Talk Radio:
Bill Bennett
Mike Gallagher
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Hugh Hewitt
BREAKING NEWS
Register
|
Sign In
Search
SIGN UP NOW!
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login
|
What's Hot
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
White House & Capitol Report
Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
Daily Conservative Cartoon
Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Columnists
|
News
|
Video
|
Podcasts
|
Photos
|
Cartoons
|
Blog
|
Your Blogs
|
Issues
|
Get Magazine
|
Finance
Mike Gallagher
|
Mary Katharine Ham
|
Hugh Hewitt
|
Michael Medved
|
Michael Barone
|
Thomas Sowell
|
Tony Blankley
|
Ann Coulter
|
Dennis Prager
|
More
Wednesday, September 25, 2002
Right versus wishes
by
Walter E. Williams
1
Walter E. Williams' Email
|
Walter E. Williams
|
Author Biography
Read Comments
|
Post Comments
Forward
Print
Share
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+]
Text
[-]
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?
Yes
No
Maybe/ Don't Know
Yes (57 %)
No (23 %)
Maybe/ Don't Know (20 %)
We hear so much about "rights" -- a right to this and a right to that. People say they have a right to decent housing, a right to adequate health care, food and a decent job, and more recently, senior citizens have a right to prescription drugs. In a free society, do people have these rights? Let's look at it. At least in the standard historical usage of the term, a right is something that exists simultaneously among people. A right confers no obligation on another. For example, the right to free speech is something we all possess. My right to free speech imposes no obligation upon another except that of non-interference. Similarly, I have a right to travel freely. That right imposes no obligation upon another except that of non-interference. Contrast those rights to the supposed right to decent housing or medical care. Those supposed rights do confer obligations upon others. There is no Santa Claus or Tooth Fairy. If you don't have money to pay for decent housing or medical services, and the government gives you a right to those services, where do you think the money comes from? If you said "From some other American," go to the head of the class. Your right to decent housing and medical care requires that some other American have less of something else, namely diminished rights to his earnings. Let's apply this bogus concept of rights to free speech and the right to travel freely. If we were to apply it to my right to free speech, my free speech rights would confer financial obligations on others to supply me with an auditorium, microphone and audience. My right to travel freely would require that others provide me with airplane tickets and hotel accommodations. Most Americans, I would imagine, would tell me, "Williams, yes you have rights to free speech and travel rights, but I'm not obligated to pay for them!" As human beings, we all have certain unalienable rights. Of the rights we possess, we have a right to delegate to government. For example, we all have a right to defend ourselves against predators. Since we possess that right, we can delegate it to government. In other words, we can say to government, "We have the right to defend ourselves, but for a more orderly society, we give you the authority to defend us." By contrast, I don't possess the right to take your earnings for any reason. Since I have no such right, I cannot delegate it to government. If I did take your earnings for housing and medical services, it would rightfully be described as an act of theft. When government does it, it's still theft -- the only difference is that it's legalized theft sanctioned by a majority vote. If you're a Christian or simply a moral human being, you should be against these so-called rights. After all, when God gave Moses the Eighth Commandment, "Thou shalt not steal," I'm sure that he didn't mean thou shalt not steal unless there is a majority vote in Congress. Moreover, I'm sure that if you were to have a heart-to-heart conversation with God and asked him, "God, is it OK to be a recipient of stolen property, property that Congress has taken from another American?" I'm guessing He'd say that being a recipient of stolen property is also sinful. Decent housing, good medical care and decent jobs are not rights at all, at least not in a free society -- they're wishes. As such, I'd agree with most Americans because I also wish that everyone had decent housing, a high paying job and good medical care.
Share:
Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Newsvine
My Web
MySpace
Forward
Print
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
About The Author
Dr. Williams serves on the faculty of George Mason University as John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics and is the author of
More Liberty Means Less Government: Our Founders Knew This Well
.
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Walter Williams' column.
Sign up today
and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
News Articles On This Topic
Reid; Senate health care holdout signals progress
Report: US helped Yemen's strike against al-Qaida
Feds: Arrests in Africa link al-Qaida and drugs
Possible Senate opponent to Reid worth millions
Republican Snowe still courted on health care
Pregnant soldiers could face court-martial
Wrap-up bill clears Senate hurdle
Cash gifts, liquid lunch_the case for impeachment
Liberal MoveOn.org opposes Senate health care bill
US on watch for Iranian meddling in Iraq voting
Popular Articles By
Williams
We've Been Had
A Minority View: Constitutional Contempt
A Minority View: Excused Horrors
Join The Debate!
Post Your Comment
(
1
comments so Far)
View in ascending order
View in descending order
Roger
Location:
AE
Reply #
1
Date:
Sep 13, 2009 - 12:26 PM EST
Really
In a democratic society we Elect governments to run the country. Part of that ruuning the country includes deciding what services to "Steal", as you put it, our money they will provide. "Stealing" our money for Healthcare is no different to stealing it for our protection, building roads or stadiums. So with no "Stealing" no military except private protection companies, no public schools, no public roads. It comes down to what the Majority of people feel should be paid for out of this stolen Money, Personally healthcare seems a much rewarding than lets say a Multi trillion dollar satellite anti missile defence system and new fighters when what we already have defends us so well.
Flag as Offensive
(
Read all 1 comments
)
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click
here
to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Need an account?
Login
Login
Your Email:
Password:
Get Your Password
|
Register
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (
*
) are required.
Salutation:
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Miss.
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note:
Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
Townhall.com Spotlight
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
New Blog Posts
Video
Audio
Obama Dispassionately Reads Through Copenhagen Speech: "We Are Running Short Of Time"
posted at 05:24 PM
Is Anyone Surprised By This?
posted at 03:49 PM
Why Does AARP Support Obamacare?
posted at 03:07 PM
Morning Market Update
posted on:06/05/2009
Keepin' Away the Skeeters
posted on:06/05/2009
Man vs. Animal
posted on:06/05/2009
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
posted on:06/23/2009
Chris Daggett
posted on:10/07/2009
The Headliners Hour 2
posted on:12/12/2009
Today's Columns
Kudlow :
Without Bipartisan Support,...
Cooper :
Reading This Column While D...
Harsanyi :
All the President's Menda...
Klukowski :
High Court Rejects Chall...
Kennedy :
Gifts Under The Tree: Ther...
Blackwell :
Power Player of the Week...
Gainor :
Class Warfare: Government v...
Fields :
When 'Spiritual Elevation' ...
Chavez :
Climate Hubris
North :
Be Afraid, Very Afraid
Tucker :
The Rising Tide of Red Ink
Buchanan :
Shakedown in Copenhagen
Goldberg :
Global Wealth Can Heal th...
Malkin :
Welcome to the Democratic P...
Krauthammer :
An Anniversary of Sort...
Limbaugh :
Radical Is as Radical App...
Charen :
Giving Thanks for Life
Bandes :
"Prediction: Pain" for Demo...
Gerson :
A Draconian Step in Uganda
Bozell :
TV and the Soft Eshoo Bill
All Columns
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Save my list
THANK YOU
Your email has been sent.
News
Video
Audio
DINA CAPPIELLO : GOP: Obama can't act on climate without Congress
SAM HANANEL : Unions frustrated with Senate health care bill
Today's Cartoons
Friday, Dec. 18
Lisa Benson
Michael Ramirez
Eric Allie
Gary Varvel
More