Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, January 04, 2007
Victor Davis Hanson :: Townhall.com Columnist
A war of endurance
by Victor Davis Hanson
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

As we begin a new year, with a new Congress being sworn in Thursday, it’s a good time to take stock of the “global war on terror.” The enormous conventional military power of the United States probably ensures that we will not lose in Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond. Yet the considerable advantages of the jihadists suggest that we might not necessarily win, either.

So before we surge troops into Baghdad, as many Republicans wish, or yank everyone out of Iraq, as many Democrats are calling for, it is wise to review why America has had trouble turning wins over the Taliban and Saddam Hussein into long-term strategic successes.

Creating new political systems on the ground is far more difficult than simply blasting away terrorist concentrations. Such engagement demands that American soldiers leave the relative safety of ships, tanks and planes to fight subsequent messy battles in streets and neighborhoods. Once that happens, the United States loses its intrinsic military advantages

First, the Islamists have just enough Western arms — automatic small weapons and explosive devices — to achieve parity with individual Americans on the ground. Our billions spent on aircraft carriers, drones and stealthy jets were not intended to fight hundreds of terrorists hiding in houses.

Second, when losses mount, they are viewed differently by the two sides. Violent death and endemic poverty are commonplace in the Middle East, but not so in the West. We aim to avoid casualties in our war making; the Islamists want only to inflict them, whatever the cost to themselves.

Third, everything our soldiers do is subject to Western jurisprudence and ethical censure. Americans distinguish soldiers from civilians to avoid collateral damage. Jihadists deliberately hide among women and children to ensure that our restraint provides them sanctuary. Our utopian moral expectations can never be met; their very lack of such considerations means we are accustomed to rather than are outraged by their beheadings, kidnappings and suicide bombings.

Fourth, in the process of reconstruction, Americans are held responsible for keeping the electricity and water on to ensure that life for Afghans and Iraqis gets better. Jihadists win only by destroying such efforts. And it is always easier to tear down than to build.

So we are at an impasse. Now after five years of fighting, Americans have two stark choices in the war against terrorists.

One, we can withdraw ground troops and return to punitive and conventional bombing — tit-for-tat retaliation for each attack in the future. That way, the United States stays distant and smacks the jihadists on their home bases below. Few Americans die; terrorists sometimes do. The bored media stay more concentrated on the terrorists' provocations, not on our standoff response from 30,000 feet in the clouds. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and a recipient of the 2007 National Humanities Medal.

Be the first to read Victor Davis Hanson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Don't pass the Buck
Unconditional surrender. The Japanese and others lobbied for a partial surrender and tried to avoid making the emperor say that he was a mortal. Some have observed that the quickest way to prosperity is to unconditionally lose a war to the U.S. The author rightly observes that we are fighting as gentlemen and avoiding "low blows" while the enemy aims for the nuts. Buck rightly observes that "tit-for-tat" wrist slapping is foolishness. Had my son, who recently returned from Iraq, come home in a body bag because of "rules of engagement" constraints, I really don't know what I'd have done. Our deepest loathing must be reserved for those who continually weaken our resolve.

war terms
A big part of the War on Terror, as several posters have pointed out, is that the phrase is too inexact. "Terror" is not an ideology; it's a pattern of using the civilian massacre as the tactic of choice. That tactic is nothing new; it's been characteristic of fanatic but disadvantaged fringe movements since time immemorial. In the service of a powerful state apparatus, the death tolls can become truly awesome. It's arguable that Stalin's version of communism, for instance, was state-sponsored terror. Even though the Communist Party never won a general election, their dedicated minority seized power in a politically primitive country and combined the worst of two worlds -- a semi-feudal, autocratic, political tradition with the surveillance and killing machines of the 20th century.

The ideology motivating Middle Eastern "terror"
is militant Islam -- again, nothing new. Islam has been at war with much of the rest of the world since its inception. Although it had a heyday 1200 years ago, for the most part it's been the most intolerant, most trigger happy of religions. It's been a seesaw struggle between Islam and the surrounding infidels for most of the last 1400 years.

This is not to say that many Muslims are not peaceful. Neither is the Muslim world monolithic. Shiites and Sunnis are mutually hostile, and the Ottoman Turks, who dominated the Middle East for several hundred years prior to their defeat in WW I, have different political, military and dynastic traditions. Turkey in the mid-20th century was the only Muslim country in that area to modernize intentionally, and for the most part successfully.

There is little tradition of pluralism and moderation within the core area of Islam, particularly Iran and the Arab Middle East. Most of the various militant sects there also riven by tribalism and seem to hate modernism in a general sort of way; thereby representing the most retrograde form of militant Islam.

Trying to convince American liberals that any war is worth fighting is probably as useless as attempting to convince Wahabis that Western greedheads and voluptaries aren't minions of the devil. The American left never seems to support the war that's actually happening -- only some other war in the distant future, even if it might antagonize Arabs. Local newspapers where I live run full-page ads to "Save Darfur;" there are even billboards here and there, but of course they fail to mention that the only way to "save" that area would be to occupy Sudan, the largest country in Africa with about 40 million people scattered over an area about the size of the U.S. east of the Mississippi. Such a mission would require an American army many times the size of the one in Iraq.

Those same liberals are not apt to find military force truly justifiable until a jihadist army wades ashore on Long Island.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.