Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Steve Chapman :: Townhall.com Columnist
Obama's Economic Mythology
by Steve Chapman
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


If you're at a Catholic shrine, it's a good idea to show respect for the Virgin Mary. In New York, a Yankees cap will make you look right at home. And among a Democratic crowd, you can never go wrong by lamenting the decline of the middle class and the stagnation of wages.

I don't have to tell Barack Obama. He makes a habit of claiming that "wages are shrinking," working families have lost ground and the country desperately needs his "Rescue Plan for the Middle Class." His economic program rests on the unshakable conviction that everyone except the wealthy is doing worse and worse all the time. If elected, he will find sympathetic ears among Democrats in Congress, where never is heard an encouraging word.

In the midst of alarming headlines, it's easy to persuade people that things are worse than they used to be. The only problem is that aside from the transitory effects of the current turmoil, they aren't.

Even on that front, things are better than advertised. For nearly a year, we've been told that the economy is on the verge, if not the thick, of a painful recession. But the traditional definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative growth -- and we have yet to endure even one such quarter. In the second quarter, the economy grew at a brisk 3.3 percent rate, which is the opposite of what happens in a downturn.

Given all the fallout from the housing bust and the mortgage meltdown, things may look worse when the data emerge for the third quarter. But they won't change the actual long-run picture on how most people are faring in the modern economy -- which is much better than we have been led to believe.

That is not really surprising. Everywhere you look, you see Americans shopping and buying. Vast expanses of land that used to harbor corn or cattle now provide a home for shopping centers that go on forever. In 1988, Wal-Mart had 1,200 stores. Today, it has 3,800. Americans bought 24 percent more new cars and trucks in 2007 than in 1990.

All sorts of products that didn't exist a generation ago are now commonplace even in humble neighborhoods -- personal computers, cell phones, high-definition TVs, Polartec jackets, digital cameras, Starbucks coffee and more. If their incomes are steadily falling, how do Americans cart home so much stuff?

Terry Fitzgerald, a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, says the answer is simple. Far from declining, he writes, "the economic compensation for work for middle Americans has risen significantly over the past 30 years."

The mistake made by the School of Gloom is looking only at wages, narrowly defined. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, average hourly earnings of production and nonsupervisory workers, adjusted for inflation, fell by 4 percent between 1975 and 2005. But those figures deceive because they omit fringe benefits like health insurance, pensions and paid leave, which make up a bigger share of total compensation than before. The numbers also rely on a mismeasure of inflation.

When those flaws are corrected, a very different trend leaps off the page. Median wages, says Fitzgerald, rose 28 percent between 1975 and 2005. Nor were the gains restricted to Bill Gates and Hannah Montana: Significant gains occurred in the middle as well.

The same pattern holds for households. The figures that suggest families are struggling to stay even overlook some types of income, and they don't account for the fact that households have gotten smaller on average. After accounting for such things, Fitzgerald found that "inflation-adjusted median household income for most household types increased by roughly 44 percent to 62 percent from 1976 to 2006."

None of this alters the fact that some people have done worse. Domestic and global competition, which raise living standards, also spell trouble for many companies and workers. A 50-year-old who loses a $30-an-hour job on the Chevy assembly line may never find anything comparable. But the steady, broad rise in living standards makes it clear that -- at least until recent months -- our economy consistently spawns more good jobs than it destroys.

Thanks to American capitalism, ordinary workers and families are better off today than they were a decade or a generation ago. In the midst of scary economic times, that's a heartening fact to keep in mind. Even if certain Democrats would rather you didn't.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Steve Chapman is a columnist and editorial writer for the Chicago Tribune.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
The Truth Is Painful
I would like to see someone nail Obama with how much he contributes to the poor.

He’s ready to spend your money, but shelters his own like anyone who has any to spare.

Why doesn’t someone ask him about his tax sheltering investments? Where did the proceeds from his book go?
He put it in tax free municipal bonds, and his daughters tax free college fund. Nothing wrong with that, but what if all the wealthy do the same? Who do you think is going to pay for his spending programs? The wealthy are not going to carry this tax burden.
Corporations will be forced to pass the tax on, tickle down taxation. CEO’s are going to do the same thing that Obama is going to do with his wealth.

The fact is that money is power. The more of it that you can keep, the more power you have. The very wealthy that he says that he wants to tax are no different than he is in terms of wealth.
They will shelter as much of there money as they can.
Take the wealth invested in your home. If you had a 10 million dollar home, you would not be taxed on capital gain until you sold it. If you replaced it with a 10 million dollar home, you still would not be taxed on it. Yet, the power gained from that wealth is enormous.

Take Oprah; why would she back a candidate that plans to take 50 - 70% of her wealth?
We are talking about capital gain taxes, income taxes, and corporate taxes. You see; Oprah’s corporation is going to be taxed, her income is going to be taxed, and her investments are going to be taxed. Folks, even Oprah ain’t that generous. She didn’t get where she is by throwing money away.

Obama needs to be hammered with the truth. Don’t let him squirm out of this lie

Merle
I see LSD is still being sold in the "Bay Area". Nothing and I repeat nothing you have said is True. The economy is making a "Correction" which is normal for Capitalism. Politics is the disguise of Economics. I am afraid you can't disguise Ignorance. But you keep trying.

Investing in Failure - Obama's Plan

Barack Obama's clarion call is to "Sacrifice for the Common Good" - to redistribute wealth, as Obama said to 'Joe the Plumber', "letting those behind catch up".

Who are these citizens that Obama will invest the money of those who work in?

Hard working people that need 'Just a Helping Hand' to catch up?

Hard working students that need help to finish or continue their brilliant educations?

NO, Barack Obama wants to invest OUR money in criminals, those chronically unemployed and those students that have low levels of student academic achievement.

That is like picking the poorest performing stocks one can find and investing their retirement and 401K money in failure - hoping to help those companies that are on a course of bankruptcy, complete their goals.

Those who work get to help criminals pursue their careers, those that won't work, continue not working (with some walking around money) and enable drug users, alcoholics and other addicts to continue their lifestyles.

"Establish 20 Promise Neighborhoods: Obama will create 20 Promise Neighborhoods in cities across the nation that have high levels of poverty and crime and low levels of student academic achievement." Barack Obama, Blueprint for Change

Barack Obama's 'Hope' and 'Change' = 'Investing in Failure' = coming to America with anyone who works help.

future
Other than "spreading the wealth around" Obama has no economic plan.
Wind mills,solar farms and bio fuels are his energy plan.
His health care plan will have a cost equal to 1/3 the value of all our resources.
Costs of social programs that exceed tax revenues will be added to the national debt,which now is at 10.5 trillion dollars.
Before the end of his first term in office, the U.S. will be unable to even pay the interest on this debt and will have to default..
No,the future does not look bright and prosperous, it looks dark and depressing.

Two big demographic shifts
I wonder about analysis that ignores two big demographic shifts. Boomers are retiring in the tens of thousands. Losing so many senior high paid employees will lead to restructuring and many new jobs. Also, the census report says the number of illegals has declined to 8 million. That is a change we fught for, but it has effects. Those 4 million were living somewhere, and now we have excess housing.

high-tax, an increasing disaster
In 1993, the U.S. was one of the world’s lowest-tax countries, with Europe mostly at much higher rates, and most of the Asian economies too underdeveloped to be alternatives for investments and businesses. Eastern Europe was under a cloud of uncertainty and instability following the rapid demise of The Soviet Union on Christmas Day 1991. The 1993 tax increase left the U.S. as the leading free-market economy, albeit at a smaller margin than before.

As we enter 2009, the U.S. position in the world is extremely different than it was 16 years earlier. We are no longer the low-tax beacon of the major industrialized world. Numerous countries in Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Asia and elsewhere now have lower capital gains taxes than the U.S.
Our 15% long-term capital gains tax can’t compete with the 0% rates in many other countries, but don’t forget that many capital gains taxes aren’t long-term, at which point you will pay 36% or higher.

The effect of the current high-tax policies is becoming an increasing disaster. There has been no employment growth in places such as Silicon Valley in the last decade, because U.S. companies are choosing to locate more employees in lower-tax areas such as China, India and Eastern Europe.

tax program will increase our wealth

{Kennedy reiterated his beliefs in his Tax Message to Congress on January 24, 1963:

In short, this tax program will increase our wealth far more than it increases our public debt. The actual burden of that debt--as measured in relation to our total output--will decline. To continue to increase our debt as a result of inadequate earnings is a sign of weakness. But to borrow prudently in order to invest in a tax revision that will greatly increase our earning power can be a source of strength.

President Kennedy proposed massive tax-rate reductions, which were passed by Congress and became law after he was assassinated. The 1964 tax cut reduced the top marginal personal income tax rate from 91 percent to 70 percent by 1965. The cut reduced lower-bracket rates as well. In the four years prior to the 1965 tax-rate cuts, federal government income tax revenue--adjusted for inflation--increased at an average annual rate of 2.1 percent, while total government income tax revenue (federal plus state and local) increased by 2.6 percent per year (See Table 4). In the four years following the tax cut, federal government income tax revenue increased by 8.6 percent annually and total government income tax revenue increased by 9.0 percent annually. Government income tax revenue not only increased in the years following the tax cut, it increased at a much faster rate.}

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/bg1765.cfm

How-about....
How-about a 60-year-old who loses a $40-an-hour job in the Hi-Tech industry has never found anything comparable. Yet his 35+ years of Hi-Tech experience was replaced not once but twice by H2B visa immigrants. But the steady, decline in my living standards makes it clear that – I will not be enjoying my retirement; I will be working a $15-an-hour job until the day I die.

Indy
Your post is a clear example as to why I don't discuss economics with Americans. If you can,please have Dr. Sowell and anyone else you can find, to explain what the Business Council of America is. These economist have recently (Today) declared, that "US" are now in recession. Various parts of this economy have been in recession for most of the last year. I predicted the September 15,2008 "Meltdown". Where was Dr. Sowell's prediction.You better pray ,that I don't teach the world how to destroy this economy. I suggest you read more books and get back to me in a couple of YEARS..

Alinsky Method
Dear Mr. Chapman,

The New Democratic Party - as opposed to the old Democratic Party - has taken upon itself the mandate of Saul Alinsky: convince everybody how hopeless things are - and provide no solutions.

Just like Iraq: Obamessiah didn't want to go to war, but what did he propose we do regarding Saddam Hussein? Talk with him?

And Obamessiah's admission in the Democratic debates that tax increases don't really do anything, but they're "fair" shows that he is not really a problem solver at all, just someone who can point to a problem and make everybody feel angry. He can even point to non-problems - as your article eloquently proves - and make people feel bad about them, too!

The New Democratic Party has taken Alinsky and made his work - which was dedicated to Lucifer, by the way - and made it their bible and their M.O. Which stands for, in the case of the New Democratic Party, Mindless Operandi.

killer, you're not really BJ are you?
Now give me the meaning of is. 9.7% growth and going into recession? I think you need to come up with another measurement, like inflation that a sound economist would use like Dr. Sowell, because if either of those extremes is true the other is false and you come across sounding like a total doofus.

This article has more information about the history of American economics than 100 major newspapers have shown in the last two years of this campaign. The dims run screaming like a school girls from statistics and use the same line on the dim lemmings to follow. Conservatives will gladly help them hold corporations accountable when they do the same to unions and Fannie/Freddie and get their hands out of my pocket, stop calling me a racist, drill, stop undermining the troops for political gain, register and deport illegals and stop the divisive hate of their cronies.

Andrews
96% of the words in the dictionary have more than one definition. We call them characteristics. Why? Because any word with more than 1 Letter has the capacity for change. I tried to qualify my premise with the fact, that the world fundamentals have changed when it comes to economics. To use the traditional definition in a non-traditional economic circumstance, flies in the face of logical thinking. You have a parachute,I "Hope"..., Also,the ignorance of the writer exist far beyond this stated article!

AudiR10
I usually agree with you. But many things are also cheaper than ever before. Basic household goods like linens, pots & pans, dishes are way cheaper not adjusting for inflation than they were 10 or 15 years ago. Clothes are cheaper as well. Electronic equipment too.

Some things are more like food, but overall I find that I'm paying the same or less for sheets etc. than I did in the 90's.

Anecdotal yes
but all of my friends live way better than our parents did at our age and there is no comparison to how our grandparents lived.

I really do believe that baby boomers and the generations that came after them just don't have any real perspective about how middle class Americans used to live and how much smaller the middle class was.

We expect larger houses, cars and multiple cars, computers, multiple tv's, cell phones, daily restaurant meals, prepared foods, cable, etc.

crescen7...
if McCain/Palin were to point out the truth of this article, they would be severely slapped down...Obama and crew have convinced Americans that they are in a severe recession and the people don't want to hear anything different. I have worked a second job for many years...it provides me with extras like travel and purchases I would not be able to otherwise afford. My lifestyle hasn't changed, although I paid a bit more for gas over the summer. Obama/Biden need Americans to see themselves as victims, even though we live in the greatest country in the world. This article is right on!

AudiR10
You are correct. The definition of inflation is the rate at which the government prints new money. Recently, it's been around 15% - 17%.

How will an Obama administration make up for the shortfalls in revenue due to absurd taxes? He'll print more money, of course, thus speeding up our descent into poverty. (Just as our current fiscal "wizards" have been doing.)

For those who don't understand inflation, this is from InflationData.com:

What is the Real Definition of Inflation?
Webster's 1983 Definition of Inflation
According to Webster's New Universal Unabridged Dictionary published in 1983 the second definition of "inflation" after "the act of inflating or the condition of being inflated" is:

"An increase in the amount of currency in circulation, resulting in a relatively sharp and sudden fall in its value and rise in prices: it may be caused by an increase in the volume of paper money issued or of gold mined, or a relative increase in expenditures as when the supply of goods fails to meet the demand.

This definition includes some of the basic economics of inflation and would seem to indicate that inflation is not defined as the increase in prices but as the increase in the supply of money that causes the increase in prices i.e. inflation is a cause rather than an effect.


Killer
Since the technical definition of recession is two quarters of negative growth, how can you be in a recession and have growth? The very definition makes that impossible.

You call the author ignorant, but he tells you right in the essay what the definition is and you still get ti wrong.

You don't have to abide by the definition, you can call water liquid ice or growth a recession, but don't call others stupid for failing to understand you when you depart from the accepted meaning of words. And the accepted meaning of recession prevents a combination of recession and economic growth.

I forgot to add:
Either one can sure destroy our opportunity for prosperity.

A few bad policies like Cap and Trade, a little loss of free speech rights like the Fairness Doctrine, a few more corporate taxes and nationalizing an industry or two will be all it takes.


I was in deep financial doo
I left my irresponsible ways behind, paid off my debts, cleaned up my credit rating (which cost me a ton) and amazingly enough, on the same salary I was earning 15 years ago I'm doing far better.

I've got money in the bank (until somebody takes it) and am starting to look forward to retirement.

The debt that "killer" talks about above is a personal choice and one that can be remedied with a few years of sacrifice and a little self discipline.

There's only two elements to be prosperous in present day America. 1. good decision making 2.Time.

Jobs are plentiful for those are willing to work for them, and the opportunity to run a small home business to make a few bucks on the side is unlimited.

After our new government gets done tinkering with our economy that may not be the case anymore. Its going to be like the guy who goes to fix his washing machine. He takes the whole thing apart and he not only can't fix it, but he can't get it put back together. By the time he's done with it...it's trash.

Sure, we can institute the Fair Tax and maybe even get some energy out of our own ground. We might even be able to get some energy from a few traditional sources like sun and water technologies. Perhaps we could even build a few nuclear reactors.

But that won't lead to prosperity.

Prosperity only comes from personal responsibility and the freedom.

Obama can't change that, and nothing he (or McCain) do will bring prosperity either.

pablo st. cruz..
Did I mention that you're a sad, cynical little person?

Conservatives, Republicans, ...
disgruntled Democrats, Hillary supporters, and anyone else who believes an Obama presidency would be disastrous...

VOTE!!!

Obama hasn't won this election. It hasn't even occurred yet. Don't let the propaganda depress our voice. Do not sit at home on election day. It may be the most important vote you ever cast. Don't let them tell you there's no chance. Don't let them get the better of you. If you do nothing else in support of John McCain this election cycle, go vote on November 4th. Do not hand this thing over willingly. Put up some fight, at least.

PERPETRATED
It is not too hard to say with some conviction that the party of the left with help from the RINO sect on the right perpetrated, colluded and was complicit in the commitment of a massive attack to bring down the economy of this nation in order to maintian and controll the political leaderships in this nation and in doing so caused massive financial damage to nations across the planet.

I surmise anger in this nation is as high as it was in in the days when we had taxation without representation and that is exactly what we have now. It's time for massive political changes and I do not mean the one's wanted by the left.

PLEASE OBAMA DONT TRY TO RESCUE US !
OBAMA FAILED HIS CPR AND FIRST AID CLASS,HIS SOCIALIST AGENDA CANT GIVE ANY LIFE TO THE ECONOMY! DONT LET THIS DUDE RUIN AMERICA! VOTE MCCAIN-PALIN TODAY VOTE EARLY!

Oh did I mention?
AIG has spent all the money we gave them and won't tell us where it went.

The economy is doing great!!!
And this column just describes what a bunch of negative nannies the Dumbocrats really are!!!

Why the 3rd qtr results are in and the GDP only declined .3%!!! That's a lot less than was expected!!!

Heck, unemployment is rising at only .4% per week.

And the good news just keeps on coming.

Steve
I try not to discuss economics with Americans,so this is just a correction. China had 9.7% growth at the end of 2007 and was on it's way to a recession. People like you,the uneducated in economics,often quote parts of the statistical data but you fail to interpret it correctly. The coming of Globalization/Urbanization, changed the way our fundamentals work. Please take note of that fact when making your assessments. India had 8.7% growth and it's in recession right now! Also please talk to everyday people who have $7,000.00 in credit card debt,which will take 23 years to pay off,if paying the minimum. I guess that negates much of that 30 year prosperity of yours. There is a TON of good news about this economy but you have to understand economics to state IT!!! Sorry..

video
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?feature=related&v=Lr1M1T2Y314

Federal Funding Increases Costs
Every time congress decides it's going to decrease the burden on the middle class by "helping" pay for services, the costs go up. Before Medicare was enacted in 1965, per capita medical costs in 2005 dollars were about $500; by 2005 that number approached $2000. That's roughly a 400 percent increase.

Since 1948, there has been federal assistance for college costs. And guess what? College costs since then steadily rose at twice the rate of inflation. Then in 1996, federal funding for college expenses rose 43 percent per pupil, and college costs have not caught up, but have risen 29 percent in private colleges and 41 percent in public colleges. Coincidence? I think not.

And finally, in 1977 congress, under Carter, gave us the Community Reinvestment Act, which was supercharged in 1995 under Clinton. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were tasked with getting loans into the hands of otherwise unqualified potential home buyers. Real estate values shifted from just under 7 percent annual increases to double digit, and in some places, triple digit inflation and gave us the housing bubble. That bubble has burst and now the ripple effect has hit our financial markets, credit markets, and businesses that depend on new home construction. This is what we get when we let the brain-trust at the federal government try to "fix" the economy.

What ideology can do
It is odd that Chapman asks how given stagnant wages people can buy more and more stuff. It has been pretty widely reported that people have done so by going into increasing debt. And of course that debt is not consequenceless, it contributed to the current credit crisis which Chapman treats as unrelated.

There has been very flat growth over the last year. The exception was that 3.3% expansion that followed the stimulus package that Chapman opposed. So now he is pointing to the growth that followed the stimulus package as evidence that the theories behind the stimulus package were wrong.

So Chapman accepts uncritically the view of an economist who derives different results than the great bulk of economists in order to explain things that are already well explained by the other economists. And the others seem to be less selective in the facts they consider relevant.

On the otherhand, this column shows why Chapman is at Townhall.com despite his other columns that drive the regulars crazy.

Scott
Obama's plan has no tax hikes for individuals making less than $200,000 and couples making less than $250,000. That has been his plan all along. Possibly he expects to have credibility with people who are not looking for excuses to accuse him of lying.

Economic reform splained for william
Repealing all the hidden indirect taxes would stop government from imposing them on every business, big and small, and remove them from the price of every item sold by every business to every customer business, and on and on and on. Government is one (or many) of these customer businesses. The business-accounting cost of calculating these taxes would be gone for every business, further reducing the price.
All the taxing bureaucracies, and the total governmental cost would be removed. All the taxing bureaucrats could get real jobs and start paying INTO THE TREASURY, INSTEAD OF TAKING MONEY OUT OF THE TREASURY.
Government would have the income tax money from the employees with the new jobs, and from the jobs that are not taxed out of the country.
The single simplified tax form for the single replacement tax could be easily filled out by almost all people, so there would not be the personal cost of having it done for them. There would not be a marriage penalty for married people. The lowest tax rate (0% for the first $15,000 for everybody) would make up for eliminating the complicated sections of the present tax form, simplifying it for everybody.
The price of everything (even aircraft carriers) would be one-third (1/3) lower.
There wouldn't be: a 45 Trillion dollar carbon credit tax, Rangel's one trillion dollar tax, Obama's 845-billion-dollars-to-the-UN-to-give-to-our-enemies tax, Obama's 76 billion dollar
gasoline tax, or any of the hundreds of destructive taxes we have now.
Do you now understand how eliminating taxes will reduce the price of everything?

Ron in AZ: I thought Barney Franks wanted to cut our military by 25%.


Economic reform
We the people pay all taxes, and we are the only ultimate source of all tax revenue. Regardless where government initially collects the money, all tax money ultimately comes from us, the people, even though business has to pay thousands or millions of dollars at one time, and get it back from us one dollar at a time.
Since we the people are the one and only source of all tax revenue:
There should be only one tax to collect all tax revenue.
It should be a single, simple, fair, direct, graduated, individual, full-income tax levied on living persons for each level of government: One Tax and Done.
The best thing that government can do to help the country, the people, and even government, is to repeal all of the many hundreds, or thousands of existing taxes, fees, and charges. These taxes are the federal deficit. These taxes are the high price of everything. These tax eliminations are spending cuts. Every tax that is eliminated is a tax that we the people no longer have to pay. These taxes are the difference between the price we pay for health care and everything else, and the price we would pay if these taxes were repealed. Eliminating these taxes will remove them from the price paid for everything by everyone, including government.
One Tax and Done will provide many benefits to all, even government:
One Tax and Done will reduce the price paid for everything by one-third, While Democrats have 47 Trillion Dollars in new taxes written in bills awaiting action to quadruple the tax burden of all Americans, except for tax-exempt rich liberals.

Obama , A Motivational Speaker?
After two years of listening to Obama , I finally figured out who he reminds me of.

A few years back I worked for a motivational speaker who convinced people to become a part of a pyramid scheme just barely legal.

My boss taught us techniques on how to convince anyone to join the so call "wealth club".

After a few weeks of pretending that I was doing something good for the people i realized that it was all phonny and just a scheme to make the boss more money.

He would hire people and promise them all kinds of perks and when the time came to give you a raise or a bonus..he would find some excuse to fire you and get some other sucker to make him wealthy.

Obama reminds me of him...I wonder if Obama took a motivational speaker course to lie and convince others to join him?

Anderson 659 Thnk you
Evidently uou have read all my replies , and thought enough about what they contained to comment on each one. I thank you for that., It is always nice to b appreciated.
Now you go back to whatever grade you are in in school and pay very careful attention to when your teacher is talking about reason and reasoning . If yn=and when you learn these skills please come back and i will eluducdate you will slightluy more meaningful blogs, hoping that your lessons have took. Once again Thank you. Im so pleased to have a real live fan

Anderson 659
evidently you have read every one of my blogs and , as that is the reason i have written them, i tank you. Now next time , after youve had a chance to go to school some more ans learn a little bit about easonng, come back, let me know, a

Obama understands the economy EVEN LESS
Sen. McCain is candid about his strengths and 'needs for improvement' with us. But, you know what, I BELIEVE MCCAIN KNOWS MORE ABOUT THE ECONOMY THAN OBAMA DOES. Obama has been too busy TRYING TO DECEIVE US INTO BELIEVING that the Senate 'maverick' is just another Bush, to come clean witih us about his own lack of economic expertise.

Obama wants to use our economy to create 'economic equality'. Obama knows little about how a democratic capitalism provides economic opportunity for its citizens. Obama did not know that when you lower capital gains tax rates, you get more tax revenue. But when Sen. Clinton and the debate moderator told him in a nomination debate, he didn't really care--because he was more interested in taking away profits of those who had earned them, so lower income people would not feel so left out. Obama doesn't understand that higher corporate taxes means higher prices for consumers, and fewer jobs for American families!

We are in a financial crisis that is screaming a lesson at us, IF YOU FORGET THE RULES OF FISCAL SOUNDNESS, YOUR ECONOMY WILL BE UNSOUND! THERE WILL BE LOSS OF INCOME, THERE WILL BE JOB LOSSES! THERE WILL BE UNPAID DEBT!

We have to remember fiscal soundness, or our economy will not provide a good living for us; and we have to remember our poor, our unemployed, our homeless. McCain scores higher on both these counts. He will reduce taxes on employers (corporations and small businesses) to increase jobs. He has urged the Treasury to expend money from the fiscal bail out package to keep families in their homes, to stem the tide of foreclosures. This will help stabilize the housing market, and help stabilize our overall economy.

Obama has backed the Dem approach to the foreclosure crisis: providing funds directly to banks, leaving 'workouts' to the banks' discretion. The 'fox guarding the hen house' again...

True - but . . .
It doesn't help that both McCain and Palin echo the Democrat sentiments of "struggling Americans," rather than point out the vast abundance this country and economy provide.

In America, we struggle like no other people of the world. Yearning for a 46" HD plasma screen TV; and settling for a 32" qualifies, in America, as "struggling."

The dirty little secret
What will happen to the Bush Tax Cut? Te one that not only cut Capital Gains to 15%, it also cut Middle America taxes, (by approximately 2,000 dollars a year @ 60,000 net),

Nancy, Harry and Barry will eliminate that as fast as they can in 2010. Plus they have already stated they would raise capital gains (all investments including all gains on retirement accounts, 401's, homes sales or anything else that generates income from investments.)

Then Spend, Spend, Spend on entitlements. This will grow the economy?

Don't forget their financial guru, Barney Franks, who recently stated we will cut the military by 15% and make everyone have to pay more taxes. Barney is the primary reason for our "Fannies and Freddies" in a meltdown.

The inconvenient truth
This inconvenient truth about the economy won't stop Obama from preaching his doom-and-gloom message any more than the inconvenient truth about the lack of global warming has stopped Al Gore. There is a blinded-to-truth, illuminati compulsion to keep on lying in the face of evidence to the contrary if you're a liberal politician.

Correct me if I am Wrong?
I thought the goal was to be independently wealthy. To provide your family with the best you could. The goals were to make $100,000 or more in order to past this on the next generation. Oh! That's right! I forgot! I am suppose to work hard for all the lazy rear people who truly believe that they are owed everything and will hurt themselves by doing hard work! All the illeagels who are here they have kid after kid just to get welfare that Mexico will not give them! I ahve to work hard to end WORLD Poverty! Thank you Messiah Obama! You have hown us the way! Please tax us to death and teach us from your wonderful example! NaH! On second thought, why don't I just not vote for you and get others not to and then get rid of all your kool-aid sippen, lazy, insane, Marxist, liberial, tree hugging friends a one way ticket to Kiss My rearville! And for all of you responed to this that disagree, BE MY GUEST AND JOIN HIM!
Nothing you say will make me cry and hide in fear!

How can they do it?
Credit. Most of the stuff people have bought has not been paid for. The rise in *Do Not Pay Until 2009!* type shops, where the quality of the merchandise tells us they are not marketing to the Middle Class, is astonishing. They encourage people who have no money to charge overpriced goods under the delusion that in two years, after their children have ruined the goods, they will have somehow gathered the money to pay for that stuff.

My salary since 1975 has risen from $5,700 to $57,000. My rent has risen from $150 to $1500. My car in 1975 cost $5200 (1975 Ford Gran Torino); gas for that car was $7.20 per tank. A comparable car today would cost $60,000 and the gas would cost $75.00 for a tank. In 1975 parking was free. Today it costs $100 extra per month just to park at my apartments.

So talking about how salaries have risen since 1975 is only half the story. Prices have risen too. Sure you can still live in a trailer in Alabama and drive a banger and work full time at Wal-Mart and get by, if you are single and have no kids. But life for the rest of us is just about keeping pace. Not to say that we are not well off; I am pretty comfortable and have what I need, even here in socialist Kanukistan. And I know first hand that socialism does nothing to make things better for anybody. Still, you ought to tell the whole story, sir.

The Obama Equation
Solve this problem
Democratic President + Democratic Senate + Democratic House of Representatives + Democratic Media = ???

Note: Obama is ahead in the polls. Sitting out the election is a vote for Obama. You don't even have to get out of your chair to help Obama win!
http://rightklik.blogspot.com/


mrbmrb=loser
Spoken like a true Marxist ideologue.

Now, sit up, beg for it,you can do it.

Barack HUSSEIN Obama's
own website says that no family making less than $250,000 will see their taxes increase.

Tonight on his infomercial he said it would be $200,000.

How can he have ANY credibility?

You lib hacks have been hypnotized by a snake oil salesman.


Obama needs an economic crisis
I'm sorry to say it but Obama is very fond of Marxism.

He's smart enough not to come right out and admit it, but it's there between the lines.
Negative Liberty = Adam Smith
Positive Liberty = Marx
What does this have to do with Obama?
Glad you asked!

Obama on our constitution:
"...the Constitution is a document of negative liberties, says what the states can't do to you, says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf."

For most people, including those listening to that broadcast, the word NEGATIVE is synonymous with BAD. Obama knows this. If Obama knows anything, he knows how to choose words carefully. Although Obama is making other points, this information sheds more light on Obama's attitude toward our Constitution. Obama is a constitutional scholar, and if he wanted to make the Constitution and its "negative liberties" sound like the best thing since chicken noodle soup he would have chosen different words.

For some insight, take a glance (online) at the book "Negative Liberties" by Cyrus R. K. Patell. This book, perhaps coincidentally, was released three months before Obama made his comments. Do you think Patell admires the negative liberties of the U.S. Constitution? Do Patell and Obama have similar viewpoints? Wouldn't it be nice if someone had the courage to ask Obama about this and insist on a straight answer? Wouldn't it be nice if more voters actually cared?
Everyone please study this issue more.

*Final Note: Obama is ahead in the polls. Sitting out the election is a vote for Obama. You don't even have to get out of your chair to help Obama win!

http://rightklik.blogspot.com/

Yes, Obama has all the
answers to what ails America. The only problem is that his leftist illuminati ideals are nothing short of Socialism and they haven't worked before, so why should we believe that they will work now?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.