckley

b. Dinesh D’Souza

c. William F. Bennett

d. Phyllis Schlafly

10. When she was selected as the commencement speaker at Wellesley College, 150 out of 600 graduating seniors protested, signing a petition that read, “[She] has gained recognition through the achievements of her husband … [Wellesley] teaches us that we will be rewarded on the basis of our own merit, not on thatof a spouse.” She decided to speak anyway, and defend her choice to be a full-time wife and mother to adecidedly hostile, feminist crowd. Who was she?

a. Clare Booth Luce

b. Phyllis Schlafly

c. Barbara Bush

d. Labor Secretary Elaine Chao

11. Which American conservative said this in his Acceptance Speech: “We must replace the welfare state with an opportunity society”?

a. Ronald Reagan

b. George W. Bush

c. Newt Gingrich

d. Calvin Coolidge

12. Which speech not only needed to heal a nation, but established a new direction in American foreign policy?

a. George W. Bush’s post-9-11 televised speech to the nation

b. Ronald Reagan, in 1983 after the bombing of the Beirut barracks

c. Gerald Ford after the fall of Saigon in 1975

d. Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address

1.) Answer: B. Whittaker Chambers. Whittaker Chambers’s August 3, 1948, testimony before the House Committee on Un-American Activities included the public naming of U.S. governmental officials whom Chambers claimed had served as associates during his life as a Soviet subversive. The testimony transformed Chambers into a conservative icon.

2.) Answer: D. William F. Buckley. Buckley’s June 11, 1950, Class Day Oration at Yale University foreshadowed the blistering attack he would later unleash in his first and most famous book, God & Man at Yale. The book’s success encouraged him to then found the magazine, National Review, which is considered the gathering place for conservative thought.

3.) Answer: A. Everett Dirksen.Illinois Senator Everett Dirksen delivered his speech, “The Time Has Come,” on June 10, 1964, just minutes before the U.S. Senate was to vote to shut down Democrats’ filibuster attempt to torpedo the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Dirksen, who was then the Republican Minority Leader, challenged Republicans to live up to the party’s mantle as being “The Party of Lincoln” and to do the right thing, even though Republicans would get zero credit from black voters for stopping Democrats like former Klansman Robert Byrd from defeating the bill. After Dirksen’s speech, 27 out of 33 Republicans joined with Dirksen in ensuring equality for blacks, even as 22 Democrats voted to keep the filibuster alive, and therefore ensure the bill’s defeat.

4.) Answer: B. Barry Goldwater. Goldwater’s July 16, 1964, Acceptance Speech at the Republican National Convention in San Francisco, California, is striking in that it stuck firmly to conservative convictions and seemed to almost taunt anyone who disagreed. While Goldwater’s bid for the presidency ended in a landslide defeat, out from the electoral ashes rose a young breed of principled and committed conservatives who propelled the movement for the generation to come.

5.) Answer: D. Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan’s speech, “A Time for Choosing,” (AKA “The Speech”),was delivered and televised October 27, 1964, in support of Barry Goldwater’s presidential bid. The speech electrified the television audience and showcased Reagan’s political talents while utilizing his skills as a Hollywood actor. The speech put Reagan on the national political map and two years later he became Governor of California.

6.) Answer. C. Clare Boothe Luce In the pantheon of figures associated with the American conservative movement, perhaps none has lived a more eclectic life than playwright, journalist, congresswoman, and ambassador Clare Boothe Luce. In her 1978 address, “Is the New Morality Destroying America?” Luce attacks the moral corruptions of a sexually permissive culture and offers a prophetic warning about what such attitudes may mean for America’s future.

7.) Answer: A. Ronald Reagan. President Reagan’s January 20, 1981, Inaugural Address represents awatershed rhetorical event wherein a president declares government the problem. The speech was also unique in that it broke presidential tradition and was delivered on the West Front of the Capitol.

8.) Answer: D. Ronald Reagan. President Reagan’s “Evil Empire” speech, delivered on March 8, 1983, before the National Association of Evangelicals in Orlando, Florida, sent shockwaves through the media universe. Reagan’s speech cited Scripture and the words of C.S. Lewis and argued that the Cold War and the Culture War were really a spiritual battle. Not surprisingly, liberals and European elites shrieked in horror.

9.) Answer: D. Phyllis Schlafly. On June 28, 1987, conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly appeared before the Conference of the Legal Services of the NYC Board of Education and delivered her powerful speech, “Child Abuse in the Classroom.” Schlafly, best known as the woman who single-handedly brought down the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), is frequently cited by many female conservatives—Ann Coulter most notable among them—as a hero (or “heroine,” as liberals would have it).

10.) Answer: C. Barbara Bush. While not often thought of as a “conservative icon,” First Lady Barbara Bush’s Wellesley College commencement speech drew national attention when feminist students protested Mrs. Bush’s invitation to speak at Wellesley (Hillary Clinton’s alma mater) and sparked a national controversy. The feminist protestors objected to Barbara Bush as commencement speaker because she had made the choice to be a stay-at-home mother. Bush’s speech, which was recently rated by top scholars as one of the top 100 American speeches of the last century, challenged Americans to support a woman’s right to choose whatever career path she wished. Bush won the audience over with her stirring address and received a standing ovation.

11.) Answer: D. Newt Gingrich. On January 4, 1995, Newt Gingrich stood before the congress and delivered his Acceptance Speech as Speaker of the House. The speech laid out the blueprint for the Contract with America, the proposal that helped break Democrats’ 40-year reign and take back the congress.

12.) Answer: A. George W. Bush. Roundly considered President George W. Bush’s finest rhetorical performance, Bush’s September 20, 2001, address before a joint session of Congress was watched by an estimated 80 million Americans. In the speech, Bush laid out his doctrine for fighting and winning the War on Terror. As Bush said in his speech, “Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or justice to our enemies, justice will be done.” Also: “We will not tire. We will not falter. We will not fail.” Apparently Sen. Harry Reid missed that part.<

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Wynton Hall is a Visiting Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and author of "The Right Words: Great Republican Speeches That Shaped History".

Be the first to read Wynton Hall’s column.
Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
Sign up today
EvilLeftist thy name is traitors
Jimmy Carter sucking up to every d****d pot-bellied dictator and Commie.

Bill Clinton giving away tech goodies to his good buddies and political campaign supporters, the Red Chinese.

Conservatives protect, defend and love America. EvilLeftists hate it and want it destroyed. Any other explanation for that abomination of a bill on illegal immigration in Congress???

Why I am no longer a libertarian
Why I am no longer a libertarian, except on economics. Ron Paul's EvilLeftist-style Blame America for Sept. 11 is why.

Libertarian views on American foreign policy are joke. This is the 21st century. Fortress America has been declared technologically obsolete by at least a century of communications, transportation, and military technological developments.

And if you read Dangerous Nation by Robert Kagan, you'll learn that American disentanglement from the rest of the world in the 18th and 19th century was just a myth.

We played international hardball since the American revolution.

The libertarian mythos may have sounded good for awhile, but after Sept. 11, hell after the World Wars, it's just plain sick.

The Ron Paul Rebellion
"We saw, dramatized on national television and in ensuing media discussion, the two worldviews that may battle it out over the next year or so for control of the Republican Party—and possibly the country itself—with ramifications well beyond Election 2008. The one Rudy Giuliani represents (which is that of the Bush clan, the neocons, and the corporatist elite generally): the U.S. is an empire obliged or destined to rule the world, capable of building “democracies” in the Middle East and perhaps elsewhere, relying on a value system based on money and power. Power does not necessarily corrupt. We peons should fall in line behind our leaders.

The second, which Ron Paul represents, sees the U.S. as a Constitutional republic with a limited government, believes that sound economics requires sound money (not our present fiat dollar), would distinguish genuine free enterprise from corporatism, and advocate a foreign policy of trade with all but entangling alliances with none—i.e., a foreign policy rooted in respect for other nations’ sovereignty and their right to self-determination. Other nations’ internal affairs are not our business unless we are explicitly invited in.

This is not simply a clash between “left” and “right,” or between “liberal” and “conservative.” We may be approaching a major dust-up between those who want freedom and those who want power, between those who believe society must be aggressively centralized and those who wish to see power dispersed. We may see a struggle between those who want policies that allow the common man to live as he sees fit if he isn’t bothering anyone else, and a cadre of oligarchs who view the world as theirs, and who see themselves as unaccountable."

READ THE REST HERE:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Yates/steven26.htm

Ron Paul. The REAL conservative.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com

If you want the only candidate
currently in the race who actually advocates these principles in policy statements and a campaign platform, you need to visit my website, JOEOLIVAFORPRESIDENT.ORG.
Every iota of those principles are what I propose, and if you think that any Democrat OR Republican evens come close to doing anything like it you are mistaken.
If we elect another Dem/GOP President in 2008, you are guaranteed to be voting for more big government and a continuing decline in personal freedoms, and with them the beginning of the end of America as we have known her and loved her. This election is too important to return power once again to the same elites who always promise something new but always give us the same old same old. It is time to ignore the propaganda of both parties and choose a return to the Constitution, rule of law, and will of the people as the principles by which we govern ourselves as a free people.
Check out the site, send me your comments, pro or con, but let's not deceive ourselves any longer that the the same two parties who have been slowly destroying this great nation are going to do anything other than seek power for power's sake, and all the rest be damned! Think about it. Thanks, Joe

"Conservatives...

...don't like losing wars".

How very true. The US losing a war is as immoral as a live birth abortion. Most people assume that Ford lost the 1976 election to Jimmy Carter because of Ford's pardon of Nixon. I disagree. Nixon's pardon is the excuse, the fall of Saigon the reason. It was the images of helicopters on the US Embassy roof in Saigon rescuing refuges from the victorious North Vietnamese Army that doomed Ford. It's tribal. The chief that loses a war loses his throne.

Bush is now losing the peace. He should have packed up our military the minute we had Saddam Hussein in custody. Bush snatched defeat from the jaws of victory because of the Western concept that we couldn't just kick Iraq's a** and leave. It's not, well, "civilized", Old Chap. Well, neither is "re-deploying" and neither is IED's killing an American soldier a day while garrisoned.

conservative courage
Its too bad that GWB didn`t believe all he said. I have to wonder if the other people actually meant what they said. I am sure someof them did. We are hated around the world not because of all the good we do but because we are able to. And that embarrasses them. Sad state of affairs.

America's Future


These next 2 years are vital to the future of this country. For 2007 we must make certain that McCain/Kennedy or whatever it's called this year does not pass the House. It will pass the Senate. The President will sign it, followed by the Totalization Treaty with Mexico, which qualifies former illegals with just 6 qtrs(18 mo) even if worked illegally, the benefits that we had to work 40 qtrs(10 yrs) to qualify for.

In 2008 we must make the candidates address border security and immigration enforcement.
20-30 million citizens of other countries are in our country illegally, 55% from Mexico, most of the rest from other Central and South American countries. Let's not ignore the leftward voting trends of these countries. It is notable that they picked May Day, an old communist day of celebration for their marches.

Most polls show at least half of the American citizens of Hispanic descent want the borders and laws enforced. Republicans will not win by alienating their current voters to get 40% of a new small block that will grow very large, very fast if amnesty is granted. That will grow the Democrats vote larger and faster as the influx increases exponentially as the result of another amnesty. It will spell the end of the Republican Party. The people who used to vote Republican will stop voting or form a new party. Conservatives will lose political influence and we will slide inexorably towards socialism (it has already started).

Most of what you hear about this issue is political propaganda that tries to convince you to give up your country without a fight, including on Fox News. The big money players are all on board the cheap labor express, they care not that American citizens do not want another amnesty. We know the last one resulted in 10 times the number of illegal aliens and a general disregard of our laws. The next one will be equally successful.

We need Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement, not reform. We need to restore respect for the law and the faith of the American people that their government is not selling them out. Amnesty for the illegal aliens is also amnesty for the corrupt companies who have been employing them. Money trumps everything, including love of country. Multi-nationals have no loyalty to country by definition, they see us as a market, not a nation. They see people as workers, documented or undocumented, no difference. If they can't send the work to where the labor is cheaper, then they want to bring the cheap labor here. Citizenship is meaningless.

If we love our Constitution and our representative Republic and we intend to keep it we must not surrender our sovereignty or abandon the rule of law. Profits must not supercede security. We should not create a new path to citizenship. We have a path to citizenship, more generous than any other country, illegal aliens have ignored it and bad choices do have consequences.

the quiz
missed 8,9,11

The opportunity society I thought would be
GWB because he was using it for social security
reform and education I thought would be tied to
Bennett.

Anyways, I would like to see more on Coolidge
and Hoover. And IKE!

I'm sure I'll pick up the book sooner than
later. Anyone have any recommendations on
books of sources for American conservative
thought other than this one?

leftisevil
You know Liberals that claim they loved Reagan?
Many Liberals supported Bush the elders foreign
policy but not his domestic policies. I'd like
to hear from some who have changed their mind.

Now if they change their minds on Bush the Younger
they would not be Liberals just as they would
not be Libs if they now thought Reagan's thought
was correct. Now this is different than saying
you like what happened during a presidency like
the ending of the Cold War.

I got 8 right
I got 8 of the 12 right.

I thought that old chestnut--no good deed goes unpunished--went back at least as far as Cady Stanton's era.

It probably actually went back to the time of the builders of the pyramids. :)

* * *

Liberals will one day claim to have just LOVED George W., the way they now claim they just LOVED Reagan and Bush the Elder.

Hypocrisy, thy name is EvilLeftists!

Wars that Conservatives Don’t Like

Interesting reflection on why conservatives are turning on Bush’s Iraq and how it’s playing out in the Republican presidential primary.

Andrew Sullivan: The 20 percent or so of Americans who still think we’re winning in Iraq happen to be the Republican base. And so the GOP in Congress has to pick between surviving their own primaries, maintaining civility with their own faithful, and potentially getting wiped out in the next election. The game of chicken is getting very intense. I guess we’ll know how strong the kool-aid is by September.

The paradox, of course, is that a major source of disaffection with the war is from the right. Conservatives don’t like half-assed wars - and this one has been under-planned, under-manned and chaotically strategized. Conservatives don’t like losing wars; and this president has been overseeing meltdown in Iraq and war without end. Conservatives tend to think armies should be about fighting and winning conflicts; but Bush has forced the US military to be nation-builders, religious peace-makers, torturers, and civil war policemen. Conservatives believe wars should be in the national interest; and let’s just say that grinding your military into the dust for the sake of “democracy” in a place where few even understand it and those who do have left is arguably not in the national interest.

And yet no major Republican candidate can yet express the sentiment articulated by William F. Buckley last week. McCain seems to be grappling toward such a posture. But the GOP would be well served by an actual debate on the war, how it’s metastasized beyond the original purpose, how it’s become a way to increase rather than reduce the terror threat, and how to win it or cut our losses. I see no way this necessary debate will happen unless an anti-war Republican runs for president. Senator Hagel, your time may be now.

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/wars-that-conservatives-don%e2%80%99t-like

Jimmy Carter
You missed two. I missed all but two.

Among the Luminaries
I missed number 11. Darn. I think the statements I'm making about the important issues of immigration and abortion on my blog might someday put me in this group of luminaries. Or, maybe not. :-)

Loved the test.
I missed nos. 3 and 10.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.