Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, November 10, 2008
Star Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Republican future in principles - not process
by Star Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


John McCain has a knack for the bizarre. But he outdid himself, appearing on Saturday Night Live the weekend before election day to make fun of it all.

It was evident from the polls that only a miracle could pull this election off for McCain. But the SNL appearance made it clear that there would be no miracle.

Why would Americans, sitting on the political fence, riddled with doubt and worried about their future, vote for a man running to be their president who could satirize the campaign two days before they would go to vote? The man telling them that their sons and daughters must remain to fight in Iraq, that the future of the nation supposedly rides on his message, making it all a big joke?

McCain's strange sense of propriety, of nobility, of being the gentleman, is to be above it all. So days before a crucial election he could play the clown on national TV. Yes, of course, the message is important. But he showed, for him, most important is process, not principle.

This accounts for McCain's also bizarre suspension of his campaign, at a crucial time after the Republican convention, when he was picking up momentum, to be part of the process in Washington to produce a bank bailout package.

The initial months of a new presidency, as we are about to witness once again, are crucial. A newly elected president uses the opportunity to demonstrate leadership, consolidate power, and begin moving his agenda.

When George W. Bush was elected to his first term, it was clear in those critical early days that there were already cracks in the Republican vessel. When Republicans on Capitol Hill should have been marching in lockstep with their new president, taking over after eight years of a Democrat in the White House, there was a distracting voice in the Senate.

John McCain. What was his obsession? Campaign finance reform.

A new Republican president needed to move a conservative agenda and a key Republican senator deflected focus with his personal obsession with process and not principles.

Back to the current campaign, we have McCain's troubled selection of Sarah Palin. Did McCain pick a conservative Christian because of his own convictions? Of course not. He concluded he had to placate the evangelical base. Did he move to find the best and most qualified person? Someone that voters could readily picture moving into the oval office if necessary? No, he wanted a woman to appeal to women.

Process, not principle.

Our nation is troubled today. Americans are worried and confused.

We are in a fog and Senator Obama held up his light and said follow me. John McCain touted his prowess at working with senators of the other party.

Now, of course, the soul-searching begins for the future of the Republican Party. The antidotes are flowing. So much pain and so little learned.

How can it be that even now many suggest that the problems of the party relate to process? They suggest that the party platform must change to appeal to this new constituency or reach out to that one?

Who is asking what do we believe to be true? What principles are crucial to assure that our grandchildren and great-grandchildren will be born into and grow up in a strong and prosperous nation?

Those who suggest that Americans have turned liberal are not paying attention. In California, as Obama captured 61 percent of the popular vote. In the same election, Californians passed Proposition 8 — getting 71 percent of the black vote and 53 percent of the Latino vote — to codify traditional marriage in the state constitution

The future of the Republican Party is not in process but in restoring leadership for traditional American principles that are relevant to every demographic group, to every ethnic group, in every time.

Let the work begin.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Star Parker is the founder and president of CURE, the Coalition for Urban Renewal & Education, a 501c3 think tank which explores and promotes market based public policy to fight poverty, as well as author of White Ghetto: How Middle Class America Reflects Inner City Decay.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Palin for the evangelical base?
If you think McCain picked Sarah Palin to placate the evangelical base, then you didn't pay close attention to what was going on. In an election you support your candidate 100%. Not 50%. In the contest between Obama and Hillary, Fox news and talk radio adopted Hillary as their Republican sweetheart. Thats where McCain's other 50% went to. In supporting Hillary. McCain picked Sarah Palin to continue the wave Fox news and talk radio started with the idea of a woman running for the Presidency. In McCain's case VP. McCain knew Fox news and talk radio put Hillary in the hearts and minds of the voters and he picked Palin to continue the wave Fox news and talk radio started hoping the wave would carry over onto Palin.

McCain is not the Future
His most coherent and welcome speech was his concession address which also presented a congratulatory to his opponent.

Let's hope it was the last we'll hear from him, he will play no role in rebuilding the Republican Party.

But we should not be discouraged, FOUR years ago, hardly anyone had ever heard of Barack Obama and in 2 years, he will have succeeded or failed. Remember that Bill Clinton lost his super majority in 1994 and never regained it, that George Bush lost his two years afger retaining the Presidency and that Bsrack Obsms's present House/Senate will come up for review in just a scant two years when an opportunity will emerge to turn the tide.

We have 2 years of planning, the same amount of time spent by Barack Obsma.

The task is not nearly as daunting as it may seem.

The Lesson
from the failure of McCain's campaign would certainly be that mediocrity (moderates) in the "process" of trying to win votes is obvious pandering and fools no one.
In order to lead one must present their views and plans for the country clearly and loudly enough that the choice between candidates is clear.
If one remains non commital or flips and flops one appears spineless.
I believe conservative principles are the only guidelines that will keep the U.S. strong and successful.
Whether the GOP will decide to return to them will determine if I can support the party or look elsewhere.

Just to pick up
Just to pick up on what pjal said about by 1994 Clinton and the democrats after they had hosed up.

I saw Rahm Emanuel interviewed and ask this and he said "No we learned our lessons from 1994 so we will never do THAT again.

Sorry to tell you Rahm but the same absolute power that got us and got them in 1994 is stewing and cooking for 2008 and the dems.

Knowing what happened in Vietnam didn't inoculate us in Iraq did it?
Same BS. Didn't win over the people. At least General Petraeus got it figured out in 2006.

We'll see if the Dems have a General Petraeus in Obama who can command and control the party but he looks a little Green for that. I predict they can't keep it together because this whole moderation thing will not look like Change after a while and then it starts.

We got work to do
It will be tough. Here's why.

The media succeeded in creating a false caricature of Sarah Palin, not based on who she is, or what she accomplished. Instead of the groundbreaking female leader she was in Alaska, she was portrayed as a ditz, as a sex object. They repeated it. SNL picked up on it. Rumor became fact. Enough people bought it.

The opposite happened with Barack. They created a shiny perfect product, a saint, the cure for all that ails you--not based on who he was, or on his scant resume--not based on his questionable associations. The media's image of who they wanted him to be was repeated. It became fact. He was both the miracle product and its spokesperson. Enough people bought into it and got duped.

How do we compete with that? The left owns the media and the cultural mindset. They are now officially 'the establishment'. They own the message. They dictate the perception. They create the heroes and villains.

And they haven't let up. Barack won, but they are still busy making Palin out to be the villain. So much for 'coming together.'

THAT is what we're up against.

Well Said Parker
John McCain spent his entire campaign trying to woo those same voters (Independents) who chose Obama in the end. Why? Because believe it or not, Obama was the more conservative of the two. He was able to sell tax cuts to the public when he was one of the most liberal members in the Senate. He inspired people while McCain depressed his base.

John McCain was the most flawed Republican candidate ever.

How much crap are you gonna take?
A 3rd Party is the Answer. There needs to be party that focuses on individual rights, strong defense, and low taxes - that ain't the current Republican crowd.

Bush shoving that bailout package on us was the final straw. Remember how the A.I.G. execs celebrated with our tax money after we bailed them out. Note how the golden parachutes didn't get removed. Again, how much crap are you gonna take?

Good job Parker
You certainly nailed McCain and 90% of the CINOs that got their butts kicked. It seems impossible to me that Obama can talk his way out of what he has talked his way into. Will there be a voice for fiscal responsibility and the freedom from Federal interference intended to be provided by the constitution? Or will the constitution continue to be trashed and a nanny govt be established in the name of protecting us from our mistakes, our sloth and our greed. This has never worked because while individuals reap negative feedback from these human fraities, govts do not. They just get stupider, lazier and greedier.

This is a rather odd column
You are blaming McCain for the loss. Perhaps he
did not help the cause, but if you want to be
truly honest with yourself, the Republicans did not lose because McCain showed up on SNL.

What happened last week is that Reaganomics
lost and Obama , the man , won.

Great Article !
The concept of "Process over Principle" hit the nail right on.
As a conservative all my life, going back half a century, I was weary about a possible McCain election as his liberal bent could have destroyed conservative credibility for a long time.
In a perverse way I am glad that Obama got elected and hope he will succeed. Unfortunately I am all but certain he won't.

For years I have had to put up with voting for the "lesser evils" and McCain was the very last straw. With Bush veering so far left and with an administration loaded with RINOS, a McCain election would only encourage yet more left leaning "Republicans".
I have now officially left the party and won't come back until it comes to its' senses, goes back to basics and favor principles over process.

???
And how, precisely, did McCain run on Reaganomics???? He opposed the Bush tax cuts, remember?

Star is right on how to fight
Once again Star shines a light on the core issues.

Nobody can win over dissafected Republicans unless they understand the core values of Republicanism and PUSH those values aggressively, not compromise them.
Geez, most people are normal and would not want a chaotic society with their kids being taken to view gay ceremonies, instructed that to be proud of Euro Americans is wrong, to be soft on terrorism at home, to make life hell for Christians, to force minority conservatives into hiding, is just plain WRONG.
.
Just standing by and babbling about honor and principle or forming internet debating societies, or trying to outdo the official Dem.De-gooders is NOT going to do it. Neither is bashing environmentalists when this is such an important issue. The trick is to pick up what's good on the left and wrap it in a mantle of DECENCY and SOBRIEty and WESTERN CIVILIZATION so that ALL conservatives can join up immediately. The Pro lifers and Chritian Right wing need to repackage as FORCES FOR GOOD against the dark forces of greed, environmental exploiotation, third world supression of women, and the terrorist culture of death. They have to be the original REPUBLLICANS who walked six miles to school and re-used household items. THIS IS THE REPUBLICAN BASE!!! OUR GRANDPARENTS VALUES !!!

Bailout
The Bush/McCain bailout was the last straw. Now we have the Palosi auto bailout. Does anyone know a country where we can move????

Obama was a "Product"...
I personally have much more respect for John McCain than I will ever have for Obama. Obama rode into the White House on the coat tails of the MSM and the $$$$ of George Soros and other far far left Ultra-liberals.

He broke promises about campaign monies and town hall meetings. After all this time, all I DO know about Barack is that he is STILL very Liberal and I don't trust him.

I do not think McCain ran a good campaign; I don't know if it was his advisors or if he tends to be stubborn (hence his nickname "the maverick"), both or just the Obama machine, created by Oprah and others like her (MANY others like her) simply ran over McCain, et. al.

I for one deeply regret the outcome of the election. I think most people voted emotionally...if you're black, you voted for a black man. If you're young, you voted for a liberal or simply for the first black candidate just to say you did. Many voted "against Bush".

Obama's views are not mine, nor will they be, yet I'll be governed by them. Lord help me. Lord help us all.

MoveOnPassMcCain.org
Please don't get me wrong. McC would have been a far better choice for President than BHO--but McC didn't present it that way. Nor, am I a total hater of the Mac. But he was the wrong candidate from the beginning and so many of us know that--knew that. One thing Mac's lose does is help the Republicans move on passed the so-called Maverick Senator from Arizon. He was always more comfortable opposing and taking on his fellow republicans than he is at opposing those across the aisle--which was evident throughout the campaign. It is time to start MoveOnPassTheMac.org

We have to change things
We can't let the Democrats pick our candidates like they did in the primaries this time. We can't put up with the voter registration scams that took place. And we need to repeal McCain-Feingold. It is no trick working with the people across the aisle when all you do is lay down and let them roll you over. Gorw some conservative backbone and stand up for America before it is too late ! Get Ready for high priced oil again, as soon as Obama issues his executive order against drilling and exploration and then crams global warming down your throat. It may not matter though, after his muslim brothers get through touching off a few bombs in our country. This cat will make Hitler look like a small-time amateur !

I scratch my head
Why in the world can't working people see that the "gimmie & takers" will soon outnumber the providers/givers.
JUST LOOK AT YOUR PAYCHECK! Then tell me how you can afford it.

And the Republicans in government SURELY know how we feel.

Entitlements are stripping our self worth as a nation.

Principles?

Star.
Thanks for your comments. We need to get back to
our principles that we once had. I met you in
Washington D.C. back in the nineties at a
Christial Coalition Conference. I attended your
reception that evening and chatted with you and
I have been spreading your talk with other people that you gave that afternoon. It woke
everyone up that day. You were great. Thanks. Ed

McCain opposed
the Bush tax cuts because there was a ton of pork attached the bill as I recall.

The time has come for all Republicans to remember that all the pundits and leftist Dems were saying our party was dead after the '64 election. And we went on to win 7 out of the next 10 presidential elections.

It'll be no different this time in '08. Our message will shine through after 4 years of a tax and spend liberal whi is going to have a base in disarray - many of them angry he is doing what he said he would.

His foreign policy is going to prove weak and vacillating - and create boondoggles that don't sit well with voters when the U.S. is seen as weak and unwilling to exercise our power in advancement of our own best interests.

His fiscal polict will be inflationary already adding a nasty problem to create a new misery index unrivaled since Carter's time.

Them's the facts.


SNL Appearance
Star Parker, I most always agree with what you write but not in this case. If John McCain and Sarah Palin had not appeared on SNL, The program would have made a mockery of both and the public would have only known that part. The public got a chance to see them both in a much better light and could have realized that they are not hiding their true identity as are Obama and Biden. I feel confident that the republicans did not lose votes because of that particular SNL. They lost the election do to the excessive recruitment of young, inexperienced voters, and media bias.

PRINCIPLES -- Oh yea....PRINCIPLES!
Great article, Star. Spot on comments.

I saw a post that mentioned Reaganomics. Please, people. McCain signed off on the stimulus package. He is not a conservative. The GOP has strayed from fiscal conservatism over the past few years. The principles are still there, as Star so brilliantly pointed out.

The current GOP leadership has strayed. Its a big tent party. Moderates and conservatives alike. The Democrats on the other hand, just have the far left. There are no moderates. Don't believe me? Just ask Joe Lieberman.

Parker makes one...
...obvious mistake. The restoration of "traditional American principles" is not an end in itself. Sound principles have no nationality.

Some traditions are fine. The good traditions, by their very nature are self-preserving. No intervention is necessary. Others, the ones that fail the test of universality, are just as well left behind.

I agree ...
Star you are right on many things. I would add a couple of things to the mix for consideration:

the SNL bit was dumb but so was the commercial saying that Obama would be a good president someday, but not now. How can the McCain campaign even allow such a thought to be spoken. He sounded like Al Gore saying "Its my turn. Its my turn!"

Secondly my first reaction to the choice of Governor Palin was oh, no he picked someone based on identity politics. God help us. However, I did come to like her and agreed with many of the ideas she spoke about. the problem. It came too late. I voted for a VP not the president and that is where the Republican went wrong.

Great article Star ----

http://TrueBlueAmerican.blogtownhall.com/2008/11/08/wanted_ a_true_conservative_leader.thtml

Facing the truth
The truth about oursleves can be a bitter pill to swallow, but swallow it we must if America is to have a legitimate two-party system that represents all the people and keeps runaway politics in check. Dems have risen to the forefront, as happens cyclically. It's the sort of wake-up the Republican out-of-touch illuminati need.

McCain and Palin
To carry Star Parker's excellent analysis a step further, McCain never left being a Senator to act like a President.

The financial crisis was a perfect opportunity to stand aloof from Congress and the President and point fingers from afar. He could have skewed the Fanny Mae Freddy Mac Democrats at that time. He could have refused ON PRINCIPLE the bailout as so many Americans wanted to do. What did he do? Go back to Washington and act like a Senator! Stupid and unprincipled for sure.

I disagree with Star on Palin. She WAS the principled one who was very poorly handled by McCain's people. I gave money for Palin, I made phone calls for Palin. She could have debated Obama and beaten him for she clearly saw the ruse and the rout.

When Amnesty Juan met Caribou Barbie


He knew nothing about her. He had two brief meetings lasting about five hours in all. That was all it took for John McCain to pick his ticket's president-in-waiting, the person who might have to launch nukes.

It was a move by cynicism out of panic, from a RINO who knew the Republican base would not stomach another Beltway insider such as Romney or Ghouliani.

McCain could not find a serious conservative outsider, so he went for the airhead.

It probably did not affect the result in the end-- McCain would have blown it anyway with his behavior during the financial crisis, and his "bipartisan" vote for the bailout. But Palin sure didn't help.

Independents, floaters and national-security Dems on the whole are not Palin's kind of middle class, and they know when their intelligence is being disrespected.

SheerFaith
"It's the sort of wake-up the Republican out-of-touch illuminati need."

Illuminati, huh? That's a pretty classy word. Tell me, have you ever used it in a comment before?

Excellent
And just what I've been saying.
We've got to get back to the Core of what makes Conservatism Right. We got bogged down in the issues, the candidates, and name calling.
The simple fact is that Conservatism is Right. We need to go back and examine our roots.

I agree with Seventh Degree
Back when Ronald Reagan was running for office, it was his handlers that kept botching things up for him. Reagan was getting frustrated with them because they would not turn him free to be himself. As a result of his handlers, Reagan was sounding off-key and not inspiring people that much. Sound familiar so far concerning Sarah Palin? Finally the aides and handlers were convinced to turn Reagan loose to be himself and we all know what happened then. Most of the country became a Ronald Reagan admirer.

I wish they had just turned Sarah loose to be herself. The McCain aides should have read the book about Ronald Reagan that I did - they would have seen a mirror image of themselves and how it was they who were screwing things up, not the political candidate. I wish McCain would have come out immediately when the people from his own camp started criticizing Palin, and told them to stop.

what ever happened to tricameral?
Wow!

Are republicans really becoming fascists? This article represents one of the worst journalistic efforts I've seen in a while - blaming John McCain for not being lock step with the new president as evidence of republican 'cracks in the vessel'?????

Let me tell you something (a realization/epiphany i had just last night). As a strong democrat I looked forward to 8 years of 'lock-step' politics, when Senator Reid gives an interview this weekend establishing the senate's independence from the executive branch of government in formulating at passing legislation at the start of the Obama administration. "Ohhhh my God", I thought, 'here we go again with my democratic party self immolating because we don't have the lock-step mentality of the republicans." Then it hit me. I'm currently reading a biography of Jefferson and reviewing the federalist papers and am admiring the essence of Americanism at it rawest and most beautiful form and how that translates into the structure of our government. I mean it really hit me. Senator Reid is right. As Americans we elect a president, not an emperor, and congress must, and should, exert its prerogatives and power in the greatest deliberative body in the history of the world.

Senators and Congressmen have the RIGHT and RESPONSIBILITY, to debate and reach compromise and consensus and reject demagoguery. Caucus all they want to reflect and refine and hone their party's message but in the end the tricameral government needs to return to its rightful balance power. Statesmanship MUST return to the congress and this article is almost treasonous in its intent to argue that the party members in congress should lock-step with the executive branch and anything less represent failure.

So, Senator Reid initially flushed me anger and resentment until I realized that he is right. Congress has it's own rights and responsibilities and executing at any other lever level is really unamerican.

Newt G. is ready
to accept an appointment as RNC chief - it he is offered it. They should - the guy is a brainiac and definately on message.

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/gingrich_party_chairman /2008/11/09/149429.html?s=al&promo_code=70BE-1

Please, Republican
Leadership, listen to Star Parker!

There hasn't been a more coherent message written than this and the "Bizarre" Behavior of John McCain. I can laugh at an SNL skit, but that was exactly right. How demeaning and inappropriate.

I like Sarah Palin, but she was thrown in as a last ditch effort and it showed. It was unfair to use her like that.

In the end, we are most likely fortunate to not have elected John McCain. This might wake up apathic religious conservatives. I hope and pray.

Carlos wrote:
"A 3rd Party is the Answer. There needs to be party that focuses on individual rights, strong defense, and low taxes - that ain't the current Republican crowd."

We already HAVE a third party - and a fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth... about 50 of them all told!

Are you forgetting the Libertarian Party? And also the Green Party, the Communist Party, etc., etc. ?

The problem with so-called 'third' parties in the U.S. system is that it's virtually impossible for them to succeed at the national level, since we don't hold runoff elections (like France, for instance), where they form coalitions after the first round of voting, throwing their support behind one or the other of the two top candidates.

Our version is the Primary Election. That's why our two major parties are so broad-based, each covering a whole spectrum of political tendencies ranging from far right to centrist (Republican) and far left to centrist (Democrat), and the more narrowly focused 'third' parties fall by the wayside. It tends to boil down to the same thing, and no specific fragment of the political spectrum gets its way entirely. There is always a lot of compromise.

Exit the Clown--Puhlease!
I have no sympathy for my fellow Republicans who nominated McCain (with the help of crossover Democrat votes). Most conservative Republicans knew he was a disaster who loved to clown on comedy shows like SNL and laugh at himself. He was playing to the media and the so-called hip crowd and they laughed--and then destroyed him in the general election.

Isn't there some way we can fire him from the Republican Party? Or, better still, force him to join the Democrat Party?

The man should be honored for his military service--and expelled from the GOP for his suicidal stunts as a Republican political candidate and presumptive leader.

He is--and was--a clown as the leader of the GOP but it's time the Party grew up and banished the clowns.

Test
Test

McCain, in this new administration,
will probably find a home. He was never a republican anyway and by finding him a place, Obama can pretend he is being bi-partisan. I heard a sunday panel joking and talking about him as once again the friendly maverick and applause all around for the man who is still their favorite republican landing blows on his colleagues

Scott
Nice post. The fed paper stuff is fun, isn't it? I always go back there when people start chanting "traditional values". Funny how they rarely know what those are.

"Are republicans really becoming fascists?" The fascists are in both parties. And they are very smart. See how they have the theocrats and faith cons arguing from their framework. They can't see what the fascists are doing to them because they are standing on their shoulders.

Jose

I address this at more length in my blog called "The Shell Game"

COUNTER ATTACK


.....Peter Hitchens waved good-by to America and wrote that we had begun the long slow decent into the Third World ...well I'm not going without a fight ...

.....Conservatives who are looking for a place to congregate and mobilize a comeback of Conservative values should check out Michael Reagans new web site http://www.reaganaction.com ...

.....The time to take a stand against the Socialist tide is now ...the first battle will be in 2010 .....COLOSSUS

McCain Will Switch Parties
McCain might just as well switch to the Democrat party. Like his pal Chuck Hagel. We need to purge the RINOs. I voted for McCain only because of Palin but I realized he's not fit to be president.

Irony =
The GOP begins to rise from the ashes when a Senator from AZ (where PHOENIX is located) FUBAR’s us in the Election. Star Parker should be a carpenter because she NAILS it! CALLING ALL CONSERVATIVES! Stick your fingers down your throat, shower with Comet and a wire brush or use ANY others purging ritual you need to remove the Stench of The McCainiac. ACORN, Reid and Piglosi are fixing to WAY overreach their limited mandate, which makes 2010 a POTENTIAL Waterloo for the DNC. From amongst Ryan, Pence, Jindal, Palin, Steele and others, find our Four Horsemen of The Liberal Apocalypse and UNLEASH THEM! Lastly, if I might paraphrase Leonidas, the Spartan King, when the flight of ACORN Executive Orders blocks out the sun, FIGHT IN THE SHADE! The GOP MUST return to its Shield of Conservatives Principles or it WILL return on said Shield!

Sarah Palin was not "process"
Sarah Plain was the ACTUAL recipient of the Hillary Clinton "3 AM phone call", and she handled the situation brilliantly, although not flawlessly. She clearly showed character, integrity, intelligence, and understanding, and the minor fluffs in the face of evident hostility and condescension were trivial compared to the gaffes and flaws of both Biden and Obama.

In addition, the McCain campaign was circling the drain before she came aboard. Our local campaign office had an occasional 1-2 visitors present, and usually kept the radio on to keep the staff awake. Post-Palin, we had LINES of people to buy buttons, caps, T-shirts and stickers, as well as an active phone bank instead of an empty room.

McCain was as bad a candidate as this article states, and Ms. Parker's analysis otherwise bears consideration. But she, along with the other Palin detractors who have engaged in this group lamentation and and finger-pointing, are all dead wrong.

A Setup From the Getgo
Given the title, I thought this was going to be a column about proclaiming principles instead of engaging in cutesy clever strategies. There were lots of those at work!

Mack was absolutely the worst possible standard bearer any way you slice it. His candidacy was based on the bogus theory fobbed on us by the Dems that "undecideds" were looking for some kind of watered-down compromise Democrat agenda, & would be spooked by conservative words & actions (but never leftist extemism?!) We were told he was the only possible winner v. Hillary (oops!). When his primary run almost tanked in summer 2007 the pop media kept talking about him & keeping him in the spotlite. When it looked like Romney might move ahead, suddenly here comes Huckabee to take the wind off R's sails, in favor of Mack.

Mack was himself almost entirely a pop-media creation. They, & Dems, and establishment types such as the Rockie Republican country club, wanted him to be the Republican candidate, but not the POTUS. The minute the two candidates were nominated, the pop media turned on Mack. Without them, he was basically Bob Dole but nuttier. It was Gramps v. the Young Cool Dude.

Sarah herself was great, given her lack of recognition. If Mack really did want to win, she was a desperation move that almost worked. It shows that Mack's people knew where & what his problem was. Otherwise, why not Romney or Guiliani or Leiberman?

However, I have this nasty feeling they're really trying to make her, & her conservatism, the scapegoat for Mack's failure. The real underlying agenda for this go-round has been to alienate and marginalize conservatives & conservatism.

John "Democrat-lite" McCain
If Obama, Pelosi, and Reid say 2+2=6 I certainly don't want John "cross the aisle" McCain working on a compromise to legislate 2+2=5. No, I want a conservative insisting that 2+2=4, calling a news conference to emphasize the point, and demanding that the media tell the truth. Reagan knew that 2+2=4, Palin knows that 2+2=4. The Republicans had better field 2+2=4 candidates in 2010...

"Why McCain Lost" at:

http://colony14.net/id62.html

This is a great article
The democrats gave the Clintons the boot. We need to get the 'moderates' out of the republican party.

Moderates and/or libertarians are almost always socially liberal fiscal conservatives. They need to make up their minds. Conservatives should never compromise on principles for the sake of a few votes.

Excellent article and assessment
to end this whole thing. If the republicans don't understand that the are put into power to promote the principles that they are known for then get them out of power. They are permitted to govern because people elect them on republican preciples. If they want to give up those principles let them become democrates.

my 2 cents
Enough with the analysis!

Please!


Go to NRO, Bill Whittle - A Flag on a Hill, 11/7/08.

Herein the pertinent quote:

"On Tuesday the left, armed with the most attractive, eloquent, young, hip, and charismatic candidate I have seen with my adult eyes, a candidate shielded by a media so overtly that it can never be a shield again, who appeared after eight years of a historically unpopular President, in the midst of two undefended wars and at the time of the worst financial crisis since the depression and whose praises were being sung by every movie, television and musical icon without pause or challenge for 20 months, .... who ran against the oldest nominee in the country's history, against a campaign rent with internal disarray and determined not to attack in the one area where attack could have succeeded, and who was out-spent no less than seven to one in a cycle where not a single debate question was unfavorable to his opponent, - that historic victory, that perfect storm of opportunity....

yielded a result of 53 percent."

two more cents
I for one can't think of ANY Republican who could have beaten b o.

In any case - It's over.

We lost, they won.

GET OVER IT.

Bill Whittle, NRO, 11/7:

"We have tried, and failed. Tomorrow we try again.

How can we lose, my friends? How can we lose, UNLESS WE GIVE UP? (emphasis mine)


ALL
It is time to find a republican CONSERVATIVE.
Wher do we look?

The only one that comes to my mind is Newt.

It has to be someone who can look these Socialist in the eye...........and say "GO TO HELL".

Good post: NAlcoba
Palin is the real deal. She is principled in both public and personal issues. Because of this, the media mocked and attempted to destroy her. (They may succeed in squewing her image; they will never succeed in changing who she is.)
The vast majority of Americans no longer understand principle based thinking or conduct. It will surprise me if Republicans find the resolve and leaders to return to principle based thinking and principle based leadership.
Sincerely.
Thank you Star.

question, etc.
4 years ago who could have imagined that b o would be elected president?

Our candidate for 2012 is out there, we just haven't found him/her yet. (Sarah Palin? No) Let's just say our prayers, take the dog for a walk (if you have one) write a few more nasty letters from the anonymity of cyberspace (yes - like this one) say some more prayers and then see what we can do to help those less fortunate than ourselves, say some more prayers and then go to bed and



live for another day

Good Bench of Candidates 2012
Star is absolutely right, and when I watched McCain give his concession speech, it occurred to me that perhaps he was relieved to lose. There he was congratualting Obama and looking every bit the McCain we knew and loved before he ran for office. Who was that guy? His handlers ruined him.

We have a good bench for 2012 but my #1 pick is Bobby Jindal and a woman, perhaps Sarah Palin. It's a shame what was done to her this go-round and should not happen again.

Gingrich???????

You guys talking about the round-faced former conservative known as Newt, as the guy to run next time?

That the same Newt who sat on that couch on TV with Pelosi talking about how man-made "climate change" is real?

THAT Newt?


Pftttt......

There are plenty of fresh new faces and Young Turks in the GOP who are REAL conservatives who'd make great candidates. We don't need some musty dinosaur who's ten years past his "use by" date.

Hunter, Cole, DeMint, Jindal, Sessions, and at least a dozen others. We need to look FORWARD, not backward.


Re: LD35
"It has to be someone who can look these Socialist in the eye...........and say 'GO TO HELL'."

I would add: "But you are not taking our country with you."

finding leaders
Once the principles are defined, articulate young leaders must be cultivated to represent those principles. Where are such leaders? And who is finding them? Don't forget--the principles of our country and the GOP rely on human execution. And when execution falls to traditional politicians, those with the ability to talk out of both sides of their mouth and loft themselves to power, we are always going to be morally disappointed. The liberal illuminati don't have such a problem tolerating two-faced leaders because they are not as tied to extreme morality and orthodoxy.

McCain
I hated McCain for years. First, for standing against his own Party, conspiring with Finegold and Kennedy, of all people. I despised him after the "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" he and Kennedy authored. Yes, I helped him financially but under duress!

McCain prides himself on being a "maverick" and reaching across the isle, instead of standing up to the Stalinists from the left. That's why McCain never mentioned Dodd, Shumer, Frank as guilty for the financial collapse as the Republican administration. He elected the easy, populist way to blame the greed of the Wall Street but Democrats did it better: they blamed Bush. In my opinion, capitalism is all about greed, making money, moving up the social ladder, for power, recognition, fame. No one blames Hollywood personalities or professional athletes for making millions, while a poor man at fast food establishment makes the minimum wage.

This should be our message of equal opportunity to succeed, regardless of one's color, gender, age, religion or sexual orientation. That's better than diversity and that should be promoted, not big government, welfare, political correctness and victimization. One must think that even if he did not reach his desired destination, his son will, given a chance.

I also blame Fox News, for parading the same ugly faces of liberal democrats and black radicals night after night. Aren't you tired of Alan Colms, Gerry Ferraro, Larry Davis, "Professor" Hill and their own Geraldo defending illegal immigrants?

I AM!!!

Principles, Not Process
Star, you are right on target when you say that the future of the Republican Party is not in process but in restoring leadership for traditional American principles. But you offer little in the way of specifics. I would encourage readers to view Merlanie Phillips's (melaniephillips.com) article of 11/6/08 for valuable details. She has witnessed the sad results in England where conservative values have not been defended.


Forget the Presidency......
for the time being. We conservatives need to get as many good, true conservative politicians elected to the Senate and House. That's where the concentration should be!!! They need to be tough as h**l!!! For example: One man for senator of Michigan comes to mind: his name is Ted Nugent. Now, he has a PAIR! We need to get tough.
Conservatives: stick to your guns! As Pat Buchanan would say: "lock and load".

GOP and racism
Although younger generation of GOPers are not at all RACISTS, old school republicans seem to entertain the fact that bigots are part of GOP and it is OK. The problem is, vast majority of white americans are NOT racists and do not like bogotry at all. Palin's "palling around with terrorists" non-sense alienated so many voters from GOP. I think he is an ARAB and McCain's answer No M'am he is a fine man was also not very kind to vast majority of Arab Americans who live in Michigan. GOP is set to lose for next 50 years because of BIGOTS/PIGS like RUSH LIMBAUGH, SAVAGE, BOARTZ, etc.

STOP THE FREE RIDES
OBAMA WAR CHEST WAS COURTESY OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY REFUSAL TO CHALLENGE DEMOCRATS LIKE THE DEMOCRATS HAVE DONE TO REPBULICANS THE LAST TWO CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION CYCLES. PRINCIPLES OF THE REAGAN REVOLUTION STRONG CONSERVATIVE VALUES
INSTEAD OF THE PROCESS OF STEALING FROM THE DEMOCRAT PARTY REACE AND UNITY PLAY BOOK. NO MORE BIG GOVERNMENT NEOCONS IN THE WHITE HOUSE OR RUNNING THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. GOD IS FIRST, THEN COUNTRY, NEXT YOU MUST HONOR GOD AND COUNTRY. TRUE CONSERVATIVES DO NOT HAVE TO BE TAUGHT ABOUT HONORING GOD NOR COUNTRY. IT IS TIME TO ALLOW THE BASE OF CONSERVATIVES TO RUN THE PARTY AGAIN. NO SUPER DELEGATES NEEDED.

Conservative, not Republican
John McCain is as much as product of the GOP as Obama is a product of the Democratic machinery. And like the DNC is far left, the GOP is pretty far left as well, certainly left of center.

I don't know one true conservative who actually FAVORED John McCain. Many of us voted for him because we were voting against Obama, but back in the early days of the primary, McCain was the dead-last choice for many of us. I would have preferred Hunter, Romney, Guiliani, Thompson, even Tancredo or Paul. Mac was Numero Last in my opinion.

The GOP needs to seriously study how the Dems won. One factor was the choice of a young and vibrant and attractive candidate. We have many CONSERVATIVE younger candidates to choose from.

George Bush is not a conservative. John McCain is not a conservative. If we ever intend to take back the executive branch, we need to take a cold, hard lesson from the Dems. They won, the GOP lost and there is nothing to do now but LEARN from that.

Some thoughts--
Some thoughts and observations as well as my opinions that I share with most of my friends: Yes, I voted for Mac and Sarah, because this was the "slow poison" opposed to the "fast poison" that was the other choice. Neither candidate focused on one of the most expensive problems in this country, Illegal Immigration, that costs the U.S. taxpayers over $300 Billion each year according to most documented estimates that I have seen. Secondly the dumbing down of our school systems has had an impact on the "liberal sheep and you owe me" mentality that has many thinking that the Govt. will take care of them. Next come the costs of policing the world and believing that every whining third world country is supposed to receive a handout. You conservatives can fill in the other areas of concern. The bailouts!!!
When the time comes that many people find out that the economic system of the nation is totally broke, then the thinkers will want a real solid conservative to be in office. Yes, one that does not have any "pupppet masters" to control his group.
We have heard that Hunter and Tancredo could not have won, I don't know at this point, but if the gates are opened wide, the populace may well wish these men were in office.

Excellent article, Star!
You are correct that this country continues to be right of center, in my opinion. I agree with you that the three state votes in support of marriage demonstrate that fact, especially given that one of the states was the uber liberal California. I think we need to have a RNC chairman who is understanding of this and knows what to do to get the party back on track by getting back to our conservative, both fiscal and social, principles. Those are the candidates we need and those are the candidates to whom the electorate will respond. I supported John McCain because of the alternative, but I greatly appreciate true conservatives stepping up to the plate. I think there is hope for the party if we can become the true Republican Party once again.

And your criticism is....?
Let's see...you blasted Sarah Palin at a critical time in the campaign, giving the MSM ammo to sway many voters, including undecideds, to Obama; and now you say that the loss is McCain's fault. You know who you sound like? McCain's campaign aides covering for their ineptitude by trashing Palin. No, Parker, you cannot worm your way back into our affections by suddenly regaining conservative values and blaming McCain for losing. Remember, smarty, when McCain-Palin were 8 points ahead? (So much for your brainy theory of why Sarah was the wrong pick. Please stop blaming Palin. (Why are women so jealous of better women?) No, whatever the movement we need is, most certainly it must include those treasonous publicity-seekers as yourself as we proceed to a better America.

Lessons to learn
From what I have read, people over 60 voted predominately for McCain. Young newcomers voted predominately for Obama. Maybe in four years they will be wiser.

Good grief, Don...
I believe the Palin blasting came from Kathleen Parker...I didn't see Star take up with that smear campaign.

The economy sunk McCain
He did not have a chance. As soon as the McCain/Palin were ahead in the polls, the economy began the meltdown. The party in power always loses when the economy tanks; they were hired to be the mangers. The timing of the meltdown almost looked arranged. I doubt that such things can be arranged, but no one seems to be able to understand the meltdown.

McCain was not a great candidate, but there were good Republicans in the House and Senate who also lost.

This is a good time for Republicans to figure out their values. As one start it would be good to acutually propose a plan for energy independence that does not further bankrupt the country or abandon scientific princple. The Democrats will have a plan guided by environmental whacko principle.

It also might be a good time for Republicans to emphasize the separation of church and state.

Robin
Star Parker just slammed Sarah in this article!

The have nots
They will always vote for the man that makes the most promises he can't keep,
The rats are most useless low life on the planet, they have made promises to the young people and those promises will never be fulfilled. I am waiting on the day when the federal gov, tries to own the doctors and the doctors gets fed up and tells the federal gov, to go to hel*. Slavery was outlawed years ago, doctors are not slaves, they are the doctors and the politicains should remain that! which is nothing compared to a doctor. The fed wants to own Wall Street (CRA) carter and clinton, they detroyed the housing market, they are to blame for your home having far less value today, they forced the banks and mortgage companies to make the bad loans. they are the problem, they have never been the solution, vote democrat and drive America on down the $hit hole.

GOP ticket
Ms. Parker,
The problem with the GOP ticket was McCain, not Palin. You seem to be blaming her: "Back to the current campaign, we have McCain's troubled selection of Sarah Palin." Sarah Palin is still the best candidate in the race.

Parker is exactly right!
Conservative principles did not lose this election, an ardent "moderate" did. A man who has spent the last 8 years trying to undermine any and all conservative policy. "Moderates" told us that McCain was the only Republican who could have won this year. Completely wrong! McCain is one of the only Republicans who could have lost this year, against the most unqualified, unknown, and troubling candidate to ever run for the presidency. McCain's unwillingness to stand for conservative ideals gave Obama the chance to steal those winning ideals and look credible doing it. That is the only way he could win. Obama looked principled and McCain's unprincipled nature was on full display.

Let us conservatives never forget how we lost this, and never fall for the "moderate" BS again.

Deceit
I believe the gas prices and the Wall Street collapse was manipulated to get the low life rats back in the white house.
Strange, how just 4 months ago gas was selling for almost 5 dollars a gallon and today it is selling for fewer than 2 dollars, some lunatic said it was because China was buying up all the crude in preparations for the Olympics.
Now we have an avowed Marxist for president, we defeated Russian in the cold war and they are now a capitalist country and we are going into Marxism, just what the doctor ordered. American has finally achieved the status of the Balkans.
The media in the USA is a piece of dung, anyone believing the lies they tell needs have his head examined.

More
Someone needs to answer for why Sarah Palin was sent to do interviews in the camp of the enemy (Gibson and Couric) instead of where she would get fair treatment (O'Reilly) and why McCain was doing such stupid things such as going to Larry King instead of accepting a half hour free from O'Reilly on the same evening that Obama did he half-hour network spin cycle.

No, Star
I, and every Republican I know, was not going to vote for McCain until he chose Palin for running mate. So, most of Star's article is right, but not her slam of Sarah. What she didn't know, she could learn. Who has ever taken over the presidency knowing everything? She was underestimated because she was young and attractive and a woman. She was mis-controlled by inept and probably jealous and small-minded campaign workers who are now trying to destroy her with ridiculous smears that are completely out of character for her. One has to sincerely wonder where those people's loyalties lie. They should be kept away from ever being involved in a campaign again.

Or go to work for the democrats where they would fit in better.

The Audacity of Dumb Talking Heads
Blame the dumb conservative airheads, the Limbaugh's, Hannity, Parker, you name it. Absorb this message. We got beat because of principles? Yes, John McCain ran on small government and reform, check, lower taxes, check, moral values, country first, check, strong defense, check. Why soes anyone not recognize the $millionaires who are exploiting the conservtaive party offering nothing? John McCain RAN as a fiscal and social conservative and got beat. You can't lie to the American people when you say one is inexpreienced and you have Sarah Palin on the ticket- you have no credibility. You cannot say you are going to reform government and have it grow under Bush. You cannot say you went to war because of WMD and then say it was to spread democracy. You can not preach morals and ethics and be the earmark king of the feithdom. What a paradox. Micth McConnel carries Kentucly ONLY because of his tried and proven record of bringing pork to Ky. The same with John Boehner. No Ms. Parker, you are completely wrong. John McCain ran on all the conservative principles, granted, tactfully, poorly and inept. But the principles were text book conservative. He got beat because the majority viewed the double speak about principles which were not refelceted in conservative ACTIONS in the congress. Now do you get it? The party has FAILED to WALK the WALK Ms. Parker, that goes with the TALK. Recall- John McCain saying that at the RNC? Principles lost? Rubbage. Principles exemplified and codified by our elected conservatives? No. And that madam, is why a PR campaign at the most rudimentary level,smacked down the conservative movement. I need to get a position on talk radio, as they make money without much thought.



I agree with Pjal
While it is very easy (even tempting) to wallow in despair, we have two years in which to take back Congress. As Pjal said, 2 years ago, we didn't even know who Obama was for cryin' out loud!

I said this a few months ago: If Obama and his ilk can ruin this country in 4 years, then our Republic was already DOA. We are still America and there are 57 MILLION American patriots who did not take the O-kool aid.

Let's dust ourselves off, roll up our sleeves and get to work on not only restoring the GOP to conservative principles, but in saving our Republic.

GOP leaaders must return to what made the party great or be cast out. [Did you notice CPAC did NOT invite McCain to their annual event next February?]

"Let's roll!"

the gop should never talk to snl again!
the view,david letterman,j lino,katie couric,george stephonyosopolisi forget about them!we should never play into their liberal trapp!

Get Palin and the truth in
McCain may have chosen Sarah Palin as part of his process but she fit perfectly with my conservative principles. Gov. Palin was the ONLY person of the four that was telling the TRUTH. She was also the only grown up anywhere.

Palin SLAPS the GOP
by telling the TRUTH!



"I think the Republican ticket represented too much of the status quo, too much of what had gone on in these last eight years, that Americans were kind of shaking their heads like going, wait a minute, how did we run up a 10 trillion dollar debt in a Republican administration? How have there been blunders with war strategy under a Republican administration? "


Palin told Anchorage Daily News, published Nov.9th.

Link:
http://www.adn.com/sarah-palin/story/584193.html


=========


carrollflys...
I am a Palin fan myself, but I was simply telling Don that the Parker who blasted Palin at a critical time in the general election was Kathleen Parker. If Star doesn't think McCain made a good selection after the fact, I guess that's up to her; I don't agree with her on that point, but she is obviously placing the blame for this on McCain, not Palin. I think Star agrees with you that the problem on this ticket was McCain and the election was lost because of him.

I don't Totally agree with Ms Parker
BUT I can't disagree either..The utter disarray the GOP has shown the past 2 years made McC's downfall almost inevitable.
Having said that I agree with the writer who says"if we ,the Repubs, can't survive 4 years of Obama we're DOA" so we need to quit whining and figure out who won't go on SNL!! JOKE..
Newt looks good to me , but I've proven many times I don't know Much...HAVE A GOOD DAY!!

Ted Stevens does not help!!!!!
It looks like SEVEN-TIME CONVICTED FELON Ted Stevens, a Republican, is going to retain his senate seat. Good job, Alaska. The self-proclaimed 'King of Pork' lives to legislate and get more pork for another day.

I remember when Ted thought his 'Bridge to Nowhere' was more important to fund than aiding the victims of Hurricane Katrina. No one will confuse him of being a compassionate Conservative.


Get a grip on spending
the Republicans deserve to lose. Here's why.

It's Republican thought that has brought on this financial meltdown. Spending more than you have will surely lead to disaster.

It was Republicans who spend more than the Democrats. They increased pork barrel spending from 3,000 to 14,000 projects a year, NOT PAID FOR.

They have engaged in a five and half year social engineering project in the Middle East that costs $120 billion a year and may well last another 100 years, NOT PAID FOR.

They have added another layer of entitlement spending that costs $50 billion a year called Medicare Prescription, NOT PAID FOR.

Mandated $4 billion a year in ethanol subsidies, as well as drastically increased cotton, sugar, soybean, corn, wheat handouts, NOT PAID FOR.

Doubled the size of the Department of Education, NOT PAID FOR.

How would you pay for all this spending? It took 210 years for the first $5 trillion and debt and only 7 years of Republican control to double it. It's nigh time for some fiscal Republicanism.


USMC Birthday
This is just a reminder that today is the birthday of the United States Marine Corp. ........

http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/11/10/usmc-birthday/

money
The total national debt stands at 10.6 trillion dollars.
By all measures, this amount is not sustainable.
The total debt when you add entitlement programs
is 59.9 trillion dollars.
This country is bankrupt.

2012 Conservative Resistance Movement
NEW GOODIES FROM HITLER'S BROTHER OBAMA:

Obama Planning U.S. Trials for Guantanamo Detainees
http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/obamaterrorists/#com ment-6408

Oh yah, between THIS and the new ABORTION plan he announced today (that abortions overseas will be funded by Americans); AND that he wants to do hideous experiments on LIVE EMBRYO’S CREATED IN A LABORATORY, not discarded ones [as if THAT is really any better]
http://ironmill.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/obama-executive-or ders-will-fund-abortion-embryonic-stem-cell-research/

…and the new OBAMA NATIONAL HOLIDAY they’ve got in the works: http://special.cjonline.com/stories/110908/loc_353922770.s html

IT’S ON!

I WILL not and REFUSE to claim this MONSTER as president, my president.

and not one DIME of mine will go to his ghetto pet projects to spread the wealth around NOR the horrific lab experiments on human life.

if he wants to pay for this stuff, let him get it from the poor he’s always talking about. I’D TAKE DEATH before I’d submit to that monster.

I DON’T EVEN SUPPORT DOING THOSE ABOMINATIONS ON ANIMALS, LET ALONE HUMAN BEINGS.

There is no question this monster is the antiChrist, move over Hitler, YOUR BROTHER OBAMA IS HERE.

The prayers of the saints have risen up into the face of God Himself.

And the wife? i te watcha!!!! Monster #2.

AND HE WASN'T EVEN BORN IN AMERICA!

JOIN 2012 CONSERVATIVE RESISTANCE MOVEMENT
http://moniquemonicat.wordpress.com/2008/11/07/%E2%80%A2-20 12-conservative-resistance-movement-1-we-do-not-acknowledge -barack-husein-obama-as-president/

The Palin Interview
Just watched the first part of Greta Van Susteren's interview with Sarah Palin.

We had the wrong candidate for President.

Isn't going to happen.
"The future of the Republican Party is not in process but in restoring leadership for traditional American principles that are relevant to every demographic group, to every ethnic group, in every time."

The Republicans have proven what they believe with Bush - bigger and bigger government and a ever expanding lobbying apparatus. You can't expect these people to change. We need intellectual leaders, not political ones, as much. Unfortunately, there is no Thomas Jefferson on the horizon to breathe new life into the ideas of the Enlightenment that birthed America. We only have liberals, leftists, conservatives and neo-conservatives sparring for government power, worshiping their favorite politicians. The end of that is total ruin for this country and the world.

Democrat Lite
The voters have stated clearly that if they want a Democrat, they will vote for a real one. Bipartisan (collaborator with the enemy) Senator McCain (Feingold) has supplied the evidence.

Palin/Anyone in 2012
The biased media hates her, and that is good enough for me.

Get a grip on spending
All we have to do is eliminate all the government programs which are prohibited by the Constitution. Good luck!

With government monopoly schools, misguided voters, opportunistic politicians in both major parties, and a spineless Supreme Court, our republic is terminal if not already dead. I hope you enjoy this "wonderful" democracy where all I have to do to force your money into my pocket is to buy and steal 50.01% of the votes. The bread and circuses will last only a little longer.

Republicans are split.....
Sarah Palin DID represent the Conservative principles, ideals and values that I/family/friends hold. Her energy and enthusiasm energized the Republicans in Texas, she is the reason they won here.

After reading many Republican articles stating the fate of the Party, I now realize that there are TWO divided, different camps of Republicans. I don't know how that can be resolved easily. Maybe the Conservatives will eventually have to sever themselves from the Republican Party and begin their own Conservative Party.

I see a growing lack of tolerance towards religious, middle America Conservative principles and values by the moderate Republicans. I was so disappointed by the many negative articles, by so called Republicans, that I read during the election. Who's side were you on?

Too bad, we had the momentum and opportunity but, we blew it. It may be years before the Republican Party is able to recover. I find many true Conservatives are leaving in droves. Be careful what you ask for. You may have the Party and no more voters.

Long Live the Republic!

Star....
I see you have a lot of Liberals posters cheering on your article. They like it when you insult Gov. Palin. That can't be a good sign?


Principals and Sarah Palin
Quote:
Richard
Location: IL
Reply # 26
Date: Nov 10, 2008 - 9:08 AM EST When Amnesty Juan met Caribou Barbie


He knew nothing about her. He had two brief meetings lasting about five hours in all. That was all it took for John McCain to pick his ticket's president-in-waiting, the person who might have to launch nukes.

It was a move by cynicism out of panic, from a RINO who knew the Republican base would not stomach another Beltway insider such as Romney or Ghouliani.

McCain could not find a serious conservative outsider, so he went for the airhead.

It probably did not affect the result in the end-- McCain would have blown it anyway with his behavior during the financial crisis, and his "bipartisan" vote for the bailout. But Palin sure didn't help.

Independents, floaters and national-security Dems on the whole are not Palin's kind of middle class, and they know when their intelligence is being disrespected. "

Thanks Richard! You prove, once again, that it is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

John McCain would have been slaughtered without Sarah Palin. As for texasps, perhaps you should learn to understand what you read. Star DID NOT insult Governor Palin selection, just the reason!

Very Well Said
Ms Parker has hit the nail on the head. McCain refused to fight with the ammo delivered to him - instead relying on the goodwill of the American people - goodwill that he squandered with McCain Feingold and the Illegal Immigrant issue - among others. I cannot even get inside his head. I think he believes that he is the smartest one in the room by a large margin. He tried to regain it with Gov Palin - and succeeded with the base - but an independent looking at the choice would have had to wonder if this was the best choice - especially after the Mainstream Media finished castigating her!
McCain had so much ammo on just the history and the lack of experience of Obama - and the people he chose to have around him -and he CHOSE not to use it! He had strikes against him - but what would have been wrong with defending the good that Bush did - while critizing the deviation from sound American principles! Yes - I said American principles because I do not believe that America is liberal - or Socialist!

McCain Legacy
McCain lost, because he sought the loss with great effort.

He failed to understand that the Republican base is conservative, and flirted for a long time with picking a liberal VP like Ridge, or Lieberman.

The Big Mac refused to pick a VP right after the convention, when he could have built momentum, but picked Palin long after his numbers were tanking, and when she lifted his numbers up, he took her out of the spotlight, and hid her, possibly because of ego or a fear that she would make the Macster look bad.

John refused to nail the slick Obama on the fact that the man is not a actual citizen, but born in Kenya, and adopted by an Indonesian, so that Obama would not be qualified for the Senate, much less President.

Finally, John showed a feckless lack of understanding that he needed to lead the charge against the bailout, since the calls to stop this monster bill were thousands to one, but instead went out of his way to cater to King Paulson and the bankster crowd, so they could drink deep of the US national wealth.

John earned his loss, and I hope the taste of defeat lingers on his palate.

Exactly
McCain focused on irrelevancies like "reform" and "corruption" because he was in fundamental agreement with the big statism of the left, but had to cull votes from the right somehow. So, he simply pretended that his statism didn't exist and he avoided the subject like the plague, except where he thought advocating the free market would make a good sales gimmick, separting him from his opponent, where he could argue that his bag of tricks was wiser than Obama's. And who doesn't hate corruption? Who doesn't think reform is a good word? But they are completely meaningless; such concepts represent nothing in this context. Between that so-called platform and his character resume, he thought he would be able to eke out just enough votes from the center to win.

He only got as far as he did because Republicans in general and conservatives in particular failed to nail down what the movement stands for: Individualism/limited Constitutional government. Because the movement failed to stand up for these ideas and enforce them on the politicians and hold them accountable, the pols did not feel the need to adhere to them. As a result, the center voter over time simply accepted the status quo as normal. Why would they have a problem with big government? That is something only those right-wing extremists are jabbering about; EVERYONE else knows that you HAAAAAAAVE to have a powerful government to solve all our problems which were OOOOBVIOUSLY created by the free market, and we've got a lot of them. No one on the right was both willing and able to say, "That is wrong, morally and in practice," and to explain why, until it was way too late.

McCain's campaign logically collapsed when one too many problems happened.

close, but no cigar this time
I agree, at least with the the tone of the article. Still, you are wrong on Sarah Palin. She is the only reason I was able to stomach a vote for McCain. If he hadn't picked her, McCain would have really lost by a landslide.

The other contention is McCain's suspending the election. It was a great move until he realized the media was against him. Had he continued to suspend the election til there was a real difference on the table (by eliminating Sarbanes-Oxley, the uptick rule for shorting, and offering insurance instead of bailout) he would have won easily (and the stories of doom and gloom would have subsided as well). Instead, he bowed to media pressure and was handed responsibility for the bailout.

Christians and Pastors, WAKE UP!
HOW COULD ANYONE CONGRATULATE OBAMA WHO HASN'T EVEN PROVEN HE QUALIFIES AS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN? HOW CAN YOU MAKE SUCH REQUESTS TO OBAMA WITHOUT FIRST TELLING HIM HE MUST REPENT!

REMEMBER JOHN THE BAPTIST? he was NOT SILENT in speaking out against Herod and Herod's sin of adultery - he told Herod to repent AND he got his head chopped off for it:

How much WORSE than Herod's adultery are the atrocities of Obama?

1. Horrific abortions
2. Homosexual marriage
3. Encouraging and accepting worship/adoration from people (a type of worship/adoration that belongs only to GOD).
4. Refusal to comply with Constitutional law [Refuses to provide proof of U.S. Natural Born Cititzenship via a valid birth certificate] WHICH MEANS HE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT.

Jesus said John the Baptist was the greatest man that ever lived.

Any pastor or person who is trying to get out of doing their job in speaking out against sin by masking their fear of the media or of being called "names," and telling us to "congratulate and pray for wisdom and discernment for Obama" WHEN HE'S NOT QUALIFIED TO EVEN RUN [not a natural born US citizen] is seriously outside the will of God, as THERE WILL BE NO WISDOM AND DISCERNMENT WITHOUT REPENTANCE.

PLEASE PASS THIS AROUND TO OTHER CHRISTIANS AND REMIND YOUR PASTORS OF THE PRICE OF KEEPING SILENT:

IF THERE ARE TO BE ANY PRAYERS WE MUST ASK FOR OBAMA'S REPENTANCE BEFORE GOD WILL GRANT HIM ANY SUCH WISDOM AND DISCERNMENT (which by the way are gifts of the Holy Spirit which Obama does not possess). NO HOLY SPIRIT = NO WISDOM AND DISCERNMENT.

CHRISTIANS (AND ESPECIALLY PREACHERS DO YOUR JOB!: WARN THE PEOPLE!

If not, John the Baptist’s life and death stands in judgment against you.

http://moniquemonicat.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/%E2%80%A2-no -prayers-for-obama/

ARE YOU LISTENING MIKE HUCKABEE AND OTHERS???

Restoring...
"The future of the Republican Party is not in process but in restoring leadership for traditional American principles ..."

ORRR...how about restoring the Constitution? If anybody up in DC can find a copy, maybe they could read it and, you know, do what it says. It is the supreme law of the land. Doesn`t anybody care that it has been trashed to the point of irrelevance?

Had it been adhered to, we would not be in this mess.

McCain revisited
John McCain MUST be reviled as someone who should have known he could not win the Presidency. He should be reviled for not stepping aside in favor of a candidate who had a chance. This campaign could have been won...even by McCain...but he didn't have the will. He didn't have any political smarts and he refused to hire those who do to advise him. A candidate may not succeed in his quest but he must, at the outset, know what must be done in order to prevail. I saw none of that in McCain. Sarah Palin? I can only ask who else? She was the shovel whose insurmountable task was to dig McCain out of the pit. She was tapped very late in the game. Odds are she will be much better prepared the next time. At least, she understands Conservatism in a way that McCain never did. The office is such that it must be pursued with the idea that only one term is available. It is, then, imperative that the candidate sell his ideas to the public in terms that are frank, even frightening, so long as they are identified as fighting words. We fear the unknown because we don't know how to anticipate it. Ergo, the candidate must lay out the facts as well as his solutions, and defend his recitation in the face of objections by the Democrats. Conservatism is not dead. It is not even weakened! What it lacks is a spokesman skilled in hammering it home to the public at every opportunity and a coterie of supporters in the Congress who are equally talented and who will speak with one voice. This is essential! We bumpkins from the hinterlands understand this. How is it that the sophisticated talking heads in the Party don't have a clue!

VP choice is questionable...

I agree with the column, but am not convinced we've truly tapped the Palin nomination. She did have credibility on the energy front and that was critical during ancient times--ie. two months ago. AND the other choices would have been slammed...in good part because running with McCain would have been difficult for anyone except, possibly, Lieberman. McCain does not enjoy agreeing with the people that support him and volunteer for him. The ground game for this campaign was basically non-existent--IN PENNSYLVANIA no less!
Let's quit blaming this mess on Palin...just for awhile, okay???

Otherwise your comments are spot on...

Daniel
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.