Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Terry Jeffrey :: Townhall.com Columnist
A Party Against Pioneers
by Terry Jeffrey
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


It can now be said with confidence that founding father John Adams would never vote for a Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama or John Edwards.

As witnessed by their South Carolina debate, each of these Democrats would annihilate the pioneering spirit Adams so prized in the American people.

When the British Parliament passed the Stamp Act in 1765 -- demanding that American colonists not represented in Parliament pay a tax on playing cards, dice and various documents -- Adams was infuriated at its infringement on the already well-established tradition Americans had of deciding things for ourselves.

He counseled his countrymen to remember they were descendants of pioneers.

"Be it remembered, however, that liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it, derived from our Maker. But if we had not, our fathers have earned it and bought it for us, at the expense of their ease, their estates, their pleasure and their blood," wrote Adams. "Recollect their amazing fortitude, their bitter sufferings -- the hunger, the nakedness, the cold, which they patiently endured -- the severe labors of clearing their grounds, building their houses, raising their provisions, amidst dangers from wild beasts and savage men, before they had time or money or materials for commerce. Recollect the civil and religious principles and hopes and expectations which constantly supported and carried them through all hardships with patience and resignation. Let us recollect it was liberty for themselves and us and ours, which conquered all discouragements, dangers and trials."

After Americans won their independence, it was this same pioneering tenacity that allowed them to settle and develop a vast continent.

The families that created this country built their own homes, cleared their own fields, grew their own food, took care of their own health and educated their own children. They depended on themselves and perhaps their neighbors. They did not depend on the government in Washington, D.C.

In exchange for the risks they took in striking into the wilderness, they found boundless freedom and the potential to create wealth for themselves and their children. There were no guarantees, just beckoning opportunities.

When the continent was settled, Americans saw other frontiers to conquer: The same spirit that drove them West drove them to be innovators and entrepreneurs in industries that already existed and in new ones they imagined and brought into being.

In their South Carolina debate, Clinton, Obama and Edwards offered the antithesis of the pioneers' vision. They competed in offering voters opportunities to become dependent on government.

Clinton opened the bidding, offering to help people pay for their homes and heating costs. "I have a package of $110 billion," she said. "$70 billion of that would go toward dealing with the home mortgage crisis. ... Then, I think we need to give people about $650, if they qualify -- which will be millions of people -- to help pay for their energy bill this winter."

Edwards agreed that there should be "a home rescue fund." Obama upped the ante, offering to give retired people "a supplement to their Social Security check."

Edwards vowed to invest tax dollars "in green infrastructure, which creates jobs."

Hillary trumped him. "That's why I have $5 billion to do it," she said. "We could put hundreds and hundreds of young people to work right now, putting solar panels in, insulating homes."

Edwards offered an additional plan to "help low-income families save." "(W)e need to match what they're able to save," he said, "so they actually have something that they can fall back on in case they get in a place where they need more money."

Finally, they argued over whose "universal health care plan" was more universal. Obama deviated from the party line, admitting his plan would only guarantee coverage to those who actually "want" it. Clinton said: "I am adamantly in favor of universal health care, and that means everybody is covered. And we will have a system to make it affordable, but it will be required ... ."

Edwards won the competition, however. Asked if illegal aliens would be covered by his plan, he said no -- because he would make them American citizens first. "(W)hen people who are living here undocumented actually have a chance to become American citizens, then I think they've got the opportunity to become part of the plan," he said.

What could be farther removed from the America that John Adams imagined, where descendants of pioneers lived free from undue government interference, than the place John Edwards foresees, where immigrants come here illegally on a road paved by tax dollars that runs straight into a government-run health care program?

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSNews

Be the first to read Terence Jeffrey's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Depressingly True
The founders of this great nation would be apoplectic to see what has become of their magnificent vision. We have truly squandered what should be our birthright as Americans - freedom and liberty - in a thousand ways large and small.

My hope is that one day soon we will wake up and reclaim our heritage.

No government program handout is worth your soul, fellow citizens. Freedom is worth every sacrifice.

Silky & The Hildebeast
Want to "help low-income families save".

And put solar panels on every roof.

And spend vast amounts of money "creating jobs".

(News flash- governments can only "create" jobs by taking liquid capital from somewhere else, as government can not "create" the capital to fund said jobs. Economics For Dummies.)

And spend anything from $70 million plus (Hildy) to "Whatever It Takes" (Silky) to do it all.

You notice, neither of them has explained where they're going to get the money from?

Best guess; everybody, regardless of income level or employment status (including everyone on any sort of public dole) will be expected to fork over at least 75% of their assets to the government, which will then decide what to do with the largesse, and who gets how much.

"From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs." -Karl Marx.

Oh well, at least they're no longer pretending that they aren't really Communists. I suppose that counts as an improvement. Sort of.

So, what's the excuse for anyone else in this country who actually thinks that either one of these two is remotely qualified for any post in government, let alone the highest office in the land?

cheers

eon

obvious..
...than any of the founding fathers wouldn't vote for a democrat candidate running today. that said, any of them wouldn't vote for a republican running either...save one: ron paul.

Sad but true,
and the only thing missing is the fact that the Republicans are no better. We are stuck with two parties dedicated to bigger government no matter how we frame it.

This scam has been going on for a long time, promoted by the DEM/GOP/MSM propaganda machines that have developed the big lie technique to an art form. Most Americans today have accepted the lie as true, that only the elites have the wisdom, knowledge, and experience to govern. Once again, we will vote the lesser of two evils, always hoping for a different result, one that never has and never will materialize.

The election process is rigged to assure the elites continued power, and with that assurance we have gotten the following:
Our resources squandered, military weakened, our sovereignty sold out to the internationalists, and the future we are passing on to our kids mortgaged to the hilt. The partisanship continues unabated, and common sense solutions are ignored in favor of party loyalty.

Unless we wake up to the scam being pulled on us and stop voting the lesser of two evils, we are going to wind up with another elite who will give us more of the same.

If you want to see how the elites have accomplished the hijacking of our nation, I urge you to visit my website, JOEOLIVAFORPRESIDENT.ORG. The time has come to demand accountability and performance, and any vote for the elites borders on treason. It is an outrage that our inheritance of freedom has been stolen by these elites and yet we keep on giving them more power. Exactly what is it going to take to reclaim our birthright? What are we waitng for? Think about it, and then do something! Thanks, Joe

romney
literally said "promise them anything"

he runs from state to state promising jobs in michigan, hurricane insurance in florida.

to blame this on the democrats goes beyond partisanship.

they both do it.

That may be true, rel lib
however, Romney has the expertise to do it the right way, the three Marx brothers was to impose punitive taxes on the producers (thats me and mine, you and yours) and I take exception to that government theft..and payola to people who broke our laws getting here/and people too lazy to work and play the system and we all know of at least one is a master at that game. I'm sick of paying taxes upon taxes so crooks can be re elected. I didn't read it, but one column refers to the FAIR tax as double taxation, duh what do we have now between state, local, fed, gas, and whatever other punitive assault they can think of to steal our money sneakily. Hitlary is the worst, Noam Chomskey is her alter ego, she's a Marxist..I'm not ready to cede this Republic to trash like her
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.