Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, April 10, 2009
Suzanne Fields :: Townhall.com Columnist
Mom in Chief as Marie Antoinette
by Suzanne Fields
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Michelle Obama set just the right example as the mom in chief. She made no speeches about Afghanistan or the stimulus for the global economy, but returned from a boffo trip to London and Europe with better press notices than her husband. She visited a girls' school in England, dispensing hugs and air kisses, and charmed heads of state from two dozen nations. No first lady has so dazzled Europe since Jackie Kennedy took her husband along when she conquered Paris and put Charles de Gaulle at her feet.

Nevertheless, Michelle hurried back to Washington early on Sunday for first things first, to get Malia and Sasha ready for the school bell on Monday morning. Despite a grandmother in residence at the White House and a staff of thousands -- well, dozens, anyway -- a mom in chief knows that only she can enforce the discipline that every schoolchild needs and craves.

When she and the president catch up on what they missed in Washington, they should read the latest performance evaluation of the Opportunity Scholarship Program, a school voucher program in their new hometown. It should be of particular interest to a mom who gives the education of children, her own and others, pride of place at the top of the agenda.

Seventeen hundred Washington children attend private school with vouchers under this scholarship program, and two of them attend Sidwell Friends School with the Obama girls. Unlike most programs and schemes in the nation's capital, this program has human faces -- all of them children's -- and the evaluation report will influence education policy across the country.

The Opportunity Scholarship Program is small stuff in Washington, where trillions of dollars are thrown around like Frisbees, but the program drew national notice because a few sentences and paragraphs were tucked into the stimulus bill to abolish the program. Congressmen and figures in the new administration, who like the Obamas wouldn't dream of sending their kids to a public school in Washington, cheerfully killed a program for families not as fortunate as themselves. All in the name of high principle, of course.

The president and the Democrats say they killed it because there was no proof that it worked. But now there is. The evaluators found that scholarship students scored specific gains in reading -- by a half grade. That's no small increase. Math scores remained steady, and the scores suggest that further gains will follow as the students from deprived neighborhoods acclimate themselves to the more rigorous discipline of private schools. This is the change that hundreds of parents are eager to believe in.

"There are transition difficulties, a culture shock, on entering a school where you're expected to pay attention, learn, do homework," Jay Green, an education scholar at the Manhattan Institute, told The Wall Street Journal. "These results fit a pattern that we've seen in other evaluations of vouchers. Benefits compound over time."

Ninety-nine percent of the low-income students who have transferred from deprived neighborhoods are black and Hispanic. A long waiting list, with four applicants vying for each scholarship, testifies to the demand for the program. The $7,500 voucher is equal to slightly more than half of what the District government spends per student in the District's dreadful public schools. Despite the $14,000 the District spends per pupil in its public schools -- highest in the nation -- the District achievement scores are among the lowest in the country.

Vouchers are key to education reform, along with more charter schools, knowledge tests and merit pay for teachers. But the powerful teachers unions, the ventriloquists behind the congressional dummies on their laps, naturally oppose reforms that would impose accountability. The worst teachers know their weaknesses, and the protection of mediocrity becomes the first order of business for the teachers unions.

President Obama promised that he would support "what works for the kids," and now he has the proof that this specific program works. In addition to the statistical evidence, there's the reassurance, hard to measure but abundantly clear, for parents and their children to feel secure and safe in the program. The program takes them out of schools where learning is not often prized and where physical safety is often at risk.

No one begrudges the president and the first lady their choice of a good school for their children. They can easily pay for whatever they choose. But if Michelle, as the nation's mom in chief, keeps her silence as others kill a program enabling choice for those who can't easily pay, she invokes the ghost of Marie Antoinette -- the kids cry for the bread of knowledge; let them eat stale cake. They need more than a hug.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Suzanne Fields is a columnist with The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Suzanne Fields' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
MIchelle Obama is Still a Lib
First, Mrs. O's trip was just one end of a Mutt and Jeff routine she pulled off with her husband. All orchestrated by publicists; all intended to benefit the Presidency. I'll bet she felt like throwing up after mixing with so many white kids. Jackie Kennedy was at least genuine and not ashamed of her country.

Second, the author should brush up on her history. Marie Antoinette was not the monster that traditional history has painted. She never even said, "Let them eat cake."

Is the author a little star-gazed? Some valid points, but overall an obnoxious article.

Obama's Hypocrisy
This incident, more than anything else, illustrates that Obama is not the Messiah, not the Redeemer, just a Union man. He owes his election--and his soul--to the Unions. Unions, especially the Teachers' unions, have done more than any single other organization to ensure that the American educational system remains a mediocre entity and the poverty stricken underclass and immigrants are the victims. The Democrats and liberals couldn't care less as long as this class continues to vote them into office.

Vouchers=Welfare
I can't believe that people who call themselves conservative support vouchers. ANOTHER ZILLION DOLLAR ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM!

Remember the good old days (under Reagan) when conservatives actually fought AGAINST social engineering?

Vouchers don't equal welfare
Taxes are already paying for children to attend public school, by Xerxes' logic that is welfare too. If the goal is education, how is it welfare to pay 7500 bucks to send a kid to private school or 14,000 to send them to public schools which do a poor job?


"No one begrudges
...the president and the first lady their choice of a good school for their children."

Suzanne, You are wrong on this one. I for one begrudge their CHOICE!!! Don't mix up the opportunity of their daughters for a good education with the choice made to educate them at an expensive private school.

"President Obama promised that he would support "what works for the kids."

But he did not live up to that promise, did he? Surpise, Surprise!

He could have put his daughters in a public school and made sure they and all the other students received excellent instruction. But no, he is doing what the vast majority of people who like to legislate for others do. He is making one set of rules for them and living by entirely different standards. "You shall know them by their fruits." Shame on him, shame on Michelle, shame on every single politician who holds the children of our country hostage to their political ambitions and thirst for power!!!



Obama Perpetuates Plantation Philosophy
The sad truth is that Obama is acting just like a white liberal president would. The Democrat coalition wins victories because their black supporters vote overwhelmingly for the Democrat ticket but when a white Democrat takes office as the president the union component of the coalition has more power than loyal African American voters. When Obama did not support a voucher program for D.C. minorities he sided with the unions more than the blacks who were so instrumental in his election.

It's kind of pathetic when we remember that Michelle's father had great difficulty in joining a union and obtaining a good job because of the racial prejudices at that time.

Obama could really make a success of his presidency if instead of giving the usual handouts to blacks he actually helped them to get out of their ghettos and find real jobs and real careers not tied to the scraps thrown at them from time to time by the Democrat oligarchy.

Unions are at the core.
Why does Obama want national healthcare? Because it would create tens of millions of new SIEU Union jobs with only the government to determine their pay and benefits. What will Obama and the Democrats get? Millions of captive voters. Why do they want to funnel hundreds of billions into Education when the government has been throwing billions at education for fifty years and public education is worse now than before we started? Because the NEA Teacher's Union will get millions of new jobs and the pay and benefits of all the members will be controlled by the Government. What does Obama and the Democrats get? You got it! Captive voters.
Why increase governement radically in so many areas that appear capricious and sometimes downright wasteful. More government workers to put on the union rolls and more captive voters.
Why Amnesty now? More illigal union members to pay more union dues and vote for Democrats. Make sense now?

Michelle Antoinette First Lady

Vouchers, don't need no stinkin vouchers
We have teachers in all public schools who are graduates of our esteemed "teacher schools". And all the teachers are members of the "teachers union" and so we know they are helped by the union and are very well qualified.

As long as students stay stupid...
...they'll grow into more idiot sheep voters!

Xerxes
Then it's actually a welfare _cut_ to pay to send the kids to private schools as contrasted with the more expensive and far less effective public schools. What's wrong with that?


school choice
You can not say "no one begrudges the Obama's school choice for their children". I do. I do when they deny it to others. I do when they are constantly spouting off about "the decadent rich". I do when Obama's intent is clearly to destroy our country.

Knock Off the Bull
I doubt seriously that the rich, sophisticated women that had the dubious pleasure of dealing with Michelle were awe struck. Those women recognized what she was in a heartbeat. I imagine they were horrified and went home straightaway for a bath. Stop with the bull because this tasteless, classless shrew bears no resemblance at all to Jackie.

Re DC Schools
As I recall, previous presidents with minor children, who wanted to put their kids in public school, have been prevented by Secret Service from doing so because the kids' security couldn't be managed. Didn't this happen with Amy Carter?

I can tell you from personal experience that the DC schools stink. We moved to DC in 1966 and thought living in the nation's capital would be a thrilling experience for kids. In many ways it was---they played ball on the Mall and could walk to the Smithsonian, where they soon became regulars. But they also got mugged in the school bathroom for their lunch money, and some of their teachers were awful. We would have loved to put them in private school but couldn't afford it, so fled to the suburbs.

In spite of this true history, I oppose vouchers. Republicans like to talk about self-reliance, and yet they want others to pay for their kids' private school tuition. I no longer live in DC but where I do live we have two fine private schools near my home, and the tuition at either one is now about $25,000 a year. A voucher for $2-$3K ain't gonna pay that tuition. And what makes you think that academically prestigious schools want to mess with parents who oppose teaching science? In this matter, conservative parents fail to understand the realities of the situation.


Watch out!
If you say too many nice things about Mrs. Obama you will be banished out of Townhall forever!

Win-win
A two or three thousand dollar voucher to get a kid out of public school that costs $14,000 per kid isn't exactly a subsidy, it reduces the number of students the public school has to have per class, and it's way cheaper (for taxpayers) than paying to have them in it. It's a bargain for DC.

First lady foolishness
I have yet to find the term "First Lady" in the Constitution.
I don't really understand how, Mrs. "America is a mean country," Obama can be admired.
Mrs. Obama would certainly not have fit my Mother's definition of "a lady."
And finally, judging by things that she has said, and written, she is more of a racist than he is.

School vouchers
Just abother axample of the democrats bending down and kissing the behinds of the teachers union. Why do what is right for the kids when you have the teachers filling your campaign coffers. How many more times must we see where the dem/libs say public education is fine for everyone else while they send their children to the most exclusive private schools around.

School vouchers
Just abother axample of the democrats bending down and kissing the behinds of the teachers union. Why do what is right for the kids when you have the teachers filling your campaign coffers. How many more times must we see where the dem/libs say public education is fine for everyone else while they send their children to the most exclusive private schools around.

"Grandmother in residence"
Apparently, I am the only one who noticed the line "Grandmother in residence". Is Michelle Obama's mother living at the White House? If so, who's paying for her? If the Obama's want to put her up at their house in Chicago, that's fine. But, if they want to put her up in our house, then they need to start paying rent for her. She has no right whatsoever to live in our house at our expense.

Rocks 11:55
News reports in January about the Obamas moving into the White House included information about the Grandmother. As I remember it, she said she was going to be there with the family to help them get settled in, especially the grandchildren, and then would determine whether she should stay or go back to Chicago. She was the one who took care of the grandchildren when the Obamas were campaigning, so it seems logical that she would want to help them through their transition to living in DC and continue to stay there if needed. That's what family should do - take care of one another, especially the grandchildren.


I assume there are established accounting procedures for handling the First Family's expenses, including family in residence, staff in residence, and those just staying overnight for visits. If expenses for the "Grandmother in Residence" are handled according to these procedures, I see no problem with her living there. I absolutely am not an Obama supporter, but I don't think this should be an issue unless there is some financial hanky-panky going on.

We Aren't Buying It!! Suzanne!!
A sow's ear is, after all, only a sow's ear--with or without the lipstick!!
She is the middle half of the team of ObamaObama and Momma. I lost whatever good will I might have accrued to her when she did the fist bump, and spoke of being ashamed of America. After seeing the shameful policies of her husband, my opinion of her as America's first lady fell into the basement.

The nouveau riche Obama's are doing the usual "do as I say and not as I do" routine. Go pandering to Ebony or Oprah. If you praise her there, they will swear to it.

Investment in education!!!????!
As Suzanne so rightly points out Obama's call for "investment in education" has been tried in spades (no pun intended) in the DC schools with the worst results possible. Obama insists that we double down on what is surely a losing bet!

Why weren't the DC schools example one of the sheer insanity of calling for more "investment in education" during the campaign. McLame didn't want to be called a racist? John you incompetent fool they called you one anyway!!!

Lilly the reality of the situation is that children in the DC school system know all the rap lyrics about hos and bitches but refuse to learn times tables, know all about being victims but refuse to learn responsibility, know school learning is acting white but readily believe America is a hateful and racist society, don't know who their father is but expect welfare from the state to provide all.

In short you could double the amount spent on teachers and schools in DC and still have schools full of hoodlums whose only role models in life are drug dealers and pimps.

Why is the murder rate in DC 10 times the national average when we spend almost unlimited funds educating these pupils who turn into criminals? Can anyone here spell family breakdown, meltdown or just plain no family whatsoever? A sick society without any moral compass or sense of responsibility will not become good through education.

I'm sorry
but how often is Mrs. Obama away from her children. Not just this trip, but throughout the almost two-year campaign. Wednesday night coactail parties. Going out to dinner, etc.

I don't know the answer but as a mom I'm not sure she is a good role model. Her children are quite young -- they aren't even in HS. I understand that she's in a tough position, but I question Barack Obama as well. I'm not sure anyone with children below HS age should run for president.

You have them for so few years and to give up time with them seems selfish and a shame. I was appalled by the Edwards as well.


Rocks
You miss the point. Clearly grandma is in residence because somebody has to raise the children.

lilly
raises a good question why in the world should anyone finance anyone else's children's education. I'm right there with you. Forget vouchers and abolish the government schools. Let parents home school or pay for their children's schooling. It would bring competition into the schools improving outcomes and lowering costs.

And lilly not all private schools cost 25k a year. Most parish schools cost between 4k and 5k a year. And non-Catholic christian schools sometimes cost less.

My grandparents paid for public schools they never used, then my parents paid for public schools they never used, and now I am paying for public schools I do not use. I am not asking anyone to pay for my kids and no one paid for me so why should I be paying for everyone else?

To JAG in CA
It's a horrible mess, you're right. And I'm sick of people blaming the teachers. What would have helped a lot is if the BHOs had put their girls into a public school. Imagine how straightened up those kids would be with the Secret Service roaming the halls? It would have been the patriotic thing to do. It would have made a huge difference to many, many kids in whatever that public school was. They would have been able to receive a good education with a quiet, behaving student body. The teachers would have been able to teach for once! And it would have made the BHOs look good...something they could use a little of right now, especially after that embarrassing BOW to the Arab king.

To lulu
Do you know why mandatory free public schools were first established? I learned this in my long-ago college American History class: to ensure that everybody would be able to read the Bible. They called this "Biblical literacy". It wasn't about Socialist indoctrination at all. I do think that somewhere along the line people did figure out that a citizenry able to read and write and calculate would be able to get along better, in commerce for one thing. Your plan to have only private schools would create, within a generation, a pool of illiterates.

Re homeschooling: check online and you will see that some states have no educational background requirement for the homeschooling parent, no requirement of record-keeping, and no requirement of testing or evaluation of pupils. It is romantic nonsense to say that a mother who dropped out of 8th grade or bumbled her way through a year of Community College before quitting to get married is magically a better teacher of mathematics or history to her 11th grade son than a professional teacher with a Master's degree in the subject being taught. A mom who never heard of sine/cosine or the French Revolution is unlikely to teach it well, if at all.

Perhaps the philsophy is that children need not be taught what their parents do not know? All of this places us on a trajectory toward cultural illiteracy. Some subjects are well-taught in a tutorial (spelling is an example). Some parents are very well-qualified to teach their children. But many are not, and many homeschooled children are doing little work. This I know from my own professional experience. Right here on townhall a homeschooling mother challenged the rules of English grammar since, as she was unaware of them, she saw no need to teach them. If the public schools hired as teachers high school dropouts or people with just a year or so of Community College, parents would burn down the school, and I would gladly hand them the match. I believe in education.

lilly
I was answering your absurd statement that conservatives don't want to pay for things they use. I pay for private school then am asked to pay for public schools. And every year they ask me to pay more, and from what I can see my local public schools are producing teen pregnancies and young adults who can not make change.

As to the idea that a "professional" public school teacher is obviously a better idea then a parent or private school teacher, I would have to disagree.

Many private school teachers work for 1/2 to 1/3 the pay with no pension etc. Yet these non-union teachers manage to turn out well-educated students. My own parochial HS had a college attendance rate of 96% for graduates. Add to that the fact that those who plan to become teachers have the lowest SAT's of any major in colleges, and when these same students go on to graduate school they have the lowest GRE scores of all college graduates(if the GRE is even required) I would say I'm not that impressed. Most teachers do not have a graduate degree in the subject they teach they have a Masters in Education.

My point though was parents should provide for their own childrens schooling. I could see my way to government funding for the poorest families, but the idea that I and other people are subsidizing the education of middle, upper-middle, and upper class students is infuriating. And even when discussing the poor, I would argue you don't value what you don't pay for, and these "poor" families do not pay a penny to educate their children.

To lulu
If you attended a parochial high school, you were where you chose to be, your parents were willing to pay for you to be, and the school had an option of accepting or refusing you to be. None of this is the case in a public school, which must by law teach everybody who shows up at the door, and that's why your school sent 96% of its pupils to college---NOT necessarily because the teachers were better. They don't teach you much that's worthwhile in education classes, but this statement is gold: "The public schools serve all of the public". That includes the kids who haven't seen a meal set on the table at home in years, kids who don't know where they're sleeping tonight, kids who just found out they're pregnant, kids whose mother is drunk and father is gone, and kids who get diddled by Uncle every night: kids who have a real, real hard time keeping their minds on learning. And, trust me here, all of this happens in "nice" suburbs and small towns just as it happens in the inner city. And, please, can we have some common sense here? A person who has made an intense study of a subject for twenty years knows more about it that someone who has never heard of it.

Vouchers
Nice spin on why conservatives want school vouchers. Your feigned concern about inner-city D.C. students is transparant. Conservatives want "vouchers", which is essentially government money, to pay for their kids to go to a school that mirrors their religious and cultural views. You cannot have it both ways. Vouchers are nothing more than a way to funnel government dollars into religious institutions. A definite attempt at derailing the separtation of church and state. Not to mention, if religious schools start accepting vouchers, there will surely be strings attached that will require some oversight by the government. ie. nothing unconstitutional or any policy bathed in the Right-Christian ideology. No praying, foregoing teaching Creationism, health classes that actually address sex education and many other policies that religious schools currently disdain. And as far as some of you complaining about paying taxes for schools your children don't attend, that argument is ludicrous. When is the last time an individual had a choice in where their taxes go or how they are spent. I am unabashedly against the Iraq War, but my tax dollars, along with other Iraq War opposers, have surely been sent to that spending bottomless pit.

re: lulu
Were you as concerned about Sarah Palin being away from her children during the campaign and, had she been elected, the stresses of being vice president affecting her ability to mother her children, especially a newborn with Down's syndrome?

Also, expanding on Lilly's statement. Public schools are necessary for a democratic public to produce an educated populace. In the absence of public schooling, do you really think private schools will fill the void? Profit seeking private schools will most surely congregate in well to do areas and neglect poorer areas where they will not expect to get a return on their costs. As poorly performing as some public schools are, that is not the case for all, and is certainly not a case to do away with the entire system. Reform is needed, surely, but also public schools are not the sole reason for failures in performance. That also rests with the children and their families in the system. Even in poor performing schools there are some population of students that do benefit and removing the system entirely would leave those kids in the cold.

finally
Everyone pays for public schools, including people without children. If you choose to seek private education or home school, that is your choice, but is also your cost to bear. Why would you want the taxpaying population as a whole to not only subsidize public education but also your private education choice, when you could choose public?

also
There are some examples of Denver inner city schools that were actually closed for poor performance, to later be reopened as charters, and results went through the roof. There is definitely a way to improve on public education without throwing out the baby with the bathwater. But it does take a "community effort", something conservatives seem to find objectionable.

This is unfair..
Marie Antoinette was not all that bad.

I am a teacher
in a non-government, i.e. private school. I did not go to a "teacher's school". I do not have an education degree. Instead, I have bachelor's degrees in physics and biochemistry and a master's degree in mathematics. I am more or less typical of teachers in private schools. Parents, do whatever you have to; get your kids out of government schools! Take another job. Forgo that new car, that big screen TV. Shop at one of those "no-frills" grocery stores that are popping up everywhere. Government schools have devolved from educational institutions to leftist propaganda indoctrination centers. Your kids deserve better.

Smarti
Because parents who put their children first in many places in this country would never send their children to public school. I went to Catholic school the whole way through and half our students were not Catholic. Meaning they were not there for the religious aspects but rather the academics. These parents wanted their children to be able to read, write, and do basic math when they graduated.

In DC the longer a child attends public school the lower their scores are not only on achivement tests but basic IQ tests.

I think it is the dirty truth that no one wants to talk about in this country that for political power and money politicians from the local to the federal level have essentialy decided that we will generation after generation produce a class of citizens that are destined for low wage jobs and crime. Not to mention the basic hardships attendant to going through life functionally illiterate.

There are places in this country where the entire public school system should be shut down for what amounts to fraud and child abuse.

But unlike you so-called compassionate liberals, I don't believe in low expectations for poor children or generational poverty. Then again my sense of self, job, or ideology is not dependent on maintaining an underclass.

You do know that Catholic schools in inner cities take children from the worst neighborhoods and bad home situations and somehow manage to give them a future at 1/2 to 1/3 the cost of public schools?

My own experience in grade school was a large segment of those entering kidergarten where legal and illegal immigrants who somehow were completely fluent in English before 1st grade, yet public schools keep them in bilimgual education through HS then wonder why these kids don't complete HS or go on to college.

typical liberal hypocrisy
Of course Obama and Michelle won't send their children to a public school. Neither will most of the politicians who have children in Washington D.C. They all know how horrible the schools are, but it is okay for other people's children to have to go there. We need the money to follow the children instead of the children following the money. We need school vouchers. Parents of all classes should have the opportunity to send their children to any school they want. Schools should be privatized and taken out of the governments control anyway. That will never ever happen under a democratic administration and probably not under a republican one either until we the people demand equal access.

Doug you are so right
All parents should get their children out of the government schools if at all possible. They are no more than indoctrination centers for the liberal left and are turning out citizens who vote for such people as Obama who is an enemy of the Constitution. Since a great many of the people who vote do not know what is actually in the Constitution, they vote for socialistic ideas. Sadly we are turning into if not already a socialistic state. I don't see how we can get out of it until he citizens become better educated.

Origins of Public School
Here's a different perspective than Lilly's:

http://4brevard.com/choice/Public_Education.htm

from the page:
From the very first report issued by John D. Rockefeller's General Education Board -- this is their first mission statement: "In our dreams, people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present education conventions of intellectual and character education fade from their minds and unhampered by tradition we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into men of learning or philosophers, or men of science. We have not to raise up from them authors, educators, poets or men of letters, great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, (he's really covering the whole gamut of employment isn't he?) statesmen, politicians, creatures of whom we have ample supply (whoever the pronoun we is meant to stand for there). The task is simple. We will organize children and teach them in an perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way".

The real purpose of modern schooling was announced by the legendary sociologist Edward Roth in his manifesto of 1906 called SOCIAL CONTROL. Your librarian will easily be able to get a copy of this book. In it Roth wrote, (I am quoting) "plans are underway to replace family, community and church with propaganda, mass-media and education (of course he meant schooling)...people are only little plastic lumps of dough". Another insider, H. H. Cadard, chairman for the Psychology Department at Princeton, called government schooling approvingly -- "the perfect organization of the hive with the anthill". Cadard wrote further, "standardized testing would cause the lower classes to confront their biological inferiority, sort of like wearing a dunce cap. In time that would discourage reproduction of the ants on the anthill".

Jesus is Risen - He is Alive

Hallelujah, "He is risen!"
Jesus is gone up on high!
Burst the bars of death asunder;
Angels shout, and men reply:
He is risen, He is risen,
Living now, no more to die.

Hallelujah He is risen!
Our exalted Head to be;
Sends the witness of the Spirit
That our Advocate is He:
He is risen, He is risen,
Justified in Him are we.

Hallelujah, He is risen!
Death for all has lost his sting;
Christ, Himself the Resurrection,
From the grave "His own" will bring:
He is risen, He is risen,
Living Lord and coming King.

oh Death Where Is Thy Sting,
grave, Where's Thy Victory,
in Three Days, The Stone Rolled Away.
stone Rolled Away,
an Empty Grave Proves What I Say,
he Lives Today.


typical liberal hypocrisy
Michelle, advocate of the common man, on Barry and Michelle's Excellent European Vacation, was accompanied by 8 personal assistants, including one full-time makeup artist. She dislikes America, fancies herself champion of all black female children, and yet has not spoken up about the elimination of this program. Hypocrisy is rampant within this administration. I yearn for the quiet, dignified Laura Bush. And her cowboy husband, for that matter. Barry - it's ok to comment on the pirate situation without giving away sensitive information.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.