The impact of the rejection is palpable. To say just that -- "No" -- to a proffered meeting with the president of the United States fires mutinous juices, and Pan-Arabia lights up.
Some speculate that this would play into the hands of the incumbent: Don't mess with difficult situations in mid-crisis. More likely, this would translate into increased votes for Bush, on the grounds that, without having to opine on this Camp David or that Oslo or that Temple Mount, the diplomatic challenge for the superpower is to keep such things from happening, to the point of upsetting the whole bloody world! and cutting the value of my market investment by 30 percent!! Aaargh!!! Wouldn't Bush get the Aaargh vote?
Persuasive injunctions, but not, at this point, very useful. When at the U.N. Security Council meeting one member argued that a litany of Israeli offenses should be accompanied by a litany of Palestinian offenses, the fruitlessness of that pursuit became evident. So that now, people are asking less, Who was primarily at fault? than, Where do we go from here?
William F. Buckley, Jr. is editor-at-large of National Review, the prolific author of Miles Gone By: A Literary Autobiography.
Be the first to read William Buckley's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.