Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
Terry Jeffrey :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Politicians Losing Iraq
by Terry Jeffrey
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

Watching Gen. David Petraeus testify before Congress inspired several thoughts.

The first is that he has taken on one of the most difficult missions ever given a U.S. commander: building a nation in a region of the Middle East already involved in an incipient ethno-sectarian war.

Petraeus unambiguously identified this as the core struggle we face. "The fundamental source of the conflict in Iraq is competition among ethnic and sectarian communities for power and resources," he said. "The question is whether the competition takes place more -- or less -- violently."

The second thought is that it would be difficult to find a man better suited to this monumental challenge. Petraeus is very smart, honest and tough.

The third is that the courageous troops Petraeus leads are performing as well as military forces can be expected to perform in such a situation.

At one point, Petraeus gave an example of the problems they face. Shiite warlord Muqtada al-Sadr has decreed that his Mahdi Army should take a six-month hiatus from fighting. Some have apparently obeyed his decree -- others have not. As consequence, Petraeus has decided to treat some Mahdi Army members as enemies, some as potential friends.

"We are not going to kill our way out of all these problems in Iraq," he explained. "You're not going to kill or capture all of the Sadr militia any more than we are going to kill or capture all the insurgents in Iraq. And, in fact, what we have tried very hard to do is to identify who the irreconcilables are, if you will, on either end of the spectrum, Sunni and Shia, and then to figure out where do the reconcilables begin and try to reach out to the reconcilables."

"Some of that will have to be done with members of the Jaish al-Mahdi, with Sadr's militia," he concluded. "The question is: Who are the irreconcilables?"

To put this in perspective, recall that we went into Iraq because all of our intelligence agencies with all of their resources could not accurately determine whether Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Now, to get out of Iraq, our soldiers must accurately determine which members of a heretofore murderous, Iranian-armed, Shiite fundamentalist militia can be trusted to make peace and which ones cannot.

Yet, in the face of such challenges, our troops have achieved measurable success. "The military objectives of the surge are, in large measure, being met," Petraeus said. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSNews

Be the first to read Terence Jeffrey's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Guess I'm 1 for 1
... slacker, since I only intended to address one of your points. I met my objective.

Yes, I'm saying that Petraeus was right to refrain from commenting on how the progress in Iraq is affecting US security. Saying "I don't know" and "I hadn't thought about it" is an inelegant way of doing so. But only if you operate from specific prior assumptions can you deduce that these expressions are code for "I think there's no connection between Iraq and US national security, and I'm fumbling for words to avoid saying that."

Clearly you do operate from the prior assumptions required to reach that conclusion. Enjoy.

As a point of information, Ambassador Crocker is not charged with assessing Iraq's implications for US national security either, so Petraeus would not have been correct to refer the question to him. The quick-thinking response would have been something like, "Well, that's Secretary Gates' department. What I can tell you is what's going on in Iraq today."

This was an accountable political situation for Petraeus. What he said mattered. Therefore, he was not going to comment on things outside his assigned purview.

The interesting thing is that if Petraeus had instead replied, "Oh, yes, sir, in my judgment the progress of the surge strategy in Iraq has materially enhanced US security" -- in that event, I feel pretty sure you would be accusing him of being a rehearsed, mendacious carrier of Bush's political water rather than an honest man.

We all operate from our assumptions and premises. It's not criminal or dishonest to have different ones. It does get tiresome to see people assail each other over "honesty" or whatever when the truth is, they operate from different basic premises.

A great American called a liar
Harry Reid calls the surge a failure even before it is fully implemented. Chuck Schumer calls the obvious success done in spite of our troops.
This is their way of supporting the military? Which is it?

General Petraeus belives in Duty, Honor, Country. Democrats in congress and their hate group MoveOn.org have gone overboard and owe Petraeus and the American people an apology.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.