Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Terry Jeffrey :: Townhall.com Columnist
A War We Are Still Losing
by Terry Jeffrey
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


The terrorists swept into Cananea in a convoy of 15 vehicles. They were on a brazen, murderous mission.

They kidnapped seven policemen and two civilians. Outside town, they shot and killed four of the policemen and dumped their bodies in a park.

Local police who had not been kidnapped deserted their posts to a man. "When the state police arrived, there was not a single municipal police officer," the local governor later told The Associated Press. "We had to take over the command. There wasn't anyone there. They had all left."

Government forces tracked the terrorists into the nearby mountains. A pitched battle ensued. Fifteen terrorists were reported killed. Others got away, melting into the local population or deeper into the hills.

So went another sad episode in a region of the world where anarchy reigns. Assessing the day's carnage, the mayor of the targeted village spoke with bitter candor. "Our municipality has become the victim of the violence that pervades this entire country," he said in a statement. "The events of this morning are beyond shocking."

Where is this placed called Cananea? Is it in Iraq? Afghanistan?

No. It is almost in Arizona. Specifically, it is about 20 miles south of the U.S. border in the Mexican state of Sonora. Pull it up on Google Earth, as I did this week, and you will see that the nearest town of any size is Nogales, Ariz. The nearest big city is Tucson.

Cananea is in the war zone next door. It is a place where Mexican criminal syndicates, bolstered by Mexican army deserters, fight one another for control of the best smuggling routes into the United States.

The terrorist raid on Cananea, which took place on May 16, points to a monstrous strategic blunder by our government.

More than six years have transpired since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. In the quest to make our nation safer, we have sent armies halfway around the world to occupy and attempt to create democracies in both Afghanistan and Iraq. But our government still has not secured our own border.

The Government Accountability Office last week presented testimony to the House Foreign Relations Committee that demonstrated just how porous our southern frontier remains.

"Mexico," said the GAO, "is the conduit for most of the cocaine reaching the United States, the source for much of the heroin consumed in the United States, and the largest foreign supplier of marijuana and methamphetamine to the U.S. market."

In the years since 9-11, the drug cartels that trade in South American cocaine have found Mexico to be a more -- not less -- attractive route for smuggling their product into American cities and towns to sell to American kids.

Citing an annual U.S. government analysis called the Interagency Assessment of Cocaine Movement (IACM), the GAO said: "From 2000 to 2006, the IACM reported an increase in the estimated amount of cocaine flowing through Mexico to the United States -- from 66 percent in 2000 to 77 percent in 2003 to 90 in 2006."

"Despite the apparent increases in cocaine arriving in Mexico, the amount of cocaine reported seized in Mexico and along the U.S.-Mexico border for 2000-2006 did not increase proportionately," said GAO. On average during this period, GAO said, only about 13 percent of this cocaine was seized.

The record was worse for heroin. "Reported heroin seizures in Mexico and along the U.S.-Mexico border averaged less than 1 metric ton or less than 5 percent a year of the estimated export quality heroin produced in Mexico between 2000 and 2005," said GAO.

Americans have and will pay many prices for the failure of our president and Congress to secure our border. In 2005 alone, according to the Department of Health and Human Services, people using cocaine visited emergency rooms 448,481 times, while people using heroin visited emergency rooms 164,572 times. The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy estimates that in 2002 Americans paid $180.9 billion to cover the negative consequences of drug use, which includes health costs, criminal justice costs, disability and death-related costs, and the cost of lost productivity.

Then, of course, there are the criminals that cross our borders to conduct business here for the cartels. Mexican drug trafficking organizations, GAO said in an August report, have "regional managers throughout the country and rely on Mexican street gangs to distribute illicit drugs at the retail level."

If, one day, the powder that comes across our border is not heroin or cocaine but something even deadlier, and the thugs who bring it through are not drug dealers but al-Qaida terrorists, the current president and Congress will not be able to say: No one saw it coming.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSNews

Be the first to read Terence Jeffrey's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Why can't we see the obvious?
Yes, we need to beef up border security. But that's a band-aid. If we address the underlying causes, we could virtually eliminate illegal border crossings by all three types of invaders...

1. Illegal immigrants. Stop doling out the benefits! End birthright citizenship. Catch and deport foreign trespassers when they show up for free medical benefits, education, and welfare! Then we won't have to beef up border security...they'll just quit coming!

2. Drug smugglers. Leave drug laws to local communities, and to the States. Eliminate the drug war at the federal level, removing the profit motive for the drug cartels. The result would be an immediate reduction in drug related crime, smuggling, and the incessant civil rights violations inherent in the enforcement of federal drug laws (no knock searches, sneak-and-peak fishing expeditions, etc.) Plus it would be a step in the direction of Constitutional govt, which is a good thing.

3. Terrorists. Get out of the Middle East. Muslims become suicide bombers when foreign armies invade, occupy, sanction, or station troops in Muslim countries, or on Muslim holy lands. Wanna avenge 9/11? Target Osama, not Iraq. The longer we stay in Iraq, the more we anger Iraqi citizens, and the easier it is for al Qaeda to make jihadists out of otherwise ambivalent Muslims....some of whom have discovered the easiest way into America is through Mexico.

Anyone want to guess which presidential candidate would do all three of the above? Yes, only Ron Paul.

An alternative to quick deportation
We need to address the cost of enforcement. Just kicking the illegals out without some sort of punitive action is wasting taxpayer money.

Illegals should be sent to a work camp for a period of 3 months and put to work building a wall along the border. This sentence would be doubled with every offense. Mothers of children under 18 along with these children could be deported immediately.

The cost of this would be offset by fines on employers that knowingly hire these illegals. Say a $5,000.00 fine per offense, doubling every time the company violates the law

Terry Jeffrey's article
Mr. Jeffrey is spot on. And, not only have we not strengthened our border security down south, our northern border with Canada continues to present easy access for the bad guys.

waldothewise
Also, charge the Mexican Gov't the cost of processing the human locust and the Invasion of the Benefit Snatchers will end FAST!

Failing that, build the fence with a nice 300 meter killing zone. A human locust enters the zone, SWAT em!

BTW, check my blog for a story on a PEACE that WE ARE WINNING. (Hint: you won't see it in the Lamestream Media.)

GunnyG,
That reminds me. I haven't heard of any actions related to the finding that the Mexican Gov't. has a policy of paying the medical bills of any Mexican national requiring medical care outside Mexico.

Anybody heard of any sucess in billing the Mex. Gov't. for treating illegals in the States?

joe_america
NO one in DC has the balls.

What SHOULD happen is when settling import/export balances, insert the medical, police, prison, and deportation costs of the human locusts, and deduct it from what we own Mexico.

You can bet they'd stop the invaders ASAP!

Banks
by the way, how is your hero doing in the poles? Oh, thats what I thought.

2008 election
The primary issue of national concern in the upcoming 2008 election should not be the battles taking place halfway around the globe against dangers to this country and its way of life, it should be the battles taking place daily right here along our southern border against even greater dangers!
I am going to make a very politically BALANCED assessment right now: LIBERAL DEMOCRATS, like Dick Durbin, should NOT be returned to office specifically due to their record on the INVASION of the USA across our southern border! Likewise, regardless of their recent rhetoric, those RINOs, like Lindsay Graham, should not see another term in Washington.
We MUST elect people to Federal office pledged and dedicated, ABOVE ALL ELSE, to the preservation of the SOVEREIGNTY and SECURITY of the USA!
I don't care about any politician's position on ANY other issue; it IS the issue of the DEFENSE of our INTERNATIONAL BORDERS that is paramount and necessary to the success of all other Federal issues.
Some may consider Tom Tancredo to be "way out there", but the man is absolutely correct when he states that the Federal government's failures in DEFENDING our sovereignty and effectively enforcing our immigration laws (inclusive of the eventual deportation of ALL here illegally and their offspring sired on US soil as a result of their illegal activities) are at the root of most of our national emergency issues today.
If the Federal government used troops in the past to prove to the lesser governmental potentates of this country that they were indeed not separate from the USA and therefore subject to, and obligated to enforce, its laws, then why aren't there US troopers on the streets of EVERY "sanctuary" city this day!
If it is so important that we expend the blood of our patriots in uniform and our national treasure assuring the sovereignty of Iraq and Afghanistan, why is the sovereignty of this nation no less deserving of this cause?

GOP should nom. Giuliani
Giuliani was a ghung-ho, ferocious prosecutor and creative law enforcer as mayor of NYC.

He says he'll seal the southern border. He is probably the only candidate who has the tenacity and wherewithal to enact his commitment.

Bush and the current administration, Dems. in Congress included, have been irresponsibly irresolute in maintaining national integrity and actively endangering of the population of the US and its citizens with an overflow of unknown, illegal, and often criminal foreigners.

Jobs Americans won't do
Why should they when they can sit on their butts and collect welfare?

If, as Bush states, there are millions of jobs that Americans won't do, then unemployment and welfare should be zero.

We've created an entitlement society that has destroyed the American work ethic. Ask an employer who he'd rather have working for him - an illegal whose only motivation is busting butt to send money back home, or a person raised on food stamps and publicly-subsidized housing.

Wall Street demand growth, growth, growth. As long as that's the mantra, expect no changes of real substance.

Not trying
to start any fights, just a couple of statements. First, Renny, there's that thing about 'sanctuary city' that you have to consider. I think it was a reality in NYC during RG's term.

Sinless1, you were clicking along really good until the last sentence. At the risk of starting an avalanche of what we all have come to be used to, let me say a couple of things about Ron Paul. Some of Dr. Ron's desired policies are right on the button. He's a tad whacko regarding foreign dealings. The attribute that Ron Paul fails at is leadership. For a fellow who has been in congress for as long as he has, he should be, at least, known throughout the country. I'm talking about leadership now, not performance. Having said that, I'd still vote for him over any of the crap running under the (D) symbol.

Flaw in Banks' reasoning
quote: "The puritanical Taliban tightened their hold on the growers; but since we "liberated" the country in the first of Bush's neo-colonial wars, Afghan's only big export earning industry is thriving. Unwittingly US and Uk troops in Afghanistan promote addiction in the West."

Actually, Taliban didn't tighten due to any scruples (their seeds having been laid by Zia ul-Haq, an "Operation Searchlight" war-criminal, and his toadies Akhtar Abdur Rehman and Siddique Salik, Taliban scruples never exceeded the scruples of those three unlamented vile examples) but only a desire to CONTROL it on their own terms (they had stockpiled plenty through extortion/tax, etc); basic idea was to tell farmers "we decide what, how much, ... that you can grow; you obey or die grotesquely"!

Also, in case you didn't know, heroin trade in Afghanistan and NWFP/FATA was almost always thriving (indeed during Zia's 11-year term, NWFP/FATA alone exceeded the "Golden Triangle" in heroin output).

Positions of Candidates on the Border...

What we all want is for the moderators at the face to faces that candidates do, "the debate", is to ask them the questions we all have for them.

One obvious question(s) is about border security.
The press is not going far with that proposal.

So, we have to contact the candidates, en masse, about the questions we have, ie., border security.

Contacting congress is great. It is a temporary measure to stop a bill. But we have to put the candidates, one of whom will be our candidate, on notice as to what is important to us. Let's get there attention, and that will lead to more comments from them and obligate them more. We might even get a war going among the candidates as to who is more hawkish on closing the border.

It won't do much good after the election to complain about what happens next if we don't close the door now on what will be the priority.

Presidents close borders, or are supposed to.

Get your message through to the candidates. The MSM will not. They know there is a very high level of public interest on this subject, and don't want to get a head up of steam that could wipe out miss Shrillary. Let's wipe her out and get the border closed by the next president through his prior commitment to do so.

Contact each candidate. Tell them what we care about. Let's shut the door. A promise now is almost a signed contract. I want definitive words not small talk.


Military HATING DOGGY
Wrap it up stupid. Yes, GunnyG makes over the top comments, and we all know it. There will never be a killing zone, but he's frustrated and expresses himself like, well, some Gunnery Sargents do.

Take your knapsack and your doggy tags and go some place dark where the sun never shines.

failed WoD
Yes, our failed war on drugs, and failed attempts at prohibition are hurting our national security. It sends billions of dollars into criminal gangs in Mexico, so much money that they can challenge the Mexican army and often win. Until we end prohibition we will NOT be able to secure our borders because their will be a huge business in crossing.

And of course this is all from a practical stand point. Let’s not even go into the nanny state implications of the government telling you that you can’t get high.

For onceamarine
I am also originally from a country (India) which faces much trouble (including fodder for insurgencies) from large numbers (last count over 25 million including over 20 million Muslims--and this is only a count of those from ONE of India's neighbours, Bangladesh) of illegal immigrants--and I've immigrated LEGALLY and been naturalised to US. Ergo, I have few sympathies for illegals--only with legal tempworkers (and even some Americans) who wish to "convert themselves to illegal aliens" to speed up their own immigration process (or in the case of Americans, merely keep more of their paycheques) do I sympathise.

Basically dhole's idea that "Gunnery Sargents express themselves like racist nazis who want to kill the poorest of the poor merely for seeking a decent job and the ability to feed their family by crossing our borders to work as busboys, garderns and pool cleaners" is twaddle.

The US has been lucky in not having insurgencies (though it does have a quiescent separatist "Republic of Texas" movement which could be transformed to "proper" insurgency using the issue of the illegal immigrants from Mexico) so far in areas bordering on Mexico.

The only "right" an actual illegal alien has in my book is that of a ride to the border in a vehicle of my choice (deuce-and-half if I'm in a good mood, loadbed of large-rear-tipper if I'm not).

renny..
Do you know Giliani's lawfirm is putting the deal together for the Spanish company to own our roads...all for the Super Highway and the NAU?

And don't forget folks...the money that these illegals send back to their 'beloved' country, is MEXICO'S HIGHEST SOURCE OF REVENUE!!


Military Hater

It is quite apparent that the mistakes you make in writing are not normal ones. You are of foreign extraction and probably by your tone are an illegal.

Go away, lap dog of the communists.

And if by some coincidence you are......

...not a foreigner, you do have a very deficient education as well as a deficient IQ.

For onceamarine @ 12:12, 12:15
Oh, I've already exposed the extent of dhole's "love" for military to be on par (if not lower) than that of Pierre Trudeau, late erstwhile Canada PM.

Trudeau dodged draft in 1939 (through his dad's bribing Canada military recruitment--at a time when Canada was actively at war in Europe, and later Asia), allowed US Vietnam-era draft-dodgers easy welcomes in Canada, and gutted Canada's military. In 1968, the most advanced aircraft in Canadian Forces' (CF) inventory was the CF-101, basically identical to USAF's F-101. When Trudeau finally resigned (after taking his party to a position where it was going to get pounded in elections scheduled later that year, but before the elections themselves), CF's most advanced aircraft was....still the CF-101! (and by this time, there were serious attrition losses and no parts availability; F-101's in US were by then either in museums or some private collections).

IMO, dhole's "love" for US also matches Trudeau's visibly-demonstrated (in 1982, when he "flipped bird" in front of CBC and Macleans cameras from Mt. Robson) "love" for Canada.

For onceamarine
I forgot to mention (of course, not being military I hadn't even bothered checking till now) that the F-101 had been retired from USAF in 1966 (two years PRIOR to Trudeau's becoming PM) and Air National Guard in 1982.

svpallava......

..I have read a number of your posts for sometime now. You are, I am sure a good guy, and the kind of person of foreign extraction that we badly need and want in this country. I am married to a foreigner, and I speak more than one language. Since I have dealt with the British on several occasions, I also understand your lingo.

You must be very proud to see the newly elected governor of Louisiana being of your origin and being a conservative with the best intentions for this country. It often takes a foreigner to see real values and appreciate what the USA really has to offer. We, most of us, do not want to lose through attrition the basic values that we know made and to date have kept this country at the forefront of the modern world.

Thanks for your comments and your well based knowledge of a number of lessor known FACTS.


For onceamarine
Yes, I am quite glad of Piyush "Bobby" Jindal being elected governor of Louisiana for more than just ethnicity reasons:
(1) it also gives me hope on how to witness to ABCD's ("American-born-confused-desis", a rather obviously pejorative acronym--unfortunately all too true) with the Truth, since Jindal started life as ABCD.
(2) the fact that he, like me, is a convert from Hinduism to Christianity (ok--we differ in my being Protestant and Jindal's being Catholic...)

FYI, Canada's erstwhile Revenue Minister (a naturalised immigrant from India, Harbans "Herb" Dhaliwal--and the first Indo-Canadian to hold a cabinet post) DID NOT stir such feelings in me--as he had tasted "Liberal salt" (no case-mistake here, that's the actual party name).

But how do we deport 20 million people?
Part of securing our border needs to be enforcement of current laws and deportation of people who are here illegally. The question is how do you deport 20 (or more) million illegal aliens?

I was driving down the freeway last evening, going the speed limit, and being passed by virtually everyone. All of a sudden, I noticed everyone had slowed down to the speed limit. What happened? One of those cars that had passed me was now pulled over by a State Trooper and was being issued a citation.

How do we deport tens of millions of illegal aliens?

One at a time...

MLD
No, But chitlins do. Go back to mama's basement till you are educated enough to know that the soldiers you hate so much are the ones that made it possible for you to bite the hand that serves you. You are the worst kind of racist in America today ... one who hates everyone except himself. May god call you home - soon!


HUNTER/TANCREDO "08"

Phileo
As soon as we start deporting them by the busload and show them that it's working, and start drying up the employment, the rest will self deport. The only problem is convincing the politicos that it needs to be done. Start letting them know. I guarantee that if the 70% that were against scamnesty keep loading up their lines of communication, the buggers will take notice. Make them understand that WHOEVER gets elected will be at best a one term POTUS if not done.


HUNTER/TANCREDO "08"

A War We Are Still Losing
The continued effort by the Administration and congressional "leaders" (an oxymoron) to neglect their obligations and heap abuse after abuse on the citizens of the USA, is to the point of being nothing more than Criminal Contempt, a national disgrace, a conspiracy that's destroying the nation. We will sorely pay a tremendous price very, very, soon for their inability to enforce existing laws to curb all the border crossing illegals and threats.

Just think. Within the last half of the twentieth century, we and our allies (mainly the USA), through supreme sacrifices, saved the world from dictators, destruction and famine. And now, the three-ring circus, better known as Washington DC, cannot secure us from a hoard of illegal aliens who are bringing down our house.

We should not allow the MSM to hide, or spin, the facts. Those elected congressional representatives and senators who fail to stand up for the Constitution need to be run out of office or jailed before every community is turned into a ghetto. Fore, with the aid of the circus clowns and buffoons, it is guaranteed to happen very soon.

MLD is no MLK
Martin Luther King, Jr. would be ashamed of you, Military Lovin'Dogg; I am ashamed of you; you SHOULD be ashamed of yourself, but I think you've hardened your heart to the point you feel no shame. You must be one messed up brother.

P.S. PLEASE change "Military Lovin'" part of your handle. Your writing makes your pen name blasphemous.

SO, M****ry L****in' Dogg,
You're just a bigot and a racist... that explains everything...

Gunny
I think I've got MLD figured out. He hits on Marines harder than anyone else. He's a "Baby Blue Marine" He's tried to get through Marine basic and failed. He now hates all branches, especially the marines. How sad! Sad indeed!!!



HUNTER/TANCREDO "08"

I don't read MLD.
If I did, I'd probably think he was a F.I. There are so many, however, that it's hard to discern the differences between them.

to Chopper John re: Ron Paul
Don't underestimate Ron Paul's leadership. He has been the conscience of the Congress for 20 years. That his colleagues cannot be shamed into obeying the Constitution by his stellar voting record, unflinching resolve, and integrity. The man has balls of solid brass.

Further, Ron Paul cannot so much as sneeze on the campaign trail without 300 people there to offer a hanky. His supporters would climb a mountain for him, and walk over hot coals. He draws between 500 and 2000 at speaking engagements! He raised $5 Million in Q3. Not bad for an unknown.

If Ron Paul is not a leader, he sure has a lot of passionate followers.


Birthright citizenship?
Not wanting to argue, sinless, but what do you mean by "end birthright citizenship"?

My take on birthright is that my children should automatically be American citizens because my husband and I are American citizens. I wouldn't necessarily disagree with the idea that people should take a test and an oath before being allowed to vote, but the American children of American parents should automatically be citizens of the US.

If you're talking about the so-called "anchor baby" that's a fallacy. Contrary to popular belief, when a child of non-citizens is born in this country, they do NOT automatically become citizens. This is true even if their parents are legal residents. They remain citizens of the country of their parents, though there may be issues with that on that end, as there are issues with that for our government when the children of American citizens are born overseas. They do NOT become American citizens simply by being born on American soil. However, should the immigrant parents become citizens prior to the child's 18th birthday, the child can apply for automatic citizenship and it's supposed to be granted, provided the child has no criminal record.

Our pastor's daughter is an immigration lawyer and the source of this information. Anchor babies make good propaganda and I'm sure that many illegal immigrants believe having a child in this country will exempt them from deportation, but it's propaganda and not legal fact.

STOP THE INVASION!!!
OUR politicians are giving away our country to the illegals and the drug runners. WHAT is wrong with these people??!!
Fine the employers..therefore drying up their place to work. STOP giving the free social services.. STOP catering to them...STOP printing documents, etc in THEIR language...this is America...English...If they want to be here...LEARN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE!!
Stop giving and giving to them and TAKING from the American citizen.. With no free rides, they will go home...
Therefore... Easy deportation...
GET THE BORDER SECURE WITH A FENCE...PERIOD!!!


Mamacat
I couldn't have said it better. Without secured borders, all the rest is pointless.


HUNTER/TANCREDO "08"
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.