Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, February 20, 2009
Suzanne Fields :: Townhall.com Columnist
Obama Meets the Real Hamilton
by Suzanne Fields
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


MARIGOT, St. Martin -- Barack Obama is wintering in the Caribbean. His visage adorns T-shirts everywhere on this small dot in the Leeward Islands beyond the eastern tip of Puerto Rico -- T-shirts worn by black, brown and white folk, natives and tourists alike.

The Caribbean has a rich and controversial sociology, but Americans think mostly of the islands as idyllic latitudes for winter lassitude. Few native-born islanders have made it into American history. One striking exception is Alexander Hamilton, who was born on the tiny West Indian island of Nevis and grew up in nearby St. Croix.

He's a founding father who might have been president even though he was foreign born -- "the bastard brat of a Scotch pedlar," in the derisive description of John Adams. He was considered a "citizen" of the new United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. But he had many political enemies. Thomas Jefferson derided him, unfairly, as a secret "monarchist." Martha Washington called her tomcat "Hamilton" to mock his scandalous sexual appetite.

Despite all that, and the vicious thrust and parry of his Republican opponents, Hamilton is nevertheless one of our most important original political thinkers, and he sounds like just what we need to lead us out of the contemporary economic crisis.

Although Hamilton's reputation suffered in the long shadow of Thomas Jefferson, liberal and conservative alike now agree that revisiting his words of wisdom would benefit us all. I packed up a small library of revisionist interpretations of the first secretary of the treasury, including Ron Chernow's wonderful biography, to read for reflection in St. Martin while back in Washington the politicians are huddling to give away taxpayer money in ways that would have surely appalled him.

Hamilton understood that money collected by the government is the people's money and should be spent responsibly, with appeals to reason, not as gratification for ambitious spendthrift legislators. A responsible government inspires confidence, and doesn't provoke suspicion and fear. A responsible government aims to unleash the entrepreneurial spirit, and its decisions tend to send the stock market up, not down.

Government debt, Hamilton said, was tolerable to pay for necessary wars, and debt can be run up carefully when the economy falls into trouble and expanded for the infrastructure repairs with specific "internal improvements" for the common good.

He reckoned nationalizing the Revolutionary War debt was legitimate because the states of the new federal government had incurred the costs against a common enemy and held a mutual interest in encouraging investment in an industrial economy. Whereas Jefferson saw America's future as an agrarian nation in the direction of landowners, Hamilton reckoned industrial prosperity as the key to a prosperous future.

He had no reluctance to give private banks power as long as the bankers made sure that their loans were granted to borrowers whose personal integrity was matched by smart business plans. They had to be capable of paying back the money. (No Barney Frank escapades with Fannie and Freddie allowed.) Such common sense evaporated over the past decade -- careless banking and foolish granting of loans, it seems clear now, is what led us to the present predicament. Idealism exploited by greed begot a deadly result.

Barack Obama invoked Alexander Hamilton and his economic genius at Cooper Union in New York City in a campaign stop last year. "The great task before our founders was putting into practice the ideal that government could simultaneously serve liberty and advance the common good," he said. "For Alexander Hamilton, the young secretary of the treasury, that task was bound to the vigor of the American economy. Hamilton had a strong belief in the power of the market, but he balanced that belief with a conviction that human enterprise 'may be beneficially stimulated by prudent aids and encouragement on the part of the government.'"

The key word here is "prudent," a cautious reserve absent from the recent big banking, and specifically from the president's stimulus bill. A year ago, Barack Obama as campaigner recognized that special interests had put their thumb on the scale so that government rewarded "financial manipulation instead of productivity." Subprime mortgage lending became reckless and unmonitored. Now it's a government thumb. Maybe it's necessary, and maybe it's not -- but it's a heavy thumb.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Suzanne Fields is a columnist with The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Suzanne Fields' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Jefferson on spending
"I sincerely believe... that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale."


http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/


Jefferson
"[With the decline of society] begins, indeed, the bellum omnium in omnia [war of all against all], which some philosophers observing to be so general in this world, have mistaken it for the natural, instead of the abusive state of man. And the fore horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression."

chaka zulu
writes, "So it is understandable why Suzanne Fields, a right winger, would prefer Hamiltonian over Jeffersonian Democracy and economics. Hopefully, President Obama will be a Jeffersonian, not Hamiltonian, democrat in this era of economic chaos. Chaka Z."

Dream on. There are other options. Socialism was all the rage in the 30s. It is not at all a stretch to call FDR a communist. The NYT was extolling the virtues of it. Stalin and Mussolini were lionized by the academic elite and intellectuals of the time. Obama has stated exactly where his sympathies lie. He sought out the marxist professors and so on and so forth, need I go on?

Would Jefferson have approved? I think not. Hamilton would probably blanch at the concept as too far even for his taste. Hamilton would probably retract much of his arguments were he able to foresee what we are today.

A benevolent and wise king can work just fine but, counting on a succession of wise and benevolent kings is putting all your hopes and dreams on one person and is not wise from the perspective of common people. Obama is not Caligula but, he will certainly set the stage for one and the people certainly seem willing to put all their hopes and dreams onto a king instead of their own productivity which will allow for one.

Read....
...and gain some perspective. Quit idealizing Jefferson who didn't necessarily practice what he preached. No - Jefferson was not evil. He was a great mind without whom this nation may have foundered and failed. But there may be a reason that Hamilton resides on the ten dollar bill and Jefferson on the two.

Crap!
OK, remind me to never again waste my time reading Ms. Field's articles.

As DiLorenzo has said, compared to Jefferson, Hamilton was an economic ignoramus.

Forget Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton was an elitist and (as Jefferson rightly accuses) a secret monarchist as president Bush was. Hamilton put his faith in the money and property classes to solve the economic problems of his day. He viewed these “responsible” classes as the source of finances for “internal improvements” especially the building of roads and canals. The true democrat was Thomas Jefferson, who wanted to establish an agrarian democracy based upon the small yeoman farmer. Jefferson viewed the moneyed classes, the large capitalist especially, as the source of inflation, bankruptcy, depression, joblessness and the very situation we have today. So it is understandable why Suzanne Fields, a right winger, would prefer Hamiltonian over Jeffersonian Democracy and economics. Hopefully, President Obama will be a Jeffersonian, not Hamiltonian, democrat in this era of economic chaos. Chaka Z.

Wrong-Headed Collectivist Economics
Give us a break! Hamilton was a collectivist.

He advocated "prudent" governmental intervention into the economy. Just like Obama.

Ludwig von Mises and the Austrian School of Economics has impeccable theory and ages of historical corroboration of the folly of "prudent" governmental intervention into the economic realm.

FIRST: GOVERNMENTS NEVER REMAIN PRUDENT.

Everyone (and especially Suzanne Fields) should read Ludwig von Mises little booklet: "Planned Chaos". Available for free download from http://mises.org/

This collectivist baloney of "helping out" and "leveling the playing field" has been tried for centuries and has never worked.

Laissez-faire capitalism with a severely-restricted government might work until government finds ways to un-restrict itself.
********************************************

Dixie Dame...
I agree. Hamilton is not the prize many believe him to be. He was obviously essential in the founding of this country, but his greatness ends there. He was so very much in favor of centralized government that he argued endlessly with Washington about it. Our first President had to consistently remind him of the evils of a central government and the fact that they fought to become independent of one! And let
's not forget that our dear Lincoln vociferously loved and adored Hamilton. However, Hamilton would have drawn the line at pitting the nation against itself, which is what Obabba is doing with his merry band of thugs...

Jefferson's derision
Jefferson's derision was not unfair, but accurate, Hamilton constantly fought for doing away with the states altogether, and his proposals during the Constitutional Convention and afterward were often at odds with his writings in the Federalists Papers. Ms. Fields get your facts straight.

In the words of Jeff Spicoli

"All Right, Hamilton!"

The truth will set you free
Democrats need to understand the truth will set you free. Until they confess they promote and fund genocide, infantcide, and murder by choice abortion,the wrath of God will fall upon this country. Advocacy groups that have partnered with these Jim Crow law practicing liberals also must repent, and stop funding the murdering of babies, blacks, and the unborn.

Hamilton and Centralized government
In agreement with Dixiedame and John, Hamilton believed in a strong central government in opposition to Jefferson's belief. Haven't yet read "Hamilton's Curse" but will. DiLorenzo's "The Real Lincoln" and "Lincoln Unmasked" are classics and so will "Hamilton's Curse" follow suit.

Obama is Hamilton's Heir,
Although even Hamilton, proponent of an all-powerful central government partnering with business, would know Obama has gone too far.

"Hamilton's Curse" is written by an economist, Dr Thomas DiLorenzo (available at Amazon.com)and thoroughly follows Hamilton's influence from the Founding until today. In the Federalist Papers, Hamilton said many things we can revere today, but his actions and later his words set him in direct opposition to Jefferson, who knew a strong central government would eventually become what it is today.

Wrong!
No, Jefferson did NOT envision America as "an agrarian nation in the direction of the landowner." He framed a LIMITED government and knew that the only way to ensure freedom to the citizens was governance at the state and local level. Hamilton, the mercantilist, wanted a powerful central government because he did not trust the people to self-govern. His protege, Chief Justice John Marshall, perverted the Constitution by changing it from a limiting document to a big ball of modeling clay for social engineers. For a great read: "Hamilton's Curse" by Thomas J. DiLorenzo. 15 bucks on ebay.

What Jefferson Understood
Jefferson knew that government with unlimited power would eventually destroy the freedom of the people and bring economic ruin. Hamilton wanted the power vested in a strong central government. The politicians have taken us down the road that Hamilton wanted and what Jefferson warned us of is here.

Jefferson knew that if politicians were allowed to they would take as much power as they could. That is human nature and he tried to warn us of it and protect us from it. It worked for a while but when you have millions voting to give away their freedom there is little that can be done to protect them. This is a lesson we are forced to learn over and over.

Long winter
Being a long winter, me and wife started to watch some old John Wayne movies. No f-words there, so different than today's "movies".
Why would that be ?
Why Hamilton's thinking and John Wayne's way on screen recall to us old times - where manhood was to be proved by prudence and decency ?
Indeed... we are in for a long winter.

Huh?
And what would Hamilton have said about a Justice Department threatening mortgage lenders & banks with fines & suits if they were not maintaining government-imposed racial quotas? The 'government thumb' is what brought it all down. The banks had little choice. Hamilton never had to deal with Janet Reno.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.