Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, May 21, 2007
Star Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Falwell gone, evangelical movement alive and well
by Star Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


The Rev. Jerry Falwell's passing seems to have traumatized the mainstream liberal press. Absent in its coverage of the event is even the normal pretense of objectivity.

Take your choice. According to Newsweek, Falwell's "influence on American politics has been vastly overstated." His role, the article concludes, in the rise of the Christian right was not "significant." And according to Time, evangelical Christians are now moving into a big non-ideological tent, where all points of view are welcomed, and the evangelical movement has "left Falwell behind."

I think a brief visitation with facts and reality might be in order here.

The point of the Moral Majority, which Falwell launched in 1979, was to transform a politically dormant Christian evangelical universe into a political force.

Not significant?

Today, approximately one of every four American voters is a Christian evangelical.

We've had over recent weeks three debates of presidential contenders -- two Republican, one Democratic. Despite the fact that massive entitlement programs are bankrupting the country, that health-care costs are going out the roof, that public education is in bad shape, abortion is among the main domestic issues that these candidates are being grilled on.

The Pew Research Center reported last year on attitudes on religion and politics.

In response to the survey question "Should houses of worship express views on politics?" 51 percent responded affirmatively. However, 63 percent of white evangelicals and 68 percent of black Protestants said "yes."

Assessing Falwell's influence, the Pew Center's executive vice president, Paul Taylor, wrote: "... (I)f the key goal of his movement was to encourage a formerly apolitical group to become politically engaged -- and to do so in part through the guidance of organized religion -- then he leaves behind a powerful legacy."

According to Pew Center senior fellow John Green, "Falwell changed the way that evangelicals think about political activity."

What about allegations that the evangelical movement is no longer the movement of Jerry Falwell? According to Time and others, the edge is disappearing and more evangelicals are buying into the so-called "progressive" agenda.

Now remember that "progressive" is today's code word for "liberal." Suggesting that this increasingly defines today's evangelicals tells us more about the wishful hallucinations of left-wing journalists than reality.

In last year's elections, supposedly a case in point for the great transformation in our political landscape, 72 percent of white evangelicals voted Republican and accounted for 22 percent of the overall vote.

Not exactly a sign of a great evangelical surge to the left. What we did see is a drop of a couple percentage points in the Republican vote in this universe and a similar drop in turnout from the 2004 elections. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Star Parker is a nationally syndicated columnist through the Scripps Howard News Service and a regular commentator on CNN, MSNBC, and FOX News, as well as author of White Ghetto: How Middle Class America Reflects Inner City Decay.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
there are no two sides....
When we are confronted with a human being that says they are enduring pain, and injustice or that false witness is being exacted on them-it's plain to see who is participating, rather than relieving these issues from that human being.

Instead of LISTENING to the gay person and what they are enduring, the dialogue becomes a sermon, or a rationalization on why gays and lesbians deserve to be treated that way.
Layering on MORE false witness, injustice and pain...and forgetting all the while that there is no license to do that-without FIRST hearing that person out, or putting yourself in their place, or simply believing they know their own experience and who they are.

Over and over again, there isn't even respect to that self knowlege and history.
There is no respect to it as legitimate truth.
There isn't even respect paid to how the gay community responds to whatever outrage.
Any protest against such treatment is seen as an affront to heterosexual authority.
Which in and of itself isn't about morality, but strength.
And that strength wasn't exacted through gentle persuasion, but brutality, threat and deprivation.
Any level of this is what really confronts gay lives at any time, and with no betterment of lives to justify it.

A morally sound treatment of another human being, has improvement and betterment to prove it.
Not pain, deprivation, violence or threat.

Without justice, empathy and respect for identity, there is nothing moral in the treatment of another without it.

Identity is a very powerful thing in all of us. Whether ethnic, familial, religious or cultural.
And dismissing any of those things or actively being unjust to another for it, isn't and never was moral...but cruel.

And it's knowing what is a characteristic identity and acting with respect to it, and responding with equal justice and access....is the ONLY thing that can make judgment more sound, and only then.
Not before.

As soon as anyone conflates the identity of a gay person with criminal acts on another human being, bestiality, polygamy, promiscuity or addiction-is already making a huge mistake in judgement. And can't be trusted with the civil dispatch of fairness.
First of all, because those behaviors are not considered AN IDENTITY, and second because they are not exclusive to being homosexual.
Nor is heterosexuality an indicator of values, virtue and character.
It's an instinctual characteristic as is homosexuality.
The prejudicial acts against gay persons, that characterize being gay as automatically indicative of that person is also making that orientation a matter of non virtue, character or values.
The inversion of orientation isn't also the inversion of goodness.

And arguing against a gay person, against identity, orientation or their value as a human being because if it, just shows that moral judgements and decisions are not strong in the hetero majority, AT ALL.

Matt Barber goes on and on and on and on about what he knows absolutely NOTHING.
The bigger picture escapes him.
And the bigger picture is what really matters, when you are deciding on the LIFE and DEATH issues that concern human beings...who are simply, very simply, of a remarkable difference.

Not a good or bad difference, just difference.
Irrational intractability, regardless of all the proof necessary to desist the unequal and unjust treatment, proves immoralty coming from Barber and those who think just like him.
More and more irrationality and fear mongering, isn't justification.

I know the difference. You just wish I, and the gay folks talked about in this way were too stupid to know that.


did it again!
Okay, that's it. You can't have a conversation about gay people without pulling the pedophile/bestiality card.

My answer absolutely does NOT imply the standards limited by what I think

You put words in my mouth and again kneel at the same altar of heterosupremacy.
Being a heterosexual parent is not a matter of superiority over a gay parent.
Nor is heterosexuality a guarantee of anything to do with how a child will be cared for. Otherwise, why ARE there so many children born out of wedlock, victims of domestic violence, poverty and foster care?
That's the failings of straight people, NOT gay people.
Gay folks are just trying to help out.
The nurturing gene isn't automatically bestowed on GROUPS.
Nurturers are individuals and one's orientation doesn't determine that talent.
Gays and lesbians most often are adoptive parents, so therefore are subject to checks, sometimes licensing or they are professionals who are highly qualified to care for the young, unlike the natural straight parents that make the need for adoption an issue to begin with.

From here on out, if every discussion on gay and lesbians lives turns into another rhetorical statement on pedohilia and bestiality, I'm won't engage anymore.

Not because you are right to bring it up, but because your prejudice doesn't allow you to do anything else.

Accepting what homosexuality really is, is also about knowing what it ISNT.
And you don't know what it isn't or care to.
I remember how supremacists talk. I know how a supremacist thinks.

Falwell, didn't repent in the way that meant something and in a timely manner for black people.
His remarks after 9/11 were indicative of WHO HE IS, period.

I lost four friends on Flight 175 that hit the WTC. Three of which were a gay couple and their three year old adopted son.
I met them when Davy was 8 mos old.
I know a lot of gay parents, and I'm sure you wouldn't say to their faces what you say here.
I know plenty of disgustingly incompetent straight parents, who have created generational dysfunction.

I'm sure you have too.

That's real life. And your beliefs only assert your disapproval of gay people.
That disapproval is misplaced. It only speaks to the distinction of the characteristic, not character. Which inevitably ARE conflated when it comes to gay people...but not straight people.
Big mistake all around.

However, there isn't anything regarding this treatment of gay people that's improved any lives.
And if it were the right thing to do, it would improve lives. Indeed, the detriment has been profound to this community without justification...just rationalization.
Which are two very different things.
And if you were such a morally upright person, you'd know the difference.
Gay people don't and don't want to exist at the expense of anyone.
However, the reverse isn't the same.
Therefore directly violating the prime tenet.

You don't know gay people as well as they know you.
But that's always been the mistake of supremacists.
Jerry Falwell repented too late for those he'd hurt before and continued to.
Sometimes sincere gestures are like that, and too late, is just that.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.