Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
Walter E. Williams :: Townhall.com Columnist
How much does politics count?
by Walter E. Williams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


Blacks and Hispanics, especially blacks, are the most politically loyal people in the nation. It's often preached and taken as gospel that the only way black people can progress is through racial politics and government programs, but how true is that? Let's look at it.

In 1940, poverty among black families was 87 percent and fell to 47 percent by 1960. Would someone tell me what anti-poverty program or civil-rights legislation accounted for this economic advance that exceeded any other 20-year interval? A significant chunk of that progress occurred through migration from rural areas in the South to big Northern cities. Between 1960 and 1980, black poverty fell roughly 17 percent and fell one percent during the '70s. Might this have been a continuation of a trend starting much earlier, or was it a miracle of the civil-rights movement or President Johnson's War on Poverty?

Dr. Thomas Sowell's research points out that in various skilled trades, the incomes of blacks relative to whites more than doubled between 1936 and 1959. What's more, the rise of blacks in professional and other high-level occupations was greater during the five years preceding the Civil Rights Act of 1964 than the five years afterward.

In 1940, 86 percent of black children were born inside marriage, and the illegitimacy rate among blacks was about 15 percent. Today, 31 percent of black children are born inside marriage, and the illegitimacy rate hovers around 70 percent.

In the mid-1960s, Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan sounded the alarm for the breakdown in the black family in his book "The Negro Family: The Case for National Action." At that time, black illegitimacy was 26 percent. Moynihan said, "[A]t the heart of the deterioration of the fabric of the Negro society is the deterioration of the Negro family." He added, "The steady expansion of welfare programs can be taken as a measure of the steady disintegration of the Negro family structure over the past generation in the United States."

Moynihan's observations were greeted with charges of racism and blaming the victim. If one accepts that a weak family structure has devastating effects on well-being, pray tell us what solutions can be found by electing Republicans or Democrats to the Congress, Senate or White House. By the way, today's growing illegitimacy among whites is what it was among blacks in the 1960s.

Another significant problem for black Americans, independent of whether there are Democratic or Republican congressmen, senators or president, is the level of crime in many black neighborhoods. It's a level of crime unimaginable to most Americans and unimaginable to blacks of yesteryear. In 2005, the nationwide murder rate, per 100,000 of the population, was 5.6. Cities with large black populations had much higher murder rates, such as: Gary, Ind. (58), Richmond, Va. (43), Detroit (39), and Washington, D.C. (35).

According to Justice Department figures, blacks were six times more likely than whites to be homicide victims, and 94 percent of black victims were murdered by blacks. Again, pray tell us what solutions will be found by electing Republicans or Democrats to the Congress, Senate or White House.

Homicide is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the level of crime in many black neighborhoods. The overwhelmingly law-abiding residents of these neighborhoods live their lives in fear of assault and battery, rape, robbery and various forms of intimidation. High crime not only turns many neighborhoods into economic wastelands, but they cause the most stable members of those neighborhoods to be the first to leave. The solutions to the major problems that confront many black people won't be found in the political arena, especially not in Washington or state capitols.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Dr. Williams serves on the faculty of George Mason University as John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics and is the author of More Liberty Means Less Government: Our Founders Knew This Well.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Walter Williams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
What if it is intentional?
The general assumption behind the failure of the Great Society is that it was an unintended consequence. But I think there is a lot of evidence that it is intentional.

The reason people mistrust the economic freedom the right espouses is because of the problem of the poor. Most people on the right recognize this problem and try to deal with it in ways that are least disruptive to free market incentives to success--e.g. Milton Friedman's negative income tax. Those on the right want to solve the problems of poverty because it is the problem of poverty that motivates most of the objections to right-wing, classically liberal economics.

This raises the possibility that those on the left are actually trying to create a class of intergenerational poor for the purpose of the economic power they provide for leftist ideas.

So the left pays poor families to dissolve, opposes freedom of educational choice for the poor, and presses for means tests on social welfare programs so that those who work for low wages fare no better (and often less well) than those who are idle. Recently, after having opposed any and all attempts to fix Social Security, and thus dooming our children to pay into a system that, at best, will pay little and will probably fail altogether, the leftist members of Congress stood up and applauded themselves.

Or look at what happened with Katrina, when the Democrats in Louisiana, with advice from national Democratic figures, barred the inflow of FEMA/Red Cross aid, in order to create a political problem. The Red Cross website says that local officials barred the aid because they said it would deter evacuation. Both the constitution and federal law dictate that the federal government can only come to a state's aid with the permission of local officials. When Bush used his new (and probably unconstitutional) powers to finally deliver aid without state consent, the aid flowed in quickly. But the result of this savvy political action is that Lousiana is now being provided with far more in aid than the damage Katrina caused.

Or look at the minimum wage debate. It is clear that the reason the high minimum wage is attractive to unions and to the middle class is the fear of competition from those willing to work for low wages. Raising the minimum wage keeps these people out of work and dependent on leftist largesse. The whole idea of a high minimum wage is to benefit the middle class by eliminating wage competition from those in direr circumstances who would be willing to work for less.

I don't think it is that the left is mistaken. I think that they actively want the expansion of the needy classes, for the political power that they provide.

People yield to incentives. The economic incentives of the Great Society created the problems that Dr. Williams describes. And the political incentives in turn lead the left to create those problems. The left has become like the physician who gives bad advice in order to keep his patients coming back for more treatment. When this happens, it is always hard to tell if it is out of greed or honest error, and we would like to be charitable and assume it is error, but I think the evidence points to it being greed.

When it happens time and time again, by people who are educated enough that they ought to know better, at some point you have to realize that it isn't honest error at all.

trulib...
the devil is always in the details. Most liberals are probably truly bleeding hearts. They see suffering and want to end it. They see inequality and their life's mission is to find a way to make everybody equal. Sure, some are hypocritical opportunists, but I'm not cynical enough to believe that most really don't want what's best for people.

The problem is 2-fold. First, the solution lies with the individual, not with some government agency. Nothing is going to change a man if he doesn't want to change and that is as true for sloth as it is for drunkeness. No enthusiastic and idealistic social worker can change it. The second problem is that it is too easy for a liberal (or anybody for that matter) to just throw money at the problem when it isn't coming right out of their pocket. Heck, what is a few cents for all the taxpayers when it will mean hundreds of dollars to some poor indigent. Not only that, the elected politician is actually rewarded with votes and praise when he sends taxpayer money to his constituents. It is a hard sell for a politician to tell somebody that he must earn his own way for his own good when another politician is promising the same person that he will give him a helping hand. And there is actually a third problem when the redistribution becomes as large as it has. Everybody wants a piece of the pie which dilutes the amount of money going to the intended needy "victim" and leads to corruption.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.