Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
Thomas Sowell :: Townhall.com Columnist
The real issue at Duke: Part II
by Thomas Sowell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


As predicted in this column last May, District Attorney Michael Nifong will not take the Duke University "rape" case to trial -- at least not as a rape case. His latest ploy has been to drop the rape charges and keep related charges hanging over the accused Duke students' heads.

This happened shortly after the head of a DNA laboratory testified under oath on December 15th that there was DNA from other men, but not from Duke students, on the stripper who accused the students of rape -- and that he and Nifong knew this months ago, but had decided to keep it secret, in violation of the rules.

What did that leave Nifong with? The multiple, inconsistent, and sometimes mutually contradictory claims of a woman with a police record, whose fellow stripper at the Duke party contradicts her story.

The hard evidence likewise points the other way. That includes not only the DNA tests but also a bank surveillance camera picture showing one of the accused taking money out of an ATM at the very time when he was supposed to be raping the stripper.

Why not just drop all the charges, as the students' attorneys have asked Nifong to do? Nifong cannot afford to drop the charges.

Just as this case was the salvation of his career, by enabling him to win the black vote with inflammatory charges against white students accused of raping a black woman, so this case could mark the end of his career, in view of charges of his own misconduct that could lead to disbarment or even to criminal prosecution for obstruction of justice.

Nifong is riding a tiger and he can't just get off.

Those remaining charges hanging over the heads of the Duke students can be Nifong's salvation, even if he never proves a single one of those charges in a court of law.

It is an old ploy to keep some charges hanging over the heads of accused individuals, even if you don't have enough of a case to convict them, just so that they can be persuaded to plea bargain down to something with minor penalties, in order to get the hassle over with.

That would also get the heat off Nifong, who could then claim that in fact he had some basis to prosecute in this case, when in fact he had nothing from day one.

If bad gets to worse, Nifong can take the case to a jury, hoping to find at least one juror so biased by racial resentments as to refuse to declare the Duke students not guilty. A hung jury can save Nifong from being hung for a groundless prosecution.

We can only hope that the Duke University students hang tough, even though this whole process is costing their families money, beginning with bail set several times as high for them as for someone accused of murder in the same jurisdiction.

If they "confess" even to something that will only get them probation or a few hours of community service, the stigma will follow them as long as they live and blight their personal lives and professional careers.

Far more important, it would allow a nationally publicized gross misuse of prosecutorial powers to go unpunished, emboldening other prosecutors across the country to think that they can get away with anything.

What happens to Nifong matters far beyond Nifong, just as what happens to these Duke University students matters far beyond these students.

Nifong has not only played the black voters for suckers, he has been helped by knee-jerk reactions from liberals in the media and in academia, who started loudly denouncing the accused students from the moment the accusations against them were made.

The whole schedule of the Duke lacrosse team was cancelled and its coach fired. Scores of Duke professors took out an ad, lining up against the students. The New York Times led the media attacks on the students. The local NAACP chapter joined in the lynch mob atmosphere -- a painful irony, in the light of history.

An atmosphere of mindless reactions will always be exploited by demagogues. Our gullible vulnerability to such manipulation is the larger tragedy in this sordid and painful episode. District Attorney Nifong was neither the first nor the last demagogue to take advantage of that gullibility.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of The Housing Boom and Bust.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Thomas Sowell and Townhall.com's daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Thank God for such as Sowell
Precisely because of his African-American ancestry, his intellectual prowess is the socialistic libspeaking race hustlers' worst nightmare.
Thank you Dr. Sowell, and God bless you for the work you do!

Wise advice all students should heed....
> If they "confess" even to something that will
> only get them probation or a few hours of
> community service, the stigma will follow
> them as long as they live and blight their
> personal lives and professional careers.

The same is true with the kangaroo court proceedings in academia. I know far too many kids who did nothing but agreed to some sanction like this so that they 'could get on with their lives' and now have nasty black marks on their transcripts that are blighting their professional careers.

What is needed is for a public fundraising for their defense. When it becomes clear to Duke and Nifong and the rest that *they* are now the folks with deep pockets, this will all end.

Dr. Sowell
Your clarity is like a drink of cold water after a long hot hike.

M isc
Great article, as usual. It doesn't leave much room for meaningful comments, so here are a few of the other kind:

1. I thought kidnapping was a federal offense, i.e., that the FBI would automatically become involved if kidnapping charges were filed. No?
2. Let us not forget that Nifong couldn't be doing this if it weren't for the "stripper." Of course, she will be (has been) portrayed as a victim no matter how egregious her involvement, not to mention lifestyle, and I will be greatly surprised if she ever receives her just rewards.
3. Then there are the enablers - the Duke President, some faculty, local Nifong voters, sympathetic press, NAACP... Will they ever adequately enjoy the consequences of their words and actions? I doubt it. Some few have recanted, the remainder will just quietly slink back under the slimy rocks they call home and wait for another excuse to slither out and rant. I would SO like to see some major attorney take on a pro bono case and make a national spectacle of a widespread damages case.

Jumping to conclusions: liberal exercise
Apparently the Liberal idea of exercise is jumping to conclusions and Piling On.

I recall a number of occasions in Atlanta where a Black student accused "Whitey" of scrawling racial epithets on her car or in her room, or otherwise terrorizing her (it's generally a woman) -- and after the marching students and the Hey Hey Ho Ho crowd started their rallies and teach-ins to denounce Whitey (including those eager to prove that they were Reverse Oreos: we may be white outside, but we're black inside!) the student admitted that she had in fact done the damage herself for some reason as trivial as wanting to go home to her boyfriend and not be educated at all.

You'd think by now that people would have got to the point where they'd investigate accusations before declaring guilt, but if it wasn't for jumping to conclusions, apparently, liberals would get no exercise at all.

I'm with those who urge the Duke Lacrosse Players to hang tough and not admit to anything, especially "racial insensitivity" -- hold out for complete exoneration not only in the name of your future careers and the good name of your families, but to give heart to the next wrongfully accused group of students and the circling race warlords who prey on the herd mentality built up by marching and chanting being substituted for thinking.

A minor vocabulary nit
... which I wouldn't even bring up, if it weren't that I hold Dr. Sowell in such high regard.

"A hung jury can save Nifong from being hung" ????

No no no no no no... while Mrs. Nifong might desire that Mike be HUNG, and he would no doubt be pleased, the fear for him is that he might be HANGED.

I realize that the "hung... hung" parallelism read better to the ear, but honestly...

Stripper
Once it has been determined that the "Stripper" has been lying all along, hopefully charges of filing a false police report will follow. Maybe she and Nifong can share the same jail cell.

Don't hold your breath...
"I would SO like to see some major attorney take on a pro bono case and make a national spectacle of a widespread damages case."

Pigs will likely fly before that happens. But I agree with the sentiment. It is quite possible, though, that the LAX players will be cleared and end up winning a lottery of their own with an excessive settlement and book and made for TV movie deals. I don't really have a problem with any of that except that our legal system is being turned into a lottery system.

This whole episode
Has degraded, not only our system of laws, but race relations as well. I only hope Mr. Nifong gets jail time for it, and also the woman making the charges. I'm sure whe is going to be papmpered adn coddled thru it all though. We are already hearing about all of her emotional and mental problems.

Just a small question
As mentioned in the article, the cost of all this is extreme for the families of the falsly accused...

Has anyone set up a fund for their defense?


Healing process???
I caught a glimps (TV) of Nifong stating he wanted to be part of the "healing process" (I'm assuming in an attempt to save himself). Have others heard similar comments from Nifong?

Pirate- fund raising?
I don't know about you, but I am having trouble putting myself through school, and can't afford to contribute. If they can afford to attend Duke, they can pay for their own defense.

Besides, this would be a feather in the cap of some aspiring defense attorney, who wants to become as famous as Gloria All-Pinko.

While I think Nifong is a cretan, I can think of better things to contribute to, if I had any spare cash to give.

anti-socialist - healing process?
If Nifong is going on TV, talking about being part of the "healing process," he should be removed from his post as DA.

He should not be discussing the case in front of the media, and should not be acting like the court "pop" psychologist.

FergusMacLennan
you stated, "...while Mrs. Nifong might desire that Mike be HUNG, and he would no doubt be pleased...". Funny stuff, thanks for the chuckles.

We know our civilization is depleting...
...when we are considering setting up a fund to "exonerate" a bunch of underage jocks who get drunk and hire a stripper to liven up their party. I'm with mountain rose: let 'em pay for their own defense. "Not guilty" is the best I wish for them, for their poor judgment deserves no more. My charitable dollars go elsewhere.
TimC

Nifong Must Go!
Nifong is a criminal and should be fired, have charges brought against him and put in jail for many years. Oh yeah, the Racists, no morals, lying, multiple sex partners stripper should be in the cell with him! To portray her as a college student is a massive joke. What is wrong with North Carolina, the attorney general, governor or someone in that state should be putting an end to this gross injustice!

Marion: Why oh why...
does this episode have to set back race relations? Are "race relations" so fragile that any interaction deemed disagreeable by the right sets them back? I can't recall any identifiably conservative posters on TH raising the possibility that the Jasper, TX episode would set race relations back, but somehow the Duke case is destined to take us all the way back to the 1960s.

Finally, are race relations so good now that a "setback" does irreparable harm? I would hazard that this episode does absolutely nothing to race relations that hasn't already been done on both sides and so it shouldn't make a difference. Those who would argue that this case will impact race relations are probably exposing more of their own feelings about race than they would care to admit.

Ezra Howington
Where is the re-action from nifong's superiors??
He has to serve as DA a someone else's authority.
If his superiors don not take action....they are
as guilty as he.... of totally betraying the public trust and making a sham of the elective
process.

I would love to see
Just what these kids did that was so wrong that we feel they should have massive legal bills at the very least. Once again, punish the innocent and keep your money in your own pocket, and this is coming from the side of conservatives that supposedly have a heart, and believe in fairness?

Im sure if one of these kids were one of our sons, we would be searching for help, and I sure would be embarassed to have to read that convicting some innocent boys of at least monetary damage is fine since they did hire the strippers.

Lack of judgement deserves millions in damages. How heartless.

John Doe
Race relations respond to every inter-racial episode. I know a previously racist woman who switched in a few seconds to a staunch supporter of civil rights. The few seconds involved being pulled from a car upside down in 12 feet of water by a man with a black face. The Jasper dragging set race relations back. The Long Island commuter shootings set race relations back. The Gayle Sayers/Brian Picolo friendship moved race relations forward. Until total colorblindness sets in, cheap shot artists will use race to take cheap shots.

In Defense of the MSM
- - now, don't get me wrong - - - I'm sure they went overboard - - -

But recognize that MOST OF US will ASSUME that district attorneys are not generally guilty of criminal malfeasance, as would appear to be the case here.

Larry Elder used to say things like, "Why would the DA put his career at risk to prosecute someone he didn't believe was truly guilty?" Well, I suppose, the ratio of "bad" DA's is similar to the ratio of "bad" any other profession, and a similar ratio of "bad" DA's who think they can get away with it. Nevertheless, I still believe (and hope and pray) that in the vast majority of the cases, the DA's are doing their jobs properly.

So, in discovering that some wealthy white students are accused of raping a black stripper -- well, that *is* newsworthy. It fits beautifully -- wealthy white attackers, and a victim who is going to face being treated like the "guilty party", even more so than usual for rape cases, thanks to her profession.

I wouldn't expect the media to treat it like other rape cases. This is the stuff that sells papers.

Now, cancelling the lacrosse program, firing the coach, and the professors taking out an ad, that's going TOO FAR. This country *is* still based on the principle of "innocent until PROVEN guilty." However, that was the liberal university, not the liberal media. Even so, I'd expect them to know better.

I'd say some serious apologies are due at the very least. In a full page ad, at least as big as the previous one.

It'll be interesting to see if/when Nifong is disbarred or some such, and see how the New York Times treats the issue then. If they don't go after him with the same vigor that they went after the students, then surely there's just no hope for them.



IN THE MEAN TIME -- it occurs to me that Nifong has NOT been proven guilty of anything yet. So let's not be hypocritical here, and until such time as he IS proven guilty, let's give the poor smuck the benefit of a doubt.


BigBelly
LOLOL :-D at those terrible puns. Are you from Pittsburgh? Most of the Yankees i know who have a sense of humor seem to be from Pittsburgh.

yinzeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrs
i would not classify pittsburghers, or "yinzers" as affectionately known to me and outsiders, as yanks... i'm from new york, yes, the yankee capitol of the world and i went to college in pittsburgh... it's definitely a different mentality altogether...

then again, ny is getting nutty itself

I am sympathetic to the LAX players...
assuming the case goes as it appears it will. It was truly a travesty by an overreaching DA. The correct redress for the defendents is a counter suit after they are exonerated. Rich or not, once some of the exculpating evidence materialized, there are plenty of attorneys who would be licking their chops at the prospects of going after Nifong personally and possibly the state and the university. If my crystal ball isn't too cloudy, I'm betting the defendents (and by extension their attorneys) end up winning a huge lottery from this.

And anybody who thinks boys won't be boys doesn't know much about biology.

UncaAlby
Thank you for bringing up balance, and the need to accord Nifong the same forbearance we said the Duke 3 were entitled to. All the same its hard to refrain from hollering "Lets give 'em a fair trial, boys, and then string 'em up".

This Duke affair
has frightened me all along for all the reasons that Dr. Sowell reinterated in his article. The corruption of the rights and the reputations of these soccor players by the media, professors and the legal system is greatly disturbing. No proof, no trial, but all have treated these young men as guilty. I couldn't helped feeling as if this couldn't be happening in America and that how vulnerable an individual is if the legal system is in the hands of the wrong person. With relief, I learned of the State Bar Associations initiative to bring ethics charges. Now, where do these young men go to get their reputations back?

accuser
Although she should, I'm sure she won't be held accountable for false accusations. In fact, she'll probably be invited to be on Oprah.

Liberals and the LAX players
It is ironic that Liberals think of themselves as,somehow,the champions of individual rights. It is very clear that their concerns are not extended to the only class of citizen open to constant and continueing discrimination: the White Male.

A small suggestion
A great article.

In the future, if possible, please try to hyperlink some of the more interesting quotes or activities of the protagonists. For example, I would like to read the New York Times op/ed directing the media attack, the ad taken out by the Duke professors, or some direct quotes of the NAACP.

Once again, thanks much.

Falsely Accusing - - - who's Fault??
I'm not exactly sure whether the "rape victim" should be prosecuted or not.

From the facts of the case as I understand them, Nifong *ONLY* presented the Duke lacrosse team in the lineup for her to point out.

Likely as not, possibly she *was* raped by a white male, but considering her (admitted) state of inebriation at the time, it would be easy for her to be confused. If Nifong had been doing his job properly, he would have set up the line-up to account for that. As we know, he didn't.

If, for example, you're told, "One of these boys raped you -- now which one?" and the only choices are from the Duke Lacrosse team -- well, what other result would you expect? Unless she's got the backbone to flatly refuse to point out the wrong person, despite pressure to finger *somebody*.

Given her profession, I doubt if backbone is in huge abundance!

Now -- in making this supposition, I don't know if that's exactly what happened. I'm merely speculating. We'll have to wait and see as the facts unfold. But it wouldn't surprise me if the accuser is as much a victim as the Lacrosse team.


Double standard for One-Ring addicts
The stupid-human pecking order scrambles our brains and makes us invent whole new languages. E.g. If an individual kills someone on purpose, the operative word is "murder." Even in self-defense, the operative word is "kill." But, in the case of the dominant members of the pecking order who call themselves "government," when they kill someone on purpose, the word is "execute," and when they kill on purpose an innocent person, it's called a "tragic mistake" (which they seldom if ever own up to anyway) instead of "criminal negligence".
I told you that to tell you this: reasonable people may disagree with me on this, but precisely because of the inherently evil and inevitably corrupting nature of the One Ring of coercion-based political Power, I believe that the standard of judgment and punishment for those who desire to possess the One-Ring of Power should be much stricter and harsher than the standard for regular, ignorant, blue-collar thug criminals. E.g., if withholding exculpatory evidence from the defense was punishable by death, it is likely that Nifong would have chosen to be more forthcoming than so manipulative.
Another example, go ahead, use tainted evidence and false testimony to convict and punish such as OJ (if the jury is convinced of his guilt), but then mete out the EXACT same punishment to any cops who planted evidence (e.g. test-tube-cleaning chemicals in blood on OJ's socks) and false witnesses. See Deuteronomy 19:15-19. Some of the ancient ideas are worthy of serious consideration.
For an interesting case of the Supremes slapping down a sexual-predator judge, David Lanier, check out United States v. Lanier, 520 U.S. 259, 117 S. Ct. 1219 (1997) and compare that decision to the Sixth Circuit's tortured good-old-boy logic in the same case at 73 F. 3d 1380. See also the story about the flasher judge, Donald Thompson at the the http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/08/18/D8JJ01N80.html webpage.
I hate to break the bad news to the naive among us, but Nifong is the farthest thing possible from an anomaly. What he did was NOT due to ignorance (ignorance of the law is no excuse anyway)but calloused manipulation. Sure, give him procedural due process to avoid the talking point of "hypocritical", but don't try to pretend he is somehow due the slightest shred more consideration than any other common criminal who gets accused, tried, and convicted, because it is manipulative judges and prosecutors who have destroyed, and continue to destroy, the individual freedom (and economic structure) the Founders intented the Bill of Rights to preserve.

The ad signed by the Duke professors
Does anyone have a web site that would refer to the ad taken out by the Duke professors that was critical of the LAX players? I am interested in the details, the timing of such an ad, who signed, what was known at the time, whether the University took an "official" position, etc. I am interested in knowing why the coach was fired, why the season was cancelled, and the University's culpability in the support of the prosecutor and whether they acted prematurely. Someone needs to hold the University and all responsible parties accountable for thier actions, if they were without cause. Their behaviors should of necessity have a strongly negative impact on Duke's status as an elite school, the recruiting of future students, and each and every staff person responsible should be held accountable. Other than offering the 2 undergraduates the right to be readmitted, has there been any attempt on the part of the administration or the professors to apologize? Thanks.

Well written articles.
It is a sad commentary in America that there are not more enlightened Blacks like yourself who would come forward and speak out on Black injustice. Other culprits in this major American injustice are the Black community in Durham that the White DA pandered to. The State Attorney General who in effect is the DAs boss should have taken over the case and made his own investigation. Nifong, nor anyone from his office interviewed this false accuser FOR NINE MONTHS. There were many criminal felonies by Nifong that comprise some of the STATE BAR CHARGES, which should be under investigation by the State Attorney General. The Civil Rights were violated of these three students and the US Attorney general should be investigating and prosecuting. If the woman was white and the collage boys were black there certainly would be a Civil Rights investigation and prosecution. The NAACP and Jesse Jackson violated the Civil Rights of the three students. Duke University violated the Civil Rights of these students by expelling them on just the CHARGES. The LEFT WING STUDENT BODY AND 88 LEFT WING PROFESSORS violated the three Students Civil Rights. It is OUTRAGEOUS THAT THE FALSE ACCUSER IS NOT SHOWN WITH NAME AS THE THREE INNOCENT CHARGED EXPELLED STUDENTS ARE. The LEFT WING NEWS MEDIA LED BY THE NEW YORK TIMES FOUND THE THREE STUDENTS GUILTY BEFORE FOUND GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW. DAs have more power over the individual lives of Citizens then the President of the US. Why are there NO DEMONSTRATIONS. If it were three Black students there would be demonstrations. The Black pregnant false accuser must be charged and should be given the same sentence as would be entailed in the charges. Why are FEMINESTS SO SILENT?

I saw on Fox News today..
that two of the students (the third already graduated last May) were allowed to attend Duke again with "Good Standing" status. Sounds like Duke has decided that the remaining charges also sound flimsy and would like to get this episode behind them (hopefully, for them, without a lawsuit from these students!)

Mountain Rose, I am not sure why you think that these kids are all rich kids whose parents can afford their high legal fees from their checking accounts? Many kids use athletic scholarships to get into schools they could never afford otherwise.

The Victim
"Although she should, I'm sure she won't be held accountable for false accusations. In fact, she'll probably be invited to be on Oprah."

Or maybe she can just move to Virginia and hang out with Tawana Brawley. I am old and my memory is flaky, but I seem to recall that Tawana and family took the $300K donated by the bleeding hearts and ran off after the Grand Jury decided she was lying. Some penalty for ruining the lives of decent folks.

Unca Alby
posted that, "This country *is* still based on the principle of "innocent until PROVEN guilty." "

O.K., you're bending over backwards to be FAIR. The fact is that "innocent until proven guilty" only applies inside the courtroom. Out here on the street, we can reach whatever conclusion we think is right.

Nifong has committed illegal and unethical acts while acting in the public trust and that is sufficient for me. Nifong's guilty of (at least) obstruction of justice, violation of civil rights, malicious prosecution and withholding exculpatory evidence from the defense attorney.

Your hyperbole of "this country was based on the principle of innocent until proven guilty" wasn't afforded the defendants, was it, Alby? Yet, you expect it to be applied to Nifong.

You can do better, Alby, than exhibit petty hypocrisy in the name of "fairness".


DavidMac - on hypocracy
All I'm saying is we should be careful not to be just as bad as the hypocrites we condemn.

The students should be considered innocent until proven guilty. We all know that. You say, "Out here on the street, we can reach whatever conclusion we think is right." Well, the New York Times can say the same thing. The professors who bought that ad can say the same thing.

We, and they, are just excercising our 1st Amendment rights to express our opinions.

But if we're going to condemn the NYT, as Dr. Sowell does, of crucifying the students before guilt is proven, then let's not do the same thing to the other side, just because it's the other side.

Nifong will get his judgement. It might not be in a courtroom, such as if he's disbarred or impeached or whatever, or it might, such as if he's sued. I don't know. In the meantime, metaphorically, the "jury is still out".

We don't HAVE to be "fair" -- none of us has the power to ruin anyone's lives, the way Nifong does -- but we should try anyway.



Jesse Jackson's view now?
In the beginning, Jesse Jackson believed that the white lacrosse players were likely guilty of rape based on what he had heard of the case. An example of whites employing their cultural racism towards blacks. Now, I wonder if Jesse Jackson would be willing to acknowledge that the person who is really guilty of his definition of cultural racism is Mike Nifong. Nifong is the one who ended up using and abusing the black race for personal gain and thereby winning an elected office.

Nifong's color mix-up
Maybe Nifong got his colors mixed-up. The stripper was a poor little white girl and the three guys were black rapists.

It would have been a done deal, with the good people of NC trying to get him to run for governor.

It has not been all that long ago when we lynched blacks for "look raping" white girls.

Mercy. It's as if some people here thing this is so rare - that a DA gets "guilty" in his mind and pictures higher office, and nothing else registers on his radar.


yo gamecock
Nifong plays to his audience, which if you read Tom's Sowell's column was largely of color. Guys like Nifong are only concerned with color when it benefits them personally.

rules versus laws
"-- and that he and Nifong knew this months ago [about the negative DNA-test results], but had decided to keep it secret, in violation of the rules."

Here's a question for someone familiar with law in general and maybe also North Carolina law in particular:

Is it "rules", or actually "laws", that Nifong and the DNA-lab-head violated?

Are "rules", as the term is used here, linked to criminal law? In other words: Perhaps violating such "rules" can get one fired from one's job or sued [in civil court], but can doing so get one prosecuted [in criminal court]?

Duke problems
Nifong is an obvious psychopath who belongs in psych lockup and not prison. The president of Duke (Brodhead), the gang of 88 super losers on Duke's faculty, the elected authorities of Durham NC, and the bigoted idiot voters of Durham who re-elected Nifong have no such excuses.

Duke University needs to clean house, meaning minimally get rid of Brodhead and the 88 super losers who signed the infamous public letter, and the city of Durham needs to be sued into oblivion. Duke should seriously consider finding a better location. Just no way would I send a kid to school there under present circumstances.

icebear
Now all we need is a lot of people to pick someplace beside Duke/Durham to go to college. The most powerful votes are those we make with our feet and our pocketbooks. If Duke applications take a sharp drop, not just Duke, but a lot of colleges will take notice. This incident might even have the effect of moving colleges back towards our traditional educational values, like fairness and respect for law.

Men's Nightmare in Court
I unexpectedly found myself in a feminist (man bad, woman good) driven court when my wife for little reason filled for divorce after three years of marriage.

It cost the marital estate (read my savings) $125,000 in legal bills while my wife falsely accused me of stealing money, adultery, and being a dead beat dad. For example, at $350 per hour the divorce lawyers, my lawyer included, refused to review a dozen cancelled checks to quickly resolve the charge of dead beat dad. It was more profitable for the attorney and judge to waste time (the judge needs to do work too at $150,000 per year salary).

While I do not condone hiring strippers, I feel the student's pain for the lack truth, fairness, and a timely justice.

For providing false testimony the stripper ought to serve the same time as the false charge carried.


UncaAlby & Mountain Rose
UncaAlby - While I appreciate your desire for SOMEONE to act like the ideal American and wait for the facts to be decided before rendering judgement, what we have here is a case where piling on the "presumed innocent" LAX players was practiced hypocritically by every member of the "race is the issue" crowd. So in this case, firing back is self-defense, not sinking to their level.

Mountain Rose - You seem to want to punish the students (and their families) with sky high legal bills for the actions the students took that you disapprove of, but not what they are being accused of. I believe that they have already paid a serious price for what they did judgeing by their being trashed in the national media, so any effort to help them gain justice over their treatment for what they apparently didn't do is more to protect other people innocent of media accusations and governmental overreaching.

And finally, people in power (Duke Administration, for example) that pile on public punishments for "crimes" not proven or even fully examined are guilty of SLANDER, and should be dealt with accordingly. ("Rev." Al Sharpton was found guilty of slandering Steven Pagonis, although to my knowledge, he's never paid a dime on the judgement Mr. Pagonis won.) Apologies don't cut it as making good...resignations and contributions to the student's legal defense is a GOOD START.

Re Able Goodman's remarks on double stan
Well stated Mr. Goodman about the double standard which holds them above the law. The tactics used by Nifong in the Duke Rapegate case, and some prosecutors elsewhere, are de facto extortion. Unfortunately, it is not just prosecutors, but all lawyers, who are allowed to get away with extortion as they benefit from the double standard. Extortion is the day to day tool employed by the hugely profitable and unregulated litigation industry here in the USA along with fraud, spoliation, and fabrication so obvious that it would make Dan Rather blush. How did we get here? The problem is attorney self regulation and a protect thy brother at all costs attitude among lawyers. The self regulation of attorneys has been shown to be ineffective in terms of recidivism, biased against small practitioners and favoring powerful law firms, and fundamentally flawed while conducted under a cloud of secrecy from complaint, investigation, and penalty as many academics have shown. Don't take my word for it, read Richard L. Abel, Leslie C. Levin, William T. Gallagher, Michael C. Dorf, Susan R. Martyn, Jerome E. Carlin, Ted Schneyer, and even the ABA. American citizens and the business community need to wake up, stand up, and oppose the criminal element within the legal industry.

Shameless plug
Check out http://www.mormoncentury.org for sociopolitical commentary in a context of rationality and faith.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.