Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
Terry Jeffrey :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Sunni-Shiite cold war -- or worse
by Terry Jeffrey
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Shortly before Iraq finally formed its coalition government this spring, one of that nation's leading Shiite Ayatollahs, Ahmad Al-Baghdadi, gave a televised sermon explaining his views on jihad.

"If the objective and subjective circumstances materialize, and there are soldiers, weapons and money -- even if this means using biological, chemical and bacterial weapons -- we will conquer the world, so that 'There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is the Prophet of Allah' will be triumphant over the domes of Moscow, Washington and Paris," the Ayatollah said in a sermon recorded by The Middle East Media Research Institute.

"This Arab Islamic nation must obtain a nuclear bomb," the Ayatollah said in a subsequent TV interview.

Now, it is an ironic fact that among those who ought to be praying most fervently for the success of the teetering U.S. experiment in democracy in Iraq are the non-democratic leaders of nearby Sunni Arab regimes.

Last week in Cairo, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice conferred with a group of such leaders from Egypt, Jordan and the nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council, which includes Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman.

Her agenda included the efforts to restore stability in Iraq and to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Sunni Arab leaders now see these causes as intimately linked -- because they see themselves sinking into a Cold War, or worse, with a Shiite Iran that is exploiting the unrest in Shiite-majority Iraq.

Events this summer intensified longstanding Sunni Arab anxiety about Iran's intentions. In Iraq, even after the formation of the coalition government, the level of sectarian violence exploded -- driven in large part by Iranian-backed Shiite militias. In Lebanon, Iranian-backed Hezbollah launched an unprovoked war against Israel and plunged that nation into chaos.

An unbridled sectarian civil war in Iraq, Sunni Arab leaders fear, could gallop across their borders, with Iran arming local Shiite militants just as it has in Lebanon and Iraq.

Were Iran to secure nuclear weapons, it could sow Shiite revolution with impunity.

The Sunni Arab anxiety about Iraq and Iran is rooted in demographics. Every GCC state is a Sunni monarchy or emirate that governs at least some Shiites. Bahrain, according to the State Department report on religious freedom, has a Shiite majority that has "often resented minority Sunni Muslim rule." Kuwait's Shiite minority is 30 percent; the United Arab Emirates', 15 percent; and Qatar's, 10 percent. Oman, said State, has "a small but significant population of Shiite Muslims concentrated in the capital area and along the country's Batinah coast."

Saudi Arabia's 26.7 million people include 2 million Shiites, mostly concentrated along the Gulf Coast.

As the Iraq war has continued, Sunni leaders have increasingly vocalized their fear of radicalized Shiites. In December 2004, King Abdullah of Jordan warned that Iran was seeking a Shiite Islamic republic in Iraq that could become part of a "Shiite crescent" that would threaten the Arab world.

"Even Saudi Arabia is not immune from this," King Abdullah told The Washington Post. "It would be a major problem. And then that would propel the possibility of a Shiite-Sunni conflict even more, as you're taking it out of the borders of Iraq."

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak put the Sunni fears bluntly. Returning from a tour of the GCC states in April, he spoke with Al-Arabiya TV. "Do you think the Iranian influence is responsible for this critical situation in Iraq?" asked the interviewer.

"Definitely, Iran has influence on the Shiites," said Mubarak. "This is not just talk -- they have many people. The Shiites make up around 65 percent of the Iraqis. There are Shiites in all these countries. It is a very large percentage. The Shiites' loyalty is always to Iran. Most of them are loyal to Iran and not to their countries."

"What will happen in Iraq if the Americans leave today?" the interviewer asked.

"It will be a disaster," said Mubarak. "The war between them will rage more. And many forces will get involved. Iran and others will get involved. It will be a theater for an ugly civil war. Terrorist operations will also rage, not only in Iraq, but also in a number of other places."

If the Sunni Arab regimes want to avert the catastrophe they envision, they should use every means possible to pressure their Sunni co-religionists in Iraq to shut down their insurgency -- before it's too late -- and cut a deal with the coalition government.

The Bush administration has been rightly criticized for woefully miscalculating the difficulty of postwar nation-building in Iraq. It unleashed a struggle for the soul of that country with the likes of Ayatollah Baghdadi. But those who demand a quick U.S. withdrawal could make a graver miscalculation. They may find the ayatollah's acolytes starting wars across the Middle East -- and beyond.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSNews

Be the first to read Terence Jeffrey's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Nightmare is right
and a Shiite Caliphate would be the worst possible outcome to the debacle we already face. I fear that the die is already cast, but we have few choices at this point but try to stave off disastor.

I'm waiting

I'm waiting for someone to come along and say that this is just a civil war and wouldn't affect us if we withdraw.
After all, they're all Muslims.
And only Arabs..Jews.. pick your group.. would die.
How long before we see that.

CD I agree with you about nightmare and I think it would have happened eventually, ( with Iran's increasing interest in nuclear power.. Saddam couldn't get them out of power)

my two cents - MEMRI
You will notice that in this peace Mr. Jeffrey mentions the Mid East Media Research Institute - MEMRI.

The actual address is http://WWW.MEMRI.ORG - I highly recommend it. It is one of my daily stops and it is invaluable. The Archives go back about 5 years.

IMO - There is nothing really that we in the west can do to stave off what is coming unless by prayer and the hope that the less violent among them can tone down their murderous brothers and sisters. The argument that this wouldn't have happened if President Bush hadn't ordered the invasion of Iraq et. al. is for another time. I personally think that it would have happened anyway. Islam is a violent faith and it encourages its followers to violent acts in the belief that they will please allah. I personally find nothing pleasing in crashing planes into buildings and forming children's suicide squads among other things but they seem to, so I guess their faith is different from mine.

Excellent article.
I applaud Jeffrey for not being a kool-aid drinker, incapable of criticism of the Bush administration(Yes, kool-aid drinkers also exist on the left, and are easily identified by their arrogance, including totally unwarranted notions of their superiority over conservatives).
I agree completely that one consequence of our invasion of Iraq was to unleash pent-up Shia fundamentalism, beholden to Iran, which threatens to embroil the entire region in turmoil. I think the Bush doctrine that all peoples have a universal craving for "democracy", is simpleminded, and the implementation of that policy upon the region will have disastrous consequences. Still, I agree with Jeffrey that were we to pull out immediately, and the current govt in Iraq fall, it would be devastating. Alas, it is a mess, and what is so tragic is that it did not have to be.

Bigger picture
It just shows that the conflict is bigger than Iraq. Iran has been working on the bomb for years, it doesn't happen over night. If they get in there to arm the shiites there may be no end to their destruction with weapons of all types. They want us driven out of the middle east as much as any liberal so they can have free reign to destroy the region and spread the hate and violence that the islamo-facists champion.

Good article
This was a good account of a serious problem that could result from the invasion of Iraq. It is not clear why an end to the sunni insurgency would not feed into the problem since the resulting peaceful state would be a largely Shiite one. (Particularly since half of the Sunnis in the percentage give above are the Kurds who want nothing to do with the resulting Iraqi state. The Shiite portion of what remains is closer to 80%.
After the invasion when it became clear there were no WMD's Bush said in an interview that at least Iraq would not get nuclear weapons in the future, presumably meaning the decade or more that it would take Hussein to build them if he restarted his program. Unfortunately the interviewer did not ask him why he was so confident that the resulting Iraqi government would not pursue them even faster. As Jeffrey's column indicates, if we succeed in creating a stable government in Iraq, there is no reason to think it will not be a stable government that wants nuclear weapons.

Rummy lied
I remember him saying "This will not become another Vietnam."

Yes it will.

I opposed going in, but being there, we have a moral and political duty to rebuild what we broke. Pulling out now would be an utter disaster.

Like Vietnam
Like VietNam, if we pull out like we did in VietNam, many, many people will die like VietNam.

And soldiers will have died for a retreat.

Disaster
We entered Iraq with the naive belief that all peoples wished for freedom, and some rational form of self rule. It appears that our assessment was wrong. We have given the Iraqis the 21st Century and what have they done with it? At this point, we need to salvage what we can. Unfortunately, if there is any better alternative than "Stay the Course", no one has pointed it out.

By the way, I think that; "If we broke it, we have a moral obligation to fix it, is obsolete". We did that, very successfully, with both Germany and Japan. South Korea must also be counted a success. We cannot afford to "fix" Iran, or any other Islamic based society. We can, however, afford to smash any society that threatens us (You can make your own list), and then leave it to fester. We can continue smashing it, whenever it again arises to the level of threat. And we can afford to repeat the process as many times as necessary.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.