Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, February 08, 2007
William Rusher :: Townhall.com Columnist
Beware of the golden boy
by William Rusher
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


I will confess that, as a conservative with Republican leanings, I have long nurtured a healthy fear of John Edwards. As a former senator from North Carolina, who burst onto the political scene after amassing a huge fortune as a trial lawyer, Edwards has always seemed (not least to himself) destined for higher things. When the Democrats nominated him for vice president on John Kerry's ticket in 2004, I expected him to turn in a brilliant performance in the campaign.

Instead, he simply disappeared. I can barely remember seeing him mentioned in the media at all between the convention and election. In retrospect, it seems likely that this was largely the doing of Kerry's managers, who, quite simply, feared comparisons. They worried, with reason, that their man, who roughly resembles a badly kippered herring, would suffer in contrast to the youthful and strikingly handsome Golden Boy from North Carolina. If there was a photograph of the two of them together taken during the campaign, I must have missed it.

Edwards' single term in the Senate was up in 2004, and he courageously decided not to run again in order to devote his whole energy to the national race. (Compare Lyndon Johnson, who ran for re-election to the Senate in 1960 rather than bet his whole career on his simultaneous nomination as JFK's running-mate.) Since then, Edwards has returned to private life and prepared himself for a run at the presidency in 2008. Once again I have been surprised at his relative invisibility; but this may have been a deliberate strategic move, for he has now declared his candidacy and is starting to show up all over the place.

In all the obvious ways, Edwards is a formidable challenger. He may not be able (yet) to raise as much money from supporters as Hillary Clinton, but (as noted above) he has made millions of dollars as a successful trial lawyer, and could probably buy Hillary's mansions in Chautauqua, N.Y., and Washington out of his pocket change.

He is also fiendishly handsome, and looks gracefully young at 53. He has a good-looking family, and incurred considerable sympathy when his wife was diagnosed with breast cancer shortly after the 2004 campaign ended. (She seems to have been treated successfully since.) As might be expected of a successful trial lawyer, he is highly articulate, but blessedly free of legalese. He comes across as just an attractive North Carolina farm boy, who wants to do what is best for his country.

And what is that? In the Senate his most important vote was in support of our invasion of Iraq -- a vote he now frankly condemns as a "mistake." But in his politics in general, and especially since letting his ambitions for 2008 become known, Edwards has hammered out a position that is rather strikingly far to the left. For one thing, he wants us to start pulling out of Iraq -- now.

And, again and again, he has described the United States as consisting of "two Americas" -- one small and almost ridiculously rich, and another that is large and just barely scraping by. This is the politics of class envy with a vengeance, and Edwards seems convinced that it is exactly what the doctor ordered for the Democratic Party. On "Meet the Press" recently, he fleshed out this vision by putting forth a healthcare proposal that would cover all Americans, cost upward of $100 billion a year, and require increased taxes.

Finally, Edwards possesses one further attribute that gives him an edge over all the other serious candidates for the Democratic nomination: He is from the South. When you reflect that the only two Democrats who have been elected to the presidency in nearly 50 years were also Southerners, that is an asset not to be sneezed at.

Watching Edwards on television, I am torn between admiration of his finesse and a deep wariness over whether somebody so glib can possibly be real. A good many other Americans may come to share that doubt. But this country cheerfully elected Bill Clinton twice, and he was surely the King of Glibness. So keep your eye on John Edwards.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

William Rusher is a Distinguished Fellow of the Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy and author of How to Win Arguments .

Be the first to read William Rusher's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

John Edwards
February 9, 2007
Wealth, Power and John Edwards

By R. E. Smith Jr.

Down-home Southern rich boy, Johnny Edwards, tried to shoot for the presidential moon and, along with John Kerry, fizzled. Now he’s recharged and ready to fight for one of his “two Americas”—the one on the left. Currently, on the TV circuit, Edwards moons the voters with a “I plan to raise taxes” figurative bumper-sticker on his, ah, rear-end.

Overt campaign threats to raise taxes bring the political kiss-of-death; even though all politicians will invariably and covertly join the spend and tax crowd, after the election.

I don’t envy Edward’s youth, energy and good looks, although I’ve lost mine. I’m not envious of his vast wealth, although I am suspicious about how he earned it. Trial lawyers have the ability to use our judicial system to enrich themselves by convincing courts to distribute other people’s money. I think it’s great that Edwards can afford a mansion and opulent living. I don’t begrudge that.

It’s his arrogant attitude, hypocritical talk and socialist views that I can’t abide.

Raleigh News & Observer headline: “Edwards offers up a $120 billion a year universal health plan” His scheme would incorporate a “patchwork” of programs and require a tax increase. He would tax mostly “the wealthy.” As pointed out by this writer in other essays, “universal” health care means socialized medicine. That results in high taxes on workers, reduced quality of care and long waits for services.

Edwards says he would “spread” the high costs of insuring the uninsured “among employers, employees and the government.” He may have been brilliant in law school, but this rhetoric shows ignorance of or disdain for economics. Employers won’t pay the cost, they’ll reduce employee’s pay, and/or pass it on to consumers. And government can pay out only what it takes from taxpayers. Guess who will be the targets of these costs?

No matter what government health care scheme prevails, individual taxpayers will pay the costs. For example, estimates here in North Carolina show that covering every citizen would require an additional tax of nearly $1000 per month on each working taxpayer. Most workers could not support that, if it were suddenly imposed. So, the socialist agenda incrementally patches together “universal” health care. Neither Edwards nor his plan can be trusted.

Just after the 2004 presidential campaign John Edwards revealed his divisive and leftist self. While even John Kerry graciously accepted defeat, Edwards showed hostility. At that time I wrote:

“John Edwards isn’t interested in domestic peace that should come at the end of our recent, spirited and contentious political presidential campaign. According to him, ‘The fight has just begun.’ He sounded bitter and angry the day after the election, threatening to fight on.

Instead of standing with most Americans, anxious for leadership to defeat or contain the Islamic terrorists, Edwards talked only of warring against a majority. The ‘cause’ he spoke of was never understood—only an us-against-you attitude came forth.

Sen. Edwards was battling against America ‘18 hours a day, seven days a week,’ according to his estimate. Earlier in the campaign he fought against our powerful economy, saying its lights were ‘flickering,’ and disdainfully made fun of eBay, a $66 billion company. One business economist wrote that ‘the Kerry-Edwards ticket was out of touch with the changing economy.’”

Edwards knows that his health care income distribution scheme will damage our economy. But, of course, that’s the ultimate goal—make more people dependent on government. He’s dangerous and a hypocrite.

Many wealthy liberals hypocritically promote their causes. In North Carolina, Edwards’ 28,000 square-foot house and recreation complex, on 100 secluded acres near the University of North Carolina liberal enclave at Chapel Hill, is under construction. His sanctimonious pretending to “fight” for the poor rings hollow while he spends over $5 million on land and buildings for his personal use. Until recently, he owned another $5 million “mansion in Washington’s tony Georgetown neighborhood.”

We should not begrudge anyone for earning any amount and spending it in anyway he wishes. But people who say they truly care about those who have less, and live a lavish lifestyle, rhetorically don’t ring true; they become ineffective and unpersuasive.

Edwards’ advisors don’t think people care about the incongruence between his poor-talk and his personal extravagance. Some try to justify Edwards’ quest for power. A Democrat supporter in Chapel Hill, quoted in an Associated Press article by Mike Baker, said Edwards came from a “humble” background and worked hard to get where he is. Maybe so. But that’s irrelevant. People with good and bad intentions start humble and work hard. Then, the Chapel Hill Democrat said, “He’s out there trying to do some good, and he’s giving back both financially and by what he plans to do….”

Edwards has spent some of his great fortune on campaigning, but he isn’t doing “good” or “giving back.” The reverse is true. Edwards’ health care plan will result in more government spending and regulation—not good. His proposal will bring taxpayer pain and economic damage—taking, not giving.

John Edwards has all the money he wants. He now seeks power and national recognition to elevate his self-esteem. Power does not corrupt everyone, but we should be suspicious of all who seek it by way of government; especially those who want it for John Edwards’ purposes.


Smiling John
This clown's persona might draw some toward him but for me it's apparently a facade. Anyone can see his attempt to position himself with the majority sentiment on every issue. It seems that Edward's ever word is drenched with empty rhetoric. The sad part is he could have a good shot at being elected if he ran against one of the weak Republicans seeking the Presidency. I can no longer put anything past the voting public. The majority of voters probably wouldn't know he ran for vice president last election.

We need a leader, not a consoler or comforter, especially one who does so only to win elections. This reality was only strengthened the other day when I heard one of President Reagan's early speeches. The speech was given at least 30 years ago but it was just as relevant for today's America. Many people disagreed with Reagan on certain issues but they still rallied for him because he knew what he was talking about and he believed in his own message. I don't know if any of the candidates will share this approach but I'm afraid if they don't we'll be stuck with smiling John or one of his equally lackluster friends.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.