Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Steve Chapman :: Townhall.com Columnist
Baseball's Persistent Drug Culture
by Steve Chapman
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


The news about Alex Rodriguez's use of steroids is simultaneously distressing and encouraging. Distressing because we learned that yet another baseball star was cheating. Encouraging because the revelation is one more step toward putting the years of bogus biceps in the past.

Baseball and A-Rod were stained, but both have cleaned up and moved on. So now the Yankee slugger and everyone else will be competing on honest terms and records set in the future won't need an asterisk.

If only. True, Major League Baseball has gotten reasonably serious about curbing its drug problems. But the incentives for getting around the rules -- stardom, records, big money or merely hanging on to a roster spot -- are as alluring as ever. The evidence suggests that plenty of players will take any help they can get. And for anyone who wants the benefits of steroids without getting busted, there's a good alternative.

You don't have to be a cynic to doubt that Rodriguez and any of his colleagues in crime have all had a moral epiphany. If they were willing to ignore the rules and use banned drugs before -- and, in many cases, reaped impressive gains -- why wouldn't they keep doing it?

The only obvious reason is the likelihood of detection. Baseball now has a system of year-round, unannounced testing for steroids and other artificial aids. But what if there were a steroid-like substance that couldn't be detected? Wouldn't it be just as tempting to anyone looking for an edge?

Judging from the steroid experience, that's enough players to fill several rosters. In 2003, the first year of drug testing, when Rodriguez got nailed, more than 5 percent of major leaguers flunked. In the years before testing became a deterrent, the number of steroid aficionados was undoubtedly higher.

But there is an alternative for anyone intent on a burlier body: human growth hormone, which is reputed to have the same muscle-inflating properties but doesn't show up in a urinalysis. To detect it, you need a blood test, which the players union has refused to accept.

The hormone's appeal is not in doubt. Barry Bonds was indicted for perjury because he told a grand jury his personal trainer had not given him HGH. Roger Clemens' trainer said he had injected the pitcher with the stuff. Andy Pettitte admitted using it. This week, Miguel Tejada did likewise, as part of a plea agreement.

But absent a reliable test, it's not easy to catch hormone hounds. Even a blood test may not suffice. The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), which supervises testing of Olympic competitors, has screened 8,500 athletes for HGH since 2000. And how many positive results has it gotten? Zero. So anyone feeling puny and weak without steroids is bound to contemplate a switch.

We also know baseball's new testing regime has not miraculously dried up the demand for performance enhancers. After Major League Baseball outlawed amphetamines, an interesting thing happened: More than 100 players got "therapeutic exemptions" for banned stimulants to treat Attention Deficit Disorder.

Calling that number "incredible," Dr. Gary Wadler, a WADA official, told USA Today, "There seems to be an epidemic of ADD in major-league baseball."

For now, though, the broadest boulevard for cheating is HGH. That could change: At a recent conference sponsored by Major League Baseball at the University of California, Los Angeles, scientists said they were making progress toward a urine test for the agent. But it is still in the future, leaving dishonest players ample opportunity.

We may have banished steroids, but there is no reason to think baseball is any cleaner now than it was before. If and when an HGH test is developed, we are likely to get another round of failed drug tests. And one or more of today's stars is bound to be doing the confession-and-repentance routine.

Unfortunately, we won't know how bad things were back in 2009. In theory, current samples could be preserved and retested in the future. But Major League Baseball doesn't preserve samples. That means today's players -- possibly including the supposedly repentant Rodriguez -- can use HGH with little fear of someday being unmasked.

It's slightly comforting to think we have moved beyond the steroid decade. But the drug-free era hasn't begun, and it may never.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Steve Chapman is a columnist and editorial writer for the Chicago Tribune.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Congress' ONLY...
accomplishment the past four years.

They proved that baseball players were on steroids.

Now they're setting up a special house committee to investigate whether or not water is wet.

What steriods really do
Steroids don't make home run hitters.

It is irresponsible to continue to characterize steroids as some sort of magic potion that produces home runs. They don't.

Home runs are produced by an extraordinary combination of skill, talent, and repetitious training. It is in the repetitious training that steroids give a boost.

Major leaguers play 200 games a year. Premier hitters take hundreds of practice swings every day. Human muscle will not recover adequately over a long season to allow strenuous training. If they want to ban supplements - so be it, and clearly there will be less home runs and more injuries.

But the idea that "steroids" are home run potion needs to be debunked if the appeal to youngsters is to be decreased.

Baseball should be abolished
Congress should do something good; get rid of that boring game in the name of national interest. Put baseball heroes to work cleaning the streets.

There's already an asterisk
The MLB recordbook already comes with an asterisk to denote the steroid era: the year 1990. That's roughly when it started, according to most baseball commentators, who know a lot more about those issues than I do. The problem is we don't know how many people were clean or not or for how long. We can assume, for example that Tony Gwynn and Cal Ripken were clean because they are both honest men who didn't put on the prima donna act that many athletes do. But even they may have some cloud of suspicion from some people.

I seriously doubt that drugs are going away anytime in the foreseeable future of sports. There's too much money involved for the players, the leagues, and the pharmacologists. It works like an arms race, a new drug comes out that sparks a new test to find the drug. The new test provides incentive to make a new drug that beats the test, which sparks yet another test, and so forth.

Corndog
Yep, that just about covers it.

I think Senator Specter is setting up a special subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee to determine if the sun is hot, too.

Good point crescen7
I'll use ice-hockey analogy instead here, for an oft-missed side-effect of steroids. They also change the user's temperament/personality, invariably for the worse.

Net result: you can turn a top-scorer (such as Gretzky***) into a top-goon (like McSorley--though Marty was that way even without steroids).

***Even Calgarians (including this one) acknowledge that Number-99 was an excellent player--of course, we really enjoyed his 1986 quarter-finals game-7 performance!

Let's see
There's a MLB player facing prison for lying to Congress about use of an enhancment chemical that harmed nobody but himself if even that, but Bawney Fwank etc are still in office, yea, firmly ensconced in the Messiah's Ministry of Everyone for having financially screwed the country?

Hello?

Steroids, hormones, and the athletes who foolishly use them: why are these the concern of Congress when they cannot or will not keep their own hands out of a far more consequential cookie jar?

do you know what steroids do?
Baseball as a game suffers more than other sports from steroid use because the ballparks stay the same size and the home-run hitter is competing against the ballpark as well as against the pitcher. In a sport like football, if an offensive tackle is on steroids (for years most, or at least many, were), and the defensive end opposite him is on steroids, it's pretty much a wash -- except for more injuries.

Chapman says that HGH has the same "muscle-inflating properties" as steroids do, and intimates that it is widely used. If so, then people would still be hitting 70 home runs, as McGwire, Sosa, and Bonds did when they were juiced. If the league leader is hitting in the 40-50 homers a year range, then whatever he is using isn't much of a substitute for steroids -- that is what was typical in the pre-steroid era.

crescen7 (7:59) says that without steroids, there will be more injuries. On the contrary, steroids greatly increase the number of injuries for at least two reasons: they increase muscle mass without increasing the strength of the supporting bones and tendons, and they cause deterioration of the joints. Players in the pre-steroid era played long careers without nearly the number of injuries you see today.

Long careers?
Most baseball players in the bygone era (pre 1990) were on the downhill by age 36 and almost all were out of the game by 40! Barry Bonds was just hitting his steroid crazed peak at 36. Some of the increase could be attributed to better nutrition and better conditioning but my money is on better performance through chemistry!

relevance?
Who really cares about steroids? or better put, who really should care? There is no real reason to make steroids illegal, as the only person harmed is the person taking them. I mean seriously breast enhancement and sex change are both legal but a person can't choose to artificially get bigger muscles. That being said there is one reason to ban them from sports, which is that a person who chooses not to put himself at risk through steroid usage should not have to compete against someone who is willing to take the risk.

Drug culture pervaded sports
long before anabolic steroids were even made artificially (including purification from animal extracts--example of this being Premarin).

Traditional celebration for championship games/series in many sports involves ethyl alcohol (certainly a drug, even if not designated such)--wine for winners, beer for losers.

GIVE ME A BREAK

.....Do you think Arnold became Mr. Universe by eating his fruits and vegetables? ...did the bulk of linemen in football go from 180 lbs (in my day) to 350 lbs today by healthy eating habits ...

.....Professional athletes compete for big bucks in a highly competive business ...does anyone think that they will not take every edge they can get? ....and why should this be illegal? ...

.....We elect a President who admits to being a cocaine user but we dump on athletes who use hormones to build muscle mass ...such hypocricy .....COLOSSUS
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.