Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, April 06, 2009
Star Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Embracing our future by ignoring our past
by Star Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


The problem with social engineering is that the world constantly changes, but government programs don't.

Among other things, over the years, life spans have increased and families have shrunk. From 40 working Americans per retiree in 1935, we're down to a 3-1 ratio today.

As the ratio of workers to retirees has dwindled, adjustments were made to taxes and the retirement age to keep the system going. But it is impossible for bureaucrats to keep pace with a dynamic world. Only free markets can do that, which is why they work so well.

Estimates are that the current payroll tax will have to at least double to pay for upcoming generations. Our young people now entering the workforce could get twice the return on their money with just a bank CD.

The last attempt to "fix" Social Security was in 1983 with a special commission headed by Alan Greenspan. It supposedly was going to fix the system well into the 21st century. Within ten years it was clear that it didn't.

The Greenspan commission came up with the idea of raising even more funds from the payroll tax to build a trust fund to deal with the increasing number of retirees per worker.

The fund has been a joke because as the money went in, our government just spent it. So now it's just a pile of government IOU's. Now even that fund is almost in the red, ten years earlier than government economists were projecting just last year.

Other government conceived and managed dinosaurs, Medicare and Medicaid, are in even worse shape.

Re-invent America by bringing government management to our auto, banking, energy, and health care industries? If you ignore all past experience, you might like the idea.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Star Parker is the founder and president of CURE, the Coalition for Urban Renewal & Education, a 501c3 think tank which explores and promotes market based public policy to fight poverty, as well as author of White Ghetto: How Middle Class America Reflects Inner City Decay.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
why...(comment from a friend)
Perhaps I’m one of the John Galts

Why? Because…

I’m a developer of new cancer therapies here in California.
My husband is an engineer who makes $100K a year. I could make another 100K if I worked. What would we get for that extra 100K?

Well, 33% would go to federal taxes and since we live in California another 10% would go to state taxes. Medicare would take another 2% and other California payroll taxes (SDI) another 2%. Loss of deductions and exemptions would probably account for another 2%. So, we’re already up to 49%. Then we have to add loss of other redistributionist incentives (e.g. that fact that our children will become less eligible for college financial aid etc.). That brings us to an approximate 52% income loss. So, of the 100K extra we are down to 48K. To that we subtract the extra commuting costs of going to work (another 8K/year) and babysitting costs at another 10K per year. What are we left with? 30K/year, 30 cents to the dollar.

And what would we get for those extra 30K? We would get to never see out kids, except on the weekends, and we would get to have our kids raised by babysitters. Thanks, but no thanks!

Please remind me, dear public, why I would work to cure your cancers ?

Now the public says that they want to increase taxes so that we work for what? 0.25, 0.20c to the dollar? And! Perhaps more importantly, they want to guarantee that we have the same level of national healthcare, no matter how much we work (read, contribute to society). They even want to guarantee that our kids will go to college regardless and perhaps guarantee us a decent retirement too. Is that supposed to stimulate me to go seek the second income I’m very capable of earning curing your cancers?

Keep dreaming, dear public. We’re bailing out! Cure your own cancers!

SEE what EVIL is coming your way !

http://www.logisticsmonster.com

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.