Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, March 27, 2008
Suzanne Fields :: Townhall.com Columnist
Back to the Future: The Fondling Father Cues Our Politics
by Suzanne Fields
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

Oh, dear. There sat Ben Franklin in the bathtub, playing chess with a heavily made-up French woman of a certain age. HBO's continuing series on "John Adams" and the founding of the republic leaves out little, not even an affair of the intellect (chess is a mind game, after all) by the man regarded by historians as a fondling father as indulgent in his time as certain politicians who would follow him.

We're in the midst of a resurgence of interest in the Founding Fathers. We see them wrestle with events, personalities and the lesser angels of their nature in a profusion of best-selling biographies and television narratives. They're armed with intellectual grounding and skilled in the arts of finesse, and like politicians of our own time, display a decidedly mixed morality in their public and private lives. They're subject to constantly shifting judgments as we learn more about them. Franklin's considerable reputation as a master of diplomacy and forger of artful compromise probably survives because there were few newspapers. And neither was cable TV nor the avaricious Internet around to catalog all the warts.

Franklin, eager to get Adams out of Paris where they were negotiating for the intervention of France, "went negative" to cut the considerable reputation of Adams down to manageable size, and Abigail rushed to defend her husband as "a man of principle" who would not violate his conscience to please a crowd. When Abigail later became first lady, she would not (like a certain thoroughly modern first lady) exaggerate her influence to suggest she faced danger when there was none, nor that she solved a diplomatic standoff by watching her husband do it.

John Adams, a devoutly religious man, fretted over the nature of man in the process of governing. He worried that human selfishness and love of ease would trump duty and obligation. He was afraid that a crowd could be too easily led. He was suspicious of power and how it could be easily abused. In our own time, we become easily jaded by the private arrogance of public men.

The fall of Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, one of the rising stars of the Democrats, is an example that Adams might appreciate. (Franklin would appreciate the technology). Mayor Kilpatrick was caught lying under oath about an affair with a woman on his staff, brought down by "text messaging." The messages, like everything else on a hard drive, survive. The Detroit mayor follows in the wake of Eliot Spitzer, the governor of New York, forced to resign by revelations of what we could delicately call "commercial romance."

Sex we have always had with us; the Founding Fathers were not immune to the temptations of the flesh. But it was their attitudes toward government that ignited the conflicts and controversies that endure to this day. John Adams and Alexander Hamilton were concerned, lest democracy without restraint become too much of a good thing, and prescribed a strong central government as that which needed restraint. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison saw democracy rooted in a society of doughty yeomen, eager to take on personal responsibility, and were reluctantly submissive to a local government of their peers and neighbors.

We're no longer so credulous as to believe doctored history, to take as true, for example, Parson Weems' fanciful story about young George Washington cutting down his father's favorite cherry tree and refusing to tell a lie about it to avoid punishment. Parson Weems, the first president's first biographer, aimed to teach a moral lesson with a small myth, and for years his "spin" survived. Our children today are more likely to consider only the flaws of the Founding Fathers, to regard them only as early Bill Clintons, Eliot Spitzers and Kwame Kilpatricks on the make. Every schoolboy knows, in that hoary cliché, several of the men who wrote in that declaration that "all men are created equal" owned slaves.

But men and women need both fact and myth: fact to feed the mind and myth to make the heart soar. The National Endowment for the Humanities has inaugurated a program to enable schoolchildren to see the nation's history through paintings. "Picturing America" is composed of 40 works by American artists, with fine reproductions for children of different ages. The program is available on the Web at www.neh.gov. It includes one of the most famous paintings of the Revolution -- "Washington Crossing the Delaware," immortalizing the surprise attack on the British and Hessian troops at Trenton, N.J. This was a stunning victory for the American army, turning the tide of the war at last to the Americans. There are portraits of Washington, Paul Revere and Abraham Lincoln. They're enough to erase that image of Ben Franklin and his friend in the bathtub.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Suzanne Fields is a columnist with The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Suzanne Fields' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Who wants to ''erase that image''?
--
Many an alum'd anus (see "Suzanne Fields") want nothing but the best and most heavily bromide'd Bowdlerization of history, and cannot bear to see the unwashed public ever appraised of plain fact.

Sad and silly, isn't it?

To be honest, I expected something much much more embarrassing than the Marat moment in Dr. Franklin's chambers as Mr. Adams pressed his intemperate way past the sputtering servant to intrude upon his colleague's privacy.

Ben Franklin liked to spend some time bare-butt in his rooms each day, "taking air-baths," and I thought it likely that Mr. Adams ("damn you, Mr. Adams!") would come upon him without even the mitigation of a tubful of water concealing Dr. Franklin's privy parts.

One benefit associated with the study of history is the rare moment when one is able to catch some insight into the nature of the people one studies as participants in the events that make history. It is from these moments that we can learn lessons about how today's thoughts and words and actions can have similarly significant effects in the histories yet to be written.

If there's worth in the study of history at all, there's the essence of it.

Ms. Fields hasn't that perspective.

To Ms. Fields - obviously - history is the raw material of mythos, and anything at varience with the myths she wants perpetuated *MUST* be edited out.

As I'd said, pretty goddam sad and silly, isn't it?

--

Modern politicians
By and large, are a product of a debased culture that doesn't value knowledge, thinking or character. I think men in Jefferson's day were much more likely to have read many books and thought many ideas before they ran for public office. Without TV and other entertainments, the intellectual arts were natural fields of inquiry for intelligent men. Moreover, because people expected men and women to act with responsibility in their lives, a man like Bill Clinton, treating women as sex objects, would probably not have been considered for public office. He'd have had a string of illegitimate children and have been considered not really bright enough to run a country. If his wife's father didn't shoot him for embarrassing his wife.

Ben Franklin was a flirt, no doubt. And, I don't doubt he had a few daliances. We know he was a tom-cat in his youth. From all appearances, however, he doesn't appear to have cheated on his wife during her lifetime. What he did after she died was moral objectionable to those of us who consider sexual immorality to be a sin, but was really pretty acceptable for his day and age. As far as anyone ever could figure out, he enjoyed the company of women old enough to know what they were doing, treated them with respect and took care of any children he produced. Yet, let us remember that he was a pretty old man for his day when he was in Paris. I think the painting might have been a bit of fancy. Do we really think that Franklin would have invited a painter into his bath chamber? I seriously doubt it.

Contrast that with Bill Clinton. Lewinski wasn't a child, but she was certainly young and manipulatible, and he did her in the Oval Office. Trust me, if I have sex in my office with my subordinate and my boss finds out about it, I'm losing my job. And rightly so!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.