Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, March 08, 2007
Victor Davis Hanson :: Townhall.com Columnist
Bipartisan hypocrisy
by Victor Davis Hanson
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Recently, several conservative politicians, moralists and evangelicals have been embroiled in scandal. As congressmen, Tom Delay and Duke Cunningham had publicized brushes with ethics laws, while their former colleague Mark Foley and Ted Haggard, who was pastor of a large evangelical church, were implicated in embarrassing sexual affairs.

In the past, scandal has hit other prominent conservative commentators who preach public virtue while indulging their private appetites, whether for gambling, drug use or other vices.

But moralist Republicans don't have the market cornered on hypocrisy. If giving into excess embarrasses some of them, for a number of Democrats - supposedly the party of the people - hypocrisy arises from enjoying elite privileges while alleging that America bestows favors unduly on the few.

In today's Roman circus, talking populist while enjoying the high life mixes no better for the left than mouthing old-fashioned virtue and living the low life do for the right.

Billionaire liberal George Soros has harangued the Bush administration for its supposed amorality in Iraq. But he's bought into it - literally. Capitalist profit seems always to trump his loud leftist ideology. That might explain why Soros' management company just purchased nearly 2 million stock shares of Halliburton, the contractor formerly run by hobgoblin to the left Dick Cheney and now demonized by liberals as a war profiteer.

Al Gore has preached to millions about the dangers of climate change caused by profligate carbon emissions. But his mansion and the private jets he has often used burn up far more fossil fuels than what the average citizens whom Gore browbeats to change their wasteful lifestyles consume.

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi promised to end the privilege of Republican elites. Well and good. But as speaker of the House, she requested a gas-guzzling outsized jet for her personal trips back to San Francisco - at a cost that far surpassed that accorded to her predecessor.

Presidential candidate John Edwards serially laments the "two Americas," one wealthy, one poor. But this multimillionaire trial lawyer just finished building a new 28,000 square-foot mansion. His palace is beyond the means even of most people belonging to Edwards' rich nation who supposedly benefit at the expense of poorer Americans.

For both liberals and conservatives, the days of the simple-living Harry Truman and clean-living Dwight Eisenhower are apparently long gone - and for two reasons. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and a recipient of the 2007 National Humanities Medal.

Be the first to read Victor Davis Hanson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Who requested the Jet?
kassandrasduplex,

Here is an "Inconvenient Truth" :-)


Here's an article from MSNBC, hardly a right-wing rag.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17035721/

It contains a link from the DoD to Pelosi's office responding to a letter from Pelosi's staff requesting a larger plane.

The direct link for the letter from the DoD to Pelosi is:

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/070208_Pelosi_DoD_Letter.pdf

The House Sargent-at-arms may have initiated the request for the plane, but Pelosi's staff requested the larger plane. While it may be true that _she_ didn't make the initial request or that _she_ didn't request a larger plane, her staff did.

The "I'll fly commercial" statement

Here's the text from the MSNBC article with her quote.

----------------------------------------
‘I’m going commercial’
Pelosi said she would be happy to fly on commercial airliners but said the House sergeant-at-arms office urged her to continue Hastert’s practice of using Air Force transport. She said she was informed on her first trip home that her plane would not make it across the country.

“I said well, that’s fine, I’m going commercial,” she told Fox News. “I’m not asking to go on that plane. If you need to take me there for security purposes, you’re going to have to get a plane that goes across the country, because I’m going home to my family.”
----------------------------------------

It is perfectly reasonable to interpret this as as either a temper tantrum or blackmail. It boils down to "Give me the plane or I'll expose myself to danger." Notice the non-sequitur for her justification for the larger plane, "because I'm going home to my family". What does making a refueling stop at a military base have anything to do with going home to her family?

Tony Snow's statement that neither Pelosi, nor her staff had anything to do with the negotiations is patently wrong.

Also, why would the Sergeant-at-Arms make the specific request to fly her whole family and have a conference room and entertainment center? Do you believe that the Sergeant-at-Arms negotiated for a larger plane with the DoD? I hardly think so. That's not proof per se. But it's something to ponder.

dyerje
I disagree with your comment about hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is the foundation of modern-day liberalism (liberalism with a capital L). Liberals do not practice what they preach. While this is true with some conservatives, it is extreme within the liberal movement (perhaps at a rate of 90-95%). Liberal advocacy is rarely based on true conviction, but instead on the need to "feel good" about ones self. It is a need to feel self righteous and be better than your neighbor. It is often driven by guilt.

Understanding liberalism, and its fundamental motive, is necessary to its defeat. The personal lifestyle of Al Gore, as an example, clearly demonstrates that he is not driven by a true belief in the environmental issues that he promotes.

Change is primarily driven by emotion, not fact. This is especially true with environmental advocacy because the fundamental lack of scientific truth. The grey area is huge. Unfortunately, many, such as Al Gore, use this to their advantage. By-and-large, people believe in fairness and consistancy. People admire those who live by their own convictions. Pointing out the hypocrisy of modern day liberalism is one of the best ways to facilitate change.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.