Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, July 31, 2006
Star Parker :: Townhall.com Columnist
Returning to the party of Lincoln
by Star Parker
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

A strange thing about President Bush's recent address to the NAACP annual meeting was the lack of pretense that this was anything but a partisan affair.

Referring to NAACP president Bruce Gordon, Bush said, "I don't expect Bruce to become a Republican _ and neither do you."

The president, later in his remarks, added, "I consider it a tragedy that the party of Abraham Lincoln let go of its historic ties with the African American community. For too long my party wrote off the African-American vote, and many African-Americans wrote off the Republican Party."

This causes me to ask two questions. First, if the president felt that he was effectively addressing the black national chapter of the Democratic Party, what was he trying to accomplish? Second, is it really accurate to say that the Republican Party "let go of its historic ties with the African American community?"

On the second point, with due respect to our president, I think it is the African-American community that has let go of its historic ties to the party of Lincoln.

When I think of Lincoln I think of emancipation. That bold stroke of the pen finally did what this nation was struggling to do for a hundred years _ liberate its black slaves.

Lincoln believed in freedom _ freedom for all.

The agenda of the Republican Party of recent years, an agenda fought tooth and nail by the Democratic Party and by the NAACP, has been an agenda of emancipation.

Let parents choose where to send their child to school. Emancipate them from the tyranny of a public school monopoly. Let working Americans take ownership of their social security contributions and build equity in their own retirement savings accounts. Emancipate American workers from the tyranny of the payroll tax and government-controlled retirement.

Lincoln took two great lies head on when he emancipated the slaves. The lie that one man should or could control another's life. And the lie that the African slaves could not be free.

It is the greatest of ironies that both these great lies animate the opposition of the Democratic Party _ and the NAACP _ to emancipating reforms like school choice and private retirement accounts. They believe that government and politicians should control the education choice of private citizens and should control savings and retirement funds of poor people. And they don't believe that African-Americans can be free and take care of themselves.

So what was President Bush trying to accomplish with his address to the NAACP?

Maybe he thought that he could plant the seeds of change by showing up, being civil and cordial, and slipping in a few remarks about choice and ownership. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Star Parker is the founder and president of CURE, the Coalition for Urban Renewal & Education, a 501c3 think tank which explores and promotes market based public policy to fight poverty, as well as author of White Ghetto: How Middle Class America Reflects Inner City Decay.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Black and White
The evil of slavery was not limited only to white people. Africans are also guilty. Not all Africans, and not all whites. And not all crimes committed are white on black or the opposite.

Growing up in the 40s and 50s, many black families lived one or two blocks from us. There were never any racial conflicts. They were not "wealthy". Neither were we. Most of the children, black and white, attended local public schools.

Walking home from grade school with my friend one day, a group of about 4 or 5 black girls came along, heading in the opposite direction. Before they passed us, one of them slapped me right across the face. Why? Because she wasn't walking alone (otherwise she wouldn't have had the guts), and simply because I am white.

Then there was a day when I was riding home from high school. The bus, public transportation, held many of our Catholic high school students, with standing room only. A group of public high school students, mostly black, joined us. One of these girls was standing next to me and got her kicks from pulling the hair of one of our school freshman. When the girl turned around, the instigator adopted a look of total innocence. When she tried it again, I just had to confront her...tell her to cut it out.

On other bus ride home, these kids caused such mayhem that my classmates were begging the driver to stop the bus. He did, as soon as he saw a policeman in sight. The police hauled all the troublemakers off the bus. Sorry to say, but they were the black kids.

What excuse did they have? This was a northern city...no history of slavery. Black men and white men had jobs. As a matter of fact a black man held the same station as my Dad, on a different shift.

Many people can testify to the destruction of the neighborhoods in which they grew up, when a particular element of people moved in. That is the truth. Obviously this cannot be blamed on "the cost of a can of paint". It's a lot more than that.

I truly respect and admire every person of every race who works to better themselves and their world. But why should we pander to any of them who won't even try?


Blacks Directly Honored Robeson
I forgot to mention that in 1999 the National Civil Rights Museum in Memphis had an exhibit honoring Communist Party member Paul Robeson. This conclusively refutes the claim that the 2004 Paul Robeson postage stamp was foisted on blacks against their will.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.