Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
Thomas Sowell :: Townhall.com Columnist
The real issue at Duke: Part II
by Thomas Sowell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



As predicted in this column last May, District Attorney Michael Nifong will not take the Duke University "rape" case to trial -- at least not as a rape case. His latest ploy has been to drop the rape charges and keep related charges hanging over the accused Duke students' heads.

This happened shortly after the head of a DNA laboratory testified under oath on December 15th that there was DNA from other men, but not from Duke students, on the stripper who accused the students of rape -- and that he and Nifong knew this months ago, but had decided to keep it secret, in violation of the rules.

What did that leave Nifong with? The multiple, inconsistent, and sometimes mutually contradictory claims of a woman with a police record, whose fellow stripper at the Duke party contradicts her story.

The hard evidence likewise points the other way. That includes not only the DNA tests but also a bank surveillance camera picture showing one of the accused taking money out of an ATM at the very time when he was supposed to be raping the stripper.

Why not just drop all the charges, as the students' attorneys have asked Nifong to do? Nifong cannot afford to drop the charges.

Just as this case was the salvation of his career, by enabling him to win the black vote with inflammatory charges against white students accused of raping a black woman, so this case could mark the end of his career, in view of charges of his own misconduct that could lead to disbarment or even to criminal prosecution for obstruction of justice.

Nifong is riding a tiger and he can't just get off.

Those remaining charges hanging over the heads of the Duke students can be Nifong's salvation, even if he never proves a single one of those charges in a court of law.

It is an old ploy to keep some charges hanging over the heads of accused individuals, even if you don't have enough of a case to convict them, just so that they can be persuaded to plea bargain down to something with minor penalties, in order to get the hassle over with.

That would also get the heat off Nifong, who could then claim that in fact he had some basis to prosecute in this case, when in fact he had nothing from day one. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of The Housing Boom and Bust.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Thomas Sowell and Townhall.com's daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Shameless plug
Check out http://www.mormoncentury.org for sociopolitical commentary in a context of rationality and faith.

Re Able Goodman's remarks on double stan
Well stated Mr. Goodman about the double standard which holds them above the law. The tactics used by Nifong in the Duke Rapegate case, and some prosecutors elsewhere, are de facto extortion. Unfortunately, it is not just prosecutors, but all lawyers, who are allowed to get away with extortion as they benefit from the double standard. Extortion is the day to day tool employed by the hugely profitable and unregulated litigation industry here in the USA along with fraud, spoliation, and fabrication so obvious that it would make Dan Rather blush. How did we get here? The problem is attorney self regulation and a protect thy brother at all costs attitude among lawyers. The self regulation of attorneys has been shown to be ineffective in terms of recidivism, biased against small practitioners and favoring powerful law firms, and fundamentally flawed while conducted under a cloud of secrecy from complaint, investigation, and penalty as many academics have shown. Don't take my word for it, read Richard L. Abel, Leslie C. Levin, William T. Gallagher, Michael C. Dorf, Susan R. Martyn, Jerome E. Carlin, Ted Schneyer, and even the ABA. American citizens and the business community need to wake up, stand up, and oppose the criminal element within the legal industry.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.