Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, October 20, 2008
Star Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
McCain must state obvious: Obama is a socialist
by Star Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


As John McCain tries to salvage his presidential campaign over the few weeks he has left, he ought to think about the Coca Cola Company in 1985.

That was the year that Coca Cola, based on what the company thought was good internal market research, introduced a new, sweeter formula to replace the taste that American consumers had always associated with Coke.

The result was disaster. Consumers were unhappy with the new flavor that replaced a product that was more than a drink. It was a time tested American tradition. In short order, Coca Cola brought the old traditional Coke back to market, and in a real feat of marketing gymnastics, was selling both New Coke and Coca Cola Classic.

Sales of Coca Cola Classic swamped sales of New Coke, and shortly thereafter, New Coke was gone.

Today John McCain heads the ticket of a Republican Party that many Americans have fallen out of love with. It's a Republican Party that Americans once knew but now, like New Coke, has confused its customers, the voting public.

Restoring a brand that has been damaged might be an even greater challenge than introducing a new product. You've got the added complexities of confusion. But this is what John McCain has got to do. And he doesn't have a lot of time to do it.

How can anyone be surprised that Americans are confused with the Republican brand? This was the party that once captured American hearts and minds by restoring focus to principles of limited government, traditional values, and personal responsibility.

Apologies to George W. Bush, but time is too precious for tiptoeing around the truth. We've seen the biggest growth of government over the last eight years since Franklin Roosevelt, and the country is in a mess. It's only natural psychology to associate the mess with Republicans.

McCain must disassociate from the mistakes of "new" Republicanism, show that these mistakes are exactly where Senator Obama wants to pick up, and re-establish the "classic" Republican brand.

His approach in the latest debate at Hofstra University showed he is grasping the marketing challenge in front of him. His pitch about Joe the Plumber, and his market-oriented stands on big issues like health care and education, showed that he understands he needs to do more than simply say he's not George Bush.

But he's still not being clear or aggressive enough.

McCain must paint with clarity the starkly different worlds that Americans will be buying into when they step into voting booths in November.

Barack Obama is a socialist. McCain must say it. It's not slinging mud but stating fact.

Perhaps a complicating factor in explaining freedom to Americans today is that when "classic" Republicanism was selling, we all still remembered the Soviet Union and communist China. The difference between the United States and the rest of the world then was clearer than today.

When someone said "socialist" or "communist,'' we could look abroad and know exactly what this meant.

There is nowhere where Senator Obama sees Americans suffering from excessive government. The opposite. He sees all our suffering from not enough.

The collapse of communism and socialism abroad was not accidental. Central planning is both dysfunctional and immoral.

Incredibly, Obama thinks that a huge and complex market like health care, where a few hundred million Americans spend almost two and half trillion dollars a year, can be improved with more government controls and spending.

And he thinks that parents, in a country that is supposed to be free, should not be given control over where they send their child to school and the type of education their child gets.

To turn things around, McCain must quickly reestablish the Republican brand of freedom and contrast this with Obama's clear socialism.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Star Parker is the founder and president of CURE, the Coalition for Urban Renewal & Education, a 501c3 think tank which explores and promotes market based public policy to fight poverty, as well as author of White Ghetto: How Middle Class America Reflects Inner City Decay.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
MIss Star luv ur article US Plantation
Back on Uncle Sam's Plantation
Star Parker - Syndicated Columnist
Greetings Miss Star;
I have never done this before but your article was forwarded to me from my Sister in CA...Wow...I love it, very very much. And listen I dont mean this to come out this way but just to let you know I'm white and I love every race, I'm not into all that separation. That was just "Outstanding" I'm nearly speechless...guess it just hit the heart and jerked it some. "smile" Anyhow I won't keep rambling but wanted to finally speak out. Your boss needs to for sure give you a huge raise. Ok Take care and always stay safe.
JR

Lionheart- Lastly 4
For whom was he a “freedom fighter?” He certainly isn’t a freedom fighter for Americans, and definitely not for the Jewish people whom Farrakhan calls “the forces of Satan.” This alleged freedom fighter has called for a “jihad” on the American people.” I believe this is the epitome of hate speech; or was it just the prelude for Obama descending into the “Greek” temple as the Twelfth Imam? Perhaps he’s not the anti-Christ, but he sure is a good precursor -- the murder of aborted babies born alive (a nice sacrifice to the forces of darkness), support of the homosexual “movement,” the destruction of “white America.” [End of citation]

Again, I'm sure you'll find a way to parse this as not being any credible evidence of my assertion that Obama is just as angry as Jeremiah Wright. Yet your apathy will not erase the image of anger that Obama exudes, even in the facial expressions and body language he uses when making appearances everyday.

It seems that whatever evidence of the true nature of this man's animus towards America, it is evident that there are many who have bought in to this notion that his is a message of Hope, Change, and Reconciliation.

The multitude of evidence to the contrary, notwithstanding.

Lionheart- Lastly 3
So why did al-Mansour go to such lengths for Obama unless there was a quid pro quo that hasn’t been brought to light? Maybe the quo of the agreement has finally come due? “We the people” only have to look at what’s happened in Great Britain with the enforcement of Sharia law for the ramifications of an Obama presidency to become crystal clear (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2957428/Sharia-law-courts-operating-in-Britain.html).

Proof of Obama’s relationship with “cutting edge” terrorists was his unpublicized May 14, 2008, meeting at Macomb Community College with Imam Hassan Qazwini. The Imam heads the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, Michigan, and according to Debbie Schlussel, Qazwini is the front man in the U.S. for the terror group Hezbollah. He also openly supports HAMAS-ide bombings. I’m sure he was dancing on the head of a pin on 9/11. He’s a close friend of Hezbollah’s spiritual leader, Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, who called on Hezbollah terrorists “to kill more than 300 U.S. Marines and U.S. Embassy civilians in cold blood.” His mosque is a hotbed of anti-American sentiment where rallies and celebrations are held in support of Hezbollah,and many of his congregants are money launderers for that terror group. All this is taking place in America while the Democrats demand hate-crimes legislation.

Qazwini’s mosque has hosted visitors like Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, a racist at minimum. And it was Qazwini who defined Farrakhan as “our dear brother,” and “a freedom fighter” (http://www.debbiesch... 2008/05/the_company_he. html; and http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2008/05/six-degrees-of-ba rack-obama-updated.html).

Lionheart- Lastly 2
"For example, why did/does Obama find “solace” in his relationships with those who score a10-out-of-10 on the rebellion scale? Folks like Ayers and his cronies are not exactly mainstream America nor is the “Reverend” Jeremiah Wright. And what’s the connection between his Muslim background, and his anti-America, socialist background (inculcated in him as a small child by his mother, father, and eventually his stepfather, the latter of which were both Muslims)? Add the corrupt Chicago political machinery through which he rose to some sort of power and you have the makings of either a dormant sleeper cell or one who believes he can single-handedly destroy and then remake the U.S. in his own twisted image without “we the people” batting an eyelash. Somewhere along the line, Obama became beholden to the Muslims and that IOU has probably come due. Regarding Obama’s admittance to Harvard Law School, Jack Cashill wrote:

“As far back as 1988, however, Obama had serious pull. He would need it. As previously reported, Khalid al-Mansour, principle adviser to Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, lobbied friends like Manhattan Borough President Percy Sutton to intervene at Harvard on Obama's behalf. An orthodox Muslim, al-Mansour has not met the crackpot anti-Semitic theory he could not embrace. As for bin Talal, in October 2001, New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani sent his $10 million relief check back un-cashed after the Saudi billionaire blamed 9/11 on America (http://wnd.com/index.php?pageId=74877).

Hence, Obama was admitted because of Muslim connections, not because of merit. This alone makes him guilty of the charge he makes against his opponents -- cronyism. The same is true, Cashill wrote, for his role as president of the Harvard Law Review. He never wrote a single article. The only paper he did write was heavily edited and demanded the death of babies that survived abortions.

Lionheart- Lastly 1
You ask: "Who said Obama was angry about any past faults besides you?

...Obama has consistently stated that he is for unification of the country and not division.

For whatever reason, you don't understand that Wright can be considered very eccentric due to his holdover feelings of rejection and anger that stem from the sixties and racist practices that have occurred in Chicago for years. I live in Texas and am familiar with Chicago politics that include Fred Hampton, overzealous policing, and segregationist communities such as Cicero.

None of this does not mean that Wright and no other person of color does not love America. However, a belief for an even better America that truly embraces the concept of Dr King that each man should be judged by his character and not his color is the driving force for some of the controversy you've mentioned."

There has been much research done on Obama's radical and anti-American associations and anti-American indoctrination. Additionally, there is no disconnect between Barack Obama, William Ayres, Jeremiah Wright and other persons they are associated [and work with to undermine this country and the Constitution].

I'm sure you'll devise a response built around trying to discredit the source of the following information I borrowed from an essay posted by JillCW, entitled OBAMA’S IOU at:
http://newsbusters.org/forums/woodshed/obamas-iou-25355
Because the researcher is not on the payroll of the Obama-MSM press and their "Oh, he's just like you and me" sycophants, doesn't make her research any the less accurate in its exposing the true nature of Barack Hussein and his cadre of subversives:

Lionheart- I Am That I Am-4

But the message I will be carrying to the black community will not be based in the "teachings" and protestations of "folk" like Cone, Wright, Ayres, and Obama, who have nothing uplifting to offer black people but angry rhetoric and the vicarious pleasure of identifying success through the ability to watch them drive their Benz's and ride off into the sunset to their gated-communities after having whipped them up into an emotional frenzy; swept away by their empty promises of reparations for the past crimes of some long-dead slave masters.

The message I will be carrying is one which says to them:

A respect that has to be forced or legislated upon society, is a respect that is tainted with anger, mistrust, and animosity from those who are forced to give it.

A respect that is earned by the way in which you carry yourself and the respect you show to others; is a respect indeed.

I am not ashamed of any of the commentary I have made here on TH. I am not playing with anyone here, including you. I don't owe you or anyone else here any explanation or apology for who I am. And everything I say here, I say from my heart and from the courage of my convictions. Like it or not.

I remain,
Semper Fidelis

Lionheart- I Am That I Am-3

The 75% of the 39M African Americans who do not live in poverty shouldn't need the education you seem to be lacking. The education that says, "I too can succeed in America through quite determination, hard work, and by making the proper choices in life; unfettered by anger at some real or perceived sense of animus aimed in my direction by those who neither understand me nor wish for my success to be realized.

Yes, I believe that we should strive for social justice. I just do not believe that social justice for African Americans will be realized through coercive redistribution policies and angry militancy meant to shame the majority society into acquiescence to the demands of radical "black nationalists" and well-meaning, if condescending elitist hand-me-down welfare policies.

The only times I have entered into discussions of race on these threads, is in answer to those who come on here trying to make an issue of it as you have.

If I weren't sensitive to the needs of my people, I would not have been able to raise a daughter, who, now in her senior year of high school, is a member of the National Honor Society, a varsity cheerleader, and a straight A student well on her way to the college of her choice.

I will participate in a mentoring program alright. I'll put my money, knowledge, and life's experiences where my mouth is, in the trenches of the black community.

Lionheart- I Am That I Am-1

Your motives for wanting to continue with this conversation are suspect.

You ask: "What are you doing to help besides calling your own people "n----" and other derogatory terms?

ANSWER: I chair a recovery program meeting every Friday night at my [black community] church, and have been doing so for the past 14 months.

In May of this year I earned an Associates degree [making the President's List] in my final two semesters with a straight A grade point average.

Presently, [as I have informed some of my colleagues here in other postings] I am enrolled as a Junior at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville as a Social Work major who after the completion of this semester will have only 3 semesters remaining to earn my BSW degree in Social Work [ while working I intend to continue to attain an MSW].

Why am I doing this?

Because I want work with the youth and others in the black community where I live, to encourage them to realize that they don't have to repeat the mistake that so many of my generation, of looking to society to change its attitudes about THEM, but that they must first accept that their individual success or failure rests upon the choices they make for their OWN lives.

What is the percentage of African Americans who live in poverty, that do so because of the wrong choices they have made in their own lives?

Yes, I plan to be that "big brother" or "father figure" because, to me, that is the most important aspect to correcting the problems of delinquency, drug & alcohol addiction, black-on-black acting out, etc. that is decimating the black community.

Oncealwaysamarine...Part 3
This is why I have no respect for you. You spew your vile with the same verocity as a KKK Kleagle while using their same derogatory terminology. It has noting to do with you being a republican for many repubs truly have moral convictions that identify with those of mainstream black communities. You think that your drivel will endear you with those on TH who think like you but those are the ones who laugh at you while making jokes to others about your tirades.

Your ability and willingness to denigrate your own color for no other reason than to stand out from the rest (in your mindset) and to appease those on this site that are like pigs in the mud when it comes to any negativity involving people of color is sickening. If you think this is being "your own man", keep it up. There are those on TH who see the value in what you say. Not many, I hope, but as you said you do have friends here that I assume think the same as you.

Btw, I'm older than you (60) and hate hip-hop and what it stands for. Another lie you told.

Oncealwaysamarine...Part 2
Never did I say that whites who do not vote for Obama are racists. Another absolute lie. I have said before on other threads that its understandable if whites disagree with Obama's policies and choose not to vote for him as I disagree with McCain's. Although, we all know that some whites will not vote for Obama because of his race while some blacks will vote for Obama because of his race. All whites are not racists just as all blacks do not hate whites. Its just that simple and I have never posted anything differently.

My posts on this thread directly dealt with specific issues but you felt the need to interject your agenda that targeted pathologies that afflict inner city black communities and in particular to fervently discuss your personal disdain for African Americans who aren't as successful as you. Yes, there are severe problems in black communities that affect quality of life and these problems are quite well known without your incessant blabber that you use to pander to those on TH who are gratified to read such.

25% of African Americans still live in poverty situations and it is 100% up to us to turn that situation around by working to make changes in the communities. Not relying on dems or repubs for solutions. What are you doing to help besides calling your own people “n----“ and other derogatory terms? Are sitting on your high horse in a suburb bi**hing about Johnny being fatherless and unable to read or are you participating in a mentoring program designed to give Johnny a father figure and inspiration to obtain an education? And why is it that I have never read in any of your posts the successful strides made by 75% of 39M African Americans who do not live in poverty? Is it because it is not a popular topic here on TH and you may lose some of your cred?

Oncealwaysamarine...Part I
It appears that you have some form of psychological problem of some sort so a lot of your tirade I will ignore. However, you gave a false characterization of me that I will respond to. You wrote the below in your post:

"You can call what I write about the "black folk" [as you call yourself] that prostrate themselves at the feet of the San Fransissy'o/5th Avenue/D.C. cocktail circuit elitists who have pandered to your basest instincts and obsession with "victimhood" if you want to; constantly telling yourselves that it is Republican and "white people's greed runs a world in need" and that YOU can't be the best you can be because the "white man" exercises power over your life, and he don't like you.

But as for me, I have no tolerance for the black or white men who tell me [over, and over, and over again] about how I'm handicapped in my abilities to achieve in this country; only because I'm black, and need THEM to help me and my people overcome my disabilities..."
----------------
Your mental problem is evident because in none of my posts did I ever mention that whites were responsible for any calamities affecting African Americans. Again you are pandering to right wing nuts who believe in the "victimhood" concept that indicates that all black people blame whites for any misfortunes. How asinine!!. Be a man and don't lie to try to get your points across. Never did I say that African Americans need whites to help us overcome any disabilities. Pure bull**** and an outright lie.

CLASSIC REPUBLICANISM IS: THE REAL THING

Star Parker writes:

"McCain must disassociate from the mistakes of "new" Republicanism, show that these mistakes are exactly where Senator Obama wants to pick up, and re-establish the "classic" Republican brand."

Aslan writes:

SO VERY TRUE STAR! SARAH SEEMS LIKE SHE GOT YOUR MESSAGE BUT NOW MCCAIN MUST GET YOUR MESSAGE!!!!!!!!!!!

ALSO, REMEMBER THE CLASSIC COKE SONG?????

ITS THE REALLLLLLLLLLL THING!!!!

McCAIN HAS TO COME BACK HOME THE WAY COKE DID AND FORGET ABOUT WHAT THE LIBERAL PRESS SAYS....HE MUS BE: THE REAL THING!!

WHEN OBAMA AND BIDEN INCLUDE BUSH'S NAME IN THEIR SOUNDBITES...McCAIN MUST INCLUDE NANCY PELOSI AND HARRY REID IN HIS SOUNDBITES...

GREAT JOB STAR !!!


If I Have Been Too Strident IV

Countless liberal Democrats, with the blessings of many in the African-American community, persist in helping to perpetuate the notion that blacks are somehow at a disadvantage to compete and that we remain in need of perpetual assistance in the way of lowering test requirements, etc. The wholesale acceptance of this notion in American society, especially when it is so enthusiastically embraced by activists in the black community and by well-intentioned, if condescending, liberals, is in itself, largely responsible for our ongoing failure to assimilate into mainstream society. If we, as members of this society, want to see true "affirmative action", it is time for us to take the action of affirming ourselves and our ability to succeed; rejecting this self-fulfilling notion of disability based on race, and yes, racism.

Again, the strident and crude nature of my comments has caused any offense, I apologize to those I have, thus, offended. My passion, while sometimes wrongly directed against
individuals, is intended to defend this country, its traditions, and the people who share my love for it, whatever the color of their skin.

And as a Christian, I will not apologize for the fact that I follow the teachings of Christ by His grace. And I thank him that he allows me the heart and the understanding to have the ability to love and respect people regardless of their whiteness or blackness, myself not being bound to view the world and His Creation through the lens of my skin color.

If I Have Been Too Strident III
If I am the one who is to be blamed for insinuating race into this discussion, then so be it. I will accept that characterization if some deem it to be necessary to accuse me of it. Conservatives, suffer the lie of that distinction evey election cycle, the truth of the charge being accepted regardless, as a matter of course, of its validity or not.

What is particularly galling to me, however, is our insistence, in the black community, that we are somehow incapable of achieving academic success in the classroom and elsewhere in mainstream American society; that reading is too hard, speaking proper English is too hard, and standardized tests are absolutely too hard for us to learn to do well on. These myths have become endemic in our community. This argument, it seems, over the past thirty-five plus years has metastasized into a permanent plank in the Democrat Party's presidential election campaign platform. The notion that we remain such a racist society that our black children can't even learn their ABCs like other folk's kids is an insult and does more to support and cement racist attitudes against blacks than it ever will do to engender anything close to "affirming" us a social equals.

Democrats, liberals, the "politically correct", and "enlightened" media pundits have been race-baiting ever since I can remember, and that they are still able to be effective at it, even as we begin the twenty-first century, is a cause of great consternation for me. Ever willing to offer an excuse for the failure of black children to achieve at the same academic levels as other groups of students, they continue to promise government intervention and assistance in exchange for the African-American vote. Democrat candidates and legislators are all too eager to assume the mantle of being regarded as the voice of the "down-trodden".

If I Have Been Too Strident II

That is why in light of the current controversy surrounding the revelation that Barack Obama has maintained a long-time association with the radical, and racist/ Anti-American pastor Jeremiah Wright, myself being a black man of fifty-four years as a citizen of this great land, am sick and tired of so-called African-American leaders, and the condescending liberal left, apologizing for the failure of us as black citizens to rise above our self-fulfilling prophecy of low morality and community standards.

It is amazing to me how pervasively embedded is the notion, which is constantly being drilled into the collective psyche of American society, that black Americans are somehow handicapped, or worse, incapable of achieving success in various areas of society.

If I Have Been Too Strident I

If I have offended some readers in my stridency while voicing my opinions; I apologize for offending you.

However, as you probably now have come to realize, I have not allowed myself to be bound by the rules of political correctness, and for that, I offer no apologies.

I can assure you that I suffer no hatred of myself for the color of neither my skin [which has been suggested] nor the desire to cut it out. However, the pride I take in who and what I am is not in any way tied to any sense of the vicarious identifications which seems to cause many of my fellow black Americans seem to feel the need to identify themselves with anyone who shares this particular allelic phenotype, regardless of their obvious moral turpitude for the sake of some sense of race-specific or "black community"-condoned authenticity.

While many in the "black community" may find it necessary to affirm themselves in such associations based on the color of their skin to allow themselves to jump on the bandwagon of Obamanation and Barack Obama worship, I have no such lack of personal self-esteem nor do I find any need of such hero figures as to demean all that I believe about the blessing God has bestowed upon me to achieve it.

I am proud of both the man I have developed into, and of the service I have provided to this great country, my service to which, has been sufficient to affirming my value to myself, my culture, and the overall betterment and protection of it. My self-esteem was formed, therefore, in the crucible of both the "black community" and in the fraternity of the United States Marine Corps.




Back to Debating with Intelligent GOPs
To Answer Tinsldr2 post 170,
You probably are older than I am Sir, and that is why I do listen to what everyone here says with an open mind. I just want to point out to you though, but Carter unemployment rate average during his term of 1976-1980 was at 6.54. Then it went up during Reagan's first term from 1980-84 to an average of 8.60. During his second term however, he brought it down to 6.43.

To Judith post 179,
Beowulfe point was pointless, the economy came out of a recession that occurred DURING Bush's term, only during his last year in office. 1 out of 4 years is not something to brag about. You should read more of my posts, and read that one over closely and go to the link if you don't believe me. If you're honest with yourself you'll see my point.


To Kirk reply about the Framers of the constitution,
I do not think they were bad people at all. I love American history and the historians who shaped this GREAT country. There were people in that convention like Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin (whom I admire) among others, that were inspirational. But i have to agree with historian Charles Beard that most were just wealthy property owners that wanted to protect their property rights. The end result was an astounding form of government that no other country can claim they created. It was the Framework for the new government, and part of the reason why it was left short is to be interpreted by the society in adaptation to its change. What is the "pursuit of happiness" to you" Is it property, wealth, education, or family. The constitution was created to protect those inalienable rights. I personally believe that it can mean education and health care. That's my personal opinion that I am entitled to.

I have enjoyed blogging with the eloquent intellectuals and I hope that the intolerable posts of OnceAlwaysMarine doesn't discourage continuation.


Oncealwaysamarine...
I'm blown away by your words. There are people on this blog, Republicans, that debate in a respectable manner. We are intelligent people who can disagree without bringing up race in the conversation. For you to call someone a n***** is disgusting and sickening. If you hate your own skin so much then cut it off! Let the rest of us debate like the sensible Americans of all backgrounds, because this country is to diverse for bigots like you.

Lionheart- Part Two
Oh and exuse me for thing James Hal Cone was white. I'm might have felt better...

Instead he's just simple-minded bald-headed black fool. Spewing hatred and serving up some more apologetic nonsense that losers like you, Wright and the idiots that follow him can take with you all the way to your pathetic graves, to make the fact that YOU didn't do anything with your pathetic lives, is not because of any bad choices you made, but because "massa" didn't give you a chance. Read Proverbs 3:6.
Trust in the Lord for a change...stop putting all your hopes and dreams in the Democrat Party and Barack Hussein Obama, who has become your latest "Savior."

The so-called "Black Church" has sold itself out to a reprobate social engineer who has never seen a form of abortion [killing of innocent babies] that he doesn't like; because, Why? Because he's BLACK? F**K YOU!! AND THE HORSE YOU RODE IN ON!! How can the people in the black church call themselves Christians when they have become so twisted in carnality and hatred that they would condone baby murder, just to be able to say, "we's sho' showed whitey!"


FREE YOUR MIND and your black @$$ will follow!

The kingdom of heaven is within.

Lionheart- Part One
You can call what I write about the "black folk" [as you call yourself] that prostrate themselves at the feet of the San Fransissy'o/5th Avenue/D.C. cocktail circuit elitists who have pandered to your basest instincts and obsession with "victimhood" if you want to; constantly telling yourselves that it is Republican and "white people's greed runs a world in need" and that YOU can't be the best you can be because the "white man" exercises power over your life, and he don't like you.

But as for me, I have no tolerance for the black or white men who tell me [over, and over, and over again] about how I'm handicapped in my abilities to achieve in this country; only because I'm black, and need THEM to help me and my people overcome my disabilities...

GET THE F**K OFF THE PLANTATION!!

The only thing keeping you down is your acceptance of the way in which your sorry tail is being characterized by those that don't give a damn about you...and thing you're too dumb to learn anything but how to spit some Hip-Hop gibberish and to speak Ebonics.

Jeremiah Wright, himself, who you adore, got up on TV doing his Steppin Fetchit routine telling the entire country that black kids [because they were Africans] have to be not expected to sit behind their desks and read from a book, but need to "feel" something, therefore, they might need to come from behind their desks and "climb all over the teacher!" He did more in 30 minutes to set black people back, than a "white racist" could do in a lifetime!!

Now you come on here calling somebody else a racist because they don't support this subversive confused half-breed inexperienced and terrorist taught candidate, not because everything he stands for is anathema to democracy, but only because he's black?!!




Marxists Radicals Take-Over
For the last forty years, radical liberals have dreamed of a Marxist Utopia --- a movement which has infiltrated much of America's institutions of learning, the media, the entertainment industry and special interest organizations. With their hold on academia and the mainstream media, these radical Leftists have disguised themselves as ‘compassionate progressives’ and have pushed themselves into the leadership of the Democrat Party itself. Now that their anointed Messiah, Barrack "The One" Obama, is the presumptive nominee (who endorses all of their destructive ideologies) they no longer hide their agenda to “CHANGE” America into something the Founding Fathers never intended us to be. With the takeover of the Democratic party by these Alinsky Marxists, there is no longer a need to hide their ideology behind emotional rhetoric and platitudes. What they have achieved is nothing short of a coup.

Ultimate Race Card..Correction
In my previous post, I said "if they lose this election"...

What I meant to say is, "if they WIN this election" and have complete control of the Executive [White House], Legislative [Congress], and Judicial branches of government.

Pelosi, Reid, Durbin, et al. have already proven they don't give a damn about the wishes of the American people. Their attitudes about nearly 80% of the American people favoring drilling for oil has proven that.

Obama Is The Ultimate Democrat Race Card
The Party of Racism, the Democrat Party, is using this Obamanation of a candidacy to serve EXACTLY the purpose it is serving now and black people like Lionheart are too dumb to see it.

You think they nominated Obama because he's so brilliant and articulate [he graduated from Haaaavaaard...]?

This was a set up from day one.

Do you really think the Democrats didn't know how controversial this radical Stokely Carmichael-wannabe & his Angela Davis-clone wife were?

In my opinion [and this is just my opinion], they knew this Marxist's background would get out...they wanted it to.

They knew this would polarize and divide the people in this country, once his true colors came out, and once divided, us peons would be ripe for the Democrat/Socialists to seize political control of this country like they have been trying to do for the past 20 years.

I wouldn't be surprised, if they lose this election, if they tried to foment race riots in Chicago and other major cities, so they can then declare martial law and take try to make gun ownership illegal.

Then we will be hopeless to resist them.

Obama [and the hatred that would be caused by a radical anti-American "black nationalist" in the White House, taking money out of the pockets of hardworking everyday Joes, to "spread the wealth around" to people who don't deserve it, and who hate their guts while taking advantage of it...

...is the ULTIMATE Democrat race-card.

Great Champions of Equality?
Now, you were telling ME about the "turbulent '60s? Here are the great Champions of the Negro race in the '60s that make you so proud to be a Democrat. This is what Democrats thought of your monkey @$$ in the '60s.

"I have never seen very many white people who felt they were being imposed upon or being subjected to any second-class citizenship if they were directed to a waiting room or to any other public facility to wait or to eat with other white people. Only the Negroes, of all the races which are in this land, publicly proclaim they are being mistreated, imposed upon, and declared second-class citizens because they must go to public facilities with members of their own race."

--Sen. Richard B. Russell Jr. (D.,Ga.), 1961
The Russell Senate Office Building is named for him.

"I do not lie awake at night worrying about the problems of Negroes."

--Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, 1961
Kennedy later authorized wiretapping the phones and bugging the hotel rooms of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

"Everybody likes to go to Geneva. I used to do it for the Law of the Sea conferences and you'd find these potentates from down in Africa, you know, rather than eating each other, they'd just come up and get a good square meal in Geneva."

--Sen. Ernest F. Hollings (D.,S.C.) 1993
Chairman, Commerce Committee, 1987-95 and 2001-03
Candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, 1984

Lionheart, before you engage ME in a debate about who was on MY side in the '60s, and who is on my side now, you need to realize where the hell you came from. Democrats have had their foot on your ignorant throat since slavery. Some free government butter & cheese [these days a Link Card and enough SSI to buy some beer and gin, don't make them my friends)...

...or yours.

Unlike you, I know that.