Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, February 18, 2008
Star Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Republican challenges and the politics of unity
by Star Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Unity is one of the big themes of the current election.

People get unified in two different ways. Unity comes either from a common threat from the outside, or from leadership emerging from the inside.

Who can forget the shock and the surge of patriotism that followed the 9/11 attacks? The political and social divisions that define calmer times disappeared and we all became Americans.

We were united behind our president, whose approval ratings went beyond 90 percent.

Over the few short years since that shock, circumstances have changed. President Bush, once wildly popular, is now wildly unpopular.

Last month, polling showed that concerns about the economy moved past concerns about terrorism as the nation's top issue.

If we look at the two parties, the Democrats appear far more unified than Republicans.

But this Democratic unity is driven primarily by the outside-in variety. Democrats are deeply unhappy with the status quo in the country, Republicans far less so.

Only about 25 percent of Americans express satisfaction today with the direction of the country.

But the gap between Republicans and Democrats is huge. Only about 15 percent of Democrats are satisfied with how things are going, but almost 50 percent of Republicans are satisfied.

Democratic Party unity is being driven from the outside, a common dissatisfaction with the status quo, with the party uniformly defined by liberalism.

The Democratic nomination contest is about personalities, not issues. Regardless of which candidate gets nominated, Sen. Barack Obama or Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, 85 percent of Democrats say they will be satisfied.

It's probably the reason why Obama will be the Democratic nominee. Despite Clinton's efforts to distinguish herself from him on issues, the truth is that there is very little difference. It's a contest that will be won on personality, and he is beating her hands down in this department.

Republicans, on the other hand, are driven by an entirely different reality. Republicans are far less put off by the status quo in the country and party unity must come from the inside out. Whereas outside-in unity is driven by a commonly perceived external threat, inside-out unity must be driven by internal leadership.

As a result, the GOP contest has been far more one of issues than of personalities.

The problem is, no one Republican candidate has been able to appeal with equal strength to the major party concerns of national security, traditional values and free-market economics.

Given that 86 percent of Republicans say that "defending the U.S. against terrorism" is their No. 1 concern, perhaps it is not surprising that Sen. John McCain has emerged as the front-runner.

But, although national security is the top concern of Republicans and remains at the top of concerns for all Americans, social and economic concerns are also strong.

The unavoidable conclusion is that, if one assumes that McCain prevails as the party nominee, his choice for vice president will be crucial both for unifying the party and for the general election. He's got to pick a running mate who will bring strong credentials that satisfy the social and economic concerns of Republican conservatism.

What will this mean for the general election?

There's a sense that this is going to be a year when a Democrat will be returned to the White House.

An election year in which general public dissatisfaction is high does not bode well for the party in power. Plus, Democratic fund-raising and voter turnout is far outstripping Republican efforts.

The decisive battleground for the general election will be the third of the electorate in the middle -- independent voters and those without strong party affiliations.

These voters have migrated to the Democratic side over the past couple years. But polling indicates that this migration has been more defined by disillusionment with Republicans than with a surge of new enthusiasm for the Democratic Party and liberals.

This is supported by the fact that despite the Democratic blowout in the 2006 congressional elections, the approval ratings for the Democratic Congress are abysmal.

It is most reasonable to conclude that the Republican tent that housed party loyalists and independents for so many years is still the tent where most Americans want to be. They just need to feel comfortable that it's a tent that will be standing dependably once they are inside.

A Republican ticket that is balanced and strongly representative of concerns for national security, traditional values and a free economy can still be the winning formula.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Star Parker is the founder and president of CURE, the Coalition for Urban Renewal & Education, a 501c3 think tank which explores and promotes market based public policy to fight poverty, as well as author of White Ghetto: How Middle Class America Reflects Inner City Decay.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Goldwater
Quoth Barry M. Goldwater ("Mr. Conservative"):

"Anyone who joins us in all sincerity, we welcome. Those, those who do not care for our cause, we don"t expect to enter our ranks in any case. And let our Republicanism so focused and so dedicated not be made fuzzy and futile by unthinking and stupid labels."

>>>>>

Catch a clue, Goldwater couldn't get elected dogcatcher. It was Reagan and his Big Tent party that turned republican party. If not for the Reagan democrats that have stayed with the party, republicans would still be a minority party. Now. thanks to you wing nuts we are right back to the Goldwater ... I.E. no where. >>>

Stick it in your ear, Mr. Gassett.>>

Pull your head out of your butt, clownboy!

wing nut
Thomas if you are a Conservative

Conservatives will not vote for McCain for two MAJOR reasons:>>>>>>

Wrong. Radical Right wing clowns won't vote for McMcain. Conservatives are voting for McCain, or how do you explain his totals?

Get your terms right, wing nut. There is nothing conservative about chasing the Reagan democrats ... you know, the republican majority away. Only a lunatic wing nut would do that.

Too bad Ms. Parker
You are more of an elite GOP hack than I previously thought. I suppose that should not be surprising given that the GOP elites are screaming at everyone to come home, forgetting the words of Ronald Reagan, who, when he joined the ranks of the GOP stated: I didn't leave the _________ party, it left me" Just choose Republican or Democrat and you will eventually figure it out.

The two parties have rigged the system to keep themselves in power at all costs. They have allowed partisanship to replace leadership, and now we find our beloved country in a huge mess, and these elite do nothings want us to once again vote the lesser of two evils and hope for a different result that never has and never will materialize!

If you want to learn how we have been scammed by the elites and how we have been duped into believing that we have no other choice, nowhere else to go, visit my website, JOEOLIVAFORPRESIDENT.ORG, and do it today. This is the election and now is the time to reject the DEM/GOP/MSM propaganda and the lies we have been fed year after year.

Check out the site, why not? Don't we realize that the elites have stolen our birthright, our inheritance? Are we angry enough to do something or is it another same old same old election? Thanks, Joe

Thomas if you are a Conservative

Conservatives will not vote for McCain for two MAJOR reasons:

1. McCain/Kennedy Amnesty for 12 to 20 million POOR illegal invaders get path to citizenship and the right to VOTE.

2. 12 to 20 million NEW POOR VOTERS vote for DEMOCRATS and Conservatives will NEVER see a Conservative President or Conservative Congress again in their LIFETIMES.

So Conservatives realize that unless McCain signs the "Contract with Conservatives", we lose even if he becomes President.



Mum's the word
Sorry Star but the best thing you could do for the Republican party is to keep your profile as low as possible. We had a chance for a strong candidate in 2008 in Mitt Romney. Romney lost fair and square--no argument. But you as a bold-faced and reckless Huckaphite attacked this good Republican savagely in a lame an pathetic attempt to prop up the paper-thin credentials of your ridiculous nominee. Your attacks against Govenor Romney were neither principled or especially insightful (excpet for the insight we gained into your own bigotry and covetousness).

John McCain may very well win the election. But those of you who either shamefully attacked Govenor Romney (rather than explaining your own dandidate) or who came very late to Romney's support only in the end when he was the only credible alternative to McCain should save your preaching about how best to win this election for yourselves.

''I'm Thomas - goggle me!''
--
Says Thomas J. Gassett:

"Your son is not a conservative! Conservatives don't eat their own over ideological purity."


Quoth Barry M. Goldwater ("Mr. Conservative"):

"Anyone who joins us in all sincerity, we welcome. Those, those who do not care for our cause, we don"t expect to enter our ranks in any case. And let our Republicanism so focused and so dedicated not be made fuzzy and futile by unthinking and stupid labels."


Stick it in your ear, Mr. Gassett.

--

History vs polls
redlac

As a historian, I cite historical facts. You attempt to refute with polls. Surely, you know how varied and unreliable polls can be.

In many ways this year is reminiscent of 1968, and there is lots of evidence that those to failed to foment a revolution then are trying to recreate it. That includes self serving propaganda.

Here are two bits of polling that contradict the conventional wisdom. Exit polls in SC inddicate that 35% of Dems do not think America is ready for a black or woman president. Second, the Democratic congress has 11% approval, but people like Nancy Pelosi predict they will gain seats.


Troll this!
not ashamed to be right writes: Tuesday, February, 19, 2008 1:46 AM
Thomas the Troll,
Please head over to moveon.org or dailykos..you are here as a pretender.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

My name is Thomas J Gassett .... goggle me.

See if you can find one of my hundreds of blog entries that Rush wouldn't agree with. YOU CAN'T! That is, before you lunatics decided to purge the majority of the republican party.

You will find that I was right on all the issues McCain got wrong. Next, think about your reaction to my position on McCain ... then realize that you aren't conservatives at all, I am. You are exactly what the liberals have called me since Reagan ... a Radical Right wing nut! Reagan democrats are voting for McCain, and you're telling them all they don't belong in YOUR party. Well we don't. We thought we belonged to Reagan's Big Tent party, not your ideological burka.

You think you're just throwing one election away for ideological reason? Think again! You clowns have given democrats everything they need to keep republicans down for the next generation .... the Reagan democrats (republican majority) back.
After reading my blog entries, think about losing people as far to the right as I am, and realize their ain't much left.

Thomas the Troll,
Please head over to moveon.org or dailykos..you are here as a pretender. In fact, I believe your mommy is calling you up from the basement in order to tuck you into bed. Go now, and take your nasty insults and namecalling with you.

Army?
McCain would be far, far worse because he would destroy the Republican Party in addition to be a leftist president.

If Hillary wins, our Republican "army" will fight her every step of the way.
>>>>

What army? The Reagan revolution is over. You Radical Right Wing Clowns and your purist purge of McCain have ended the revolution. If you insist on this insane course you will, and probably have, lost the Reagan democrats, and believe me Rush ain't going to get them back. Without them, we are nothing! We are back in the preReagan political wilderness, and the last time that happened it lasted for forty years.

No republican party
My
staunchly conservative son has announced he won't vote come November
>>>>

Your son is not a conservative! Conservatives don't eat their own over ideological purity. Your son is a Right Wing fanatic, in a party too small to matter. What a great victory ... the end of the Reagan revolution.

No republican party
I'm waiting to see before I make a definite decision although I have said I won't vote for him, but downticket.>>>

You're wasting your time. There is no republican party! We have Rush and his Jihadis, and the democrats have both houses of congress and the White House ... for as long as we all shall live. You ideological whores ruined it, with your radical right wing dogma. Now, you can do what you loser morons are good at ... whine for the next twenty years.

stupid
McCain would be far, far worse because he would destroy the Republican Party in addition to be a leftist president.
>>>

You misguided fool. Rush and his Jihadis destoryed the republican party. You freaks now have it all to yourselves. You turds might be ideologically pure, but you couldn't elect a dogcatcher. Way to go, you stupid lunatics

My
staunchly conservative son has announced he won't vote come November. I'm doing my best to convince him he must vote down ticket and he's slowly coming around. Whatever happens come Nov 8, it will be a disaster. I think too many of
the GOP suits are in too many special interest pockets and most certainly the most important
special interest is themselves.
I agree that in the remaining primaries vote against McC, and for Huckabee. And I'm NOT
a Huckabee supporter.
VEEP..they don't have a lot of power, however that's a given in a normal presidency, with McCain as someone noted, he's a cancer survivor with I believe 3 bouts with melanoma. It's an insidious killer. There's that to consider, and
there's his volatile temper which if he gets mad enough could blow the top of his head off and leave him incapacitated with a major stroke like Wilson, or room temperature. Plus his age. He doesn't look well, someone said that statistically many POW's because of the stress and abuse don't have long lives. He's got the stress and strain of campaigning for the nomination, what will it be like if he gets it?
So I think, realistically his choice of Veep is very important ane worth considering. As someone also noted, that's how we got Teddy Roosevelt. And no, I'm not wishing anything befall him, that's in God's Hands and timing, but
just thinking its' common sense to consider this
before cutting our noses off to spite our face.
I'm waiting to see before I make a definite decision although I have said I won't vote for him, but downticket. I can't see rewarding him for his numerous betrayals, or the GOP for betraying us and the country.

Robert - Quit this ''Master'' crap
--
McCain was a naval aviator.

There's no indication at all that he ever qualified to stand a watch in command of a ship at sea, or that he's ever held a Master's ticket in the Merchant Marine.

His only command experience was as the CO of VA-174, a stateside A-7 training squadron (1976). He has never held a combat command, and subsequent to the completion of that tour of duty he was assigned only to liaison roles, the process making clear the fact that despite having been allowed to attend the National War College (1973-74) he was never going to be allowed another command slot appropriate to his rank.

By 1981, it was retire or get RIF'd.

I don't care if you want to keep sucking this bilge, but the "Master and Commander" crap's gotta go.

--

WOBBIEDAWONDERWABBIT
HEY WOBBIEDAWONDERWABBIT, YOU EVER ANSWER TAIL2LONG or Tinsldr2 .MIL ADDY YET? Didn't think so. Twit!

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=956&title=Vietn am_Veterans_Against_McCain&vpkey=62acaf320c

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
Write in a name folks, it is still a free country! Well, until McQuack comes up with more ideals on how to kill free speech.

Don writes:
Does anyone think that Hillary or Obama would nominate a strict constructionist for the Supreme Court?

Nope, and I would also worry about McQuack, given his past voting record.

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=956&title=Vietn am_Veterans_Against_McCain&vpkey=62acaf320c

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
Write in a name folks, it is still a free country! Well, until McQuack comes up with more ideals on how to kill free speech.

meg
I totally understand your sentiments, but who can we vote for that we could trust?

Obama? Nope.
Hillary? Nope.
McCain? Nope.

You see the problem?

lilly writes:
Frankenstein has now been invented, and many of us in both parties fear that he will not go away.

I agree, and if billary gets the VP what can we do? Remember Vince? I say billary is a better shot than Dick!

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=956&title=Vietn am_Veterans_Against_McCain&vpkey=62acaf320c

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
Write in a name folks, it is still a free country! Well, until McQuack comes up with more ideals on how to kill free speech.


agree on this
re:

"McCain would be far, far worse because he would destroy the Republican Party in addition to be a leftist president.

If Hillary wins, our Republican "army" will fight her every step of the way.

If McCain wins, Democrats and liberal Republicans will help him pass leftist legislation, and destroy the Republican Party by turning it into another Democratic Party."
**************************************************

Better a 'Crat in there than a leftward RINO. When slick Willie was POTUS, it was Republicans who forced balanced budgets, crime control, and welfare reform. Then they morphed into RINO's by following the pied piper RINO Presidente Jorge down bad paths of neoCON nation building against the WRONG Islamics, and profligate govt. spending that any lib might be proud of, along with a willful open border to aid and abet the ILLEGAL alien invasion. Now Republicans are blamed for the actions of a 'Crat in RINO clothing. Better one of them than another like Jorge --> Amnesty Juan McVain.

RINO's misreading tea leaves
re:
"Does McCain realize the illegals will not vote conservative? Why is he willing to destroy the self-reliant culture that built this great country?"

The RINOS have been committing slow suicide/death by a thousand cuts via embracing ILLEGALS. Because miscreant employers want to milk the "cheap" labor (which is ACTUALLY VERY EXPENSIVE to America all-in socio-economically), the Chamber lobbies buy the pols. RINO's like Presidente Jorge and Amnesty John McVain made Faustian deals some time ago to get Hispanic votes, which matter in Texas and Az. RINO's speak of Jorge increasing the share of that vote. The trouble with that reckoning is that middle class Hispanic-Americans have little in common with the ILLEGAL alien horde... almost half of the former in Az. voted for tough new anti-ILLEGAL sanctions in Az., which took effect starting Jan. 1, and are causing ILLEGALS to vamanos back to Mexico.

The aspect of this that the left does not yet quite get yet is that while the ILLEGALS WILL indeed vote for big entitlement government, 3/4 of America opposes making them voters. Gov. Spitzer was nearly lynched in blue state New York for his drivers'license/voter fraud scam attempt, and even the left admits that Shrillary's equivocating on it wounded her badly-- her biggest tactical mistake to date (even though Barack agrees with her on embracing ILLEGALS).

Wanting to stanch ILLEGALS is NOT "a fringe conservative issue." It is righteous indignation that will be felt in a number of election contests.

McCain would be worse than Obama
"Bad as McCain might be as President, it would be hard for him to be worse than either Hillary or Obama."

McCain would be far, far worse because he would destroy the Republican Party in addition to be a leftist president.

If Hillary wins, our Republican "army" will fight her every step of the way.

If McCain wins, Democrats and liberal Republicans will help him pass leftist legislation, and destroy the Republican Party by turning it into another Democratic Party.

To Charlie
You argue that the Vice-President's role is mostly ceremonial. Can you spell C-H-E-N-E-Y?

Frankenstein has now been invented, and many of us in both parties fear that he will not go away.


Thomas writes:
Clue: You never find the truth on a website with an agenda to push and no reputation to protect. So, stop whining about facts and waving your idiot sheet of looney websites!
Do you know how insane you sound?

No ,but I do know how "fact" less you are. And evidently you can come with no facts to prove McQuack will do anything for our "national security" Do you realize how insane it is not to lock your doors in this day and age? You drink his kool aid, I'll have a cold beer.

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=956&title=Vietn am_Veterans_Against_McCain&vpkey=62acaf320c

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
Write in a name folks, it is still a free country! Well, until McQuack comes up with more ideals on how to kill free speech.




To get the party back to the
conservative principals and ideals it has tuned away from I feel conservatives should push for a brokered convention.

Obviously the 2006 mid-term loss of congressional seats didn't have the impact it needed.

Like him or not my opinion is that Huckabee is the best option for those who have yet to vote especially if you dislike McCain or want to see a return of true conservative ideals and principals.

If at the convention McCain is nominated then true conservatives will have to decide how to vote come November.

Parties
I have been disappointed in Bush and the Congressional Republicans, but the Democratic Congress would be even worse than it has been since the 2006 election had they had the numbers to overcome vetos.
Bad as McCain might be as President, it would be hard for him to be worse than either Hillary or Obama.
At least, there would be a possibility that he would veto some undesirable legislation. No chance that either Hillary or Obama would. Does anyone think that Hillary or Obama would nominate a strict constructionist for the Supreme Court? Judges are there for life and are not subject to voter approval once they are in office.
A lot of damage can be done in four years.
Does anyone think that radical Islam will stop trying to kill as many of us as they can? Has everyone forgotten September 11, 2001? The attitude of those people will not be at all changed by our election. I'm sure they are pulling for a Democratic victory for President and also for the composition of the House and Senate.
We can lose in Iraq and Afghanistan just as we did in Vietnam-in the voting booths. Losing then didn't matter, but losing now would be an entirely different matter.
Donald W. Bales

brainless Ru-shites
Well, stupid, why not compare him to Hillary or Obama?

More names? Whenever facts are not on your side, talk sh!t and call names, that always works....

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=956&title=Vietn am_Veterans_Against_McCain&vpkey=62acaf320c

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
Write in a name folks, it is still a free country! >>>

Clue: You never find the truth on a website with an agenda to push and no reputation to protect. So, stop whining about facts and waving your idiot sheet of looney websites!

Well, until McQuack comes up with more ideals on how to kill free speech. >>

Do you know how insane you sound?

Illegals will vote for benefits
McCain will let them pour over the borders and soon they will be voters. Having known nothing but corrupt government, the uneducated horde believes all goodies come from the masters.

In 1787 Scottish historian Alexander Tytler wrote: A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy."

Does McCain realize the illegals will not vote conservative? Why is he willing to destroy the self-reliant culture that built this great country?

Thomas
Facts? Crickets Chirping……
Good I don’t have to vote for him I reckon.

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=956&title=Vietn am_Veterans_Against_McCain&vpkey=62acaf320c

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
Write in a name folks, it is still a free country! Well, until McQuack comes up with more ideals on how to kill free speech.

ClaireSolt
I'm not going to say that McCain can't win, but your facts don't add up. Only 32% of Americans now believe that using the military is the best way to fight terrorists, and 65% have said they'd like to see the troops home in a year. At the same time, 65% say they'd like to see government insured health insurance, and over 60% say that rather than cut taxes, they'd like to see the government either reduce the debt or spend the money on something "worthwhile", whatever the last means. You tend to forget that 90% of the taxes, after all, are paid by fewer than 25% of the people. The rest are not that concerned about them.

The public also believes, by 78%, that nation building is a mistake.

This doesn't mean they want to bail on the Iraqi's entirely, but it certainly demonstrates that a solid majority have no enthusiasm for any other "pre-emptive strikes or nation-building". Like it or not, what the public bought originally was Bush's short war and quick reconstruction in which much of the money came from Iraq's oil - as promised at the time. What the majority never bought into, was a long war and an even longer period of nation building, and expenditures likely to exceed well over $1 trillion when the country is sufficiently pacified for us to end the combat mission and bring most of the troops home.

Which is why, I might add, that this race, as of today, no matter who runs on either side, is consistently even. And there is nothing either side can say to substantially change that fact.

Thomas writes:
Well, stupid, why not compare him to Hillary or Obama?

More names? Whenever facts are not on your side, talk sh!t and call names, that always works....

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=956&title=Vietn am_Veterans_Against_McCain&vpkey=62acaf320c

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
Write in a name folks, it is still a free country! Well, until McQuack comes up with more ideals on how to kill free speech.

Lunatics to the right
McCain should...
...quit the race and endorse Ron Paul.

>>>

Just what we need ... Ross Perot on steriods.

JOHN SHAFT

.....Well Heck! ...that's easy, the Dallas Cowboys ...are you a Texan? ...

.....COLOSSUS

Rush is not Reagan
Wendy writes: Monday, February, 18, 2008 2:41 PM

Get serious

Hitler unified Germany. Unity is not an intrinsically good thing, Ms. Parker.>>>

We are a doomed party. Clearly, you drones need Rush ... or any Keeper would do.

Thomas: YOU think. McCain is a total statist.>>

I think McCain is the best candidate out there with a snowballs chance of becoming president. You lunatic purist want better, and since you can't have it ... you want worse. Clearly, the liberals were right about you ideologues all along ... you're a bunch of Radical Right lunatics.

He wants to increase the power and scope of the federal government, and his judicial appointees will reflect that notion in their decisions.>>>

Compared to whom, Rush? Well, stupid, why not compare him to Hillary or Obama? You know, a comparison that means something?

Thomas writes:
All that remains are Rush and his Jihadis, or better stated, nothing worth supporting.

Whatever, prove me wrong instead of
talking sh!t. McCaniacs always do this instead of supporting their words with any facts. He is pro-amnesty and that would be ok, except none of these people running for POTUS are watching the doors! Prove me wrong and I will vote for him!

http://judicialwatch.org/blog/islamic-terrorists-arrested- u-s-mexico-border
http://judicialwatch.org/http%3A//www.corruptionchronicles .com/2007/05/illegal_immigrants_helped_plan.html

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=956&title=Vietn am_Veterans_Against_McCain&vpkey=62acaf320c

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
Write in a name folks, it is still a free country! Well, until McQuack comes up with more ideals on how to kill free speech.


Rush and his Jihadis
National security?
Sorry, but McQuack has failed Miserably on this issue!
>>>

Sorry, but your childish word games and your drone like accusations leave me unmoved.

Clearly, what's failed miserably is Ronald Reagans party.

"Never speak ill of another republican."

All that remains are Rush and his Jihadis, or better stated, nothing worth supporting.

national security?
Sorry, but McQuack has failed Miserably on this issue! If he loses by one vote, I hope it's MY WRITE IN.

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=956&title=Vietn am_Veterans_Against_McCain&vpkey=62acaf320c

http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/text/crimevictims.htm l
Free Ramos and Compean
Write in a name folks, it is still a free country! Well, until McQuack comes up with more ideals on how to kill free speech.


renny - What McCain is *NOT*...
--
...is "a tested leader."

His political career is in the Congress and not in the Executive branch of civil government, and even in that environment - marked far more by compromise than by command - his "leadership" qualifications go no further than his prominence in the Keating Five.

His only leadership experience in the Naval Service was a couple of years in command of VA-174, an A-7 *training* squadron that never served outside the continental United States.

He has never commanded in combat, and following his command of VA-174, he was posted only to a series of liaison assignments that indicated he would never get a command of greater (or even equal) significance again.

That's why he resigned from the Navy to find a job (by way of his wealthy second wife) in the private sector.

It was that or get RIF'd.

Son of one admiral and grandson of another, he knew that he'd ridden his "military hero" pony exactly as far as the pitiful little beast was going to go.

Sorry to pop your bubble, but McCain is a thoroughly contemptible specimen.

Better you should learn it now, because whether he faces Obama or Waco Willie's Wife in November, *THEY* are sure as hell not going to give him a pass.



----------------------
"I’d love to be remembered as a Goldwater Republican. But I don’t pretend in any way to live up to the legacy of the man who literally changed the face of politics in America."

-- John McCain

ALAN KEYES
The guy is ALAN KEYES to restore our country. We need to show them amnesty don't get it, neither does this way of voting. Media is doing to him the same thing they done to Duncan Hunter & Tancredo. Time to do our own picking not the media or special interest.

Please check him out and commit to him. http://www.alankeys.com

Lemmings
Infiltrated!
Those who are complain that we might lose a few battles if McCain loses and a Democrat wins just don't get it.>>>

Yeah, infiltrated. Now, I'm an unclean republican ... just like McCain. You purist turds keep this up and you will be lucky to remain a national minority party. Hell, the only ones pure enough for this party are Rush and his Dike.

Let me tell you what I do get, droneboy. Your purist crusade will reverse twenty five years of fighting for a consrevative court. Thanks to you lunatic ideologues we can kiss our court goodbye. Then we can kiss our majority status goodbye. Hell, I doubt many of us will live to see this party in the majority ever again. But those that remain will be ideologically pure ... though few.
We aren't republicans ... we're Lemmings.

McCain might win
Even though I want him to lose, I think there is a good chance that McCain will win. If he can win the Republican nomination, why not the whole thing?

His nomination by the Republican Party shows that there are a lot of voters who have little information on the candidates, so they vote based on an image, like St. John the Maverick POW.

Rerun
I have seen this movie before. The Republicans could run Daffy Duck and win in a landslide. No matter who the Dems choose, they will be repeating McGovern and Mondale. Anti war loses 49 states. Raising taxes loses 49 states. In spite of all the yada yada of the chatting heads, the silent majority is solid.
I am surely not the only one who is simmering in fury at the unrelenting propaganda from the left. I guess Bush has to go to Africa to get a decent break. there they have his picture on their dresses.

The big sell out--
At this point unless a viable conservative third party candidate emerges and catches fire with the consevatives, I believe that we all have been sold out to the special interests, amnesty crowd, and the NAU-SPP gang. I will write in Duncan Hunter at this point. BTW I have never heard any of these front runners say that they would free Agents Ramos and Compeon who are still in prison for protecting us from the illegals at the border. The fact that they are still in prison is a national disgrace.

Infiltrated! 2
I feel like I'm in one of those horror movies in which the whole Earth has been quietly invaded but almost no one realizes it. Or more realistically, I feel like I'm watching a long prize fight which is fixed, and everyone involved does a lousy job of hiding it.

The Democrat's favorite Republican, their VP choice in 2004, wins the Republican nomination, with a third of the overall vote. His victory came from independent and Democratic votes.

And yet: almost all of the party establishment, media, etc. just roll over and accept it. The other candidates never put a real effort into stopping McCain. Each put up some token resistance in his own way, but they all quickly rolled over and supported McCain.

The end result, a few days after it was clear that McCain has clinched, is 24 X 7 propaganda bombardment designed to make conservatives cave in and support McCain for the good of the party.

Of course no one in the media steps back and takes a look at the meaning of this, which is that the party leadership and politicians are corrupt and RINO to the core.

stupid righties
I read all these macinations against McCain and I realize this is not the party of Reagan. Rush's party has nothing to do with Reagan, they only use him to push their purist dogma. Rush and his mind numbed followers are exactly what the liberals say they are ... the radical right. This party is, and should be, a permanent minority party. What we need is a real conservative like Reagan. He brought the majority of Americans together, and that's something Rush and Coulter could never do.

To my republican friends, you are following Rush over the political clif and you're too damn stupid to realize it.

Infiltrated!
Those who are complain that we might lose a few battles if McCain loses and a Democrat wins just don't get it.

McCain was the Democrats' first choice for vice president in the last election, and he's been fighting Republicans and especially conservatives for years. So choosing him for the Republican nomination is like an enemy general and some of his staff infiltrating our headquarters and taking command.

If the Democrats are running the Republican Party now, we have more serious problems than whether the next president appoints two liberal Supreme Court justices.

Rush and others have said that McCain would be the end of the Republican Party as we know it, and that is what we are facing.

stupid drone!
Reply to Thomas
In your comments you never posted one thing that you disagree with Rush or Coulter on. >>>>

I clearly disagree with the Rushites and the Coulterquist and their purist crusade. These clowns are the most hated conservatives on the planet and they drag us all down. Sure, I like conserviative ideas, and I don't care who presents them. But when these bomb throwers start aiming at republicans, it's time to start throwing back.

I suspect that you agree much more than you think with both of them. >>

I don't agree with THEM I agree with ideas they mouth ... not the bombs they love to throw. I agree with Reagan and they agree with me.

I am sure since you voted for Reagan that you wouldn't be totally supportive of Mr. McCain.>>>

There's the rub ... your stupid. I support the republican nominee without reservation. That said, I disagreed with McCain on every issue mentioned. But that doesn't mean I'm an ideological pursit willing to let Hillary or Obama pick the next two supreme court judges, just to prove my bonafides.

I also suspect that if Daddy wasn't a Democrat you wouldn't be either. >>>

I'd give up on the mind reading if I were you.

For whatever the reason you voted for Reagan welcome to the party.>>

UP your butt. I'm a conservative republican without any acknowledgement from you or that fat assed Rush!

Never confuse Reagan's brand of conservativism with these ideological purist. When Reagan talked about conservative prinicples he brought people together, not divided them into warring sects.

We need you. However, don't be tricked by Mr. McCain and his big tent words.>>>>

Go kiss Rush's butt you stupid drone!


Get serious
Hitler unified Germany. Unity is not an intrinsically good thing, Ms. Parker.

Thomas: YOU think. McCain is a total statist. He wants to increase the power and scope of the federal government, and his judicial appointees will reflect that notion in their decisions. What do you think will happen in the long run when his Supreme Court nominees grant new powers to the federal government so that McCain can pursue his "Republican" agenda? Politicians who are even more rabid leftists than McCain will eventually step in and fulfill the vast power potential granted by McCain's appointees. I would prefer slow decay caused by ineffectual leaders any day over unpredictable, malevolent, hammer-wielding tyrants.

The "hold your nose" argument is dead if we consider the long run. McKeynesians never seem to want to address the long run, do they?

JOHN MCCAIN NEEDS A HEARING AID


When I heard McCain's Hispanic Outreach guy was none other than Smiling Juan Hernandez, I knew John McCain has heard nothing we have had to say.


Smiling Juan Hernadez
We know who he is, we know his loyalties are to Mexico, we know he wants to erase our borders and immigration laws.

JOHN MCCAIN, YOU NEED A NEW HEARING AID

Smiling Juan Hernandez
In case you don't know him, he used to work for the Mexican govt., lately he has been shilling for "rights" for illegal aliens in this country. He has said he wants Mexicans to remain Mexicans even if they are living here. His loyalties are to Mexico, not U.S.



Questions for illegal alien apologists like John McCain:

Why does The National Council of the Race (la raza in spanish) and the Chamber of Commerce get to negotiate a "Comprehensive Shafting of The American Citizens" behind closed doors? Since when does an organization representing foreign nationals breaking our laws get to rewrite our immigration laws to suit the lawbreakers? Isn't this akin to allowing NAMBLA to rewrite our laws regarding child predators? Or allowing organized crime syndicates to rewrite racketeering, gambling, prostitution, and extortion laws?

We The People are being told by our representatives that we should sit down and shut up while they invite in the entire world. We The People should get some say in this matter. Another amnesty will set off a stampede like we have never seen before. There is not much time to save our country. All the money and power are on the side of shoving this amnesty down our throats. The RNC wants an amnesty candidate, don't vote for one.

No Border Security/No National Security

You simply CANNOT have national security if you will not defend your own borders or enforce your own laws. Foreign nationals numbering in the thousands are entering our country at will daily. John McCain has done and will do NOTHING to stop it. Don't believe me? Ask Juan Hernandez!

Amnesty Juan is not the guy...
... to unite Republicans. First, he is a RINO at best and has been trending toward being an outright liberal. Almost all members of his party have voted more conservatively than he recently:

http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/sen/lib.htm

Ergo, it rings false for McQuisling to claim to be a "true conservative" when he so readily crosses the aisle to embrace the opposing viewpoints. Oddly, conservatives often still embrace Presidente Jorge and eschew Juan McVain, but they are in sync on two essential issues-- they love the war against the wrong Islamics in Iraq, and they embrace ILLEGALS coming here, who are ironically the truly greatest threat to America's well-being.

If we do not insist that the pols enforce EXISTING laws against the ILLEGAL invaders, we will pay a terrible price in the years ahead. America DOES NEED EDUCATED, legal immigrants, but cannot afford socio-economically the ignorant, indigent, culturally disparate ilk flooding across the border. If we let the left give them drivers' licenses (hence, voter fraud), they will vote for big entitlement government and bring in their myriad poor relatives, thus morphing America into the very third world they sought to escape. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE, FOLKS. Urge Congress to support the SAVE Act... it is easy to reach Congress right here; bookmark and contact them OFTEN:

http://www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/index.htm

McCain should...
...quit the race and endorse Ron Paul.

Not only would it be a selfless, patriotic gesture, but it would seed a coalition that could actually beat Hillery or Barack in November. The vast majority of republicans would form the base of this winning coalition. They would be joined by a huge number of independents, and virtually all libertarians. There is even a considerable number of democrats that will vote for Paul based upon his non-interventionist stance.

The only group that will not support him will be the single-issue war-hawks that believe in McCain's one hundred years of war nonsense. They are fortunately small in number, and spend most of there time in their cold-war-era bomb shelters, so they do not matter.

All Americans should beseech McCain to drop out. Do it for the good of the country. Do it for our troops. Do it because it is the right thing to do.

The big question is, will a morally bankrupt individual like McCain be willing to step aside for the sake of America? I doubt it, but it's still worth a try.

Basball Doc
Seahawks fan...OH NO! Let me narrow it down for you. My favorite NFL Team beat the Superbowl Champs(congrats G-man!)2x this season. We are building a new stadium with a 60 yard jumbotron....Figure out who that team is.

Thank you Ms Parker

Thank you Ms Parker. Well written.

Re. Thoreau
renny,

I was referring to the main theme of "Civil Disobedience," not the one Thoreau quote you cited. "But a very few -- heroes, patriots, martyrs, reformers in the great sense, and men -- serve the state with their consciences also, and so necessarily resist it for the most part, and they are commonly treated as enemies by it."

As for the "governs least" quote: the size of the federal government GREW under Reagan and it GREW under W. Bush, while it shrank some under Clinton. And "governs least" doesn't seem consistent with an administration that has claimed the right to spy on its citizens and to declare anyone anywhere an "enemy combatant," and then do anything they want to that person with no accountability. God save us from that kind "conservatism."

Actaully, Thoreau said the state that
governs least governs best. Which ain't the liberals.

The great contrast between the Dems. (whoever gets the nomination) and Reps. in this coming campaign is the difference between

John McCain (most likely candidate) who is a tested leader, military hero, ready to be commander in chief, who has never had an earmark, has pledged no new taxes, has an 83% ACU rating, conservative roots back to Reagan, and will not bring military disaster in the Middle East

and

either Obama or Clinton who are 19th C. socialits, early 20th C. pacifists, Balkanizers of America by preferring special interest gender-race political groups, who believe in the nanny state and high taxation, would implement the entire liberal agenda from civil rights for confused genders to women who can't get men's jobs (comparable worth pay), and who would abandon the military in the field, like Vietnam, when we get 30% of our oil from the Middle East, and self-proclaimed enemies of the US thrive in non-democratic, tyrannical Islamic socieites.

Tampa Dave
A lot of foolish people vote Democrat without even knowing what the party stands for. If we get all of the things you listed, not only will it make Republicans and Independants furious, but some Democrats will wake up too, and this will give the White House, the Senate and the House back to the conservatives in 2012.

I would rather wait four years to get good government than to allow the slippery slope of liberalism to turn the GOP permenantly into another socialist party for the U.S.A.

Right on, Pasadena Phil
Mac can for once prove he means what he says- he can DEMAND TODAY that the double fence required by law be rushed toward completion by October. So before citizens go to vote in Nov, we can see half of it already in place! Right now, only SEVEN miles are planned for AZ this year! Does that sound like he, a sitting senator, intends to follow the law??? Put up or shut up, McCain!

And as "PPhil" said- all conservatives should demand that he prove his intent on this issue, before the vote.

And I don't give a hang who he chooses for VP- that lipstick won't help the pig! I'm not about to give him a vote; but I will vote down-ticket. PS- I consider myself a conservative, first and foremost, not a sheep-Rep.

JOHN SHAFT

.....From past posts I am guessing that you are a Seattle Seahawks fan ...am I right? .....COLOSSUS

Not my kind of unity
"People get unified in two different ways. Unity comes either from a common threat from the outside, or from leadership emerging from the inside."

Does it bother anyone that this is a tenet of Fascism? Isn't this the kind of "unity" that's often based on impaired perceptions, either from getting swept up in collective fear, or in a populist game of "follow the leader," or, as the Bush administration has liked to play it, from a combination of the two? ("We're scared and you're the Only One Who Can Protect Us! So, we'll let you do things we used to regard as unconstitutional or barbaric or evil. It just feels so good to be unified!")

Personally, I prefer a more conditional and self-aware kind of unity. "Because you've made a convincing case that there exists such-and-such a concern or opportunity, and because I want to help out for the good of my community, I will give aid and support to those actions I agree with. But I will withhold my support from, or even oppose, any actions I find unwise or unconscionable."

As Thoreau points out in "Civil Disobedience," we serve the state best when we hold it accountable to our consciences.


The best hope for Republican victory

in 2008 is for the Republican Right to turn out in the remaining primaries and vote against John McCain. This will keep him from receiving enough committed delegates to earn the nomination. At a brokered convention anything can happen.

Anyone posting a different strategy at this point in time is not a member of the Republican Right. Instead, they are either liberal Republicans, Democrats or just plain quitters.

The border fence bill IS LAW!!
It was passed and funded. Why don't we just make an effort to insist it be built by November? Every day. Over and over until it becomes news. McCain is a sitting Senator. It would eliminate a major barrier blocking his way to the presidency and prove to us that he CAN lead on a Republican issue. We don't believe any of his promises. When it comes to McCain, we only believe what he has done and there are no conservative or Republican victories in his past.

Do not pay attention to the

McCain naysayers who offer no solutions. If they were real Republicans they would be urging you to vote against McCain in the remaining Republican primaries instead of acting like whipped puppies.

dont see it
A Republican ticket that is representative of concerns for national security, traditional values and a free economy can still be the winning formula.
I dont see any of this in JM.

the answer
What will this mean for the general election?

I'll be writing in another name for President no matter who JM chooses.

One leader has what it takes...
And all he needs is enough support to to keep John McCain from getting 1191 delegates. Once the whole tent hears him at the convention, the choice will become clearer than ever.

http://www.townhall.com/video/Campaign08/1450_020908Huck

http://www.mikehuckabee.com/?FuseAction=About.101

Regardless who wins the White House
The RNC will probably join the Socialists/Marxists and rally around the “Fairness Doctrine” to shut up conservative radio hosts, as well as massive controls over the internet to limit us conservatives from disparaging their anointed one. After all, it is freedom of communication that is thwarting the plans of both parties.

Conservatives are not stupid
Conservatives will not vote for McCain for two MAJOR reasons:

1. McCain/Kennedy Amnesty for 12 to 20 million POOR illegal invaders get path to citizenship and the right to VOTE.

2. 12 to 20 million NEW POOR VOTERS vote for DEMOCRATS and Conservatives will NEVER see a Conservative President or Conservative Congress again in their LIFETIMES.

So Conservatives realize that unless McCain signs the "Contract with Conservatives", we lose even if he becomes President.


ONLY scenario for McCain
McCain needs the Perfect Storm in order to win:

1. Hillary gets the Democrat nomination AND pisses off Blacks by not picking Obama as VP.

2. Blacks are demoralized and do not vote.

3. Nucleaur bomb goes off in NYC.

4. McCain signs the "Contract with Conservatives".

5. MSM continues to treat McCain with kid gloves and favorable coverage.

As you can see, all 4 are highly unlikely.

REMEMBER we survived President CARTER and that created the environment where Middle of the Road Americans turned to RONALD REAGAN four years later.

Let us Pray Americans will do the same thing 4 years from now.


Something left out
StarParker left something out
Maury

McAmnesty Will Kill Us
As long as McCain will amnesty 15 million new Democrats, I'm voting for Obama.

With McCains stubborn amnesty policy there is only one thing that can save him.

If the Democratic super delegates choose Hillary over Obama after Obama wins the elected delegate count.

This will ignite race riots in a dozen cities and tear the Democratic party apart. How delicious.

Tampa Dave
You did indeed leave something out.
Maury

McCain or Obama
I'm a Party loyalist, so I will vote for John McCain. For all you principled conservatives withholding your vote, enjoy the tenure of President Barack Obama. I'll think of you while paying higher marginal income tax rates, higher capitals gains tax rates, and higher self-employment tax rates following removal of the earnings cap. I'll also be reminded of your principled stance while enjoying open borders, amnesty for illegal immigrants, liberal appointments to the federal judiciary, a de-stabilized Middle East, wealth and income re-distribution in newly Marxist America, enhanced affirmative action, socio-economic class warfare, and expensive government-based socialized health care. Did I leave anything out?

Republican Challenges
My concern is for saving our planet, EARTH. Republicans are for war in order to maintain our excessive energy consumption. War wastes energy and corrupts the atmosphere.

Democrats could well fear that the McCain's gang will facilitate a provocative terrorist attack on the U.S. in order to shunt fearful voters to vote for McCain.

The evidence for this is that September 11 was a facilitated provocative attack to take on Iraq's dictator like FDR's facilitation of the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor in order to march U.S. troops to Germany to stop Hitler.

Reference to Obama as a possible Hitler and Senator Lieberman in lockstep with Senator McCain raises the question whether the stage is being set.

My two cents also,Baseballdoc
Folks also need to look at their Congressional races also, to keep the next pres in check. This is a excellent plan in case of future president has plans of Gov expansion and wacky Judicial Nominees.

BEST SCENARIO FOR GOP

.....STAR ...

.....Only the following scenario can keep the White House in Republican hands in 2008 ...

... 1. Hillary gets the Democrat nomination ...

... 2. McCain selects a running mate that has strong support in the Red States ...

... 3. Unrest and conflict in the Middle East ...

... 4. A large turnout of anti-Hillary and National Defense voters ...

.....The above set of circumstances offer the best hope for the Republicans in 2008 .....COLOSSUS

Conservative judges and McCain
I tire greatly of this canard, Thomas. I see no reason to think he'd appoint conservative judges, seeing as how he isn't conservative himself. Also, any conservative/originalist judge would vote to repeal McCain-Feingold (and probably some other McCain- somebodies) if it were challenged in court. If you actually think McCain will countenance that, well, be careful hurling those bricks in that glass house of yours.

Good Job Star
The inside vs. outside unifying concepts seems quite valid. The DEMS have a problem though . . .

They are going to alienate one segment of their base regardless of who they nominate. Couple that with the fact that John McCain is essentially a pro-military Democrat; and one can see a scenario where McCain wins because of the coming DEM split over who got screwed out of the nomination.

This would require McCain to pick a VP that both is esteemed by the Conservative base, yet not offensive to his Democrat base. In the case of a 72 yr. old cancer survivor Presidential nominee, the VP choice is quite important. It would help if the VP could raise cash too.

Make no mistake. The DEMS are going to be in a box come convention time, with no clean answer. As much as I hate to admit it - if McCain picks the right VP - he could win big in November.

alittlechild
Not the GOP, or the media, will get your point this Nov if you write in; vote for the next strongest conservative party to the GOP, Libertarian. In 2006, many House races and critical US Senate races were decided in the Democrats favor by the numbers of Libertarian votes cast in those races. The GOP party bosses didn't catch on in 2006, but if the Libertarian votes are massive this Nov, they WILL take notice. Libertarian votes are considered to be lost GOP votes, just as Green Party votes are considered to be lost Democrat votes.
Dissatisfaction caused the Reform Party to decisively impact the Presidential elections of 1992 and 1996 (elections in which votes for Libertarians also increased) and the "Greens", it can be argued, threw the Presidential race to GWB.
A write in doesn't count; a vote for a viable alternative party does.

Thomas
why don't you stop cutting and pasting the same tripe?
we all know that there is not one talk radio host who hasn't said all along that none of the GOP candidates can legitimately claim Reagan status, period; they've been very open on this from the get go. Those that can't seem to stomach McVain make their case on his post-2000 vindictive crusade against GOP Party Conservatives because they rejected his bu## in 2000. Oh, and his betrayal of this country and its CITIZENS in the schemes wocen into his and Teddy's scamnesty.
You don't like the opinions and positions of others under the GOP tent, fine, but why don't you change instead of demanding they do? Their positions are every bit as valid as any you may hold.
Come Nov 2008, I shall desert the GOP at the Presidential level, but not in most down ticket races, and this should be good enough for you and yours, or maybe you'd prefer those you oppose and ridicule to vote a straight third party ticket come Nov 2008?
People like you do nothing more than throw salt in wounds; you don't help.

Common Threat
I have been giving this a lot of thought, and I think it all comes down to this:

I believe that the enroachment of socialism in the United States from within is a much bigger threat than the terrorism we face from without.

This is why a large portion of conservatives have determined not to support John McCain. We are all familiar with the idea of the slipper slope. McCain exemplifies the slippery slope in that he is an appeaser of the socialist left. The GOP has been leaning decidedly to the left in recent years because they want the support of the MSM and because they think this is the direction most voters are going. They therefore believe that in order to survive, they must follow the lead of the country. If conservatives go along with this idea the GOP will conclude, correctly, that there is little resistance in them becoming another socialist party after the mold of the Democrats.

The only way conservatives have a prayer of having a voice in politics is to say with a loud voice that they will not support a Republican party that leans to the left. This threat has the GOP in a panic right now. They know they cannot win an election without the support of their base. This is why so many spokesmen are telling conservatives to straighten up.

The more conservatives accept the leftward tilt of the GOP, the more leftward it will become.

It all comes down to what we fear most.

Veeps
McVain could run with Jesus the Christ as his Veep, and I still wouldn't vote for him.
Veeps have no guaranteed input on any matters, other than casting the deciding vote in a tied US Senate. Throughout history, many Veeps have been completely shutout, and given McVain's temperment and ego, I don't see any one he chooses mattering much when it comes to policy.
The only importance in the Veep selection this go-round is founded in the future, but I don't know if I'd ever trust my vote to anyone who accepted the Veep from McVain.
The current Veep selection "buzz" is all about trying to sell McVain to the 2/3rds of the GOP base who didn't vote for him in the primaries and caucuses, and those who won't in the future primaries and caucuses. Sorry, try something else.

Reply to Thomas
In your comments you never posted one thing that you disagree with Rush or Coulter on.

I suspect that you agree much more than you think with both of them. I am sure since you voted for Reagan that you wouldn't be totally supportive of Mr. McCain. I also suspect that if Daddy wasn't a Democrat you wouldn't be either.

For whatever the reason you voted for Reagan welcome to the party. We need you. However, don't be tricked by Mr. McCain and his big tent words.

McCain who?
I'm doing the write-in this year.
Maybe if I vote for "Slim Pickins" the RNC will get the hint.

Who his VP is, don't mean squat
philosophocon and not ashamed are right on this one. Thomas and his big tent won't include me if it's going to be thrown open to liberals and envirowackos. I don't give up my basic principles just to get along.

I don't like or trust McCain because as an independent conservative, I've been dumped on by him and his liberal friends too many times. Having said that, in Nov I shall avert my eyes so my brain won't know my hand is voting a straight R ticket.

Until then I'll be working and supporting each and every conservative candidate who is opposing an incumbent. My Rep Raul "Gravy Train" Grijalva is going to be tough because he's embedded like a big fat tick in a predominantly Hispanic district, but lovely liberal Gabby Giffords doesn't wear well in Cochise county, a "free gun zone" where it's doubtful any lunatic would get off many shots at innocents before a well armed citizen takes him out.

ANTI - INCUMBENT FEVER, CATCH IT!!!


Would you throw
"the mother's milk" of politics out to the party this year in the apparent crying need for Senate and House candidate supports to keep out a super numerical superiority of Democrats in the legislative process... a bigger concern that Rush mentioned the past two weeks rather than the Presidential race?

I say this as a disabled Social Security recipient and disabled Vietnam Veteran.

John McCain funded by Soros since 2001

WND-As Sen. John McCain assumes the GOP front-runner mantle, his long-standing, but little-noticed association with donors such as George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry is receiving new attention among his Republican critics.

In 2001, McCain founded the Alexandria, Va.-based Reform Institute as a vehicle to receive funding from George Soros’ Open Society Institute and Teresa Heinz Kerry’s Tides Foundation and several other prominent non-profit organizations.

McCain used the institute to promote his political agenda and provide compensation to key campaign operatives between elections.

WATCH VIDEO

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/john-mccain-funded -by-soros-since-2001

VP is just another excuse to cave in
"his choice for vice president will be crucial both for unifying the party and for the general election."

No, because even if McCain picks a liberal or Democrat for VP, Republican columnists like Star Parker will still run to McCain's side, and write columns that we must support McCain or the Democrats will take over, blah, blah, blah.

Anyone who is looking at McCain's VP choice has already caved in and decided to vote for him, the Democrats' first choice for VP in 2004.

To Thomas
I will vote for McCain even though his getting elected would only give us a little more time before the Democrats take it.

But many won't vote for McCain. I can't change it and neither can you. I don't think McCain really wants to win or bring unity to the party.

THINK!
a) never saw an open border he didn't like?
b) wants to close down gitmo and try terrorists and their allies in the US court system?
c) eschew any type of coercive interrogation?

I have a hard time swallowing that.
>>>>

So, ah, how's Hillary or Obama going to go down? Before you take another shot at McCain ... think about it. Think about our conservative court and what it will look like when a flaming liberal picks the next two judges? For cryin' out loud THINK!

McCain gives no hope for economy & home
If McCain wants to unify the party he could

1. talk about how he plans to bring back jobs to America instead of following the loser plan of Bush to sell us out,

2. make it CLEAR that he will sign no bill giving another amnesty like he came up with before (right now it looks like he is pandering to the Hispanics who want a total give away, although there are many who DON'T want that AT ALL - Hillary and Obama already have the Hispanics who want a give away),

3. address the terrorist threat already here in the US in a REASONABLE way - we know it's here and has been allowed to get worse and don't want him to take dictatorial powers to take care of it,

4. stop believing that whoever he gets for VP will make a big difference on the above (most of us understand a VP isn't the one in charge).

5. and understand that we understand voting for him merely delays the fall of the Republican party due to the above (all Hillary has to do is come up with a decent plan for jobs to gain support - many of us don't think the US economy can survive staying in Iraq much longer).

We grew up and understood too much under Bush to buy that doing the same thing is an investment in an economy based on our sovereignty. Either way the election goes we lose the legacy of sovereignty for our children.

To the Rushites
An open letter to the Rushites, and the Coulterquists.

Please shut up about Reagan!
from an unclean republican.

I'm what was once proudly called a Reagan democrat. Remember us? We put
the slide into the Reagan landslide. Ronald Reagan invited millions of
Americans into his Big Tent republican party ... and we stayed. Today, the
Rushites and their Imam says I'm unclean, an apostate, a McCainiac.
Can someone, anyone please tell me when Reagan became the exclusive
property of the right, and our big tent a burka? I'll tell you when ...
when we became a permanent minority party.
I can't help but recall the real Reagan every time the Rushites or the
odd Coulterquist measure carefully for the next incarnation. I can't help
but wonder if Ronald Reagan himself would past such purist muster. After
all, he was 'divorced', and lived in Hollywood.
There is nothing Reaganesque or conservative about the Rushites, and the
Coulterquist. These purist and their Leftist counterparts are the
division and the hatred that runs right down the center of this
nation. When Reagan talked about conservatism, he brought the vast
majority of Americans together, not divided them into warring sects. The
Rushites and the Coulterquise have their place in the arena of ideas,
but they are an unmitigated disaster as the self imagined base of the
republican party.

The Reagan revolution can only survive and come to fruition if republicans
are the big tent party we were meant to be, not a purist crusade. Lest
we forget.




Why?
"He's got to pick a running mate who will bring strong credentials that satisfy the social and economic concerns of Republican conservatism."

What on earth difference does it make if the Presidential candidate abhors the very voters who hold dear the real meaning of Republican conservatism? I am one of those Independents who usually votes Republican (expressing my conservative values.) By no means am I going to move to the left (Democrat) just because I am dissatisfied with the GOP party elites. On the other hand, I will not vote for McCain no matter who he decides to run as his VP because I do not believe the VP will make one iota of difference in how McCain will govern. Based on his record he will still be a liberal. He has shown conservatives he cannot be trusted. Why would that change?

Well, to my way of thinking,
the Republican party is banking on the outside threat, defined as the Democrats, because if McCain counts for leadership from inside, the question is inside what?

Quick question: when it comes to the candidate most likely to alleviate concerns regarding defending agains terrorism, does that include one who:

a) never saw an open border he didn't like?
b) wants to close down gitmo and try terrorists and their allies in the US court system?
c) eschew any type of coercive interrogation?

I have a hard time swallowing that.

BTW, never have I heard of a presidential candidate who so sorely needs a running mate to shore up his many weaknesses. First, I don't know anyone who votes based on the VP, second, how about if the party brass had gotten behind someone who didn't have as many weaknesses so people would feel better about voting for the Presidential candidate as opposed to for the VP candidate? Oh wait, is that why they call it the stupid party?

stop Hussein now-not later
Urgent: Hussein must be stopped at all costs!

here's how:

Vote for Hillary in the democratic primaries if you live in Pennsylvania, Ohio, or Texas.

If Hillary beats Obama, then the blacks being congenitally paranoid, will cry election fraud,- even though hillary wins legitimately.

Then they will and STAY HOME on election day having an al sharpton hissy fit. Which is GOOD: very good!

Because then with no black vote, hillary loses the general election in a landslide, and we have a republican president who will retire in 4 years due to age and the stress of the office.

And we dodge one huge bullet!

RINOs are blocking unity
The liberal Republicans are the ones blocking party unity, not conservatives.

(1) If the RINOs wanted party unity, they shouldn't have nominated a liberal extremist which conservatives shouldn't support

(2) If the liberal Republicans wanted unity, they should have picked a candidate who at least TRIED to win the support of all party groups, instead of McCain who doesn't want anything to do with conservatives.

(3) If the RINOs wanted party unity, they shouldn't have set a bad example by threatening to vote for Hillary instead of social conservative and evangelical Mike Huckabee. This was when Huck had just won Iowa and it appeared that he might sweep to the nomination.


So let McCain pick Ron Paul as VP
--
...and the base can be simultaneously assured that there will be a voice for constitutional government in the McCain White House *AND* at teh same time energized by the hope that the President will have the same luck with staircases that Gerald Ford did.

The best anyone can expect from McCain is what the country got from McKinley.

A vice-president a helluva lot better than *HE* is.


--

Anybody but McCain
Given our past interest in the elections, we donated to Romney and still have Romney signs in our lawn and on our cars. I've personally worn a Romney cap throughout several airports, getting many approving smiles and comments. Then, when MSM dirty tricks and McCain and Huckabee tag-teamed Romney out of the race, we switched to supporting Ron Paul. We've also also given Paul donations and ordered signs and a cap. I'll be switching out my Romney cap for a Ron Paul "Hope for America" when that arrives.

Regardless of what happens we will never, never, never vote for a back-stabbing traitor like McCain. I'd rather the Dems win this one than than give my vote to a left-leaning liberal back-stabber like McCain who will sell me out and whose only meaningful feature is an "R" in front of his name.

As stated, I'll go to my grave having never having voted for Mr. McCain, and I'm betting much of the historical Republican core shares that belief. Finally, based upon there being a Constitution Party candidate or not, given careful consideration, for the first time this November, I might be writing in a favorite candidate for president - either Mickey Mouse or our pet cat. That's how much unity Capitan McCain brings to this upcoming cruise on the Titanic.

Unity at What Price?
Unity is presented here as a moral virtue. But it was a drive for this kind of unity that made Romney and Giuliani flip-flop on about sixty different issues. It was a drive for this kind of unity that has made McCain disgrace himself by kissing a** to the same George W Bush who lied about him in the infamous 2000 S Carolina primary (illegitimate black baby, mentally unstable due to POW experience, etc).

Selling your integrity for the sake of unity (and favor) is morally questionable: "Last week with all my heart I believed X, but now for the sake of party unity I have changed my mind and I now believe Y". I agree that the Prussian lockstep demonstrated by Repubicans has paid off for them politically. And, as Karl Rove taught us, winning is all that matters. Still, selling out is selling out. If anyone cares any more.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.