Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Terry Jeffrey :: Townhall.com Columnist
Government Guaranteed
by Terry Jeffrey
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Look over old news reports about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and you will repeatedly read that these two corporations were believed to carry an "implicit guarantee" from Uncle Sam.

That would apparently make them distinct from Social Security and Medicare, which most Americans assume carry an explicit guarantee from Uncle Sam.

"Though Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac say the federal government doesn't guarantee them against failing, Wall Street generally interprets the two companies' congressional charter -- and the $2.25 billion line to the Treasury each has -- as an implicit guarantee by taxpayers," The Washington Post reported in 1999, for example.

Now, the Bush administration has proposed a Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout that will convert this "implicit guarantee" to an explicit one, putting taxpayers potentially on the hook for unknown billions. Even before this bailout, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac enjoyed special benefits from the taxpayers. In addition to their lines of credit at the U.S. Treasury, for example, they were also exempt from state and federal taxes.

The proposed bailout will give the federal government the authority to buy stock in the companies and to increase the easy federal credit extended to them.

The bailout is needed, it is argued, because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have used their government-favored position to dominate America's secondary mortgage market. "Together, the two companies touch more than half of the nation's $12 trillion in mortgages by either owning them or backing them," The New York Times reported.

The collateral economic damage caused by their failure would be too great. We have no choice but to save them, it is argued.

How did we get to this place? It is part of a cultural and political transformation that is changing the meaning of the American Dream.

Our federal government was chartered to have strictly limited authority, primarily aimed at defending our liberty. It was designed to protect us from foreign enemies and to preserve our God-given rights.

This vision of Uncle Sam generally remained intact into the early part of the 20th century.

Since President Roosevelt's "New Deal" of the 1930s, however, American politicians have increasingly embraced a new vision. More and more, Uncle Sam's role was not just to protect our rights but also to guarantee us certain material benefits.

Fannie Mae itself was started as a New Deal government agency (privatized in the 1960s) that was intended to make it easier for people to buy homes. By buying up mortgages from banks, it allowed banks to issue more mortgages. By subsidizing lenders, it subsidized home ownership.

In a similar, but more dramatic way, Congress moved at about the same time to subsidize the retirement of seniors by creating the Social Security system.

In the 1960s, Congress created the Medicare program to subsidize health care for seniors.

In this decade, Congress created a Medicare drug entitlement to subsidize prescription medicines for seniors.

In the process, Americans became increasingly dependent on Uncle Sam. This was a good thing for federal elected officials: They could take wealth from one group (tomorrow's taxpayers) and give it to another group (today's voters).

But it also created two great problems: The bills for these benefits were bound to come due eventually, and a people dependent on government are by definition not an independent people.

The real American dream is not found in having a government that helps you pay for your home, your health care and your retirement. It is found in taking care of those things yourself, as a free and independent person.

The next generation will find this dream harder to achieve because of this generation's profligate dependence on an improvident Uncle Sam.

If Uncle Sam literally paid off every mortgage in America -- even those Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have no involvement in -- it would cost taxpayers $12 trillion. That is a mind-boggling sum. But it is far less than the $53 trillion in unfunded liabilities the Government Accountability Office now says Uncle Sam has guaranteed to make good on in the form of Social Security, Medicare and other federal entitlements.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSNews

Be the first to read Terence Jeffrey's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Freddie Mac and Fannie May
Freddie and Fannie secured their place with government protection the old fashioned way, by currying favor with congressmen. We now find taxpayers are covering their losses adding to our already accumulated 9 trillion in debt. This one may truly bring this country to its knees.

The notion that corporations and financial institutions need no government oversight has brought us crises after crisis, starting with the savings and loan collapse, that cost tax payers billions, then there was Enron, and now the housing bubble we currently are struggling with, We do need oversight. We do need rules and regulations to keep greedy companies and CEO's in line.

We haven't see people standing outside their bank demanding their money since the depression. We very well could see more of this and and soon.

Freddie and Fannie
These mortgage giants earned their government support the old fashioned way by currying favor with congressmen. Now we find we have to bail out their bad loans with tax payer money. Its going to cost us greatly and I don't think they even have an handle on how much its going to be.. More than we may be able to handle. The billions needed will be added to our 9 trillion debt run up by cutting taxes and fighting a war, plus unbridled earmarks. Our economy may not be able to weather this one.

The notion that coporations and financial institutions should have no oversight has brought us to this place. Government oversight of the futures trading was removed and brought us Enron. Removal of of oversight of the thrift industry brought the collapse of the savings and loan institution and that cost tax payers billions. Now we have had no oversight of the mortgage industry and greedy managers approved loans that no one in their right mind would approve. Now taxpayers are left holding bag once again. Only this time the country is broke. We saw this week people standing outside of banks demanding their money. We haven't seen that since the depression.
We could be seeing a lot more of this in the coming weeks. You'd think we'd learn.

excuse the double post
The first disappeared then reappeared... honest!

deregulation
another victory for deregulation. thhis deregulation of these two giants and many others are a direct result of the republican controlled congree early in bushs tenure. it happened, strangely enough right after the fuss and they fury about enron and that buch of billionasires.with prison records . deregulation DOES NOT WORK IN MORE CASES THEN NOT. YOU HAVE TO REGULATE MANS GREED AND ALMOST ALWAYS TO A MUCH GREATER DEGREE THEN CONSWERVATIVE, with their COCKEYED OPTIMISM econy would go beyond this PATTY- cake regulation and be more effective, not perfect mind you, but a hell of a lot better, lets get to it.

the Board
I have read somewhere that Jamie GOrelick,Harold Ickes, Freeh, and someone else from the Clinton Admin were tied to FrM/FaM? Seems her law firm represented those who cooked the books.

Make this policy change
If "too big to fail" is the mantra of government and I am going to pick up the bill then I suggest we change national policy in regards to oligopolies and monopolies. We have to maximize the number of competitors instead of allowing these firms to become so huge that we risk having to socialize their loses. In other words all these mergers and acquisitions are a really, really bad thing. Not in and of themselves but if we are going to bail them out when they fail, which it looks like we are going to do: have done.
The maxim of corporatist is as obvious as it is old. Capitalism for profits, Socialism for losses. This has to come to a screeching halt.
Corporatists are giving capitalism a bad name.

Politico's Article on Freddie and Fannie
Folks, read that one. It tells us a lot about who is running for office and who has been on the take for decades. Our taxes -- hard at work. Long live our republic, at least for another year.

hmmm
the chickens are coming home to roost with what was started with the new deal, great society and medicare drug plan. Ha enjoy it while you can and watch as the walls come tumbling down. idiot politicans

So big deal,
Another 12 trillion to the deficit. The current group of thieves, I mean gov't leaders will be out of office long before that problem comes home to roost.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.