Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, October 09, 2006
Suzanne Fields :: Townhall.com Columnist
Heart, soul and different brains
by Suzanne Fields
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

Nothing animates the conversation of women like talk about how they're stereotyped by men. The stereotypes are rarely consistent. Some men still rage at the look of an emancipated career woman with long hair twisted severely in a bun. But he's eager to forgive when she lets it down over a glass of wine and fluffs it suggestively.

Some American men are so disillusioned with changes wrought by radical feminism that they seek an Asian or Eastern European bride through a marriage broker or dating sites on the Internet, egged on by wild fantasies that they'll meet a submissive housewife by day who becomes a wild and crazy sexpot by night. This is not the mail-order bride of the Old West populated by manly men and womanly women. On the frontier, men and women were expected to work hard and were equal opportunity offenders of good hygiene.

But as the city and suburbs replaced the frontier, so did expectations, and women began to work against stereotypes of their own making. You can find them abundantly in the Mommy Wars, where working mothers attack stay-at-home mothers and vice versa. Freud famously asked, "What do women want?" Today women pose that very question to themselves.

Gone is the feminist bravado of sharpshooter Annie Oakley: "Anything you can do, I can do better." Or at least as good. Women are beginning to realize that sexual differences, though not immutable, determine what men and women do best.

Feminist studies still blame the environment (read men) for creating the culture that makes it difficult for them to enter the workplace, but the latest research on male-female differences suggests that the brains of men and women are wired so differently that dramatic sexual distinctions begin in the womb. An appreciation for the maternal instinct is enjoying a revival.

This does not mean that male chauvinists can revert to piggy behavior, suggesting that women return only to a place in the home. But it does allow women to validate their strengths for doing what comes naturally in motherhood.

The scientific phenomenon changing male-female perceptions is a book called "The Female Brain," by Louann Brizendine, a neurologist, all about new brain imaging technology. It ought to help (but probably won't) both men and women find a commonsense understanding of the roots of sexual differences and how to deal with them.

My favorite finding of Dr. Brizendine's is her description of the different way the brains of girls and boys determine thinking about the opposite sex after puberty. The part of a boy's brain that controls sexual thought is twice the size of a girl's. Once his brain is flooded with testosterone, the boy is likely to think about sex every 52 seconds. Surges of estrogen may lead a teenage girl to obsess over her style and her need to look desirable, but that's as far as she wants to go. She buys, he lies.

"It's hard to believe that something as tiny as a little hormone could have such a robust behavioral effect for all of us," Dr. Brizendine tells ABC News' "20/20." Hormonal changes that occur in a woman after she gives birth reorient her behavior toward her husband. "The dad is there only in a supporting role now," she says. "Whereas he is used to being the main course, he's now like a side dish." (But maybe a sweet potato?)

We've long known that women are more verbal than men, but we've only recently established that the female emotional memory is longer. Women use 20,000 words in a day where a man is likely to use only 7,000 (and often says just as much). Add her long memory to his laconic reticence and you can understand how men and women argue differently. A man is nearly always at a disadvantage when a woman recalls every argument they've ever had. He doesn't remember any of them, or so he says.

But men and women change as they grow older. Baby boomers, now entering their 60s, still work out at the gym as a way to stay fit, but the latest trend for seniors may reflect changing hormones and diminished aggression. They're returning to ballroom dancing as an alternative to exercise. Dancing burns from 250 to 400 calories an hour. Membership in USA Dance, a ballroom dancing organization, has doubled to 20,000 members over the last decade. Dancing cheek to cheek to "Heart and Soul" doesn't have the intensity of rocking to "You Ain't Nothin' But a Hound Dog," but it has a soothing intimacy and emotional memory, and it can eliminate some of the 20,000 words that most couples can usually do without. Nature will out.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Suzanne Fields is a columnist with The Washington Times.

Be the first to read Suzanne Fields' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
A dangerous path
I second the cautionary commens of audiR10 and cari. While there is no good reason to deny that there are hard-wired differences between men and women, there is good reason for us to be careful about going too far down the path that begins with evidence of natural differences and ends with denial of opportunities to women. After all, virtually every argument for denying opportunities to women rests on somebody's idea of natural differences.

Women were told they couldn't own property, have professional careers (law, medicine, just for starters), and so much more because their natures made such things either impossible or harmful to them (sometime both). One of the basic principles of genuine conservatism is suspicion of all talk about "equality" and "equal rights."

I know some of you will think I'm just indulging a liberal bias, but check is out for yourself: America's greatest conservative intellectual, Russell Kirk, rightfully regarded support for inequality in many areas as a legitimate conservative principle. It's 5th on his list of principles at:

http://www.kirkcenter.org/kirk/ten-principles.html

In fact, greater familiarity with conservative thought would show even TH readers that conservatives were opposed, for example, to women's suffrage. Recent so-called "opportunity feminism" like that of Christina Hoff-Summers is not really conservative; it is parasitic on liberalism.

One of the problems inherent in thinking carefully about natural differences between men and women is that absurd situations result, such as the following:

When former Harvard president Larry Summers got into such hot water when he talked about research findings showing large differences between men and women in such areas as mathematics, the first thought that came to this liberal's mind is that the Harvard Physics Department has Lisa Randall, an eminent physicist who may (according to some people in her field) get a Nobel Prize for her work in the next few years. Would Summers have prevented Randall from learning the math it takes to do theoretical physics because her brain wasn't supposed to be wired to do such math? Would a conservative hiring committee had hired Randall in the first place?

[If you want to learn more about Randall and her research, here's her web site:

http://www.physics.harvard.edu/people/facpages/randall.html

Of course, Randall would be an exception, some conservatives would say. What feminists have tried to make clear is that there is very often something deeply wrong with the view that "nature" should be the basis on which societies rank their members, or on which opportunities should be based. "Nature" covers many things, and feminists believe there is ample evidence that it is used as a justification for what cannot rightly be justified.

Fields should speak for herself only
"Estrogen rushes" only make females think about their appearence to males. Yeah, sure. Women sexually lusting men ? Of course not. Women checking out men and comparing notes ? Never. Fields should speak for her ( repressed ? ) self only. Women have had to live with this type of double standard forever, and ultimately we've got ourselves to blame for letting it continue. An example of this is women's use derogitory terms to describe women who get more or better sex than they do. Men on the other hand usually admire ( sometimes grudgedly )men who get more sex than they do. There's the difference.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.