Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, April 06, 2009
Star Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Embracing our future by ignoring our past
by Star Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

The Congressional Budget Office, the economic forecasting arm of the Congress, now reports that the Social Security trust fund is almost in the red. They project that the fund's surplus next year will be a scant $3 billion.

For perspective, CBO just 12 months ago projected that this same surplus would be $86 billion -- almost 30 times larger. Plus, the CBO estimated then that the fund would not be in the red for another ten years. Now it looks like it may be next year.

Beyond discovering that Social Security is in even worse shape than anyone thought, might there be a learning opportunity here?

As President Obama takes our government into the automobile business, the mortgage and banking businesses, the health care business, the energy business, and the environmental planning business, he is working on a basic premise.

This premise, of course, is that we'll be better off if we turn more of our lives and resources over to government bureaucrats to manage. Not only has this been tried many times. Every time it's been tried, it's been a complete failure.

But despite the consistent failures of government management, Barack Obama has America believing it will be different this time. He has turned up with an old, flea-bitten, worm infested mutt and everybody's excited that they are getting a new puppy. Yes, the man can sell.

The magic is so powerful that, as we set off to re-invent America, few are paying attention to the broken, bankrupt dinosaurs on our hands that are the products of our previous forays in exactly the same direction.

The first, of course, was Social Security. When Roosevelt signed it into law in 1935, he said it would address the problem that "the civilization of the past hundred years, with its startling industrial changes, has tended more and more to make life insecure."

His great idea for making our lives secure was to tax everyone working and use those funds to pay stipends out to those who are retired.

The social engineering made sense to many in 1935, when the country had 40 people working for everyone retired. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Star Parker is the founder and president of CURE, the Coalition for Urban Renewal & Education, a 501c3 think tank which explores and promotes market based public policy to fight poverty, as well as author of White Ghetto: How Middle Class America Reflects Inner City Decay.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
why...(comment from a friend)
Perhaps I’m one of the John Galts

Why? Because…

I’m a developer of new cancer therapies here in California.
My husband is an engineer who makes $100K a year. I could make another 100K if I worked. What would we get for that extra 100K?

Well, 33% would go to federal taxes and since we live in California another 10% would go to state taxes. Medicare would take another 2% and other California payroll taxes (SDI) another 2%. Loss of deductions and exemptions would probably account for another 2%. So, we’re already up to 49%. Then we have to add loss of other redistributionist incentives (e.g. that fact that our children will become less eligible for college financial aid etc.). That brings us to an approximate 52% income loss. So, of the 100K extra we are down to 48K. To that we subtract the extra commuting costs of going to work (another 8K/year) and babysitting costs at another 10K per year. What are we left with? 30K/year, 30 cents to the dollar.

And what would we get for those extra 30K? We would get to never see out kids, except on the weekends, and we would get to have our kids raised by babysitters. Thanks, but no thanks!

Please remind me, dear public, why I would work to cure your cancers ?

Now the public says that they want to increase taxes so that we work for what? 0.25, 0.20c to the dollar? And! Perhaps more importantly, they want to guarantee that we have the same level of national healthcare, no matter how much we work (read, contribute to society). They even want to guarantee that our kids will go to college regardless and perhaps guarantee us a decent retirement too. Is that supposed to stimulate me to go seek the second income I’m very capable of earning curing your cancers?

Keep dreaming, dear public. We’re bailing out! Cure your own cancers!

SEE what EVIL is coming your way !

http://www.logisticsmonster.com

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.